The Syndicate

JaggedJimmyJay wrote:Some shit is leaking in my bathroom.

ew

I have a million pages to catch up on... will post after I have read some more.

JaggedJimmyJay wrote:fingersplints was highly aggressive against Black Rock in Economics Mafia. Turned out she was town and BR was mafia, so her read was accurate. Does anyone who played in or observed that game feel this parallel is meaningful?

That's not the first incident. We are at odds frequently. Sometimes we are civ vs civ, sometimes she's bad and sometimes I am.

I'm having a day. When I say a day, I mean I have been very angry all day and want to punch someone in the face. I am only coming in here to vote. I am going to vote Devin.

I am going to leave the Roxy and Splints thing alone for now. It turns out some of the shit I was reading in Roxy had other things going on that I was unaware of. With respect to Roxy I'm going to give her the benefit of the doubt.

I deserve to die for various reasons.

JaggedJimmyJay wrote:A few of us have been talking about making espers and/or Diiny dead for a while now, and both of them have remained essentially silent on the matter (I see no reason to assume a silencer is in play). Pressure votes please if you haven't already joined a bandwagon.

I have been paying attention to my own things and don't know either well. I could put a pressure vote on but it wouldn't be real. I don't have any real opinion of them.

I deserve to die because being pretty does not distract the hosts from not performing well on punishments.

MacDougall wrote:I know that. Don't you find it weird that he would just have two browser tabs open on the home page of the site? Like, who does that?

I currently have three, and I have just closed two. How do you play mafia without multiple tabs open?

I deserve to die for being a bad punished lady.

Epignosis wrote:I must say I am increasingly suspicious of Black Rock, and I'll tell you why.

Her husband got lynched and was bad, yet she's missing votes and coming in here talking about Roxy being the serial killer. She lives with LC. She has heard him speak in real life all the time, knows his tone, has witnessed his ruses, and should have a solidi(ish) view of what he would do or would not. I'm just seeing no effort on that front, and if Black Rock is civilian, then I think her involvement would be more valuable than it is.

Huh? I missed one vote. I'm still suffering the consequence because I screwed up my punishment, not because I missed voteS. I subbed in near the end of LC's lynch and I had no idea what was going on the game. He's dead. What would you like me to, tell you if he sounded bad before he was lynched? He's bad, he was lynched and we were told so. I don't really understand this at all.

I deserve to die because I suck at punishments.

fingersplints wrote:
Black Rock wrote:I read Splints posts. She came into the game assuming Roxy is civvie because of who was killed night 1. I know Roxy doesn't like to pick on new players but I also know she can be pretty ruthless. If she didn't want to kill new players she would be less likely the SK but Splints doesn't think she could be on the baddie team either?

I still am leaning one way towards Roxy more than the other but I am going to reserve judgement for now. I find it more interesting that she has voted for Matt 5 times in a row.

I am undecided on Matt vs Mac. I'm hoping to see what I perceive to be an honest reaction from Roxy about my theories.

I deserve to die because I am an awful player who should have a better memory regarding punishments.

You can keep saying that I assume Roxy is a civvie just based off who was NKd, but the more times you say something doesn't make it true. There were more reasons than that as I keep saying.

Want to talk about making a mountain out of a fucking molehill. Your reaction is over the top BR. Why is only Roxy allowed to answer you?

I think you are just pissed off because you were trying to get in on the Roxy suspicion for an easy lynch and I called you out on your BS reasoning. I don't think you ever did answer what specifically made her the SK.

voting BR
I deserve to die for missing the vote, but not as much as BR who also missed the vote and is bad

I think you're right, you do deserve to die. I think I read through your posts and I think you are hosting with Roxy, and I think you have made protecting Roxy personal because you haven't gotten into this game. I am so shocked, you have nothing so you are going to jump on a vote for me so you look like your playing the game. Sweetheart, if I was picking a target for an easy lynch I would not pick Roxy. Roxy is never an easy target. You talk about my reaction? lol

I deserve to die for missing my punishment.

Matt F wrote:To any Syndicateer who has hosted a Mafia game...

