The Syndicate

Turnip Head wrote:Yes, the reason I sucked so hard this game is because I had no idea who my teammates were Grats winners!

I would have voted you Day 1 whether you were my lost teammate or not.

I don't have anything to say except this was my worst game ever.

Admitting I had BTSC almost saved me too. :P

Sting died.

We lose all the ties.

Rats.

Matt F wrote:
Metalmarsh89 wrote:That is a weird question Matt.
Gotta stay consistent with my rep.

Trying to match your own meta. I see what you're doing there.

That is a weird question Matt.

Wait for it...

FZ. wrote:
Metalmarsh89 wrote:
FZ. wrote:linki infinity: MM, what about defending yourself? Anything you want to say?
Don't vote for me?

I read through the accusations. I have been accused of having BTSC. I have been accused of being too jokey. I have been accused of being not jokey enough. I can't defend against these.

I understand I haven't been involved in this game very much, so my loss isn't the worst thing in the world.
Who do you think is bad?

Do you have BTSC?

Yes I do have BTSC. But like I said, this sort of accusation is undefendable. I can't prove to you that I do.

Floyd's description of my posts thus far is pretty accurate, and I think he's behaved differently than in his first game on this site, and I mean that in a good way. I know I've voted him, but I can't really endorse lynching him.

Elohcin on the other hand, looks to be in the same boat as me, just not really caught up. I don't think there are anything in her posts to call her good or bad.

FZ. wrote:MM, what do you think about Eloh? What do you think about Floyd?

I don't have a qualm with either of these two players, but I can take a look.

FZ. wrote:linki infinity: MM, what about defending yourself? Anything you want to say?

Don't vote for me?

I read through the accusations. I have been accused of having BTSC. I have been accused of being too jokey. I have been accused of being not jokey enough. I can't defend against these.

I understand I haven't been involved in this game very much, so my loss isn't the worst thing in the world.

I'm voting Floyd for my own longevity.

Golden wrote:Marmot barely posted in this thread for days, and then suddenly appeared when people said it was suspicious. I don't think lynching him would be unfair - that's very odd behaviour for a marmot.

Do you have a problem with my impeccable timing?

Sorsha wrote:
Metalmarsh89 wrote:I dont mean to vanish. I was just getting some schooled work done to day and reacharing the ol mafia batteries.

But hi! Still here. If y'alll have anyontihng to shove in my face, go for it.

Linki: I can disappear at awill too.
What do you think of BR pointing her finger at sig and then dying?

Do you think sig/his team had anything to do with it? If not then any ideas who?

What do you think of Matt's post on TH? Agree or disagree?

BR didn't do herself any favors calling out a player who had the same item that she did, and including that in her reason.

A team had something to do with it definitely. I haven't given it any thought. I didn't make the connection that you pointed out until just now.

I think it's clear that MacDougall did not have a scumread on Matt to start the game. I also agree that TH is wasting his time looking at Matt for that reason. I don't know why Draconus voted for sig (I'll check it out later), but I like Matt's theory.

What do you think about this whole matter? I don't see your stance anywhere.

I tihnk its in undfair accusation unless it can be backed up with proof.

I've been accused of being mafia when ive self-voted. That's not true, as I have selfvoted when i was a civvie as well.

Linki: ther you go, but it seems only one situation stnds out in your mind.

TH, is that the only time she self-voted, o rhads she self-voted on other occaisons as a civilain by your recollection.

One beer coming up.

I will not be voting Matt on Day 2.

O rbea.

bea wrote:I have never been both as sad and happy to see this one last beer left. I should start dinner now....

I still have two more beers in the fridge. I don't think I'll be finishing them tonight.

Golden wrote:
bea wrote:Do you guys really think I'm bad? like really?
I don't think that this is quite what either of us said

But I do really think you could be bad. I just haven't figured you out yet.

Could be bad?

Well, anyone could be bad, whether you think it or not . :P

I dont mean to vanish. I was just getting some schooled work done to day and reacharing the ol mafia batteries.

But hi! Still here. If y'alll have anyontihng to shove in my face, go for it.

Linki: I can disappear at awill too.

