The Syndicate

S~V~S wrote:

Metalmarsh89 wrote:

juliets wrote:Unfurl, in my opinion you are right, meta is not a word we ever used at LP,the piano, or rev mafia. It wasn't used at TS at the beginning either. I can't put a date on it but you have been playing longer than I have and I consider it a relatively new word that describes a concept that we always used - we just called it something different.

The first use of the word on this site goes to SVS (under a sock name) in Grimm's Fairy Tale Mafia.

I first heard it from Comfortably Numb who played with us for a while at all three sites Iirc he was a Dutch man maybe in his 40s. You must recall Comfy?

Yes, I remember Comfy, more from a game I hosted with LT at RM, I dont think I played much with him

---

I just looked over at RM and the word did not come up, in the search, so this is the first place where I first saw it
my curiosity is been satisfied

Metalmarsh89 wrote:

juliets wrote:Unfurl, in my opinion you are right, meta is not a word we ever used at LP,the piano, or rev mafia. It wasn't used at TS at the beginning either. I can't put a date on it but you have been playing longer than I have and I consider it a relatively new word that describes a concept that we always used - we just called it something different.

The first use of the word on this site goes to SVS (under a sock name) in Grimm's Fairy Tale Mafia.

So funny cause I also search the post here, and the user name came as Ricochet 2, (but I missed reading the 2)
so I thought it was from Ricochet, with who I think this was the first time we played together, so I thought well the origin is probably from another site then
but now is more of a mistery then, but Im too lazy to go to RM to see if it was used there also

JC!
Good to know, that I have not lose all my memories marbles yet cause I just started to notice it recently
One of those weird things that makes me curious to where it comes from

Thanks MM
Im probably the one that never noticed it before in other sites most likely

I have a question- curious about something

Where does the term "Meta" comes from?

like back in the days from RM, I dont recall peole using it, but now people refer a lot do it
If im correct is like someone style? but is the term sort of new? or am I have been to sidetracked that I never noticed it before :P

MovingPictures07 wrote:unfurl, yeah, that's true, I was disappointed when I saw your flip to say the least. :P

It was very exhausting for me, defending myself every day I was alive, and knowing I was neutral, I even reached to the the mod on duty cause it was so fustrating at some moments, I guess my days of playing are almost over, not that I ever been a hard core player anyway

Black Rock wrote:thellama73 has been eaten by a dragon. Bullzeye has been lynched he was Lord of Thunder and on Team Azura.

The game has ended, Team Ubzargan has won, congratulations to S~V~S, Metalmarsh89, Tranq, Devin the Omniscient... and aapje. Also reywaS has won as the Rogue Mercenary.

Special congratulations to Team Ahriman for being survivors in this bloody battle. Spacedaisy, Bea, and Sorsha you fought a uphill battle and survived. Sorsha was the best damn dragon a host could ever achieve.

I skipped this post, I correct myself llama was not lynched, he was eaten by a dragon
so only nutella and bullz were the only baddies lynched

Turnip Head wrote:

unfurl wrote:only nutella dn llama were the only baddies lynched

Llama will be the first to tell you that he was never successfully lynched

Most likely, but he was an outed baddie, so it makes more sense he was lynched at the end of the tally

only nutella dn llama were the only baddies lynched

So most baddies were not really lynched? just neutrals and civvies :o

MovingPictures07 wrote:Thanks for the game while I was in it, BR and LC!!

Ricochet wrote: Highborn Assassin - MP
-- What was your epic challenge?
-- Who did you silence on N2?
-- Did you parasite anyone on N4 before dying?

-- Epic Challenge: Become Clan leader and you will get automatic NK survival and position 4 will become a lynch stop.
-- Silenced Metalmarsh. Thought it'd be funny. :P
-- I parasited unfurl. I realized it was a baddie-friendly ability but I tried to use it to take out a major suspect if I just so happened to die. Sorry unfurl. :P

At least by me dying, I proven you and other how wrong you were at reading me being bad

Tranq wrote:

Ricochet wrote:War Monger - Tranq

Position 1: Chooses two people who have to make a case and vote for each other. If they don’t complete the case they both gain three votes and are role blocked the following night.
Mind control on BWT and unfurl. -> both complete the challenge but don't get each other lynched

oh you were the one that forced me to vote for BWT, :P I never thought he was also forced to vote for me and I got on a rolled and kept suspecting him

Ricochet wrote:
Technohacker - unfurl
-- What was your epic challenge?

