The Syndicate

JaggedJimmyJay wrote:True story: I thought about BTSC on Night 1 and sprityo sent in the MP kill at the last second

That was supposed to say FORGOT about BTSC

True story: I thought about BTSC on Night 1 and sprityo sent in the MP kill at the last second

Hooray!

Good game everyone. Thanks for hosting Quin! I got super lucky and almost blew it at the last second.

I have to leave now but I'll be back later to talk about things or something.

WTF i thought I had a minute?

thellama73 wrote:Unvote Juliets
Vote JJJ

Juliets, move your vote to JJJ. He tipped his hand with the kill analysis.

I don't think it's surprising that a guy who looked nearly confirmed was killed over me and I said as much. You look like you're flailing now.

juliets' urgency with Glorf is moving me here. You've been in a bunch of late game situations lately and this kind of emotion looks familiar.

thellama73 wrote:I found the last kill odd. If I were bad. I would have wanted to take out someone who had a vote to cast.

Valid point. Nearly confirmed or not his vote was irrelevant.

juliets please tell me in your own words why you think it's odd that I am not dead as compared to the other living players. Quickly, I beg you.

juliets wrote:
JaggedJimmyJay wrote:I intend to use all of this day phase before I make a final decision. Everyone here, including you Glorfindel, would be well advised to continue speaking with me. Provide not only your own best defense, but also your best theory for the guilty party. Please help me here. If anyone has any questions for me, ask.
I now think it is llama. He bussed Mac immediately on day 1 in GOC - bussed him before any real ground swell took place for the vote. I thought it wasn't him because of the his lack of time at the beginning of the game but it could be that sprityo really did slip and then they decided llama would bus him. I don't see any other option. It is not me. I know this may not be the best defense but I never would have killed SVS. I would have left her for last, especially since she quasi-defended me to llama.

My only other thought is it may be you JJJ. It's odd that you aren't dead.

You're correct about the Mac example. There is some manner of precedent, though the difference in game style makes me hesitate to rely too much on such a parallel.

I have taken a decent amount of heat in this game and my survival often lends itself to tinfoiling. I can only guess at why I am alive though. The last kill was kind of obvious anyway in Made I think.

Quin can we please have a time update?

thellama73 wrote:I could be persuaded to vote JJJ. I feel like this kind of confidence usually comes from bad JJ. Still rather kill Glorf though.

llama, can you point to an example, just off the cuff by memory, of me being exceedingly confident as a baddie that you were basing this assumption on?

juliets wrote:SHIT>

What was this post, juliets?

I intend to use all of this day phase before I make a final decision. Everyone here, including you Glorfindel, would be well advised to continue speaking with me. Provide not only your own best defense, but also your best theory for the guilty party. Please help me here. If anyone has any questions for me, ask.

juliets: I don't recall you playing in one of the games where Glorfindel's lying preferences was discussed if I am remembering correctly. Where does your confidence stem from about him?

thellama73 wrote:
JaggedJimmyJay wrote:It's one of the two of you. I'm going to review everything as quickly as I can and see where it leaves me.
Bear this in mind. Juliets can't possibly back up a case against me. She's flipping over now because that's what any baddie in her position would do. Epi's contention that I planned to bus a teammate in a two-mafia game on the first day hen no one else had even brought him up and I had no time for planning because I was getting take out Chinese is madness. Juliets doesn't believe it either, but she thinks she can get me lynched and win the game. Think it through.

Here's where I agree: I don't think it's likely that you had enough time to coordinate a thought-out bussing plot. It can still be a spur-of-the-moment decision now. Accusations of slips often don't take after all. You are reputed for your gambits and I have to consider the possibility.

It's one of the two of you. I'm going to review everything as quickly as I can and see where it leaves me.

Ass. That might confirm Made though.

Epignosis wrote:I don't suspect Made.

thellama73 wrote:How sure are you that Glorf doesn't lie, JJJ?

Absolutely.

Someone tell me how much I should care about sprityo's vote

Glorfindel wrote:
JaggedJimmyJay wrote:I think it's 4:2:1. A mislynch sends the game to a LyLo reliant upon the indy.
If you lynch me, you're there and that's a promise.

Glorf doesn't lie.

Leaving my vote on Epi.

sprityo wrote:Vote: Epi

You smarmy bastard

Glorfindel wrote:
Epignosis wrote:Let me ask you this: Raise your hand if you think sprityo accidentally slipped in his first post?
I don't know. That is not why I voted for him.

