The Syndicate

Aww I don't think you should give up. I rarely win but it does happen, and it will happen for you too.

Scotty wrote:

fingersplints wrote:First off, I didn't convenient disappear. My last post was at 11:30 at night.

Secondly, sitting with my hands under my butt is just fucking rude to say. Despite your insistence that I haven't been I have been defending myself too. For the record, I'm actually thinking about quitting mafia too, but I'm not throwing it into the game to fucking scare you all into not voting for me. I'm going to "conveniently" disappear again, because I'm pretty annoyed to wake up to that shit. I agreed to replace into a game and that is the thanks I get.

Hey splints, I mean no personal foul against you, and I apologize if it came off that way. I didn't think that was rude at the time, and was quite drunk to boot.
I appreciate you subbing in, and don't want any bad jojo going on between us because it is just a game. Frustrations aside, can we agree to just let bygones be bygones?

It's cool. I was a little annoyed at the insinuation I wasn't playing correctly, but I also decided to play up that "annoyance" to get you lynched. I'm tired of the annoyed=civvie thing in games and I was going to prove how easy it is to fake/use to your advantage. I am still considering a break, but it didn't have anything to do with you.
You can ask my team I even said earlier in the game how if we didn't win I wanted you to

Great work teammies and thanks for the game DF.

Voting scotty

First off, I didn't convenient disappear. My last post was at 11:30 at night.

Secondly, sitting with my hands under my butt is just fucking rude to say. Despite your insistence that I haven't been I have been defending myself too. For the record, I'm actually thinking about quitting mafia too, but I'm not throwing it into the game to fucking scare you all into not voting for me. I'm going to "conveniently" disappear again, because I'm pretty annoyed to wake up to that shit. I agreed to replace into a game and that is the thanks I get.

Umm, I am posing a solution too? I think we should lynch you next. Is "I think he looks sketchy" really all I said, because you are defending against the other things I said. Don't make it out like there aren't points and my suspicion of you is just vibes when it isn't.

Are you really trying to say you saying "Come on guys!" when people were taking there time deciding where to vote ISN'T speeding it along, because it really reads to me like that.

What exactly is weird about it? What I think is weird is how you seem to know there is only one baddie left. As far as I can see only one has been lynched, and the rest is just speculation. Only a baddie would know how many are left.
I'm not the one trying to say there is only one left. I think it's possible Golden could have been bad, but I'd rather lynch you and then see from there. I am not the one trying to rush votes to seal the lynch and end the game.

thellama73 wrote:

Scotty wrote:

thellama73 wrote:Honestly Scotty, the extent to which you've stepped into a leadership role at the endgame has me worried. You seem excited. You have the air of someone about to pull off a desperate victory, and that makes me not trust you. I owe both you and Splints a reread today.

That's fair. Not disputing how excited I am, because I am sure we are close to winning.

Do you agree that the only possibilities of mafia at this point are me and splints? That's been my whole point.

Yeah, I do agree with that, and I am agonizing over which one of you to choose. Why isn't Splints defending herself like you are? Is she a lone baddie who has given up, or is she a bored civ who was never really that engaged?

I'm not bored, but yes I am less engaged being a civvie who replaced in. I don't think I have ever been very secretive that I prefer to be bad and am more engaged and interested when I have btsc. I'm not making any excuses, I'm just saying.

Scotty is defending himself, but he is also acting sketchy as all hell. Take yesterday for example. The way he tried to rush everyone into voting for Roxy.

Scotty wrote:Literally all we need is 1 more vote for Roxy and we can seal it. Come on guys! I want to move that much closer to my first win on this site.

A baddie would want to speed this along this close to the end and not have everyone fully think through their votes. I'm also not liking how sure he is that we only have one baddie left.

I'm voting Scotty. If the numbers are correct and it has to be one of us I still don't see it as rox's baddie game and I know I am a civvie. Looks like she will be lynched anyways, so I hope you guys are right

Sorsha wrote:Splints... do you think its Roxy that's bad? Or someone else?