If you had a role like Sorsha's in the game, Sorsha picks two players to play her contest on Night 3, Sorsha dies on Day 4.

Would YOU as host allow Sorsha to pick a winner from the power she used Night 3?

I'm just curious to what the over all consensus is. If the majority says "NO", again, after today, I will stop voting for Mac for being the SK

As a host no. If the player is dead all things die with that player.

I deserve to die for not following through with my punishment.

I read Splints posts. She came into the game assuming Roxy is civvie because of who was killed night 1. I know Roxy doesn't like to pick on new players but I also know she can be pretty ruthless. If she didn't want to kill new players she would be less likely the SK but Splints doesn't think she could be on the baddie team either?

I still am leaning one way towards Roxy more than the other but I am going to reserve judgement for now. I find it more interesting that she has voted for Matt 5 times in a row.

I am undecided on Matt vs Mac. I'm hoping to see what I perceive to be an honest reaction from Roxy about my theories.

I deserve to die because I am an awful player who should have a better memory regarding punishments.

RadicalFuzz wrote:This is an extremely entertaining way of dealing with low participation.

Metalmarsh89 wrote:Black Rock and fingersplints, you two should just vote now for your top suspect just in case you might miss the vote again.

I haven't decided yet.

I deserve to die for not completing my punishment.

There, I remembered.

Black Rock wrote:
fingersplints wrote:I don't think it's narrow minded at all. I think her posts, and her votes have been civvie minded, plus I don't think the kills match Rox at all. So it's many reasons. It seems like just trying to find reasons to suspect her. What posts specifically make you think she might be the SK then?

I deserve to die more
You are literally making a mountain out of a mole hill. The post was designed to get Roxy in here so I could have a more solid read on her. Instead I have her knight riding in here on her white horse. What should I make of that Splints? Now my post is meaningless for what it was designed to do. I guess I will put a big ? mark beside her and read more up on you.

OMG I suck so bad, I should be killed for being such a loser at completing tasks my great and powerful hosts give me.

fingersplints wrote:I don't think it's narrow minded at all. I think her posts, and her votes have been civvie minded, plus I don't think the kills match Rox at all. So it's many reasons. It seems like just trying to find reasons to suspect her. What posts specifically make you think she might be the SK then?

I deserve to die more

You are literally making a mountain out of a mole hill. The post was designed to get Roxy in here so I could have a more solid read on her. Instead I have her knight riding in here on her white horse. What should I make of that Splints? Now my post is meaningless for what it was designed to do. I guess I will put a big ? mark beside her and read more up on you.

fingersplints wrote:No, BR I do not think Roxy is the SK. I have a hard time believing someone who knows her like you do would actually think that she would Nk a fairly new player to the site N1.

I agree with the kill inheriting discussed. If I had one faction killing one night, and the second another, whatever team left would inherit the kill regardless of size. I think I've seen it eliminated, but this is most likely imo

I should probably just be lynched because I deserve to die on account of missing the vote and all.

I think that is a bit narrow minded. I wouldn't knock her off the list just because of a night one kill.

I must admit I have no idea who was killed night one. I decided to move forward to keep up with the game as it is playing out.

I like your soft defend coupled with a soft accuse. Well played.

I see how you think you deserve to die, but I deserve to die because I missed a lynch and then didn't complete my punishment.

Black Rock wrote:The whole time I was catching up and actually reading Roxys posts I thought it was Unfurl. While I was writing the post I noticed Unfurl was not playing. I then went back and saw it was in fact Roxy and changed the name in my post. Because of her Avatar I have two very different opinions on Roxy. Does she know something about Matt or is she a killer? By her posts I am leaning towards killer, by her voting record I am leaning towards info. What is a lady to do.

What I meant was exactly this but...

I deserve to die because I suck at punishment.

