The Syndicate

Oh crap I thought it ended at 9:11, where did I get that idea from?

Sorry Jay, I hate missing votes

Everyone,I am so sorry for not giving this the attention it deserved.

I fwwl good about Glorfindel and Marmot, I don't feel actively horrible about Epi, so gonna trust you guys. And Vompjust seems to be low posting which I can relate to.

[VOTE: Golden] aubergine

I Googled Cactus Doctor, and actually got a usable image,

I just don't want to get lynched tbh.

I just don't want to die, tbh.

Also[VOTE: Dr Wilgy] aubergine

Mármot wrote: ↑Wed Apr 04, 2018 9:34 pm I saw a bare foot. Gross. Luckily it was already clear who it belonged to.

Wilgy has the exact same rainbow list to me, but places me at deep orange. Doesn't that seem disingenuous to you? It does to me. Like his read of me is all based on meta-roleplay, no substance. It stinks as much as bare feet.

I'd prefer a wilgy vote to a golden vote. I think both of them are exposing themselves with their lack of play, but golden has done less actively suspicious. People signed up for this game because they wanted to roleplay, if you don't want to roleplay as that person now it suggests to me that you're under a bit of pressure. Townies can just relax and climb mountains and stuff.

That's a good point.

I felt good about him as he was willing to explain his reads within the weird context of his self imposed posting limitations. So whoever he is, he is doing a convincing Wilgy. Now if only he would post cactus people.

But is it self imposed, and some of his rankings do seem rather arbitrary. If you vote Wilgy, I will vote with you. As i said, Golden is a null.

She stalks me, true story.

Crazy off topic person posting in here grrr

S~V~S wrote: ↑Wed Apr 04, 2018 9:29 pm

Mármot wrote: ↑Wed Apr 04, 2018 9:26 pm Dom, my buddy. Would you prefer a wilgy or a golden vote? I could go either way.

I don't think Wilgy is bad. I have no opinion on Golden. So I guess I feel better about Wilgy.

I am only voting for Golden to break the tie and self save. Do you have stronger feelings either way?

But heropinion is similar tomine, so meh.

Right. What about my reasoning for not wanting to mock real Dom & Epi do you find particularly, especially unbelievable, fauxpignosis?

I see we have not had a ton more discussion. Even though I don't particularly suspect Golden, gonna vote him to save myself. I will try to pop back in before the end to see if anything has changed.

Thanks, Wilgy, for explaining your read.

Dr.Wilgy wrote: ↑Wed Apr 04, 2018 2:27 am DrWilgy
Epignosis
Glorfindel
MacDougall
Vompatti
Golden
Marmot
Dom

Wilgy, could you explain some of your reads like you did for Marmot, if you are choosing not to write words? I know why I am where I am, although I think that is misplaced, but I get it.

Sorry I have been quiet, I have been busy elsewhere, and I plan to be here more tonight.

First, It's fun that I am getting suspish for a cheesy day one vote, when every vote in this game was pretty much a cheesy vote. The only discussion had been meta jokes and FauxJay trying way too hard to turn meta jokes into "scum hunting".

When I first voted, I voted for Marmot, for saying he was voting then not voting. So I said I would take it off him if he came back. At that time there was a four way tie,one vote each. It was not much, but none of the votes to that point was for any real reason that I could see.

Dôm wrote: ↑Sun Apr 01, 2018 5:34 pm

Glōrfindel wrote: ↑Sun Apr 01, 2018 4:57 pm

Dôm wrote: ↑Sun Apr 01, 2018 4:24 pm

Glōrfindel wrote: ↑Sun Apr 01, 2018 4:05 pm [VOTE: Dunya] aubergine

no you didn't. Why say you did when you didn't?

same question for marmot; he said he was self voting and he didn't. why?

[VOTE: Marmot] aubergine

Sorry, I forgot.

Does Marmot self-vote when bad? In my opinion it doesn't seem like a good move for mafia.

