The Syndicate

If Frog is town he'd be too big a loss on Day 1. Keep going after him on Day 2 and don't be deterred if he throws up tons of posts or insists everyone is wrong without giving a reason.

VOTE INAWORDYES

Frog wrote:To the people seriously voting me,

My early game was aggro across the board for reaction testing. I answered everyone's questions early game 0_o

I identified town reads by fighting with them and seeing how they react.

I was the first to post a full rainbow list.

I suggested the gamed strategy of hypoclaiming.

I suggested the strategy to straddle the slankers on wagons.

I've developed and drove content and strategies with a mountain of posts.

Anyone towns seriously voting me need to reevaluate their play.

The last 3 points are why I think you are a valid candidate. You've loaded the thread with posts and produced a lot of content (thanks) but then come out of it saying we should lynch someone who's not providing content? Then what was the point of this whole day?
Ditto re: point 2.
And point 3, you are again just making a blunt statement that the suspicions against you are wrong without a full response. Just "no you're wrong" and nothing else. That does not look good.

Frog wrote:I'm assuming one ties it's randomized.

I'm pretty confident at least one of my voters is giving me night cover, Marshmellow should be the lynch in a few minutes

His vote switch just now is a bit of a head scratcher.

sig wrote:
Sloonei wrote:Why are we not bandwagoning sig? It's Day 1, people.
Hush you.

Sloonei wrote:
Golden wrote:
sig wrote:Do I like CFDs? No
However, if we are to CFD I'd want it to be one someone who I think is mafia and there is a larger chance he is mafia then inaword.
Well, in this you are ignoring the fact that in Turf Wars, the CFD happened because a bunch of people didn't like the candidates on the table and we thought there was a better chance of Fuzz being mafia than the two candidates who were on the table.

It's not like anyone said 'a CFD would be fun, why not?' Of course it is only a good tactic if you don't want any of the existing candidates lynched.

Similarly, I wouldn't have just made a three way tie if I felt any of the three candidates were people I felt strongly about not lynching. In Champs, I didn't like a big tie because I felt strongly that two of the candidates were town. It all comes down to how you feel about the people on the block, ultimately.
The bittersweet reality of that CFD was that we also had a perhaps better scum lynch caught in that threeway tie in Epi.
AND guess what I WAS RIGHT ABOUT EPI! :P

Three of my early scum reads were Mongoose, Epi, and ika but then I dropped all of them after we lynched Fuzz to go after you and Quin instead.

Inawordyes wrote:
Marco wrote:Thanks. That's perfect.

Unvote
Ooh, okay. So I'm gonna go ahead and poke Frog since I know him from MU games. Heyo! How are you? WHY ARE YOU MAFIA?!?!? *cough* Ahem,I mean, "would it possible in any sort of context unique to both this world and any potential alternate realities that you could inform our inquiring minds just as to the current state of this fine game as perceived from your self and, potentially, a hint as to the true nature of where your alignments lie, to which you could also potentially be lying to us with a bold face and would need to understandably be punished?

VOTE FROG

This feels like an overeager attempt to make their presence felt in the game early.

Inawordyes wrote:
Frog wrote:
Zexy wrote:So, sig: what is TS? What do you think of Sloonei’s push on you? You defended, but what does that mean in regards to his alignment?

I disagree on the fake claiming part because in MU there actually a power role cover system where everybody claims all the roles so that the real ones get to “naturally” throw their real results in without standing out too much. And others fakeclaim to draw NKs.
Zexy is towny as flip.

Zexy + Sig = Town

Marco + Sloonei = scum teamish - On page 2 Marco randomly defends Sloonei. Lol. Obv slip is obvious.
The biggest test of a baddie team claim is if one of them would still be scummy enough to be a baddie if you lynch the other and they flip goodie. It sounds like Marco would fail that test if you only think he's a baddie for defending Sloonei, so I'm inclined to think that would make him a goodie.