The whole time I was catching up and actually reading Roxys posts I thought it was Unfurl. While I was writing the post I noticed Unfurl was not playing. I then went back and saw it was in fact Roxy and changed the name in my post. Because of her Avatar I have two very different opinions on Roxy. Does she know something about Matt or is she a killer? By her posts I am leaning towards killer, by her voting record I am leaning towards info. What is a lady to do.

bcornett24 wrote:
Metalmarsh89 wrote:I don't deserve to die anymore.
Who deserves to die now?

I do, I deserve to die for failing my punishment.

ricochet wrote:Roxy has now voted Matt five Days in a row.

I didn't realize this. That's something I would do if I had a lead and no one was listening to me.

Bullzeye wrote:
Ricochet wrote:Uh no, the night kills will probably be inherited by the other bad party.
Never heard of the mafia inheriting an SK's kill before.

I have, it's not crazy to believe if there is only one killing entity left that they would get to kill every night.

As a host I would wait until both the SK and civ ninja were dead though.

Now that I'm all caught up, does anyone else get the feeling that Roxy could be the SK?

Just a feeling I had as I was catching up. Her tone when discussing such matters... I don't know seems a bit off.

JaggedJimmyJay wrote:
So here's my point: if I don't believe LC's "gambit" ever really even existed, then I am not going to attribute theories about his scum intentions to that gambit. That means I am not going to be more suspicious of Mac than I otherwise be because of the possibility that this was a cooperative plan from the start. I don't think this conversation happened in BTSC:

LC: Okay guys, I really need to focus on my other game. I know we just got started here and you're relying on me to contribute, but I gotta bail.

Mac or friends: Well... alright? That kind of sucks. Uh, I guess we better bus you then and make it look nice.

LC: Definitely. So here's the plan. I am going to go after bea for her defensive posts. But when I do: it's gonna be a bad look. I want one or more of you folks to come after me for it right away.

Mac: I'm on it!

LC: Great. But here's where it gets interesting: after you go after me, I'm going to say in the thread that the original case was just a test for reactions and try to gain back the credibility that you take away. I'm known for this kind of thing, it'll look fine.

Mac: Alright sweet. Tell you what, why don't we also argue in the thread about your Flowers role and how it might affect the game? So much WIFOM!!!

LC: Aw yeah, sick. Bro fist, bro.

The only problem I see with this scenario is that if LC ever said anything like that last line I would have to divorce him right away.

I also wanted you all to know that I deserve to die for failing my punishment. I'm an awful lady.

Russtifinko wrote: I feel pretty darn bad about Mac now. Probably too late for today, but very worth a look tomorrow.

Golden wrote:
Black Rock wrote:Something about Sorshas posts just read genuine to me. I'll be surprised if she flips bad.
I uninured agree. I unwarmed don't me in charge buddy! be very surprised.

I hear ya!

espers wrote:
motel room wrote:
espers wrote:hello. voted aokiji/motel room and Long Con.
this has been nagging me a bit. espers, why did you vote me here for CEO or whatever it was way back at the start?
do you have any theory about what the reason was?

linki @bullzeye: i was thinking of br and epi.

I joined just at the end of LC's lynch. Something about Sorshas posts just read genuine to me. I'll be surprised if she flips bad.

MovingPictures07 wrote:Just a little over 20 minutes until end of Day 4.

You must cast your votes before then if you haven't already, unless you want to be punished.

oops....

MacDougall wrote:
motel room wrote:
MacDougall wrote:
motel room wrote:
MacDougall wrote:I'm actually unvoting sorsha and changing my vote to MattF. Something about him is not what it seems my friends. And I aim to get to the bottom of it.
I don't get why you've switched from Sorsha, at one point saying you wont switch for anything less than someone saying "i am scum", to Matt F because of a few "pings". This is a significant bandwagon.
I switched to MattF to get a reaction out of him mate. Sorsha looks safely lynched so I'm pretty much free to throw my vote around to scare scum.

Unvote MattF, vote motel room.

See.
Well like

Now you're just hopping to muddy your intentions even further. Do you think Sorsha is scum or not?
No I'm not. I'm trying to upset you to see if you will break that super cautious posting style you've got there. Please don't state opinions as fact.