He does it good or bad iirc, but I voted him for saying he did and not doing it. If he comes back I will move it if someone pings me more. But that vote/not vote stuck out the most to me so far. regarless of real Marmots meta.

linki, there he is.

Isn't Day 1 of most sock games meta stuff? I am still waiting for Epi to attack me

When I came back, it was a two way tie, Marmot and FauxJ with maybe 4 votes each, I don't recall. I did not particularly suspect Marmot, and did not really want to lynch him, especially when I said I would move my vote if he voted, and he had. so I switched it to the other guy. Who had pinged me, he was too manic. I thought he was trying too hard.

So there you go. If I had not switched the vote off of Marmot when I said I would, you all would be saying I was bad for that. Had I voted for a tangent third party, you would have said the same. But I felt bad voting for someone when I said I would take the vote off.

And this,

Epignósis wrote: ↑Tue Apr 03, 2018 1:00 pm I will vote for Dom as well. I think Sloonei/Jay caught onto something when calling Dom out for masquerading subtle set-up shade as meta. It's tangible, unlike the PIA POE bullshit he's fond of.

Dom also didn't react to my swipe at him:

Dôm wrote: ↑Sun Apr 01, 2018 7:48 pm

Epignósis wrote: ↑Sun Apr 01, 2018 7:41 pm

Dôm wrote: ↑Sun Apr 01, 2018 5:34 pm
Isn't Day 1 of most sock games meta stuff? I am still waiting for Epi to attack me

Sorry, I was celebrating the meaningless social construct of my sky-god incarnate dying for our sins and triumphing over death.

Now I’m going to drink beer and check my fantasy sports wagers.

Oh OK. Maybe later.

Either he didn't realize that the real Dom would have seen that for the pseudo-intellectual putdown that it was or he didn't want to get into it with me in the first place. And why would he want to with time left on the clock and a sloppy mislynch train in full swing on Jay?

Let's not just dump votes on Dom though. We have enough slackers as it is in this game and that's dangerous.

I caught your pseudo intellectual put down, but while I at first thought it might have been funny to have a bit of back and forth, I decided that since there appeared to be real tension with them in another game, adding fuel to the fire might not be wise or kind, so I played it for the lulz.

I realize I was the one who poked you to "attack" me, my apologies for letting it dangle.

I guess iwould think it was ludicrous if it was me too. But you say a bunch of crazy crap this happens. Pretending to be JJJ and actually being him isn't the same.

JiggedJammyJay wrote: ↑Sun Apr 01, 2018 9:31 pm "Albeit obscurely" means that you were disguising your shade as "meta jokes" or neutral standing. It was shade which concealed its nefariousness.

Not any more than anyone else. Sorry jiggy jam youre wrong.

Linki, why ludicrous?

I think the player Dr Wilgy is not following Wilgys meta

"albeit obscurely" lol. What does that even mean.

[VOTE: jammyjiggy] aubergine

JiggedJammyJay wrote: ↑Sun Apr 01, 2018 9:22 pm

Dôm wrote: ↑Sat Mar 31, 2018 3:34 pm

JiggedJammyJay wrote: ↑Sat Mar 31, 2018 3:11 pm

Dôm wrote: ↑Sat Mar 31, 2018 2:37 pm

Epignósis wrote: ↑Sat Mar 31, 2018 10:05 am Tell you what- I don’t know what I’m more disappointed with: the Astros for shitting the bed, the Rockets for blowing the spread, or this game. Discussion is the town’s best weapon during the day. Empty your holsters folks.

And @ Gólden, use words, you ninny. This isn’t Image Mafia.

Wat about the Red Sox?

Since when does Wilgy do rainbow lists?

Dr.Wilgy has arguably provided the most content in this game. Why is he the player you are choosing to go after?

I am not going after him, I am asking questions. It's what I do. I ask questions.

Why do you think asking a generic question is going after someone?

The premise of your question was such that Dr.Wilgy would be framed in a negative light, albeit obscurely. This looks shady. It's gross. I don't like it. I wish that I could vote for Dom.