I feel liek I have contributed nothing to this game and I'm sorry, and I'll be around tomorrow.

Cheers.

And Happy Halloween you crazy people. It is still Halloweeen here.

You called?

Matt F wrote:I'm sorry to bring this up again, but I just want to know, for the record, what Zebra 2.0's opinion of Golden is.

Good or bad???

Before, I asked you Zebra what the point of making any cases was, if you genuinely felt peeps weren't reading your posts. Remember, that seemed to be the reason why you would no longer go after Golden. After that question, you posted apologizing for your previous harsh post, but didn't answer.

Sorry again, but I'm just feeling really weird about you not wanting to go after Golden (despite you thinking he's bad...I think?) and now Golden is all "Zebra 2.0 looks good to me!!" (paraphrasing)

Are you asking zebra or everyone else?

Golden wrote:I would prefer to have you back as Gurney, but oh well.

That means we would have her on a gurney.

a2thezebra wrote:
Metalmarsh89 wrote:No I'm not.
No comma after the "no", I see. I should take this as an indication that you were nervous with this response.

That's a good idea. I was nervous when I made this response.

No I'm not.

RIP birdwithteeth.

Welcome back zebra.

a2thezebra wrote:linki - Could you elaborate on that Turnip Head vote?

Yes. He voted me first in the last speed game.

Voted Turnip Head because I owe him one.

FZ. wrote:
Metalmarsh89 wrote:
a2thezebra wrote:Are you, metalmarsh?
I am not. I like your answer though.
Who do you think is bad?

I don't have an answer for that question right now.

a2thezebra wrote:Are you, metalmarsh?

I am not. I like your answer though.

Metalmarsh89 wrote:Zebra, are you a member of mafia?

S~V~S wrote:
Turnip Head wrote:
Black Rock wrote:
Turnip Head wrote:
Black Rock wrote:This is the first I have heard of policy lynches and I don't think it's in anyone's best interest.
This post rubs me the wrong way in a way I can't quite articulate, but I'll try to. I agree that Mac's plan is a crapshoot at best and destructive at worst, but the way BR words it here feels like she has inside knowledge on the situation. The little shrug at the end pings me too, as if BR is saying "Do what you'd like, ignorant civvies, I've said my piece."
Then vote for me. I just told the truth. I don't remember anyone ever using a "policy" lynch. I still don't think following a "policy" lynch is a good idea. also, oh my goodness, BR used an emot. Would have been better if I hid behind a

Look how quickly sig jumped right in behind you.
Like I said, I don't think following a policy lynch is a good idea either. Your tone just stood out to me. What does the shrug mean BR? What does it mean?!
What would you have done had she used the bigger shrug ?

¯\_(ツ)_/¯

Draconus wrote:
S~V~S wrote:Draconus?
I was tired of my old name, so I asked MP to change it to one that I use on just about everything else I'm on.

He's not omniscient, you see. :P

I still won't be voting for Matt F today.

Turnip Head wrote:
Luke11646 wrote:
Turnip Head wrote:I can confirm that spice was a bad choice
Why was it a bad choice?
Because it didn't give me superpowers, or any other benefit. Didn't get me high. Can't even season my food with it.

We shoulda gone with Old Spice instead of regular Spice.

MacDougall wrote:Interesting. The strongest "ping". What if you didn't get one at all. Or you arrived late to the thread and didn't have the opportunity to read it all? Would you just put your vote on whichever person had a few votes and you thought was less effective a townie say? Is that a fair indication of what you would do?

No, I am unable to predicate my actions. You'll just have to wait and see.

MacDougall wrote:Encouraging the policy lynch of Matt in every game we play together =/= policy lynching every game. Only ones that he is in.

See this is interesting because I would argue that unless ANYONE discovers significant evidence that SOMEONE ELSE should be lynched then I would consider Matt worth lynching. You might disagree?

Metalmarsh if there was no significant evidence or case on anyone by the end of the day. Where would your vote end up?

Correct, I'm not arguing that.

I don't disagree with that notion. I probably won't follow it though.

I don't know. I will probably go with the strongest ping I notice, and I've never considered a policy-lynch in the cards before.