The logic probably doesn't hold though haha, and that's fine!

And this post just seems like a weak assessment with a batch of waffles at the bottom.

Silverwolf wrote:
Sloonei wrote:what did inawordyes do?
He's got a meta of being a strong town player but came in and vote parked Soneji who hadn't posted anything, and shows a distinct lack of curiosity about the game or doing any scumhunting or game solving, has said he's not gonna do anything, and has had a very nervous tone to his posts. This is preferable to a Metalmarsh lynch to me and let's be honest, it looks like it's gonna be one of those.

I'll have a look.

Golden wrote:
sig wrote:Do I like CFDs? No
However, if we are to CFD I'd want it to be one someone who I think is mafia and there is a larger chance he is mafia then inaword.
Well, in this you are ignoring the fact that in Turf Wars, the CFD happened because a bunch of people didn't like the candidates on the table and we thought there was a better chance of Fuzz being mafia than the two candidates who were on the table.

It's not like anyone said 'a CFD would be fun, why not?' Of course it is only a good tactic if you don't want any of the existing candidates lynched.

Similarly, I wouldn't have just made a three way tie if I felt any of the three candidates were people I felt strongly about not lynching. In Champs, I didn't like a big tie because I felt strongly that two of the candidates were town. It all comes down to how you feel about the people on the block, ultimately.

The bittersweet reality of that CFD was that we also had a perhaps better scum lynch caught in that threeway tie in Epi.

Why are we not bandwagoning sig? It's Day 1, people.

what did inawordyes do?

Metalmarsh89 wrote:
Sloonei wrote:I don't have time to play this game, so instead of trying to read everything I just asked the thread to throw ideas at me and I'd react to them. I am doing the same thing right now, so if you like these posts better than those ones then I guess that could explain why you're misreading me. Or you're bad and you're just trying to spin things against me. ika threw a name at me and I asked him to explain why. Frog gave me four names with a bit of an explanation behind them, so I responded to his suggestion. Just because I have or had a scum read on him does not mean I should assume he's scum. He gave me a suggestion and I followed it. zebra was the name I liked best so I moved my vote there.

I am not putting responsibility on others, I am only asking for their help so that I can make informed decisions.
Frog didn't give you an explanation for any of them. You researched the four names and provided explanations yourself. That was my point.

MP also has a much longer post history than the other 4. Time is a factor here.

Marco wrote:
Sloonei wrote:Ultimately you're shoving a false narrative that straddles every side. I don't like it.
For instance, here he is saying exactly what I just said about him. Frog's case against Marco and I at this time, and he can add any points that I'm missing if he wants, was that Marco and I were working together because Marco responded to sig when sig misunderstood something I said. Based on that, Frog made up a relationship between Marco and I which I'm still confused about. He clung to it and dragged us both through the mud. We kept trying to explain this to him, and yet he accuses us of "discrediting my content based on fallacious logic, often times side stepping my points entirely." And he never addressed any of the things I said about him.

Frog moved on from us long ago. Both of us are his town reads now.[/quote]Yes, but this was still a thing that happened early in the game. His behavior during that whole exchange did not feel genuine to me.
It's also all I have to go off of right now. I haven't read anything after that except for the bits where I've been present in the thread.

Epi is town, by the way.

Epignosis wrote:Back a moment.

I think Frog is using the drinking as a maneuver. He's overplaying it. He's reminding us that he was drunk, reminding us that he's got a hangover- to what end? It's not as if getting a hangover is a noteworthy achievement, and so I don't see why that should impair your ability to participate. If you have a headache, go lie down. If you think you can push through the headache, push through.

But don't keep harping on how drunk you got and how much of a hangover you have now. Only bea does that, and she sticks to the former like a trooper.

Ah, but what do I know about drinking? I only have a snifter of brandy around the holidays.

At least he's not playing fantasy basketball.

Frog wrote:
Zexy wrote:I lean town on Psittaciform’s first post. Because meta. Only a lean, though.

