The Syndicate

what the fuuuck noooo

that was a quick turn around. i have less time, hold your horses i'll be back. this isn't the first time you've seen a civvie swoop in with a late vote.

o shit guys im sorry i almost didnt make it

i really think epig is good and this guys on the low end of the rainbow so

Scotty

Matt are you in a team with Boomslang again?

Boomslang wrote:
Epignosis wrote:I only recommend a Simon lynch at this point if you all interpret his "I think so" to mean "I don't remember who is on my team."

For my part, I'm going to start sniffing elsewhere. Someone tried to kill two of us and only nabbed one. I recommend we look at that beautiful Day 0 poll again.
What exactly do you hope to gain from the Day 0 poll? I doubt anyone listed his or her favorite Pikmin as the one he or she actually was. Which, now that I think about it, would suggest neither you nor Luffy were Rock Pikmin, and thus slightly more likely to be bosses because we're pretty sure a Rock was targeted last night.

Epi how do you feel about not talking to me? :/

Could it be that when Simon said "I think so" he meant "I think he's a civilian as well"? I think it's just too big of a stretch especially when sig turned out civ.

Metalmarsh89 wrote:First zebra, now sig who dies twice in a 15 minute span.

What?

RIP sig.

Spacedaisy wrote:
Enrique wrote:
Spacedaisy wrote:I voted Simon, let's see how this shakes out, shall we? Tied it up for sig and Simon.
Why?
Because I think Epi is civ who truly believes his son is bad. And I think there is some merit to his reasoning. And I also have mild suspicion of sig, so either way I think we might learn something.

So do I, but why would you tie it up?

I don't like this.

Spacedaisy wrote:I voted Simon, let's see how this shakes out, shall we? Tied it up for sig and Simon.

Why?

I'm never giving an opinion on DrWilgy again after Tree Mafia. He could be the goodest goodie or the baddiest baddie and I wouldn't know. K4J is probably good but I felt his vote for me came too easily.

If today's lynch is between Epignosis, Simon, and sig... I'm voting sig. I couldn't see Epignosis being bad in this game (like FZ mentioned, throwing his kid under the bus??? harsh), and I really don't think Simon's posts meant anything serious. The whole "I was trying to dog my own grave!" argument doesn't really... hold up at all. I'm worried people are voting for Simon before him.

Glorfindel, I'm saying there aren't 6mafia and each of the zebra voters had their own reason (except maybe Typhoony, I wouldn't mind a closer look at him when he comes back).

i wasnt taunting her jeez

Glorfindel wrote:I'd played but half a game with Zebs and even I could see she wasn't Mafia. I wonder what that says about anyone else that had played with her more extensively and had a different opinion

Five of us voted for Zeeb, six including Epig. It wouldn't be Mafia if people didn't get things wrong.

kneel4justice wrote:
Enrique wrote:Zebra, you have 15 minutes to not die. Unless by some miracle you knew the votes were skewed in your favor.
What is the point of this post? It sounds threatening/taunting.

The baddies have poll manipulating powers. I got confused by Zebra switching her vote for me when it could've saved her.

Gotta admit I had a tiny heart attack when I realized the deadline had passed, opened this thread, and saw you vote for me. I'm so over that shit. *shakes fist at Tree Mafia*

ugh rip zebra. I'm used to agreeing with you a lot, but this time I think you got it all wrong. I'm sorry.

Actually, scratch that. There's only one baddie with a +0 vote today, the others need some shit activated to get their pluses.

Zebra, you have 15 minutes to not die. Unless by some miracle you knew the votes were skewed in your favor.

a2thezebra wrote:
Enrique wrote:
a2thezebra wrote:Too easy. That's what I said too but I'm bad for it.
No. You said they were bad. You said they were bad but you refused to vote for them. Don't act like you're agreeing with him.
I said they are bad (meaning both sig and Simon), and I also said that sig is not bad based on my theory that he is being framed. He's voting for me, so I'm obviously not acting like I'm in agreement with him.

a2thezebra wrote:
Dragon D. Luffy wrote:Sorry I can't agree with that. If you have confirmed mafia, you kill them first. Not only you spare a potential civ that would be lynched otherwise, but you remove one or more abilities from the mafia. Plus the information obtained is much more valuable.

At least Epi seems to be wanting for someone else to vote for them so he can make it a lynch, so that's sort of justifiable? But you being so sure of it but wanting to shoot in the dark doesn't make sense.
We will have to agree to disagree about the first part. All of it.

As for the second part, that is just nonsense. How is Epi even sort of justifiable by putting the responsibility of the lynch on everyone else (because as he pointed out himself to criticize town, there is not a single vote for either sig or Simon) when he himself won't own up to that same responsibility? What exempts him? The fact that there are no votes on what he believes to be two confirmed baddies is all the more reason he should be the change he wants to see in the world. Also, you are wrong about me in both suggestions. For one, I am not sure of it. I am not sure of anything actually, which is why I am not comfortable with taking the easy route with two confirmed baddies, whether they are actually bad or not. Two, I am not shooting in the dark. You may find my vote of Enrique suspicious, and that's fine, but anyone who looks at our back-and-forth would be stretching to conclude that my suspicion of him (if I'm civ, and it is therefore genuine suspicion) is a shot in the dark. Enrique being bad is the closest I am to be sure of anything so far in the game, so a shot in the dark it is anything but.

