The Syndicate

G-Man wrote:Maybe if we moved this game into the Museum section, Frisky Dingo will fill up faster because people will see an empty game section waiting for action.

Roxy wrote:

MovingPictures07 wrote:

Metalmarsh89 wrote:I contributed nothing to this game, except perhaps one or two exciting lynches.

I believe you're understating your contribution to the civilian win, since Mordecai was lynched at your hand.

You two have the best bromance on the site

Spamming every thread together has proven quite preciously funny on a Sunday afternoon.

Golden wrote:

MovingPictures07 wrote:I told myself I'd much rather win seldom but truly deserve it than win more often just because I develop a low participant or nonthreatening meta.

You're one of the most promising mafia newbies I've ever seen and I'd hate to see your playstyle degenerate just to ensure your own meta or survival.

This, absolutely this.

You can definitely win without compromising your meta, but I agree with MP that seeing your team win in part because of your own effort is better than winning without any effort anyway.

Ricochet wrote:Belshahahazzar account needs mod confirmation regarding the e-mail change, otherwise password reset and clean.

Farewell, drunken ego.

Ricochet wrote:

Metalmarsh89 wrote:Go figure, I do jackshit in this game and still win.


Good game everyone. I guess dying on Day 1 isn't always the worst thing.

Hello winged servant.

MovingPictures07 wrote:

Epignosis wrote:

MovingPictures07 wrote:So the moral of the story is that apparently Epi loves invisible vote manipulation.

Samson's vote was completely visible.

Well, yeah, but it was unexpected. :P

Lot wrote:

Belshazzar wrote:What did you mean by Stephen's close affinity with Paul?

I'm pretty sure that Paul's real identity subbed in and became Stephen's real identity when Stephen's 'house exploded'.

Belshazzar wrote:

Spoiler: show

made you look

Snow Dog wrote:Holy Smoke!

Absalom wrote:Quite a few missed votes again, I see. People sure were sleepy in the Bible times.

Jephthah wrote:Mary Magdalene.

Jephthah wrote:

Lot wrote:No. Day 4 is when Job was lynched. Day three was Mary Mag. But who was lynched is not important. The fact was that at the time there were two votes on each of Uzz, Job and Rachel. Voting Lazarus would be an odd thing to do right at that point in time if bad. I could understand him voting Job or Rachel right then, or holding his vote till later and voting Lazarus a little later. But right then, voting Lazarus seems like an unlikely move when Uzz might need saving.

Not an impossible move, just that it would definitely have been to the detriment of the heathen team in that moment.

Sorry, I mixed them up. But the important thing is MM's first voter was 14th out of the voters. If Rachel is bad, then giving her the vote was not an option. But I agree that giving it to Job would make sense. Still, he had only one vote. If it was just Job against Uzziah who were fighting each other, bandwagoning on Job would look bad later. Why not introduce an new suspect, one that is easy to frame. He's voting without good reason.

That said, I, the wish washy person, just read Mordecai's post and it felt on the genuine side. Not sure if I should be fooled by it.

Golden wrote:I came across this and thought it might be an appropriate and enjoyable diversion

Epignosis wrote:

nijuukyugou wrote:Ah shit. Drinking and mafia do not often mix

I disagree.