Return to “Monopoly Mafia [GAME OVER]”
Turnip Head wrote:Players the Utilities knew the roles of before BWT died:
Elohcin (now BR2.0)
Lorab
TH
Daisy
FZ
Keys
Hedgeowl
I feel so naked. Oh. Ok, I need to stop scanning the thread. I thought it was a back and forth that was distancing. Not something you ask me in almost every game we play together. I honestly didn't know what she was talking about.juliets wrote:BR this is the exchange that Elo is referring to.
juliets wrote:Thanks BR. I don't either.Black Rock wrote:juliets wrote:Black Rock, speaking of hunting down baddies, do you have any suspicions at this point?
At this point? No.
What back and forth are you talking about?Elohcin wrote:Actually, I was surprised others didn't agree with me that your little back and forth with BR was distancing. There isn't much to go on Day 1 and that (to me) was something. Am I still looking at you after the Made lynch, though? Not really.....but it will stick in the back of my mind.
By feeling crafty I meant NOT feeling crafty...Black Rock wrote:Maybe I should have not said stupid, but I felt that what you were getting at was basically that you thought LC jumping to those conclusions without asking the host a bunch of questions was stupid. Maybe it's the wrong word but I'm feeling crafty with words today. I also read it the same way as LC had, and it would seem that's how it works because the card did not go back up for auction.Turnip Head wrote:And I don't know why, BR, you threw in that line about me trying to make everyone else feel stupid with my knowledge... I don't know what that has to do with anything, or what you're specifically referencing, or why you think I would want to do something like that...
I'm sad that you feel I'm a player who has those sorts of intentions.
I also felt while you were accusing him of jumping to conclusions with out asking the host questions you were doing the exact same thing. The only difference is you were using your conclusions as evidence. That reads baddie to me. The only reason I'm not voting you right now is the fact in other games when I didn't agree with you it was civvie TH and when I did like your arguments you were a baddie. So I disagree with a lot of your thoughts this game, you are likely civvie.
Maybe I should have not said stupid, but I felt that what you were getting at was basically that you thought LC jumping to those conclusions without asking the host a bunch of questions was stupid. Maybe it's the wrong word but I'm feeling crafty with words today. I also read it the same way as LC had, and it would seem that's how it works because the card did not go back up for auction.Turnip Head wrote:And I don't know why, BR, you threw in that line about me trying to make everyone else feel stupid with my knowledge... I don't know what that has to do with anything, or what you're specifically referencing, or why you think I would want to do something like that...
I'm sad that you feel I'm a player who has those sorts of intentions.
Do you have some sort of knowledge that the rest of us don't? Are you using this knowledge to make others feel stupid? Why do you think they killed SVS if not to gain the RR property? Whjat do you know about where it ended up? Cause it didn't just disappear. I feel like there is enough thread knowledge to assume that when the RR killed SVS they gained control of the RR property. I am sorry TH you are not looking like a helpful civvie, just someone trying to use words to make his case look solid.Turnip Head wrote:I was about ready to smother my hat in some ranch dressing, BUT! This isn't exactly the same thing. Boo said if someone kills you they get your starter card but in that quote he doesn't say that the same thing happens for any extra properties we collect. That leaves open the possibility that those properties might be auctioned off or simply placed back on the board. But you seemed pretty certain about your answer that they go to the killer, and you didn't ask in the thread for clarification.Long Con wrote:Hmm, well, maybe you should put your reading glasses, grandpa...A little ketchup and fresh ground pepper might make that hat a little more palatable. Will you post a video of you eating it?boo wrote:Successful NKs will result in the player responsible for the NK getting the card of the killed player.
Third post of the game, three paragraphs from the bottom.
Are you saying you did not ask Boo any questions on this matter, and that the line you quoted from the rules was your only point of reference?
Nah man, calm down it's nothing like that... I think you're a utilityLong Con wrote:Good point, I was wrong there. They couldn't kill one of their own. So I guess now I'm a railroad who's intentionally getting some thing s wrong about my own role...?TH wrote:Just pointing out that this isn't how it works. The railroads can't be NK'd until they've all found each other. The Short Line bidding war was a win-win for the railroads.Long Con wrote:They'd better hope they're the railroad with the kill, or else they'll kill one of their own. :ofingersplints wrote:Unless whoever wins it is railroad.
S~V~S wrote:Not sure I want to spend the night talking about the person I trust most.
Sorry you had to go, thank you for making the day one lynch go so beautifully.Made wrote:I fucking hate being bad..no salt here y'all, well played.
pce out
Turnip Head wrote:Made's post looks like a bona fide slip up to me.
Made wrote:ok, I don't see a way for civvies to win this game, as civvie anyways. At all. Basically, who ever can get their partners together as a group first, without revealing they are a group, seems to have the best chance at winning.
Does this mean that if a person of my set dies, but i have BTSC with all other 3 member, would i be considered part of a LMS group?Boo wrote:A set that has (at any point) all living players together will cease to be considered a civvie set, and become a LMSing group.
Are their any incentives to work together?
juliets wrote:Black Rock, speaking of hunting down baddies, do you have any suspicions at this point?
DFaraday wrote:I can see both sides of the issue, but I think Keys has the best point. It's better to be a vanilla civ (or one with a BTSC partner) than part of a small team with no kill.