I mean, okay.

a2thezebra wrote:
Epignosis wrote:Voting sig.
Finally you're seeing sense.

sig

????

That's a case, sig, not so sure about a silver platter. Epignosis loves to fish out the bad, and sure he's not always right, but I can definitely see where he's coming from. He's reading to me pretty much exactly how he was in Tree Mafia.

sig wrote:
Enrique wrote:
sig wrote:Okay so just got back, I've got no clue what is going on, but why are we lynching Zebra? Though I see no one is voting for me.
Should we be?
Since I practically handed you a scum on a silver platter no you shouldn't vote for me.

... wait, did I miss something? Who are you talking about, Epignosis?

a2thezebra wrote:Too easy. That's what I said too but I'm bad for it.

No. You said they were bad. You said they were bad but you refused to vote for them. Don't act like you're agreeing with him.

a2thezebra wrote:
Enrique wrote:Let's make this clear. Zebra, do you believe Simon and sig are Mafia teammates? Would you rather lynch me anyway?
Yes to the first question, no to the second. I'm voting for you, not lynching you.

a2thezebra wrote:
Dragon D. Luffy wrote:
sig wrote:Okay so just got back, I've got no clue what is going on, but why are we lynching Zebra? Though I see no one is voting for me.
We aren't, but literally everybody is discussing the idea of voting for you.

What do you think of Simon's post in defense of you?
More importantly, what do you think of it? You must not think it to be a confirmation that either of them is bad, otherwise you still wouldn't be voting for me. Unless of course your name is Epignosis.

how the turntables

sig wrote:Okay so just got back, I've got no clue what is going on, but why are we lynching Zebra? Though I see no one is voting for me.

Should we be?

HEY AGLEAMINRANKS I SEE YOU LURKIN WHATS UP

I'll take my chances.

a2thezebra wrote:
Enrique wrote:Zebra this is our first game together where I can't follow you at all. I wasn't sure I could even see you as a baddie, but yup, here you are. So bad. Everything in that post is wrong and I can't take it seriously.
That's a cop out. By saying you can't take my posts seriously you attempt to justify not having to respond to them and in doing so avoid the risk of making yourself look even worse.

I don't even understand what kind of answer you want from me.

"ur wrong"

There u go. Don't think you're making any point.

Zebra this is our first game together where I can't follow you at all. I wasn't sure I could even see you as a baddie, but yup, here you are. So bad. Everything in that post is wrong and I can't take it seriously.

a2thezebra wrote:
Enrique wrote:
Epignosis wrote:Why are people not voting Simon and sig? Are you really that much more confident in your crummy little Day 1 reads?
I'm more confident in Zebra, yeah. You know him best but is it wrong to give Simon a bit more credit than assuming he just outed himself and his teammate? I mean, wasn't he also saving people all over the place in Star Wars?
Quick recap:

1. You vote for Glorfindel for no reason for what you later claim to be what was then a temporary vote.
2. Your vote on him stays for phony reasons.
3. You pretend I am projecting and that these same observations apply to me when they don't.
4. You mimic Epi's disapproval of my opinion not to consider the day effectively over because of two confirmed baddies.
5. Yet you don't even consider them to be confirmed baddies yourself and would rather lynch me because you don't like my logic.

This, folks, is exactly why Epi's idea of focusing on the obvious is not realistically beneficial to town in the long run. If we had all followed his direction, everyone would vote for either Simon or sig, there would be no more discussion, and Enrique would've lost the opportunity to reveal how suspicious he is when seen in practice.

Nah.

Glorfindel wrote:
Enrique wrote:He was acting funny, it was early into Day 1, I could change my vote. Now I'm more than happy to leave it there because he jumped into the opportunity to kill me so easily.
I was "acting funny"? I don't think so... My behaviour is (and has been) completely normal for me and I'd like to know what point of reference you're using to judge otherwise? As for 'jumping into the opportunity to kill you so easily', that is clearly untrue. I defended you and refused to vote for you in Star Wars and was deceived so you can't argue that I wouldn't give you the benefit of the doubt now. I also find your insinuation that I would take voting for you or anyone else lightly as somewhat hypocritical given the flippancy with which you voted for me ("For the fun of it").

Glorfindel, I gave you a random vote at a point when every vote was random. I gave a list for the fun of it. I voted for you because you were on top. Get over it. I gave you one vote in my only post in the game at that point, you put me ahead in the poll. This is not comparable.

linki- throwing a baddie under the bus on day one in a 16v3 game would require some massive bollocks. I don't think that's what's happening. I think you just want us to waste as many lynches as possible.