Epic Challenge: Cause the Epic Challenge of a teammate to be achieved with the help of your abilities, and you will know the Epic Challenge of all roles.

Never got close to do it and actually I did not understand it what I was supossed to do

Ricochet wrote:
Technohacker - unfurl
-- Who did you send a coded message to and what was the message, D/N2?

I send it to JaggedJimmyJay, but he never mentioned anything about appje, so I dont know if he received it or he just did not care to mention it

Originally it was this image below

Mostly It was for the lol, but I did thought aapje had a powerfull role, and I was rigth at the end

After LC and BR coded, and it looked like this http://www.jigsawplanet.com/?rc=play&pid=038a47a19862
I thought it was very creative of them, if I had lived longer I would had kept sending memes pictures with references to playes

S~V~S wrote:I got switched Unfurl. I tried to switch it to MP.

ok then , I did really believe you, while I was dead,reading something along the line that you would had not switched it to me
and when DH whas saying you were the switcher, I got curious, and thought well she sounded very honest

Congratulations to the winners!

Did someone got my message-meme about appje, I send it to JJJ, but he never mentioned appje, it was for the lol, but it was true at the end

So who switched thy lynch on me and why?

Thats all I wanted to find out

so was it uz - SVS?if he wha her,

Roxy wrote:

omg this pinguin is so cute

Roxy wrote:For unfurl bc I <3 her

Thanks Roxy, Im listening now

RIP me

Golden wrote:I am still dead.

MovingPictures07 wrote:Hey Rox, I have a few more questions for you, whenever you get a chance.

1) You seemed intent to really baddie hunt going into this phase and I feel like you've been one of the players delivering on this promise, but I'm curious to know even more about what you're thinking. Who are your top 5 (or a similar number, if that's inconvenient) suspects for mafia recruiters/recruitees at this time and why?
2) What are your current thoughts on BWT? How heavily or slightly do you suspect him at this time and why?
3) What are your current thoughts on Boomslang? Have you stated any? If so, I apologize, but I cannot recall yours off hand.
I'd like to ask unfurl the same first three questions.

1)I dont think Im so hard in the baddie hunting, Im trying to figure out who is bad, but the word hard is a stretch
I already mentioned you MP and BWT in the list that I dont trust, aapje is somewhere as he said he does not like low posters but he has promised to start hunting baddies, so Im curious about him, i said i want to hear from reywas I said that already, not ready to make a judgement, and Sorsha, I explained below more about it, she does not seem to concern about getting votes too, dont know if it is because she is not around? or what?

2)hard to put a number, but see above I dont trust him, i suspected him because he was very quick to join you in the lets go after the low posters

3) boomslang, Im not familiar with him, I said it before was someone trying to save him by votting Golden? Im leaning he was more a scapegoat
(haha spacegoat , old times name, some may remember it!)

---

DrWilgy wrote:

unfurl wrote:I think good points about Sorsha has been brought up, I think Sorsha may know who killed Epig, and she did knew it was not Golden, I think that could had been slip up with the framed part
As a matter of fact Im votting for Sorsha

Wilgy's eyes widen with horror. His heart begins to ache and his chest tightens. He finds it hard to say, but can finally let out a soft voice as he turns to face everyone.
Unfurl... How did you come to the conclusion... That Sorsha "did knew" that Golden didn't kill Epi? Sorsha even said she wasn't confident in Golden...

Sorsha was very intersting in the whole who frame Golden and wanted to hear who set him up, from others, not from her mouth
like she ask the questions but does not give her opinion, so maybe wanting to see who will jump on that first
Is a theory, not a conclusion

Sorsha wrote:I see that golden is heading out and might not be back much but I have a question or two. Anyone else can weigh in on the answer as well. I have been away from mafia for a while and don't know/can't remember all the player dynamics.

First of all I'm of the mind that golden is not on the team that killed epi night one. I know golden still claims responsibility like that team is going to do his bidding for him but I'd think their motive was more to frame him. Anyone in particular come to mind as one who would do that?

My thoughts on the matter is whoever is really hounding golden in the thread did it. But is it a silly question to ask who would set golden up?