What Frog’s done in the beginning is scummy (strategy talk + RVS hypocrisy), but votes piled up a bit too easily which made me paranoid, mostly about Marco. And Frog’s accusations of Marco are really good and he brings up towny points, although he overdoes it with TMI at some point. And there’s some tunneling going on here. I have more trouble accepting a Marco/Sloonei team than just Marco being mafia in the two.

Yet when it comes to Sloonei VS Frog, while Sloonei looks like he wins the argument easily, there is paranoia that kicks in as well. Sloonei’s cases are a bit too perfect. If he is so good, assuming he’s town, it means he could be good scum as well…

That’s it for now, will be back later.
Lol, nothing is scummy- I'm suggesting optimal strategy and pointing out things to keep eyes on. Literally none of my points have been refuted on a logical basis- all of my perspectives, warrants and basis for claims remain intact. Instead we see Sloonei and Marco discrediting my content based on fallacious logic, often times side stepping my points entirely.

It's quite sad to see your scum game Zexy

Ultimately you're shoving a false narrative that straddles every side. I don't like it.

For instance, here he is saying exactly what I just said about him. Frog's case against Marco and I at this time, and he can add any points that I'm missing if he wants, was that Marco and I were working together because Marco responded to sig when sig misunderstood something I said. Based on that, Frog made up a relationship between Marco and I which I'm still confused about. He clung to it and dragged us both through the mud. We kept trying to explain this to him, and yet he accuses us of "discrediting my content based on fallacious logic, often times side stepping my points entirely." And he never addressed any of the things I said about him.

Golden wrote:If I was to do some kind of tinfoil CFD vote, it would probably be Frog.

His trying to constantly reduce things to mechanical rules about what scum would do are not only obviously fallacious (because the moment rules develop around 'what scum would do', scum deliberately act counter to that) but also feel like someone making a play for town leader.

I see Frog's content almost as deliberate wifom - on one hand I can read it as trying to avoid being the NK target. On the other as trying to avoid being the lynch target. The one thing I have difficulty seeing it as is absolutely straight. He started off feeling quite straightforward to me, but he's wobbled his way off the road.

Yes. I also felt like he swatted away a lot of my earlier prods without actually responding to them. He'd just say that I was wrong without a direct reference to my case.

It's taking me longer to wade through the linki than it is to type these posts.

Metalmarsh89 wrote:
Sloonei wrote:
Metalmarsh89 wrote:Here is a rainbow list.

Marco
Epignosis
Dyslexicon
Silverwolf
Soneji
Zexy
DrWilgy
Frog
Golden
Inawordyes
ika
Psittaciform
sig
a2thezebra
MovingPictures07
Sloonei
I can't take this rainbow seriously when the most confident bottom read is so wrong.
Of course you can. You can explain to me why you shouldn't be lynched.

I've already made my case. I don't like your responses either. Your response, because you put the responsibility on others. You said you scumread Frog, but are following him anyway based on what other people have said. In your response, you also apologized for "taking a spot in the game". I also have a tin-foil theory that you and MP are scum buddies.

I do like your more recent contributions over the last 30 minutes or so better.

But that is why you are my top scumread.

I don't have time to play this game, so instead of trying to read everything I just asked the thread to throw ideas at me and I'd react to them. I am doing the same thing right now, so if you like these posts better than those ones then I guess that could explain why you're misreading me. Or you're bad and you're just trying to spin things against me. ika threw a name at me and I asked him to explain why. Frog gave me four names with a bit of an explanation behind them, so I responded to his suggestion. Just because I have or had a scum read on him does not mean I should assume he's scum. He gave me a suggestion and I followed it. zebra was the name I liked best so I moved my vote there.

I am not putting responsibility on others, I am only asking for their help so that I can make informed decisions.

