The Syndicate

I gave Sig some leeway yesterday because while I am not big on players responding to accusations with conspiracy theories, I gave him the benefit of the doubt due to people who know him saying he can dig his own grave and Sorcha seemingly aiming to fan the flames between Epi and Sig. Now however, with Sig saying he was purposely baiting Epi, I am inclined to vote for him as that claim seems fairly ludicrous. So early on you are going to hatch a plan to try to "catch" a big fish player?

This doesn't eliminate Sorcha from my list, though I am willing to see the Sig lynch through.

[VOTE: ] aubergine

sig wrote:Know Zebra is using the classic scum argument for a lynch.
"Even if Sig isn't scum his lynch will be great for flip value" So when I flip civ Zebra can say it doesn't matter since I provided good info.

Two first that I would make such a post directed at Simon to begin with, drawing attention to myself and a possibly teammate.
Second that I would try to get Epi lynched .

It really depends on how its framed. If someone finds two people equally suspicious but one of their lynches would potentially offer more info, it only makes logical sense to vote for that one. If the person comes across as suspecting someone else more than who they're voting for and they're voting the seemingly less suspected of the two with the reason for it being potential info, thats when some alarm bells should be ringing.

Wasn't aware this started until I saw DDL's PM on NF today. I skipped reading day 0 to save on time and because its an alien concept that I'm not sure will give any worthwhile insights.

Sorscha is my main suspect at the moment. Sorsha put forth the bait that Sig could latch onto to try and defend himself against Epi, so that he can take on leading the lynch on Epi from there, in a small post that tries to come across as helping someone who apparently has a tendency to dig his own grave more than trying to point the finger.

DrWilgy wrote:Hold on... Here's the part that doesn't make sense, if Simon is really bad, wouldn't his team tell him to stop defending as hard? or at least provide some coaching given his dire situation? With what Simon has stated, I don't believe that he and Sig are on the same team if he's bad.

Unless, he is working with his team on a huge day 1 set up. Someone tells Simon to defend Sig hard, teammate "catches" Simon, and then the ultimate bus is formed, one that would draw players into the chaos and ultimately lead to several civilian deaths.

a2thezebra wrote:

DrWilgy wrote:Hold on... Here's the part that doesn't make sense, if Simon is really bad, wouldn't his team tell him to stop defending as hard? or at least provide some coaching given his dire situation? With what Simon has stated, I don't believe that he and Sig are on the same team if he's bad.

Unless, he is working with his team on a huge day 1 set up. Someone tells Simon to defend Sig hard, teammate "catches" Simon, and then the ultimate bus is formed, one that would draw players into the chaos and ultimately lead to several civilian deaths.

The teammate that "catches" Simon most likely being Epi, seeing as how his initial suspicion of Simon and sig being teammates came out of nowhere and was completely unwarranted yet by chance now appears accurate.

Are day 1 conspiracy theories a thing here? Not everyone is always coached by their team as mafia, nor do they always listen(or should listen) when they are. Basing suspicion or lack of suspicion based on a factor such as that usually isn't going to work out for you and even when it does its more likely to be by chance than it actually being a valid method of scumhunting.


My intuition at the moment for the scum team:

Sorsha
DDL
DrWilgy