Yes gun to head I believe sorsha is scum. I had a bad feeling that there are scum on the wagon but now that a solid Devin wagon is being put together at the last minute in an attempt to get sorsha unlynched, the predictable has occurred when a scum is about be hung so I'm comfy again.

Changing my vote back to sorsha.

Did you?

Epignosis wrote:This post stood out to me. Nowhere does it say what Black Rock thinks about the alignment of me or Russ- it's just observational, but it does argue in Sorsha's favor. I read this post expecting to see if Black Rock thinks I'm good, bad, or ugly, but no assessment is made. That sort of thing looks bad to me.

Black Rock wrote:http://www.mafiathesyndicate.com/viewto ... 40#p184571

I decided to link to this post instead of quoting it since it's so damn long. I think a lot of thought has gone into this post. Two people that stand out to me is Epignosis and Russ.

I'm not used to Epi have a positive look at LC. He often thinks LC is bad and leaves him alone as neutral. With all the crap that was going on with LC I'm surprised he didn't jump on the lynch train himself. He has gone after him for less.

Russ didn't seem to want to make up his mind. Now I would have to go back and read Russ to make up my mind on him as well but if I recall his was a last minute vote changer as well.

After reading this particular post I have no suspicion of Sorsha. Sorsha and LC have been playing together for eons and they respect each other. LC has been really bad at reading her, she is a hard player to read. I believe that to be an honest assessment.
Sorsha
votes LC... for CEO spot (good leadership)
D1 implies she read something into LC's bait tactic, but later questions his choice for bea; finds his replies unrealistic
doesn't find LC to have backpedalled
===
> agreed with b24 on BWT's case, voted BWT
Just a copy and paste I didn't keep the fancy colouring.

This is not a new tactic LC has used and he often does try it as a civvie, not surprised she believed him. Hell I would have.

Anyways, I'm not voting for Sorsha today. I'd be surprised if she was bad.

Black Rock wrote:I'm not used to Epi have a positive look at LC. He often thinks LC is bad and leaves him alone as neutral.
That's because LC usually is bad.

My assessment wasn't clear. I waited for a long time after that post to see what you'd say. You kept me waiting Epi, it's not nice to keep a lady waiting.

I'm going to vote Devin, I think he's more likely to turn up bad. I really don't think Sorsha is bad.

Golden wrote:Voting bullzeye

Because he straitlaced the DFaraday that anaemia deafened locate DooberDoes targeting is bad.

I prefer cocaine lynch of night actions to Dark Willow lynch executed virago bleag Kahlan responses have TokyoRose osmanli to Dusty Spoon.

This post takes me a long journey. Some good, some being screwed over for being in a LC game.

Ricochet wrote:
Black Rock wrote:http://www.mafiathesyndicate.com/viewto ... 40#p184571

Still thinking about this post actually. I'm just loving it, it's very helpful for me. Thank you.

Negative
Matt
finding his ping "phony" in joining sig's wording case

MacDougall
suspicious of motel room for bringing up Flowers tactics (although this seems like self-aware fake sussing, imo, since LC was Flowers)
voting MacDougall D2
Can the green part of this be explained more? Is this Macs suspicion or LC's?
Uhh pretty sure that's in LC's section, so it's LC's suspicion on MacDougall.

Basically both Mac and motel brought up some interpretations of what Flowers might have done with his D1 vote and then LC sussed them both for talking about it. I already pointed out this suspicion looks fake, since LC was of course Flowers himself. But it still counts as LC putting heat on Mac for this.

I was confused on where motel room fit in under Mac, that's all.

http://www.mafiathesyndicate.com/viewto ... 40#p184571

Still thinking about this post actually. I'm just loving it, it's very helpful for me. Thank you.

Negative
Matt
finding his ping "phony" in joining sig's wording case

MacDougall
suspicious of motel room for bringing up Flowers tactics (although this seems like self-aware fake sussing, imo, since LC was Flowers)
voting MacDougall D2

Can the green part of this be explained more? Is this Macs suspicion or LC's?

http://www.mafiathesyndicate.com/viewto ... 40#p184571

I decided to link to this post instead of quoting it since it's so damn long. I think a lot of thought has gone into this post. Two people that stand out to me is Epignosis and Russ.