Dyslexicon wrote:
Sloonei wrote:What if I told you that this sort of thing is not atypical of zebra? I do not disagree that she is a reasonable suspect, and my vote for her earlier wasn't entirely baseless, but what you just described is something that I can believably see zebra doing as a townie. I've played many games with that zebra and the aggressive behavior you are describing is not atypical.

I can get behind the theory that she is trying to present an image as a "sacrificial town", but I do not think that has to be the case when reading her.
Alright, noted. But do you think she could do it as scum as well?
I'm mostly freaked out why I'm the only one suspecting this, and everyone else is like "let's lynch a random lurker or something lol".

I would not rule her out as a suspect for any of this, no. Keep on with the suspicion.

I definitely do not approve of an End of Day where the dominant discussion is about which lurker to lynch. Lynching a lurker is what you do when analysis of actual content fails you. I don't think this town is incapable of analyzing things and picking a better candidate out of the chatter. What are everyone's thoughts on the noisy people?

Epignosis wrote:
Sloonei wrote:I can't take this rainbow seriously
said no one ever.

Rainbows mean business.

I don't think I've ever seen a scummy marmot. Maybe once, on RYM a while ago.

Metalmarsh89 wrote:
Metalmarsh89 wrote:
Sloonei wrote:Well I messed that up. click? click?
At the time, it was a tie.
Whoops, I got my resposes mixed up. This was directed at Golden.

I get why I don't get it now.

Metalmarsh89 wrote:
Sloonei wrote:Well I messed that up. click? click?
At the time, it was a tie.

huh?

Metalmarsh89 wrote:Here is a rainbow list.

Marco
Epignosis
Dyslexicon
Silverwolf
Soneji
Zexy
DrWilgy
Frog
Golden
Inawordyes
ika
Psittaciform
sig
a2thezebra
MovingPictures07
Sloonei

I can't take this rainbow seriously when the most confident bottom read is so wrong.

Dyslexicon wrote:
Sloonei wrote:
Dyslexicon wrote:
Sloonei wrote:I have 80 minutes to play some mafia. I'm not reading the thread, but somebody tell me what's going on and why I should vote for people.
You should vote for Zebra. Sheep me, please. <3

The why is in my ISO.
Give me the abridged version
I'll try, but it's very much you should read it yourself. So she self voted stating that she would much rather lynch herself than MP cause he was such a strong town read. She makes a point of not having any scum reads so that's why she votes herself, she also makes a point of saying that if she was scum she would fabricate a scum read instead. So this is trying to come off as sacrificial town. She says she thought one of her or MP would be lynched, however there was plenty of time before day end at this point (she claims to not know how long it was). What follows is kind of a sift through lurkers to find someone else than her and MP to lynch. Zebra defends quite a lot of lurkers, and I believe she is playing it up as her not wanting to move over to "easy targets" painting herself more as sacrificial town. She mentions that voting lurkers is bad because the info you get from them is so scarce. However what happens is she decides to vote MM (who is arguably a lurker at this point), and she says she is ok with lynching LC (also lurker). The wagon on Zebra dissolves, and at the end of it she has zero votes.

I believe she is trying to come across as town, and it doesn't read genuine to me. At the point when she voted herself she also had been in discussion with a few players (Frog, Golden) enough to at least have some suspicion on them imo, or she could find a better target than herself.

I seem to be the only one suspecting her now, and she isn't reaction well to my suspicion imo. See in my ISO my post that has pretty colors. Basically I see her doing a lot of "Why do you say I'm doing X?" when I have accused her of doing Y.

Brevity is not a skill that I possess.

What if I told you that this sort of thing is not atypical of zebra? I do not disagree that she is a reasonable suspect, and my vote for her earlier wasn't entirely baseless, but what you just described is something that I can believably see zebra doing as a townie. I've played many games with that zebra and the aggressive behavior you are describing is not atypical.

I can get behind the theory that she is trying to present an image as a "sacrificial town", but I do not think that has to be the case when reading her.

Well I messed that up. click? click?