MovingPictures07 wrote:Roxy and unfurl, I think much of the reason we're consistently having different opinions is largely in part due to approaching the game with very different mindsets, so I'll keep that in mind going forward, and try not to judge either of you too harshly merely for disagreeing.

fair enough

Dom wrote:

unfurl wrote:

MovingPictures07 wrote: Rico, I agree that sideline Azura + voting others to vote for Golden are compatible. Which players come to mind with "wanting him gone from a distance" and playing on the sidelines? For me, I'd say unfurl, TinyBubbles, and aapje.

What do all of you players think?

Seriously MP,wow,
Golden was among the players, that was ok with how Im playing, he did thought I was just being me
why on earth I would want him gone? ask yourself that
you are clearly think Im some mastefull evil mind, or you want others to think that

Why is Golden's opinion infallible? He was not a civilian. He was neutral. While, I am not happy with the result of his lynch-- his word on you doesn't necessarily point to you being civilian. This doesn't make a lick of sense.
Who are you looking at, unfurl? I'm interested.

MP was sort of saying that I wanted Golden dead from the distance, and I didnt, that was my point
I adressed Roxy before that MP and BWT are among people I dont trust, but Im not going to be tunnel vision in that part
I would like to hear more from reywas, as to why he changed his vote from himself to golden? what made him make that move, he never explained it?
I also what to see aapje getting more involve as he promised to do so

I think good points about Sorsha has been brought up, I think Sorsha may know who killed Epig, and she did knew it was not Golden, I think that could had been slip up with the framed part
As a matter of fact Im votting for Sorsha

Spacedaisy wrote:Unfurl, while I wouldn't go so far as to say I trust you, I don't feel as strongly about you, based primarily on the fact people who have played more with you than I have are dismissing my suspicions. But frankly the biggest concern to me is that your attitude in this game seems so vastly different to me than I recall from the few games I have played with you before. I would never have characterized you as snarky or dismissive that I can recall before this. You have always eked very nice. I understand language barrier at times and so forth, but I have just felt like you had a different attitude this game.it is the big thing keeping you on my list right now. But you are not in danger of getting a vote for me immediately, I want to try to keep my mind open.

Like I said befofe it you thought I was snarky, that was not my intention, sometimes I have a dark sense of humour and sometimes it comes the wrong way

Roxy wrote:

Roxy wrote:

unfurl wrote:Bye Golden, I hope you get you wish to comeback to the game

Roxy wrote:I hope people today will act more reasonable. For me yesterdays lynch was rather disturbing and I do not understand some of the way over the top antics that are being employed during this game. It is distracting and for me very unhelpful.

I want to hunt baddies - there have been recruits and there are recruiters. I am done hearing about how Neutrals can be bad. I am sorry but Neutrals are Neutrals. How can you be a bad Neutral? Makes no sense.

If you would like to discuss possible recruiters/recruitees then quote this and list your top two suspects that you feel fit the bill.

I dont trust MP or bwt, I think you know that
I think aapje has dissapear from the map, so I think thats weird, even if he was not trying to hunt baddies he was participating with questions

I dont know if the Golden vs Boomsland, can give us some clues, like where people trying to save Boomslang by votting Golden, or is Boomslang a neutral and he just happend for people to place votes too?

Also rey voted for himself, but before the thread was lock, he changed his vote to Golden making it a tie, something to consider

Good stuff unfurl!
I personally feel boomslang is yet a Neutral. I think JJJ made his points - sure - but imo he is just going for another easy lynch. I also felt JJJ and MP's back and forth when MP stated he was trying to prove a point by acting insane and providing cover for others to follow his vote. And then later say - yeah I didn't mean it - it was me proving my point.

Your point on rey is noted and I will put him on my to read list.

What do you think of JJJ and Nutella?

I meant to add that JJJ and MP's convo felt fake.

I dont know JJJ, but he seems to be a talkative player, like he tends to comment about every little single thing is been said, i dont know if thats usual for him, but for example I do have in my mind he was quick to said few things about me early on and later on too, but he never went so far as to vote for me

Nutella, I have on mind, she did said early on that she thought I was being normal, like I think a baddie will probably be quiet and be more like who care let them put suspicious on her as long is not on them

linki llama, we will never get along

MovingPictures07 wrote:

unfurl wrote:

MovingPictures07 wrote:

Spoiler: show

unfurl wrote:Bye Golden, I hope you get you wish to comeback to the game

Roxy wrote:I hope people today will act more reasonable. For me yesterdays lynch was rather disturbing and I do not understand some of the way over the top antics that are being employed during this game. It is distracting and for me very unhelpful.

