Return to “A Mafia of Unfortunate Events [END GAME]”
Oh no DF you do you. That's just the baby of the beast.DFaraday wrote:I do think I had too much potential for BTSC and role knowledge in this game. Something I'll try to avoid in future games.
There did seem to be a lot of 'nudge nudge, wink wink' going on this game. I guess if you have secrets and info, and have engaged in BTSC in separate moments it makes it a lot easier to pick up on. For like 10 pages there over a phase ago, I had no idea what was going on or why some people were reaching the conclusions they were reaching. But if a game has this many secrets and powers without the ability to info dump, I completely understand why it went down the way it went down. Looking in from the outside, I was perpetually stumped and was like 'lol if I were bad I'd just vote out Epi and sig' as if I were the queen of space.Long Con wrote:Oh, I was following along.Jackofhearts2005 wrote:Everyone but Dom in the civvies had BTSC with someone and the VFD and cult were known.Long Con wrote:What was the case on Sorsha, by the way?
That left Sorsha and Dom. Dom managed to lynch you so the town figured he was the super voter.....though with as many votes as you bid on the bowl, a single voter would have made it a coin flip.
I held out basically waiting for Dom. I was pretty dang sure it was Sorsha but Golden was eyeing me. I would have sided with the scum/cult if it was up to me cause I trusted Sorsha, Quin, Daisy and MP not to kill me more than I trusted Sig, Golden, Dom and DDL not to. If Sorsha had a buddy or was innocent, her lynch would have potentially lost me the game and I was willing to take 100% tomorrow over 99% today. Plus, if Dom was Jerome, I figured it wasn't up to me and the town would win. I had Sig pegged as the other townie mason after DDL basically vouched for him. Didn't realize it was a temporary BTSC. Golden didn't know how right he was about there being trust or not. I wanted Quin to win but I wasn't gonna sacrifice my win to help him. I just trusted him more. Figured the town would (perhaps rightly) sacrifice me to win with the cult while cult would (perhaps also rightly) sacrifice the town to win with me.
Good game, town, especially Sig and Golden.
Fist bump to LC and Quin. So glad to get teammates and also not be scum for my first game. Too bad we didn't know Dom was Jerome or we could have still lynched Sorsha yesterday and got a win for Quin.
There's just certain folks that I don't understand casting a vote for Sorsha. Maybe because she didn't give the defense of "Why?"Just seems kind of hypocritical to blast the idea of narrowing down suspects via 'knowledge', but then just go ahead and vote based on that. Maybe I'm missing something.
SIG SIG SIG SIG SIG SIGScotty wrote:What kind of inventions did Dog devise?
Im dead. Rules of life and logic don't apply to meGolden wrote:You must be. Jeopardy doesn't have a $500 question.Scotty wrote:Ill take a rez for $500, Alex.
And yes MP I'm talking to you.
two adverbs in the same sentence.Epignosis wrote:That's literally exactly what he looks like.Jackofhearts2005 wrote:I like MP. I imagine him as a talking sock and that makes me smile.
No, don't townread me. Putting that damn target on my back.Nachomamma8 wrote:Did I mention that I'm townreading Scotty?Scotty wrote:Because of course the cop dies day 1.
Your parents may have walked uphill both ways in the snow barefoot to school, but now we have to do all of that without pants.
I'm sorry sprityo. What a shitty way to go. I take responsibility for that one.
I did, right? Good.
I'm kidding btw.Scotty wrote:Oh look! Sprityo's back!
Let's lynch him again!
Surely lightning won't strike twice..
*****Getting lynched without a whimperMetalmarsh89 wrote:****Baking me a cake (perhaps)Scotty wrote:***Busy getting drank or eaten or whatever the fuck it is you do with soupMetalmarsh89 wrote:Alright list updated.
*Promised to read and vote. Appears to be unfaithful.
- Dom
DrWilgy
Elohcin****
Epignosis*
Glorfindel**
LoRab
Marco
Nachomamma8
soup***
sprityo*****
**Deliberately withheld vote.
I hear your plea but the fact of the matter is it's day 1 and unless you have info on something, you're probably going to be taking a stab in the dark.Glorfindel wrote:I have an idea but I need to do some considerable research to support my choice. I am unwilling to nominate who they were/are at this point because the last thing I want to do is falsely accuse someone of being Mafia (granted not something most people have an issue with around hereScotty wrote:Looks like you didn't vote for anyone right now. Who would you have voted if you were required to place a vote today?Glorfindel wrote:I mean that I feel very confident in Daisy and Zebs being Town. That doesn't mean I necessarily agree with them however. I'm not voting for you right now.Metalmarsh89 wrote:How is my wagon pure? Zebra didn't read my posts properly and I don't even know why Daisy is voting for me (aside from gut).Glorfindel wrote:I don't think I've seen sufficient genuine content so far to make a judgement to be honest, my friend - and yes, I know I bear some responsibility for that... Of the current wagons, MM's looks the most pure but from my recollection, the poor guy gets lynched early every game I play with himScotty wrote:Why?Glorfindel wrote:Am I allowed to vote 'We Didn't Start The Fire'? I'm really not liking the look of those leading wagons...