I'm not used to Epi have a positive look at LC. He often thinks LC is bad and leaves him alone as neutral. With all the crap that was going on with LC I'm surprised he didn't jump on the lynch train himself. He has gone after him for less.

Russ didn't seem to want to make up his mind. Now I would have to go back and read Russ to make up my mind on him as well but if I recall his was a last minute vote changer as well.

After reading this particular post I have no suspicion of Sorsha. Sorsha and LC have been playing together for eons and they respect each other. LC has been really bad at reading her, she is a hard player to read. I believe that to be an honest assessment.

Sorsha
votes LC... for CEO spot (good leadership)
D1 implies she read something into LC's bait tactic, but later questions his choice for bea; finds his replies unrealistic
doesn't find LC to have backpedalled
===
> agreed with b24 on BWT's case, voted BWT

Just a copy and paste I didn't keep the fancy colouring.

This is not a new tactic LC has used and he often does try it as a civvie, not surprised she believed him. Hell I would have.

Anyways, I'm not voting for Sorsha today. I'd be surprised if she was bad.

Matt F wrote:http://forum.lostpedia.com/showthread.p ... fia/page14

Looking through my first game to see if I was feigning asking questions (pretty sure I was), and ran across my first post ever in Mafia that created the legend...

MR F wrote:Whoa.

I had no idea the game started, I have to get ready for work in like 20 min., I have like 6 different PMs and there's already 14 pages to this thread.

LOL

Anywho, ummmm like I said before I know next to nothing about the Beatles, but people seem to be making sense about Penny Lane being an actual road, so boom.

Hopefully there won't be 30 pages by the time I get off work lol
After letting everyone know I received 6 PMs at the start of the game, I was pretty much fucked, though. Haha!

Awww... I wish I had witnessed such newbieness. That is so cute.

I once witnesswed (while I hosted), a long time player claim vanilla civvie when there was no such thing. I miss Illyria so much.

She would have punished me for disrespecting my hosts by not voting. I deserve to die.......... good thing my hosts love me.

Black Rock wrote:
Matt F wrote:
Golden wrote:It's completely possible he is part of the scum team, but I won't leave someone new out in the cold in case they are really struggling.
I hear that. On Day 0 or Day 1, I would've been right there with you.

But on Day 4...after voting several times...after "having the gist of it" in pre-game...

At the same time, I don't want to railroad a new guy if he is being genuine. Weird, though.
I'm more inclined to believe he is a lost civvie. I feel if he was on a Mafia team he would have some peeps to talk him through it.

I know it's no excuse for my slow catch up but I started this game going into Thanksgiving weekend and as a caterer my hours have been long. Tomorrow is our family TG dinner and also two different celebrations of my sons 3rd Bday. It's not going to get easier for me until Tuesday.

Edit for truth: I am a bad, bad lady and deserve to die. I should be punished for posting like nothing happened when really I missed the vote. Missing votes is a capital offense and if you're not careful you will die, like I deserve to.

Black Rock wrote:
Matt F wrote:
Black Rock wrote:
Matt F wrote:
Golden wrote:It's completely possible he is part of the scum team, but I won't leave someone new out in the cold in case they are really struggling.
I hear that. On Day 0 or Day 1, I would've been right there with you.

But on Day 4...after voting several times...after "having the gist of it" in pre-game...

At the same time, I don't want to railroad a new guy if he is being genuine. Weird, though.
I'm more inclined to believe he is a lost civvie. I feel if he was on a Mafia team he would have some peeps to talk him through it.
If Floyd was on my Mafia team, and he had been rarely posting but making votes without explanation, I would absolutely tell him to start asking questions in thread to avoid suspicion.

In fact, I'm pretty sure I was taught this in my first game ever (I was Mafia my first game).

Does anyone agree this is possible?

(expecting Roxy to vote me again for questioning the new guy) :P
I never thought of it that way. I guess that is the other possibility. If he was on my team I wouldn't want him to come in at this point feigning ignorance, so that's not how I saw it.