I want to hunt baddies - there have been recruits and there are recruiters. I am done hearing about how Neutrals can be bad. I am sorry but Neutrals are Neutrals. How can you be a bad Neutral? Makes no sense.

If you would like to discuss possible recruiters/recruitees then quote this and list your top two suspects that you feel fit the bill.

I dont trust MP or bwt, I think you know that
I think aapje has dissapear from the map, so I think thats weird, even if he was not trying to hunt baddies he was participating with questions

I dont know if the Golden vs Boomsland, can give us some clues, like where people trying to save Boomslang by votting Golden, or is Boomslang a neutral and he just happend for people to place votes too?

Also rey voted for himself, but before the thread was lock, he changed his vote to Golden making it a tie, something to consider

unfurl, why don't you trust me? I remember your D1 vote for me, but if I recall correctly, you've hardly mentioned me again until now.

Re: the bolded/underlined, so... does this mean you suspect rey for that or what? You just say it's something to consider. So what do you think of it?

I said I was gonna keep open mind about you, but it does not mean I trust you, Gaining my trust is something someone ever harldy able to do
Maybe is just a clash of style, but I think you are a very agrresive player and you like to corner people so at the end they end up looking suspicios and then if they turn out they were neutral, you can wash the blood of your hand, hey they were acting certain way, is not your fault, example bass lynch, and if you are able to lynch me then I will another players that you will go, hey she was acting weird is her fault

I do want to hear what rey has to said first, why he changed his vote toward golden right before the thread was lock?

Thanks for the response

I'm on phone while waiting to get my Texas vehicle tags and such

Where did you get that impression about me that I skirt responsibility for my vote and blame the victim? I always am forthright in taking responsibility for my votes, so I find your accusation to be strange. If you're referring to Bass, I was obviously wrong about him being mafia, and have never claimed it was his fault that I voted for him. I did explain my suspicion clearly and why he received my vote and why I wasn't particularly heartbroken over his death, but I never once claimed to shirk responsibility for my vote.

This sounds like you are explaining thats the way he was playing, so to me is like washing the blood, cause you had your reasons

MovingPictures07 wrote:I'm not saying RIP to Bass, and, at the expense of making enemies further, I'll echo nutella's thoughts a bit and say that I'm not that sad about Bass's death either. It would have been ideal to nab a mafia-aligned recruiter or recruited, naturally, but an unrecruited Bass is still at least a somewhat favorable result. That said, I'll dearly miss him on a personal level, as always.

MovingPictures07 wrote:
I'm not alleging that I can read into Bass's brain and see what he was thinking as he played the game, so I really don't know if he was playing a bad or chaos-aligned game. That was the impression I received from his behavior, and the fact that he really didn't seem to care who received attention as long as it wasn't him.

---

MovingPictures07 wrote:

unfurl wrote:

MovingPictures07 wrote: Rico, I agree that sideline Azura + voting others to vote for Golden are compatible. Which players come to mind with "wanting him gone from a distance" and playing on the sidelines? For me, I'd say unfurl, TinyBubbles, and aapje.

What do all of you players think?

Seriously MP,wow,
Golden was among the players, that was ok with how Im playing, he did thought I was just being me
why on earth I would want him gone? ask yourself that
you are clearly think Im some mastefull evil mind, or you want others to think that

Unfurl you keep espousing content as if I shouldn't be questioning anything you do and that I should just trust that you have sincere motives, sorry but that's not mafia so I think if you were civ or neutral you would understand why I'm questioning you.

From what I recall you barely committed to the Golden debacle so that's why I named you off the top of my head. I can ISO you later to confirm if you want.

Why on earth would you want golden gone? That's a ridiculous question since you could ask that of anyone. His interests might not have aligned with yours perhaps?

You can question me, when did I said people should trust me and dont ask me anything?
Im gonna keep defending myself, but you think everyone should behave certain way, like you have a book that tells you how people should play mafia
and if they dont acordanly then they are bad?

MovingPictures07 wrote: Rico, I agree that sideline Azura + voting others to vote for Golden are compatible. Which players come to mind with "wanting him gone from a distance" and playing on the sidelines? For me, I'd say unfurl, TinyBubbles, and aapje.

What do all of you players think?