Metalmarsh89 wrote:
Sloonei wrote:
Metalmarsh89 wrote:
Sloonei wrote:
Metalmarsh89 wrote:
Sloonei wrote:I have 80 minutes to play some mafia. I'm not reading the thread, but somebody tell me what's going on and why I should vote for people.
You're my top scumread, but don't vote for me please.
Why and why not?
Because I'm a civilian, and I can dance for you.
Why am I your top scum read?
The case I posted against you which resulted in you voting for zebra.

Another point I posted later: Frog is your top suspect. Why did you question ika wert voting for MP, but readily go through Frog's list of players to vote and choose your target?

Then I've already responded. [urlhttp://www.mafiathesyndicate.com/viewtopic.php ... 81#p265081]click[/url] [urlhttp://www.mafiathesyndicate.com/viewtopic.php ... 19#p265119]click[/url]

Frog wrote:
Sloonei wrote:
Dyslexicon wrote:
Sloonei wrote:I have 80 minutes to play some mafia. I'm not reading the thread, but somebody tell me what's going on and why I should vote for people.
You should vote for Zebra. Sheep me, please. <3

The why is in my ISO.
Give me the abridged version
here you go.

And this should demonstrate 3 things:

1) I am town
2) Marshmellow is scum
3) Ponies will rule the world in the next 50 years

That is the debridged version.

Frog wrote:
Dyslexicon wrote:
Frog wrote:lynch this. there are no "civilian"
That's what they call themselves here. A bunch of people have said it, or called it civ.

Vote Zebra
- Kisses
I mean... it's Vanilla Town, not civilian. Might as well have claimed other impossible roles to have had like Dragon. Fuck it, I'm claiming Dragon. :-P

Also, Marshmellow took a dump on my lawn, lynch that dude for justice!

"civilian" is just the standard word for "town" here.

EBWOP: please

Dyslexicon wrote:
Sloonei wrote:I have 80 minutes to play some mafia. I'm not reading the thread, but somebody tell me what's going on and why I should vote for people.
You should vote for Zebra. Sheep me, please. <3

The why is in my ISO.

Give me the abridged version

Epignosis wrote:What would be helpful is if each person said in a single sentence whom they want me to vote and why.

Metalmarsh89 wrote:
Sloonei wrote:
Metalmarsh89 wrote:
Sloonei wrote:I have 80 minutes to play some mafia. I'm not reading the thread, but somebody tell me what's going on and why I should vote for people.
You're my top scumread, but don't vote for me please.
Why and why not?
Because I'm a civilian, and I can dance for you.

Why am I your top scum read?

Whoa, how did I actually manage to double vote for Frog?

Frog wrote:
Sloonei wrote:I have 80 minutes to play some mafia. I'm not reading the thread, but somebody tell me what's going on and why I should vote for people.
for the lols

VOTE FROG LOL

Metalmarsh89 wrote:
Sloonei wrote:I have 80 minutes to play some mafia. I'm not reading the thread, but somebody tell me what's going on and why I should vote for people.
You're my top scumread, but don't vote for me please.

Why and why not?

When I was leaving a couple hours ago I noticed that Metalmarsh had started up a case against me, and that this coincided with him being a leader in the poll. Where are we on this?

I have 80 minutes to play some mafia. I'm not reading the thread, but somebody tell me what's going on and why I should vote for people.

Metalmarsh89 wrote:
a2thezebra wrote:
Metalmarsh89 wrote:
Golden wrote:What MM fails to account for in his case on sloonei is the extent to which sloonei already town read or trusted ika vs frog. If I came on asking people who I should vote for and a person I didn't have any reason to trust gave me one answer and a person I'm reading as town gave me another, I know I'd dismiss one and focus on the other.
I fail to see how Frog being Sloonei's top suspect only a few hours beforehand supports this statement.
A lot can change in a few hours regarding reads, you know this just as well as I do.

Ok, but wert Sloonei, there was no change of opinion during that time.