You're reaching. A lot. The premise of my question was meta jokes. I was making Dôm staccato posts.

Epignósis wrote: ↑Sun Apr 01, 2018 7:41 pm

Dôm wrote: ↑Sun Apr 01, 2018 5:34 pm
Isn't Day 1 of most sock games meta stuff? I am still waiting for Epi to attack me

Sorry, I was celebrating the meaningless social construct of my sky-god incarnate dying for our sins and triumphing over death.

Now I’m going to drink beer and check my fantasy sports wagers.

Oh OK. Maybe later.

someone is trying to tell us something.

Glōrfindel wrote: ↑Sun Apr 01, 2018 4:57 pm

Dôm wrote: ↑Sun Apr 01, 2018 4:24 pm

Glōrfindel wrote: ↑Sun Apr 01, 2018 4:05 pm [VOTE: Dunya] aubergine

no you didn't. Why say you did when you didn't?

same question for marmot; he said he was self voting and he didn't. why?

[VOTE: Marmot] aubergine

Sorry, I forgot.

Does Marmot self-vote when bad? In my opinion it doesn't seem like a good move for mafia.

He does it good or bad iirc, but I voted him for saying he did and not doing it. If he comes back I will move it if someone pings me more. But that vote/not vote stuck out the most to me so far. regarless of real Marmots meta.

linki, there he is.

Isn't Day 1 of most sock games meta stuff? I am still waiting for Epi to attack me

Glōrfindel wrote: ↑Sun Apr 01, 2018 4:05 pm [VOTE: Dunya] aubergine

no you didn't. Why say you did when you didn't?

same question for marmot; he said he was self voting and he didn't. why?

[VOTE: Marmot] aubergine

Gólden wrote: ↑Sun Apr 01, 2018 12:48 am

Dôm wrote: ↑Sat Mar 31, 2018 2:37 pm

Epignósis wrote: ↑Sat Mar 31, 2018 10:05 am Tell you what- I don’t know what I’m more disappointed with: the Astros for shitting the bed, the Rockets for blowing the spread, or this game. Discussion is the town’s best weapon during the day. Empty your holsters folks.

And @ Gólden, use words, you ninny. This isn’t Image Mafia.

Wat about the Red Sox?

Since when does Wilgy do rainbow lists?

Dom... knows.... sport?

everyone in New England knows the red sox, sports are stupid but the sox transcend

easter is a meaningless social construct, so I will be around most of the day after i finish grading papers

JiggedJammyJay wrote: ↑Sat Mar 31, 2018 3:11 pm

Dôm wrote: ↑Sat Mar 31, 2018 2:37 pm

Epignósis wrote: ↑Sat Mar 31, 2018 10:05 am Tell you what- I don’t know what I’m more disappointed with: the Astros for shitting the bed, the Rockets for blowing the spread, or this game. Discussion is the town’s best weapon during the day. Empty your holsters folks.

And @ Gólden, use words, you ninny. This isn’t Image Mafia.

Wat about the Red Sox?

Since when does Wilgy do rainbow lists?

Dr.Wilgy has arguably provided the most content in this game. Why is he the player you are choosing to go after?

I am not going after him, I am asking questions. It's what I do. I ask questions.

Why do you think asking a generic question is going after someone?

Epignósis wrote: ↑Sat Mar 31, 2018 10:05 am Tell you what- I don’t know what I’m more disappointed with: the Astros for shitting the bed, the Rockets for blowing the spread, or this game. Discussion is the town’s best weapon during the day. Empty your holsters folks.

And @ Gólden, use words, you ninny. This isn’t Image Mafia.

Wat about the Red Sox?

Since when does Wilgy do rainbow lists?

Dr.Wilgy wrote: ↑Fri Mar 30, 2018 3:43 pm

Dôm wrote: ↑Fri Mar 30, 2018 3:35 pm wat :3

who should i trust?

DrWilgy

why?

s = \sqrt{\frac{1}{N-1} \sum_{i=1}^N (x_i - \overline{x})^2}.

wat :3

who should i trust?