Seriously MP,wow,
Golden was among the players, that was ok with how Im playing, he did thought I was just being me
why on earth I would want him gone? ask yourself that
you are clearly think Im some mastefull evil mind, or you want others to think that

MovingPictures07 wrote:

Spoiler: show

unfurl wrote:Bye Golden, I hope you get you wish to comeback to the game

Roxy wrote:I hope people today will act more reasonable. For me yesterdays lynch was rather disturbing and I do not understand some of the way over the top antics that are being employed during this game. It is distracting and for me very unhelpful.

I want to hunt baddies - there have been recruits and there are recruiters. I am done hearing about how Neutrals can be bad. I am sorry but Neutrals are Neutrals. How can you be a bad Neutral? Makes no sense.

If you would like to discuss possible recruiters/recruitees then quote this and list your top two suspects that you feel fit the bill.

I dont trust MP or bwt, I think you know that
I think aapje has dissapear from the map, so I think thats weird, even if he was not trying to hunt baddies he was participating with questions

I dont know if the Golden vs Boomsland, can give us some clues, like where people trying to save Boomslang by votting Golden, or is Boomslang a neutral and he just happend for people to place votes too?

Also rey voted for himself, but before the thread was lock, he changed his vote to Golden making it a tie, something to consider

unfurl, why don't you trust me? I remember your D1 vote for me, but if I recall correctly, you've hardly mentioned me again until now.

Re: the bolded/underlined, so... does this mean you suspect rey for that or what? You just say it's something to consider. So what do you think of it?

I said I was gonna keep open mind about you, but it does not mean I trust you, Gaining my trust is something someone ever harldy able to do
Maybe is just a clash of style, but I think you are a very agrresive player and you like to corner people so at the end they end up looking suspicios and then if they turn out they were neutral, you can wash the blood of your hand, hey they were acting certain way, is not your fault, example bass lynch, and if you are able to lynch me then I will another players that you will go, hey she was acting weird is her fault

I do want to hear what rey has to said first, why he changed his vote toward golden right before the thread was lock?

DrWilgy wrote:MM and Unfurl. I miss you. Help me out and vot Sorsha

Why are you looking at Sorsha?

Bye Golden, I hope you get you wish to comeback to the game

Roxy wrote:I hope people today will act more reasonable. For me yesterdays lynch was rather disturbing and I do not understand some of the way over the top antics that are being employed during this game. It is distracting and for me very unhelpful.

I want to hunt baddies - there have been recruits and there are recruiters. I am done hearing about how Neutrals can be bad. I am sorry but Neutrals are Neutrals. How can you be a bad Neutral? Makes no sense.

If you would like to discuss possible recruiters/recruitees then quote this and list your top two suspects that you feel fit the bill.

I dont trust MP or bwt, I think you know that
I think aapje has dissapear from the map, so I think thats weird, even if he was not trying to hunt baddies he was participating with questions

I dont know if the Golden vs Boomsland, can give us some clues, like where people trying to save Boomslang by votting Golden, or is Boomslang a neutral and he just happend for people to place votes too?

Also rey voted for himself, but before the thread was lock, he changed his vote to Golden making it a tie, something to consider

What is the code for that smile that back slowly away from the room? haha is Uhh

birdwithteeth11 wrote:

unfurl wrote:

S~V~S wrote:
Linki, the poll can't be edited once people vote, the votes will be lost. So the hosts will have to decide if they want thread voting or to ask people who already voted to revote.

well this change things
I do not like missing votes, unless is an emergency that prevents me from do it
so I will place my vote in birdwithteeth11, this back in forth bewteen me and him has not changed my mind to not vote for him so far
if I changed my mind tomorrow, and the host let vote in the thread, then I guess that option may still be open

Yes, we've had a lot of back-and-forth. But my vote was merely a placeholder in case the thread got locked (before I realized the thread can only be locked for a certain period of time, and not an entire day period).

What is it that I've said that made you not change your mind on me? Or was it more based off the fact that I voted for you again?

It was more it the fact that you voted for me again, and the reasons behind it. that you keep saying things I did not say, I dont understand that even if you are neutral, why you would try to make it like I said other things, like I felt you are trying to twist things too

Roxy wrote: unfurl - I am not seeing what others are. I do feel like you have been trying to get into the game but I think the set up leaves you at a loss because of your usual play style isn't really applicable in this type of game. You are right to say to llama that your game is usually full of contradictions. It is just your style especially in the early stages of a game.
One thing that does seem to be missing is your paranoic attitude and the questions that usually come about when you are in that "zone". I agree about Teeth but apparently Imma have to get out of lazy mode and pull quotes to get others to see what I saw. I really feel like you are Neutral atm.