People are taking what Golden said here as fact when he admitted that he was making an inaccurate statement to poke at my case.

people who are more involved than me seem to trust Frog. But i'm gonna stick with my gut and say that's unwise. A lot of his early interactions with me and Marco felt off and I had a hard time believing the things he was saying.

Now i'm leaving

Frog is still my top suspect, but I'm taking that with more than just one grain of salt because I still habe not read anything extensively past the first couple hours of the game and I probably won't be able to get cauht up ever. Again, I apologize. You can lynch me if you all think that's the best thing to do, but i'm not bad and you should just wait for my replacement instead.

I'm moving my vote back to Frog because I might as well vote on my own terms.

Massive linki. @ zebra, thanks and yeah, everything i've posted since last night has been exhaustion-fueled. Not exhausted from this game, but exhausted from real life. I'm workig every day this week as well as the last three days in a row now and I have various other RL commitments to deal with. I simpy don't have the time or energy needed to play this game right now.

STOP POSTING FOR A SECOND WILL YOU?

Metalmarsh89 wrote:
Sloonei wrote:Somebody tell me who I should vote for. I am not going to be able to read this thread tonight. Or tomorrow. Or the next day. I probably should have stayed on the sidelines.
Sloonei pops in and says this last night, asking everyone who he should vote for. Ika was the first one to respond to him with movingpictures, to which Sloonei immediately asks why.

Sloonei wrote:
ika wrote:
Sloonei wrote:Somebody tell me who I should vote for. I am not going to be able to read this thread tonight. Or tomorrow. Or the next day. I probably should have stayed on the sidelines.
moving picutre
Why?
And again.

Sloonei wrote:
ika wrote:
Sloonei wrote:
ika wrote:
Sloonei wrote:Somebody tell me who I should vote for. I am not going to be able to read this thread tonight. Or tomorrow. Or the next day. I probably should have stayed on the sidelines.
moving picutre
Why?
you asked who to vote for noting else
Now I'm asking why. Why?
But after ika gives Sloonei MP's name, Frog chimes in with a list of 4 names. Here is Sloonei's response.

Sloonei wrote:
Frog wrote:
Sloonei wrote:Somebody tell me who I should vote for. I am not going to be able to read this thread tonight. Or tomorrow. Or the next day. I probably should have stayed on the sidelines.

I already gave you 4 names, let me lead
[*]Marshmellow
[*]Pilfirmous
[*]Dr Wigly
[*]A2Zebra
I won't vote metalmarsh because being flaky and elusive early on is his MO. I won't vote Pligifudhdjd because they're a stranger and I don't want to vote a stranger on Day 1 without substance to back me up. Zebra is sometimes quiet and sometimes aggressive early on. Her quietness, in my experience, has been either because she's scum or is busy. I could vote for her.
Wilgy is normally a vocal player but Imm pretty sure he's currently in a tense late-game situation in Spirited Away so his semi-absence here would be explainable.

Zebra is my top choice of these names, I guess. I'll have a look.
Sloonei doesn't ask why, but takes those four names and narrows his options down to zebra. He then comes up with a weak case on zebra.

Sloonei wrote:
a2thezebra wrote:This isn't spam by the way because I'm making a crucial point with these posts.

D.

a2thezebra wrote:Okay, now I have a total of 11 posts. I am no longer in the bottom four.

...And yet I am just as likely to be bad as I was before I started posting.

Frog can deny it all he wants, but the methods he's using to base his vote are absolutely advocating a policy lynch.
This seems like zebra is just trying to be contrarian and throw a wrench in Frog's proposed plan, but the stated reasoning does not really seem effective or sensible. Just "I'm going to tell you this plan is bad because I can."
Then he votes for zebra.

Sloonei wrote:VOTE A2THEZEBRA, happy!?

