The Syndicate

For a sec, I thought MP and Daisy drew masons, because they were clearing each other. Guess it was just vibes, tho.

Epignosis wrote:Donald Trump (birdwithteeth) could stop a lynch.

Hillary Clinton (nijuukyugou) could send a PM through the hosts to someone each Night.

Got one from Ninju on "Night" 1, with an easy enough hint, and pretty much kept her confirmed in my mind since.

Huh. Ok. Cool.

Lucky shot with the last vote, otherwise randomizing a freakin' LYLO vote as a confirmed civ was quite ridiculous.

Deep down I started doubting llama because he could have distanced from juliets after all, plus the last night kill came with sig nowhere near as active as pointing towards him doing it. But I was long dead by then, so...

I wouldn't describe myself as focused during this turbo trial, due to late hours and post format limitations, and I'm not sure if it was 100% focused across the board either, with a lot of a spook / eyeballin' votes, big wagons with scattered other options and slow or low analysis. Then again, it was fun, so yeah.

Boomslang wrote:Going with the crowd. Juliets will yield info, if nothing else.

thellama73 wrote:I agree that it makes no sense for a mafia member to have a lynch save, so BWT is good. That means at least one of his voters is likely bad. Combined with my existent distrust of juliets, I think that makes her mafia.

birdwithteeth11 wrote:
Ricochet wrote:
birdwithteeth11 wrote:Alrighty then. Now we know who the baddies are. And I'm voting for one of them now.

*votes juliets*

If the civs want to have a chance to win they should follow my lead.
Your can either trust me on this lead or the civs probably lose the game. Up to you.

birdwithteeth11 wrote:Alrighty then. Now we know who the baddies are. And I'm voting for one of them now.

*votes juliets*

If the civs want to have a chance to win they should follow my lead.

k so I don't get vibes from Boom and Daisy, good game if you're dupers, but for sanity, I'd rather put them aside

llama tough but maybe he's on the good side as well

have a hunch BWT expected the outcome, so ech

so let me try something with the rest, just by looking at votes:

if team is juliets / elo: Elo went buss D1, juliets never voted; both of them rode the Glor wagon D2; Eloh mislynched MP as well, juliets non-voter D3; juliets voting BWT, but Eloh suddenly turning on juliets D4

=== D4 antagonism from Eloh towards juliets would not make much sense, in game flow context

if team is sig / juliets: sig hardly pulling votes, juliets mostly on bad results' side

=== little side of coordination, could be interpretable both as team or not connected

if team is sig / elohcin: same events, with sig doing little

if perhaps llama is in the mix, antagonism with juliets wouldn't make much sense; then again, he voted Elohcin D1 then went mum on the issue; they both pushed MP to death D3. fishy....

Boomslang wrote:I feel Rico is really correct here. Will consider SD again depending on results.

birdwithteeth11 wrote:
Ricochet wrote:
Prove it

birdwithteeth11 wrote:
thellama73 wrote:
juliets wrote:
birdwithteeth11 wrote:I also think juliets needs to be examined further
tell me what you want to know - i've currently got a question to boom about his vote
Are you bad?
I'm leaning yes here but want to see her response first.

sig wrote:Im not sure about Rico his stick his amusing but could hide baddie thoughts

thellama73 wrote:
Ricochet wrote:
thellama73 wrote:I kind of like BWT's style this game. I think this is the most animated I've seen him. I don't think I'll be voting him today.

Trying harder than you, Trump's Twitter.

thellama73 wrote:ALso, it occurs to me that Rico has been getting a pass due to his admitted hilarity. Let's keep an eye on that.

thellama73 wrote:So far juliets, Sig, and Boomslang have barely been discussed. Any thoughts on them?

Elohcin wrote:
MovingPictures07 wrote:THATS RIGHT YOU NON-MORMON FUCKERS I WAS EGG MCFUCKINGMUFFIN!!!!!

God luck civilians! And my fellow Americans. We will need it.
What do you expect when you act bad.

thellama73 wrote:I kind of like BWT's style this game. I think this is the most animated I've seen him. I don't think I'll be voting him today.

birdwithteeth11 wrote:So who's it gonna be broskis?

Nvmd Ninja, but:

birdwithteeth11 wrote:
MovingPictures07 wrote:BWT - that's all you have to say in your defense? Do you have any thoughts on anyone not me?
Not really. Especially when you're about to get lynched.

Elohcin wrote:I'm going to go ahead and vote for MP. Waffles and then too much syrup, I tell you.

Spacedaisy wrote:Pretty sure MP is civ, just saying.

birdwithteeth11 wrote:
Ricochet wrote:
At least I'm consistent in my inconsistency!

sig wrote:Well gary johnson winning Monroe County PA :O

But looks like he is also dead.

I knew Glorf was civ since I know his personality I find it strange Rico is saying that is odd?

birdwithteeth11 wrote:I'm waiting on Elo to see if she gets back in time to offer up an explanation.

nijuukyugou wrote:I am loving these puns so hard

Fok. Correct order:

Ricochet wrote:

MovingPictures07 wrote:
Ricochet wrote:
What's your point?

MovingPictures07 wrote:
thellama73 wrote:I know I don't want to vote for Eloh or Nijuu. Daisy seems sincere to me. I'm also torn on Glorf. It seems too easy. Kind of at a loss here.
I agree that Daisy seems good. I don't want to vote for her

nijuukyugou wrote:
Ricochet wrote:
She's back on my legs and I'm outta beer. Yeah, I'd say she's pretty bad.

Spacedaisy wrote:
MovingPictures07 wrote:
nijuukyugou wrote:And yeah, Glorfindel does look pretty bad after that lynch result.
Would a baddie so obviously defend his teammate though for dubious reasons? Especially since it seemed likely that anti-lurker sentiment was brewing? I would say Glorfindel is low hanging fruit potential. I'm nervous.
This tbqh, plus that kind of reasoning seems pretty in character for Glorf to me. He is a genuinely nice guy. I'm doubling down on my first Elo vote. Still think she's a pretty cool chick, but possibly mafia.

MovingPictures07 wrote:
nijuukyugou wrote:And yeah, Glorfindel does look pretty bad after that lynch result.
Would a baddie so obviously defend his teammate though for dubious reasons? Especially since it seemed likely that anti-lurker sentiment was brewing? I would say Glorfindel is low hanging fruit potential. I'm nervous.

Search found 76 matches