Dom was the mafias night one target. In your opinion is that someone that Roxy would want out of the game early?

It's possible, but like I said

fingersplints wrote:I still can't see this as being Roxy's baddie game tbh, maybe she is fooling me but I honestly don't see it. Wrong does not equal bad.

I cannot see Dom being Roxy's first choice of a N1 kill at all. If she is bad though, it is possible that she was overruled by the rest of the team. I know she is busy with TSM and other stuff, so if she is bad I doubt she would even be around the chat much to be part of the decision making process.

Roxy wrote:Sorsha fine if it comes to it then maybe splints and if it is splints then Dom for her partner. Don't ask why about Dom its a gut feeling since his missed vote

Et tu, Roxy?

Achilles' Last Stand is a good song, but not my favorite. I've actually been lynched in a mafia game, twice, for posting my favorite Led Zeppelin video.

I still can't see this as being Roxy's baddie game tbh, maybe she is fooling me but I honestly don't see it. Wrong does not equal bad.

Why would keeping hushed not be an option? She could have just not said anything. That seems like a pretty viable option to me, especially considering I had barely any mentions she wouldn't need to openly defend me. You on the other hand have a lot of suspicion, and would gain some from having someone defend you.

The way it looks to me is: llama says he is suspicious of you. Once the suspicion of you picks up he suddenly switched to defending you, making the earlier suspicion look fake. If you were teammates he could then say he mentioned suspicion of you early. Do you see now why this is suspicious to me?

I'm not sure I understand what point you are trying to make then by that comment. It doesn't make sense at all for you to say that. If we aren't related to each either being bad, we can't both be bad. Your suspicion doesn't make any sense.

So it's weird for Rox to defend me, but not for llama to defend you? By your own logic, why wouldn't Rox keep hushed about that sort of thing if we were bad?

Actually I don't want to miss another vote so I am going to vote Elo right now. I trust Roxy and I think she is right. It does seem like Elo has been being saved by llama. Iirc he is the one who first commented to me about greybonez and then when he was lynched he was like "you all should have listened to me about MM". seems sketchy

Elohcin wrote:and what is aorn? That is the second time you used that word.

Google says Association of Perioperative Registered Nurses....



Or as of right now

Somehow? There is an ability that does that...
It doesn't really seem that far fetched to me so not sure why you are acting like it is so unlikely

I will probably be voting for you

I asked for a summary and literally the only thing I got was about greybonez. I don't think it's fair to say it's jumping on bandwagon considering I just entered the game so how was I supposed to express suspicion before then? Also while greybonez ended up being civvie I really think defending himself some would have gone a long way.

I'm not sure how you know what's going on in my life to judge how much time I should have or have not had to catch up, but I'm pretty sure everyone here except you who is not playing (has played, or is cohosting with me) the game I am hosting, so does not know that some pretty bad shit happened there and I have been preoccupied with that. I'm keeping up with what is being said now, but I literally haven't had a chance to read prior. (Minus greybonez - who I did read all host posts before voting)

I'm going to try to reread Elo first when I get a chance. I'm pretty good at reading Roxy, and I feel from her posts that she is a civvie. She seems pretty insistent, so I wonder if there is something there.

Alright, I'm going to vote greybonez now then. I feel a bit bad since he is a new player, but it's day 4 (he's just new to me! Hello!) and I think good points. I promise I will read all tomorrow

That is a very odd vote. And I agree doesn't look great for llama if bad. I feel like a new player would be less likely to put someone in the lead day 1 unless they had good reason to.

Anyone want to give me a summary on the suspicion of greybonez?
Sorry but it's unlikely I will get to read the whole thread until tomorrow

birdwithteeth11 wrote:Welcome Splints!

So why was your former counterpart so quiet?

I think she forgot about us. Hopefully she comes back and plays again sometime when she has more time.

Will try to catch up tonight, but might not get around to it until tomorrow since it is a lynch day in TSM.