Epignosis wrote:Why are people not voting Simon and sig? Are you really that much more confident in your crummy little Day 1 reads?

I'm more confident in Zebra, yeah. You know him best but is it wrong to give Simon a bit more credit than assuming he just outed himself and his teammate? I mean, wasn't he also saving people all over the place in Star Wars?

So you want to keep two of the crazy fucks alive even though you claim to know who they are, is that right?

a2thezebra wrote:
Enrique wrote:You know what you're doing.

u bad

a2thezebra
What am I doing? I already know, so please answer that question for everyone else, not me.

You're projecting all your baddieness on to me and saving what you call "obvious" lynches for later. That's bad.

It kills baddies, Zebra. That's what we vote for.

You know what you're doing.

u bad

a2thezebra

Let's make this clear. Zebra, do you believe Simon and sig are Mafia teammates? Would you rather lynch me anyway?

If you say so...

The goal of the game is to lynch the mafia. You remember that, right?

Convenient that your unjustified temporary vote turned into an unjustified permanent vote. I'm not convinced that you actually believe I was acting funny (that's not what you said when you initially voted for me, nor did you even imply it at the time) and if you think my OMGUS is baddie-motivated, that is, assuming it even is an OMGUS, you're not just kidding yourself, you're trying to deceive everyone else. You saw me in Tree Mafia so you know just as well as I do that I am yet to do anything questionable. You're the one doing what you are accusing me of doing.

Or something. Bottomline is, you're projecting hard.

Simon wrote:If Dr.wilgy is voting for SIG, then I'all vote for him.

DrWilgy is voting for Matt, Simon

Should I ask you to justify your vote for sig then? That was like... my first post. Explain to me the difference.

a2thezebra wrote:
Enrique wrote:He was acting funny, it was early into Day 1, I could change my vote. Now I'm more than happy to leave it there because he jumped into the opportunity to kill me so easily.
Convenient that your unjustified temporary vote turned into an unjustified permanent vote.

For someone that hasn't been in any danger? You think that's convenient?

I'm not convinced that you actually believe he was acting funny (that's not what you said when you initially voted for him, nor did you even imply it at the time) and if you think his OMGUS is baddie-motivated, that is, assuming it even is an OMGUS, you're not just kidding yourself, you're trying to deceive everyone else. You saw Glorfindel in Star Wars so you know just as well as I do that he has yet to do anything questionable. You're the one doing what some are accusing Epi of doing.

I'm just saying it's silly to act like most players have a good reason to vote on Day 1. I don't understand the second part (re: Glorfindel in Star Wars, I didn't follow after I died and don't see the relevance). And for the record, Epignosis is my only real civvie read so far.

I was actually under the impression that your vote for me was random, and well, of course now it's permanent. I spy a little projection.

Epignosis wrote:
Simon wrote:
Epignosis wrote:HEY SIMON

Are you on sig's team?
I think so :shrug

He was acting funny, it was early into Day 1, I could change my vote. Now I'm more than happy to leave it there because he jumped into the opportunity to kill me so easily.

a2thezebra wrote:
Enrique wrote:
a2thezebra wrote:
Enrique wrote:
a2thezebra wrote:
Enrique wrote:Hmm, no, I don't think so. But that 3rd vote stacked on me is hella convenient, and he seems to be deliberately misinterpreting everything on the thread. Is he trying to protect you, Zeeb?
He as in the one you voted for literally reason and after responding rationally you are now using to justify your phony suspicion of him?
yea, except you got the second part backwards
If anyone's deliberately misinterpreting things it is you, sir.
Care to explain?
http://www.mafiathesyndicate.com/search ... 9&sr=posts

Helpful...

a2thezebra wrote:
Enrique wrote:
a2thezebra wrote:
Enrique wrote:Hmm, no, I don't think so. But that 3rd vote stacked on me is hella convenient, and he seems to be deliberately misinterpreting everything on the thread. Is he trying to protect you, Zeeb?
He as in the one you voted for literally reason and after responding rationally you are now using to justify your phony suspicion of him?
yea, except you got the second part backwards
If anyone's deliberately misinterpreting things it is you, sir.

Care to explain?

a2thezebra wrote:
Enrique wrote:Hmm, no, I don't think so. But that 3rd vote stacked on me is hella convenient, and he seems to be deliberately misinterpreting everything on the thread. Is he trying to protect you, Zeeb?
He as in the one you voted for literally reason and after responding rationally you are now using to justify your phony suspicion of him?

yea, except you got the second part backwards

You seem pretty good at stripping things out of context entirely. You can pretend I wasn't responding to a different post there, but where do you get the idea that people were voting for sig for making a spelling mistake? Did you just happen to miss all the paragraphs surrounding that one tiny correction? The newbie card only gets you so far, I know you can read.

Hmm, no, I don't think so. But that 3rd vote stacked on me is hella convenient, and he seems to be deliberately misinterpreting everything on the thread. Is he trying to protect you, Zeeb?

glorfindel u little poo poo

Search found 54 matches