Mac, if you enjoy reading old mafia ISO's here's one of Vompatti from a recent game.

http://www.mafiathesyndicate.com/search ... 0&sr=posts

MacDougall wrote:
Metalmarsh89 wrote:MacDougall, I think you said that.

Weren't you just telling me you would do anything that I say?
Excuse me sir I am terribly sorry but I have no idea what your first sentence is in relation to. Can you please explore that idea a little more for me?

You just said you will not be voting Matt F today. Choosing not to vote for him for policy lynch reasons is one thing but declaring that you will not be voting for him at all, at this point of the day, is highly unusual.

Your second sentence, sure I would do anything you ask me to Metalmarsh. What do you want me to do?

linki: What's a Vompatti?

You asked me "Who said anything about doing it every game"?

I reminded you that you said that.

I want you to uncover some significant evidence that Matt F is worth lynching today so that I can eat my words. Can you do that for me Mac?

Golden wrote:Imagining what MacDougall would think of Vompatti.

Mind blown.

I will admit to having a no-lynch policy for newbies, on day one, so you won't see me voting for Luke or Banana.

I miss vompatti.

Mafia must be expensive in Finalnd.

Also, I'm still alive in some musical heads game, so the underpants stay for now. :P

MacDougall, I think you said that.

Weren't you just telling me you would do anything that I say?

MacDougall wrote:I do not believe policy lynches can occur after day 1 so if this fails to occur I won't push for a policy lynch on him again.

And no, not really. This discussion should get people motivated to talk. It should influence a lot of play. It will help incentivise conversation on day 1 that could lead to genuine cases. Better that than we start by just asking about the weather. Let the games begin.

Policy-lynching a player Day 1 every game is unproductive, especially if you declare such a plan.

I will no be voting for Matt F today.

No reason at all. I just knew that votes were not changeable.

MacDougall, I think we should lynch Turnip Head today. Will you vote for him with me?

Matt F wrote:Zebra - I did come on a little strong Day 0. It's been gettin' pretty intense in TH so I thought I'd let loose in her for a bit, being day 0 and all. I know this didn't require a defense really, especially you giving it "barely a 2", but wanted to explain.

I do, however, plan to grab a hold of myself this game, and instead of spitballin' in nearly every post like I usually do, maybe just type it in the notepad, and only post a suspish when I feel it's solid.

Can I grab you in this game?

Zebra, are you a member of mafia?

Turnip Head wrote:
Ricochet wrote:
G-Man wrote:
Ricochet wrote:Btw, I never heard imprssions from you on how I handled Picture-Man in Syndicate Mafia. [/np]
I went back and looked at your handiwork. Not too bad. I'm probably a little too random to imitate with 100% accuracy but it was quite amusing. Once I read your post where you said you were mimicking three other players on top of your sock, your posts made much more sense.

Did your curse specifically require you to post like me? Kind of odd to have to mimic someone not in the game when you also had to post like two other players who were actually playing the game. I guess seeing me in action in previous games came in handy.

"Not too bad". I'll take it. Re: the 100% accuracy thing, my goals in that game were never really to simply imitate, but also paraphrase, reinterpret, seem alike etc.

TH cursed me with this. The curse was to post my thoughts only in pictures, not to "roleplay G-Man". I only assumed I basically asked for it, after doing that Day 0 Bane impression of you (posting pics as the Joker, I mean), in a conversation with you (uhm the real you, aka you).

MM in addition also cursed me to write OT stuff in Wilgy style (me and "JJJ", who posted the usual Wilgy catchphrase and then didn't seem to give a shit no more). I also paraphrased that (the labcoat thing, the narrative style) and developed it into the story in which Roxy wants to kill me for stepping inside her Host Room unannounced, using coctail molotovs and mutant Beatles members.
You've got that backwards. I hit you with the WIlgy challenge, so it must have been MM with the G-Man curse.

Also @MM, did you target MM2 with the timmer curse in that game? I was cracking up when I saw that.

Yes on both curses!

I didn't know who to curse that day, so I recycled an old one lol.

Search found 65 matches