The Syndicate

fingersplints wrote:

Long Con wrote:I think I had to wait until my 8th or 9th game to be bad.

I was bad my first game

only I didn't realise until night 2.

Did you win?

I did mine.

There isn't a policy on dead players subs that I know of, except if hosts individually come up with one (or you force them into committing to one, which you seem to imply). JJJ's take on it sounds about right to me, normally I'd try in order with players who signed as replacements, non-players (whilst not exactly trying to ask the entire forum, either) and only then 2.0s - that would have to have been confirmed civs as 1.0 or players without any 1.0 knowledge of remaining players' roles/alignment (from checking or having BTSC). I can see how Epig's sub was a bit unclear, since he was NKd, but I don't find it more dramatic than that.

Epignosis wrote:

Metalmarsh89 wrote:

Epignosis wrote:

Scotty wrote:Ah. Well that's vague as shit. And what is your win condition?

To have a good time!

Do you know what makes for a good time? Lynching baddies.

Speaking of baddies, Clue 26-Down of today's USA Today crossword puzzle has the word baddie in the clue.

"LAWS"

0:40:48