Roxy
I have not reached the paranoic state yet, and I have not hit the zone, cause is just really hard to keep up with everything
I do feel there are lot back in forth, and I do think with lynches result will help down the road to narrow things
I also think there are so many roles and variables that can switch and manipulate things, that I feel lost
According to how much I make it further, then I think I will find a little bit of light in the road

birdwithteeth11 wrote:

unfurl wrote: @ Spacedaisy
Im usually full of contradicitions , it does mean nothing to my alliance ever, Im weird person that is true, still it means nothing wheter Im good/bad/Neutral
Is very easy for people to think of me as bad, I dont express myself good enough for most people taste

I was fine with a lot of your response to Daisy except for this. So we shouldn't judge anyone based on what they say???

Let me see if I can be clearer
of course in a game people are judge based in what they said and their actions
Im still trying to get the hang ouf ot it, and she was saying that I was saying weird things, fyi, I always say weird things, or at least there is usually someone unfamiliar with me that vote for me, for me saying weird things, I blame my weird sense of humour, to me it sounded more like she suspected me because she thought I was being snarky and that was not my intention, so my response is dont judge me just based in the weird things (which is relative to each player to)

Im going to revote again in the poll for bwt
Im gonna do my best to read, but FYI Im nof feeling very well, I think Im getting the flu I got when from the rain and now I have sort throat and my bones hurt but I can at least be around a little bit to catch up

S~V~S wrote:
Linki, the poll can't be edited once people vote, the votes will be lost. So the hosts will have to decide if they want thread voting or to ask people who already voted to revote.

well this change things
I do not like missing votes, unless is an emergency that prevents me from do it
so I will place my vote in birdwithteeth11, this back in forth bewteen me and him has not changed my mind to not vote for him so far
if I changed my mind tomorrow, and the host let vote in the thread, then I guess that option may still be open

thanks scotty
I did not see those post then Im in not rush of votting, I will tomorrow

oh wait the poll ends today, I just saw it says wednsday
I thought it ended tomorrow?

Golden wrote:

unfurl wrote:

Golden wrote:Registering a vote for golden

Because I just can't be bothered any more.

Golden, I get the fustration, hey I feel fustrated at some point in every game I have played, and fustration is relative to each player
but I can never understand what drives someone to vote for themself out of it
I prefer to be modkilled if Im not having fun, but votting for myself I dont recall ever done it

There are lots of things in play. If by the time I am heading off to get on a plane, and for whatever reason people have decided not to lynch me, I will switch my vote to someone I legitimately suspect. I made that vote so that people know I'm relaxed, but also because I cannot really fight back today anyway, so I could see myself going down and not being able to do anything about it.

Right now, I feel as though being lynched will take the monkey off my back. I want to be clear though, I'm still playing the game hard. If I get lynched, I will fight for a rez. I want in on this game. I just want to get all the current suspicion out of the way so that if I was to achieve a rezz, people would know when I came back that I wasn't bad.

People are beginning to see some of the suspicion on me for what it is - like llama realising how ludicrous DH's apparent scaredness is etc, which is good. My death would also aid people in taking a good hard look at those who have pushed my lynch so hard and examining whether their motivations are true.

You tend to dizzy me out, for how much you talk, and I think you know me enough, that I dont say it in a meaner way
I tend to have more of a crazy theory about you, if you are still alive in a game, and is higher from day 5, and no ones has try to nk you and you have not been lynched, then you probably bad you tend to be more slick as abaddie imho, and you are able to lead lynches in baddies if you are good, thats ort of my parameter when it comes down to you, but it this set up, dont know how is gonna go, need to think about it probably

aapje wrote:

unfurl wrote:aapje,
besides from low posters
hypoteticall case, you join the good side will you look for baddies? or still playing more like a neutral?

Like I said, I will likely start hunting some baddies after the weekend, or maybe on Friday if I have time then, the reason being I will probably not have the time tomorrow or during the weekend. If I were a civvie I wouldn't be hunting baddies at this point. At least not publicly. I'd rather not have a massive target on my back.