I just wanted to add that I am so sorry for missing the vote, I am a horrible person and deserve to die.

Matt F wrote:
Black Rock wrote:
Matt F wrote:
Golden wrote:It's completely possible he is part of the scum team, but I won't leave someone new out in the cold in case they are really struggling.
I hear that. On Day 0 or Day 1, I would've been right there with you.

But on Day 4...after voting several times...after "having the gist of it" in pre-game...

At the same time, I don't want to railroad a new guy if he is being genuine. Weird, though.
I'm more inclined to believe he is a lost civvie. I feel if he was on a Mafia team he would have some peeps to talk him through it.
If Floyd was on my Mafia team, and he had been rarely posting but making votes without explanation, I would absolutely tell him to start asking questions in thread to avoid suspicion.

In fact, I'm pretty sure I was taught this in my first game ever (I was Mafia my first game).

Does anyone agree this is possible?

(expecting Roxy to vote me again for questioning the new guy) :P

I never thought of it that way. I guess that is the other possibility. If he was on my team I wouldn't want him to come in at this point feigning ignorance, so that's not how I saw it.

Matt F wrote:
Golden wrote:It's completely possible he is part of the scum team, but I won't leave someone new out in the cold in case they are really struggling.
I hear that. On Day 0 or Day 1, I would've been right there with you.

But on Day 4...after voting several times...after "having the gist of it" in pre-game...

At the same time, I don't want to railroad a new guy if he is being genuine. Weird, though.

I'm more inclined to believe he is a lost civvie. I feel if he was on a Mafia team he would have some peeps to talk him through it.

I know it's no excuse for my slow catch up but I started this game going into Thanksgiving weekend and as a caterer my hours have been long. Tomorrow is our family TG dinner and also two different celebrations of my sons 3rd Bday. It's not going to get easier for me until Tuesday.

I guess I screwed up when the lynch was over. I saw Sunday and thought it was tonight and went to bed. I was very tired.

Epignosis wrote:
Rbzmncaeaei wrote:
Epignosis wrote:
Rbzmncaeaei wrote:
Epignosis wrote:I would say that's not disconcerting: I would say that's the product of two things:

1) Small sample size
2) 30+ players in a game at once, many of whom are unfamiliar with one another.
I don't mean disconcerting in the sense that it looks bad for anyone in particular, only that it means we don't have as clear of a lynch candidate today as I thought we would after Long Con flipped bad.
Okay, understood.
I like your recent activity with the Long Con metascan so you're off the hook for now. Which means...my vote is back to Sorsha. I'm not as comfortable with this vote as I was last time because her defenses are pretty good, but Wilgy made too damning of an observation earlier for me to go with anyone else.
Well, let's work out who could be a Long Con teammate. Sensibly. That's The Syndicate way.

I was going to go back and read the end of that lynch next. Something's got to stick out.

The casino gods were not good to me. They took my money and never gave it back

Golden wrote:I'm in for gut reads, but JJJ you have to play too. And, for post number reasons, lets make it four or five at a time?

That's a great idea.

JJJ, what do you think about Epignosis? Sorry if you have said something before about him but I can guarantee I haven't read it.

JaggedJimmyJay wrote:I'll explain what it is:

We'll run down the list of living players together (I'll shout out the names two at a time) and everyone including me will offer a ONE WORD read on that player WITH NO "NEUTRAL" ALLOWED.

The only legal words are "GOOD" or "BAD". Nothing else is acceptable.

Sounds like fun, I can't participate because I leave soon and also my opinion wouldn't be educated anyways. I already have good feelings on a couple of players though.

It is going to make extra pages though, but easy for me to get through so I approve.

JaggedJimmyJay wrote:
Black Rock wrote:Is this some sort of posting challenge that will make people post even more? If that's the case I think it's a terrible idea.
Participation will require posts, but simply making posts is not the point of it, no.

I just have a lot of posts to sift through so I can make any guesses on who is bad.