Why did you vote for him?

JaggedJimmyJay wrote:I think it's 4:2:1. A mislynch sends the game to a LyLo reliant upon the indy.

I say this with my mind on Made. We have to make that decision now. Do we eliminate the question mark or do we carry it on and hope for the best? I vote for the latter. It's a shit sandwich but I want to vote for a suspect.

I think it's 4:2:1. A mislynch sends the game to a LyLo reliant upon the indy.

Epignosis wrote:Let me ask you this: Raise your hand if you think sprityo accidentally slipped in his first post?

Not really. I thought his responses to the accusations were the problem.

That wasn't intended to be critical of you Quin, it's a game comment.

Quin wrote:I would allow a teammate to send in the actions of their teammate if they were absent.

That kind of negates the reductive potential of the rule then.

It's also plausible that llama did the killing. I still think he looks civilian though.

thellama73 wrote:
JaggedJimmyJay wrote:I didn't even see that rule until now.
Clever.

I'm serious. I jumped into this thread once it was in motion during EOD of the other game and barely skimmed the rules. I had no clue.

Epignosis

I agree it can't be Made who sent in either kill. It can technically be Glorf.

I didn't even see that rule until now.

thellama73 wrote:Actually, it does help. Baddis have to alternate sending in the kill, and we've had two in a row, which means it can't be Made and it likely isn't Glorf. That leaves Epi, Juliets, and JJJ. Hmmm.

Vote JJJ

What do you mean alternate sending in the kill?

I ain't kill shit

Later S~V~S.

Epi, if I recall you said earlier that you didn't think sprityo slipped but could still be bad. In that scenario is there a need for a plan to exist?

Glorfindel, updated thoughts GO

brb water

Get Rico!

Ricochet wrote:
JaggedJimmyJay wrote:
Ricochet wrote:pleasure lynch jay, folks. himself is build contradictory reads in two players this take the do same thing. hunting via outlandish hypothesiss
I think one guy looks good because he housed a scum on Day 1. I think another guy looks questionable because he skipped over that notion and jumped straight to "theatrics".

You're assuming they're both good based on very little.
myself'm assuming epig is don't goal or expectations for success to hark in llama

Were it only that I knew what this meant.

Ricochet wrote:pleasure lynch jay, folks. himself is build contradictory reads in two players this take the do same thing. hunting via outlandish hypothesiss

I think one guy looks good because he housed a scum on Day 1. I think another guy looks questionable because he skipped over that notion and jumped straight to "theatrics".

You're assuming they're both good based on very little.

Ricochet wrote:
JaggedJimmyJay wrote:Ricochet

TMI on llama and Epi
still absolutely zero reasoning

you are a miffed?

The reason is right there. You seem to already have the answers re: llama and Epi.

Ricochet

TMI on llama and Epi

Ricochet wrote:becuase he is a scenario is as far outward as llama. so assumption would then be both are good

What makes "outward" good?

thellama73 wrote:I could be persuaded to vote JJJ. I feel like this kind of confidence usually comes from bad JJ. Still rather kill Glorf though.

We have no time for lacking confidence.

Ricochet wrote:
JaggedJimmyJay wrote:
Ricochet wrote:
JaggedJimmyJay wrote:Epignosis
llama is great for pushing "slip" scenario, epig is bad for pushing "bus" scenario?

vote Jaggedjimmyjay
I don't see why that exchange looks like "theatrics". Coordinating plots in this nonsense would be very difficult. I can barely even post at this pace.
why are is epig badly for his version

Presumptive aggression against a guy I think looks good. Why is he good

I doubt this playful stuff is teammates

Ricochet wrote:
JaggedJimmyJay wrote:Epignosis
llama is great for pushing "slip" scenario, epig is bad for pushing "bus" scenario?

vote Jaggedjimmyjay

I don't see why that exchange looks like "theatrics". Coordinating plots in this nonsense would be very difficult. I can barely even post at this pace.

Epignosis

Ricochet wrote:
JaggedJimmyJay wrote:
Ricochet wrote:sprit voters power rankings

prob good: llama
uncertain: Glorf
fishy wagoner: JJJ, juliets
okay why
with able to't explanation why are you are actually switched to sprit. to what convincing you are. may seem appreciation you are a find that gateway to accuse he is a tone

what

Epignosis wrote:
JaggedJimmyJay wrote:haha llama caught two slips
Not hard to do when you scripted them.

how much of your read is driven by the fact that it's llama?

Search found 75 matches