Thanks for you answers aapje

thellama73 wrote:

unfurl wrote: @ Spacedaisy
Im usually full of contradicitions , it does mean nothing to my alliance ever, Im weird person that is true, still it means nothing wheter Im good/bad/Neutral
Is very easy for people to think of me as bad, I dont express myself good enough for most people taste

Yeah, nothing I ever do indicates whether I'm good or bad either. Don't analyze anything I say, because you will find nothing and it's all meaningless.

Come on, unfurl, do you really expect us to believe that?

I say a lot things and people take it the wrong way, there are been 3 days, with me getting votes, and so far, 2 of those days were thrown early on
and I know where I belong, so

aapje,
besides from low posters
hypoteticall case, you join the good side will you look for baddies? or still playing more like a neutral?

---

TinyBubbles
you said

i know my own arguments are flipping back and forth but thats what happens when you get emotionally invested in a game like this

how is that you are emotionally invested? can you point to where you felt that way?

---

@ linki Scotty
perhaps you could be right, I recall timmer also did it, and I seen in other games too where people to it, but I still dont understand it
So if I ever vote for myself, people should take note, I was force to do it I hope this does not give idea to people with vote manipulations powers

Golden wrote:Registering a vote for golden

Because I just can't be bothered any more.

Golden, I get the fustration, hey I feel fustrated at some point in every game I have played, and fustration is relative to each player
but I can never understand what drives someone to vote for themself out of it
I prefer to be modkilled if Im not having fun, but votting for myself I dont recall ever done it

Spacedaisy wrote:Two things unfurl.

1. I will keep this in mind about you regarding contradictions. I have limited knowledge of your game play,we've only played a handful of games together I believe. I will freely admit to not feeling like I read you well for this reason.

2. You keep going on about how you are just you, it's how you play but then you turn around with snarky jokes about other people's suspicions. Well, I play the way I play. Making fun of the fact I find contradictions suspect doesn't make me feel good about you. In fact it grates me really wrong and kind of pisses me off. Make fun all you want, most people do find them suspicious.

I'm leaving my vote where it is for now, but I'm open to hearing input from people who have played more with unfurl than I have. I would prefer to get a baddie than a neutral personally. They aren't bad lynches but they aren't good ones either.

1. ok fair enough

2. I did not think I was being snarky, maybe we have different sense of humour, if people think I was snarky then sorry, that was not my intention, cause in previous games before a lot people think Im bad cause Im too nice, so I guess is relative to what people consider snarky

Several people already gave their 2 cents on how they feel about me, since day1, I dont know if you did not noticed it, or you want more from them, I guess thats up those players to speak up

birdwithteeth11 wrote:

unfurl wrote:birdwithteeth11
http://www.mafiathesyndicate.com/viewto ... 73#p170173
read my post, I did not say RIP I said Bye, good thing you said you read my posts, makes point you did not
Too bad you dont think I have contributed much to the game, thats your opinion, great way to encourage players to keep playing in this site!!!
I was not around when you finally answered your questions to me
Perhaps my reasons for votting for you were not the strongest or the clearest but that was it at the moment, maybe I need to learn to make better cases
can someone teach me?

I know you said bye, not RIP. Where did you think I thought you said that? I thought I read through your posts fairly well.

How am I trying to discourage you from playing here? I just happen to think you've said a lot without saying much that adds to the content so far. It seems to me like you're taking my comments way too personally. It's a game, ya'll.

I went ahead and voted for you because I couldn't wait any longer for you to give your response. Otherwise you might have convinced me to look elsewhere. But you didn't and so it is what it is now.

Also, your comment about how the most engaging people are the only ones who are going to get lynched and/or killed? Are you trying to be intentionally divisive?

seriously you said says rip etc.... you said I said it, I dont even know why it was important for you to mention it, but still proves that you dont even know what you wrote
look at the link

bwt said:

Says RIP to Epig and Typh. Otherwise, looks to me like she says she takes awhile to get going in most games, and feels overwhelmed with all the reading/posts involved.

also I did not meant hard core players are going to be lynched, Im saying low poster will be lynched because the feel around is, they are not contributed so lets lynch them, but the same time a double standart of look at me Im contributed so much to the game, that the best plan is to go after low poster

I dont know if at this poing is an english issue, that people dont understand what Im saying tbqh
Fustrating