JaggedJimmyJay wrote:Oooh, I just remembered. If we have enough people present (ideally at least six, but more than that would be preferable), we should do gun to head reads right now. Many of you might not know what that means (I know some of you do though).

I will explain when I have affirmed there will be participation. If you're here right now and can take part in a REAL-TIME exercise right here in the thread that will likely last 10-15 minutes, please indicate that by saying AYE or something.

Is this some sort of posting challenge that will make people post even more? If that's the case I think it's a terrible idea.

Just checking in, I am so far behind from where I posted yesterday. I'm not going to catch up tonight but I'm going to do my damnest tomorrow. I'm heading out to dinner and the casino and although I love Mafia I have been looking forward to tonight for months.

Elohcin wrote:I guess no one is going to make me laugh today. *self vote*

Elohcin, I just started and I have read the rules. Have you?

Golden wrote:
JaggedJimmyJay wrote:
Golden wrote:I'm completely willing to help flip this lynch to JJJ. I don't trust him in the least. Anyone else on board?
Excellent. Why is that Golden? What am I up to?
I have no idea. That's what bothers me. I usually see rationality behind your actions. Possibly, it's something to do with your position as assistant CEO.

I don't know what is going on with you, and I find that incredibly scary.

@BR - what question?

Black Rock wrote:
JaggedJimmyJay wrote:
Golden wrote:linki @ BR - tell me about it. I didn't sub in, but I'm currently around 19 pages behind. Admittedly I've probably read some decent chunks of that, but not in order. It's intense. On the bright side, there are LOTS of us struggling to keep up, so you are not alone.
Werd. I have a crapload of posts and I'm not even caught up. That's only going to get worse for me though.
You guys scare me.

I guess the vote is upcoming, I looked at the poll.

Golden can you tell me about bcornett? JJJ, why did you move your vote?

Linki JJJ: what?

The one in here.

Black Rock wrote:
Matt F wrote:Four of the last five votes have gone to llama. Who are the other front runners, bcornett and LC, I think?

bcornett was in the lead when I got here.

Golden wrote:I'm completely willing to help flip this lynch to JJJ. I don't trust him in the least. Anyone else on board?
Why?

I don't think you answered my other question?

That last sentence was not really a question, I got carried away.

Matt F wrote:Four of the last five votes have gone to llama. Who are the other front runners, bcornett and LC, I think?

bcornett was in the lead when I got here.

Golden wrote:I'm completely willing to help flip this lynch to JJJ. I don't trust him in the least. Anyone else on board?

Why?

I don't think you answered my other question?

motel room wrote:
JaggedJimmyJay wrote:Brief appearance. Ask me things.
what do you think of Choutas?

Random page number 1. Saw this post. How is this name pronounced? This may be giggle in ways that are inappropriate .

On a much more serious note. I just found out I did indeed replace in about an hour ago so I am going to refrain from voting this lynch.

JaggedJimmyJay wrote:
MacDougall wrote:Excuse me JaggedJimmyJay but why are you playing like a car accident victim with brain damage when I know that you're actually awesome at this, the game of forums mafia?
That's a good question, you should think on it for a couple minutes and tell me what you think I might be doing.

Cocaine?

JaggedJimmyJay wrote:
Golden wrote:linki @ BR - tell me about it. I didn't sub in, but I'm currently around 19 pages behind. Admittedly I've probably read some decent chunks of that, but not in order. It's intense. On the bright side, there are LOTS of us struggling to keep up, so you are not alone.
Werd. I have a crapload of posts and I'm not even caught up. That's only going to get worse for me though.

You guys scare me.

I guess the vote is upcoming, I looked at the poll.

Golden can you tell me about bcornett? JJJ, why did you move your vote?

Linki JJJ: what?

Wow guys, I thought replacing in on day 2 wouldn't hurt so much. I obviously have not been a part of this game and have no idea what is going on. I am probably not going to read every post. I will read the past few pages. Maybe start at where I was announced. If anyone feels kind and friendly and wants to clue me into anything important I should know I would very much appreciate it.

Search found 48 matches