The Syndicate

Pilate wrote:

Uzziah wrote:I find it curious that both Pilate and Absalom vote for me right after I defend them. However Stephen is acting even more sketchy so that's where my vote goes.

Curious indeed.

Stephen wrote:Fuck it, I'm voting Uzziah.

Pilate wrote:

Uzziah wrote:

Balaam wrote:Found this during my re-read:

Uzziah wrote:

[color=#FF00FF]Job[/color] wrote:

Uzziah wrote:I admit I may have been somewjat ambiguous on purpous. I'm just zany and fun like that! The above is the root meaning though, is it not?

So are you going to share any thoughts on anyone besides myself, Paul and Cain or are you going to continue to be unhelpful and further verify that you're bad? I don't believe you used that definition of the word for even a second.

I'd rather have one of you lynched first and go from there.

You got your wish and then some. They're all dead now, so where do you propose we go now? :P

I would suggest we pick a trustworthy leader (I nominate myself) who will randomize between everyone who is not Absalom or Pilate, for it seems to me that those two are being subtly framed by the baddies.

Incidentally I'm still glad that Job is dead, as he was clearly leading us into lynching each other. He may have had a civvie role but in actuality he was no better than Paul.

You're a baddie who is trying to frame me. Absalom is your baddie teammate. You're hedging here for when you turn up bad. Then they lynch me, and I turn up Civ. Then they leave Absalom alone.

*votes Uzziah*

Rachel is right, I've been phoning it in. But I read the last few pages and this is what really caught my eye. Uzziah has no reason at all to think I'm Civ, unless he's bad.

Balaam wrote:Found this during my re-read:

Uzziah wrote:

[color=#FF00FF]Job[/color] wrote:

Uzziah wrote:I admit I may have been somewjat ambiguous on purpous. I'm just zany and fun like that! The above is the root meaning though, is it not?

So are you going to share any thoughts on anyone besides myself, Paul and Cain or are you going to continue to be unhelpful and further verify that you're bad? I don't believe you used that definition of the word for even a second.

I'd rather have one of you lynched first and go from there.

You got your wish and then some. They're all dead now, so where do you propose we go now? :P

Balaam wrote:

Uzziah wrote:

Balaam wrote:

Job wrote:Catch up is tl,dr.

Great job everyone, can we lynch Uzziah now?

Can we lynch you if he's neither Heathen nor Horseman?

I'm fine with that.

What if I propose it the other way around? If we lynch Job Day 4 and he is neither Heathen nor Horseman, can we lynch you next?

Balaam wrote:

Job wrote:Catch up is tl,dr.

Great job everyone, can we lynch Uzziah now?

Can we lynch you if he's neither Heathen nor Horseman?

Job wrote:

Uzziah wrote:Yay!

I'm voting you until one of us is dead.

Lot wrote:I feel like this entire day has been about nothing but Uzziah, and this I don't like. Even if we ultimately lynch Uzziah, it might be nice if we had a good amount of time talking about other options as well.

Absalom wrote:

Uzziah wrote:If Job was good, he would have backed down on pursuing me.

I don't see how that's true. Aren't good guys just as tenacious as bad guys?

Job wrote:

Uzziah wrote:I admit I may have been somewjat ambiguous on purpous. I'm just zany and fun like that! The above is the root meaning though, is it not?

So are you going to share any thoughts on anyone besides myself, Paul and Cain or are you going to continue to be unhelpful and further verify that you're bad? I don't believe you used that definition of the word for even a second.

Job wrote:

Uzziah wrote:I'm rooting for the scum.

Duh

Job wrote:

Uzziah wrote:

Job wrote:

Uzziah wrote:

Job wrote:But more importantly beyond martha/absalom, why aren't more people suspicious of the person who admitted to being bad?

Who might that be?

You?

Not sure if trolling

I beg everyone to read uzziahs posts. The first five are fluff and claiming to be bad and then he does a huge no u. Now he is throwing a tantrum. The wifom is unbelievable. I think he's mentioned a total of three or four people altogether if that.

Job wrote:

Uzziah wrote:

Job wrote:But more importantly beyond martha/absalom, why aren't more people suspicious of the person who admitted to being bad?

Who might that be?

You?

Job wrote:But more importantly beyond martha/absalom, why aren't more people suspicious of the person who admitted to being bad?

Job wrote:RIP darlin.

Public enemy number one is obviously uzziah. He point out blank said he's rooting for the scum.

I also suspect absalom. Why else would Martha be dead? She gained more than her fair share of suspicion day 1 IMO.

Jephthah wrote:

Uzziah wrote:

Lot wrote:I did a reread of Job (just in case Uzziah actually finally had something to add). I don't see anything pertinent that would cause you to declare him scum Uzziah, care to elaborate at all?

Well for one the post above where he accuses me of having a wife in front of me, an obscure acronym which I had to look up in the dictionary, is such nonsense that if I wasn't a fan of logical phallasies I'd be facepalming so hard right now that my hand would be coming out the other side of Australia. Earlier he was very much against trying to figure out which sock is who, yet he clearly bases his judgement on whom I'm impersonating. Finally the subtlety of how he and Paul have been building the Martha case makes it obvious they're in the same team. And why is he so morbidly obsessed with horsemen anyway? Could it be because he's desperately trying to deny the fact that he is one? The same goes Paul, who himself is the biggest scum -- and for that I applaud and support him.

You just told Paul that you helped him find 2 scums. Now you're saying you're applauding and supporting him for being the biggest scum? Are you trying to help him find scum or are you trying to help him as a scum? How is that helping him if you're allegedly outing him? You're making no sense even for your twisted playing style.

Are you trying to be helpful or not? I have no problem lynching you.

Lot wrote:I did a reread of Job (just in case Uzziah actually finally had something to add). I don't see anything pertinent that would cause you to declare him scum Uzziah, care to elaborate at all?

Jonathan wrote:

Uzziah wrote:Also Paul, would you agree that I've caught one if not two scum for you? No need to thank me, it's all in a day's work.

And who are the one or two scum that you've caught?

Jonah wrote:

Martha wrote:Absalom how am I backing down from it? I was clarifying a post. I'm still me darling whether is makes people annoyed or not hunny.

And Paul no one else really made me feel super strong enough Day 1 at that point to vote or talk about yet. Day 1s are always slow to start hunny.
Although, at this point I still want to vote Paul but I do think Uzziah's comment sounds like he's hinting to be a Horseman rather than Heathen. He has pretty big balls hunny to announce he's Heathen like that otherwise.

Why would somebody hint that they're a horseman

Jonah wrote:

Uzziah wrote:I'm rooting for the scum.

hi Vompatti *waves*

Rahab wrote:

Uzziah wrote:I'm rooting for the scum.

Oh yeah?

Deborah wrote:

Paul wrote:cool thanks man

Let's rvs this shit I'm ready

What is rvs?

Lot wrote:

Mordecai wrote:The Apocalypse(Genesis I think?) because there are some wicked stories in there. Stuff about prostitutes being skinned alive and stuff like that.

I already like this person who confuses the beginning with the end.

It made me laugh a lot...