---

@ Spacedaisy
Im usually full of contradicitions , it does mean nothing to my alliance ever, Im weird person that is true, still it means nothing wheter Im good/bad/Neutral
Is very easy for people to think of me as bad, I dont express myself good enough for most people taste

---

Maybe people think is an excuse when I say I dont have a lot time to be reading to every single word, Im a slow reader and Im skimming a lot of the wall of text, maybe I should had not signep to the game, that will had been the wises idea when I know my schedule is not so free, so my fault for wanting to play

---

Golden, I do mentioned it previously, a little bit, but if you want to hear more about what I think about you let me know ok

---

As for my vote today, maybe I will joing the club and vote for a low poster, oh wait Im contradicting myself again

I see my name in the poll, with two votes, well I need to read several pages, but I also needs to work, so I will try to catch up as the day goes on

Also Bye Bass
I think this is become an elitist game tbqh, where the people who arenot hard core player will going to be lynched, my prediction, less see in an a fortune teller

First, I think you people have too much free time to be posting a lot :P I really have no idea how you guys can talk so much, so Im just skimmed around cause today I have lesser time to be reading

---

birdwithteeth11
http://www.mafiathesyndicate.com/viewto ... 73#p170173
read my post, I did not say RIP I said Bye, good thing you said you read my posts, makes point you did not
Too bad you dont think I have contributed much to the game, thats your opinion, great way to encourage players to keep playing in this site!!!
I was not around when you finally answered your questions to me
Perhaps my reasons for votting for you were not the strongest or the clearest but that was it at the moment, maybe I need to learn to make better cases
can someone teach me?

---

Votting for choice 2 again

unfurl wrote:

unfurl wrote:

birdwithteeth11 wrote:Alright. I'm all caught up now, but I'm way too tired to really post coherent thoughts. Thankfully I only work a half-day tomorrow, so I will have plenty of time in the afternoon to be around then. The best I can do for tonight is to just keep up with the thread.

So what are you thoughts for this lynch? you voted for a low poster day 1, Dfaraday, which also brings the question? are you still looking at him? is not like he has changed anything?
What do you think of the people that voted for you? do you think they still looking at you?

For now Im placing my vote on birdwithteeth11 I gonna try to pop up later to see if his afternoon promised is fullfilled

Im gonna keep an open mind about MP, but Im also not joining The save MP party by votting Bass, Im actually intersting to see if any more guesses will be joining eitheir one

birdwithteeth11 wrote: - Unfurl, why did you throw a vote on me out of curiosity? Was it because I hadn't come back to post yet or were there other reasons? Do tell. And on that note, what else have you actually contributed to this game since receiving MP's vote on Day 1? Because I feel like you've still said a lot without saying a lot.

Aparently you have missed a lot of my previous questions
I wanted to get answers/reactions from you, to decide if to change my vote from you, instead you asking me why I voted for you and go, and are using the same words MP said about be Day 1
and now you are saying the underline part which was what MP was saying, and actually you never said that about me during day 1
aparently you are a copy cat of MP cause day 1 you also agreed with him about votting for a low poster
my vote is staying in you, cause you are quick to agree about low posters but you are pretty much just copying MP

unfurl wrote:

birdwithteeth11 wrote:Alright. I'm all caught up now, but I'm way too tired to really post coherent thoughts. Thankfully I only work a half-day tomorrow, so I will have plenty of time in the afternoon to be around then. The best I can do for tonight is to just keep up with the thread.

So what are you thoughts for this lynch? you voted for a low poster day 1, Dfaraday, which also brings the question? are you still looking at him? is not like he has changed anything?
What do you think of the people that voted for you? do you think they still looking at you?

For now Im placing my vote on birdwithteeth11 I gonna try to pop up later to see if his afternoon promised is fullfilled

Im gonna keep an open mind about MP, but Im also not joining The save MP party by votting Bass, Im actually intersting to see if any more guesses will be joining eitheir one

@ aapje
Bass_the_Clever is Roxy´s son

About the messages posted from The Speaker of Serenity and the Keeper of Ravens
The issue that I see with roles that can post messages on the thread, is that we dont know the identity or the intentions behind it?
From probabilities is more likely early on that player is civvie-neutral, but later on it can become an old fashion witchunt
It can become very handy to help to figure out things if they are receiving extra-knowledge but also good to keep an open mind