Addendum: Sloonei treats the interactions with ika and Frog in these circumstances way too differently. Ika suggests he vote MP, and does give reasons why, but ika asks for evidence, before disappearing. Then you have the Frog interaction, where Sloonei readily narrowed his vote down to zebra, voted for zebra (with the strange reluctant "Happy!?" thrown in), and hasn't posted since.

I realize Sloonei has very limited time this game, but I still don't like this sequence. I think Sloonei is bad.

I asked ima why but not Frog because I knew Frog had narrowed his list down to the four of you because you hadn't posted much at that time. Ika just drew MP's name out of a hat and I wanted him to give us all something substantial.
Hello and goodbye again, I just got home from work and now I have to run back out. I'm sorry for taking up a spot in this game, my schedule is not getting better any time soon.

Are the people who are caught up on this thread reading Frog as town?
Also Frog, how are you currently reading me?

ika wrote:
Sloonei wrote:
ika wrote: i know i wanted to have some fun.

no but mp doesnt seem to believe in his push when he was pushing me when i called him out on it.

then when sivler moves her vote after MP was suspecing her slighy, makes a 180 and joins her
could you link me to the posts you are referring to? Please and thank you
sigh...... can you iso him and read that at least?

No. I am a lazy townie and I'm dragging you all down with me.

I will not be my normal self in this game due to time constraints but I don't want to drop out so I'm gonna have to adjust on the fly. I apologize.

VOTE A2THEZEBRA, happy!?

ika wrote:
Sloonei wrote:
ika wrote:
Sloonei wrote:
ika wrote:
Sloonei wrote:Somebody tell me who I should vote for. I am not going to be able to read this thread tonight. Or tomorrow. Or the next day. I probably should have stayed on the sidelines.
moving picutre
Why?
you asked who to vote for noting else
Now I'm asking why. Why?
i know i wanted to have some fun.

no but mp doesnt seem to believe in his push when he was pushing me when i called him out on it.

then when sivler moves her vote after MP was suspecing her slighy, makes a 180 and joins her

could you link me to the posts you are referring to? Please and thank you

a2thezebra wrote:This isn't spam by the way because I'm making a crucial point with these posts.

D.

a2thezebra wrote:Okay, now I have a total of 11 posts. I am no longer in the bottom four.

...And yet I am just as likely to be bad as I was before I started posting.

Frog can deny it all he wants, but the methods he's using to base his vote are absolutely advocating a policy lynch.

This seems like zebra is just trying to be contrarian and throw a wrench in Frog's proposed plan, but the stated reasoning does not really seem effective or sensible. Just "I'm going to tell you this plan is bad because I can."

ika wrote:
Sloonei wrote:
ika wrote:
Sloonei wrote:Somebody tell me who I should vote for. I am not going to be able to read this thread tonight. Or tomorrow. Or the next day. I probably should have stayed on the sidelines.
moving picutre
Why?
you asked who to vote for noting else

Now I'm asking why. Why?

Frog wrote:
Sloonei wrote:Somebody tell me who I should vote for. I am not going to be able to read this thread tonight. Or tomorrow. Or the next day. I probably should have stayed on the sidelines.

I already gave you 4 names, let me lead
[*]Marshmellow
[*]Pilfirmous
[*]Dr Wigly
[*]A2Zebra

I won't vote metalmarsh because being flaky and elusive early on is his MO. I won't vote Pligifudhdjd because they're a stranger and I don't want to vote a stranger on Day 1 without substance to back me up. Zebra is sometimes quiet and sometimes aggressive early on. Her quietness, in my experience, has been either because she's scum or is busy. I could vote for her.
Wilgy is normally a vocal player but Imm pretty sure he's currently in a tense late-game situation in Spirited Away so his semi-absence here would be explainable.

Zebra is my top choice of these names, I guess. I'll have a look.

ika wrote:
Sloonei wrote:Somebody tell me who I should vote for. I am not going to be able to read this thread tonight. Or tomorrow. Or the next day. I probably should have stayed on the sidelines.
moving picutre

Why?

Search found 99 matches