Who would you like to vote for, grand elf?
If you joined it, it would be pure. But I don't want that.).
***Busy getting drank or eaten or whatever the fuck it is you do with soupMetalmarsh89 wrote:Alright list updated.
*Promised to read and vote. Appears to be unfaithful.
- Dom
DrWilgy
Elohcin
Epignosis*
Glorfindel**
LoRab
Marco
Nachomamma8
soup***
sprityo
**Deliberately withheld vote.
Looks like you didn't vote for anyone right now. Who would you have voted if you were required to place a vote today?Glorfindel wrote:I mean that I feel very confident in Daisy and Zebs being Town. That doesn't mean I necessarily agree with them however. I'm not voting for you right now.Metalmarsh89 wrote:How is my wagon pure? Zebra didn't read my posts properly and I don't even know why Daisy is voting for me (aside from gut).Glorfindel wrote:I don't think I've seen sufficient genuine content so far to make a judgement to be honest, my friend - and yes, I know I bear some responsibility for that... Of the current wagons, MM's looks the most pure but from my recollection, the poor guy gets lynched early every game I play with himScotty wrote:Why?Glorfindel wrote:Am I allowed to vote 'We Didn't Start The Fire'? I'm really not liking the look of those leading wagons...
Who would you like to vote for, grand elf?
If you joined it, it would be pure. But I don't want that.
I ripped my leash off long ago myself, so I understand ya brotha.Jackofhearts2005 wrote:Nah, not really.Scotty wrote:Dude I don't know shit.Jackofhearts2005 wrote:Two big differences between what I criticized and what I'm doing.Metalmarsh89 wrote:You suggested anyone willing to randomize to not vote at all.Jackofhearts2005 wrote:Yeah?Metalmarsh89 wrote:Now wait a second jack.
Jackofhearts2005 wrote:What's the advantage of random voting at all?
If you're not the determiner, you might as well not vote.
If you are the determiner....you want to determine who should die randomly?
Now you're randomizing a low poster.
What changed your mind?
1) My pool is shortened significantly
2) I haven't voted. I've asked Scotty for his opinion on switching from one player within the pool that he (a potential scummer) chose and a player chosen at random.
I also don't know shit in this game.
But I do know that you can do you, and I have no idea whether or not LoRab is a better or worse pick.
But I'm curious if you have an aversion to voting sprityo, jack
Just don't like being lead around in general.
I like Spirityo as a lynch candidate better than anyone else with 1 or more votes.
Is he?Sorsha wrote:Would voting spirityo be a policy lynch since it's because he's usually a low poster?
Why?Glorfindel wrote:Am I allowed to vote 'We Didn't Start The Fire'? I'm really not liking the look of those leading wagons...
Dude I don't know shit.Jackofhearts2005 wrote:Two big differences between what I criticized and what I'm doing.Metalmarsh89 wrote:You suggested anyone willing to randomize to not vote at all.Jackofhearts2005 wrote:Yeah?Metalmarsh89 wrote:Now wait a second jack.
Jackofhearts2005 wrote:What's the advantage of random voting at all?
If you're not the determiner, you might as well not vote.
If you are the determiner....you want to determine who should die randomly?
Now you're randomizing a low poster.
What changed your mind?
1) My pool is shortened significantly
2) I haven't voted. I've asked Scotty for his opinion on switching from one player within the pool that he (a potential scummer) chose and a player chosen at random.
Metalmarsh89 wrote:Now wait a second jack.
Jackofhearts2005 wrote:What's the advantage of random voting at all?
If you're not the determiner, you might as well not vote.
If you are the determiner....you want to determine who should die randomly?
K. I dunno. Yes. Bring salsa.Jackofhearts2005 wrote:But I wouldn't believe you cause you've been MIA during all the game theory discussion.sig wrote:I dislike this post, I say the same thing when I'm mafia.Jackofhearts2005 wrote:@SpaceDaisy
In the interest of fairness, I will debate and analyze game theory to the ends of time cause I really like it.
So I'm not a baddie but I'd be doing much of this culture reading/mechanic strategy debate anyhow.
Linki? @Scotty
I'll join the low poster train.
A random roll of the low posters gets Lorab.
If I rejected your suggestion of Spirityo right now and voted Lorab, what would you think of that?
This is the cutest thing I've read today.Quin wrote:Mum wants help in the garden. I intended to stick around but I'll likely be preoccupied until past EoD.
THIS. See guys? It's not so bad if there's no one around. Or parked at a red light. Right guys?Metalmarsh89 wrote:I realize it's a flimsy excuse, but I only do it on the highway when there aren't cars around.Spacedaisy wrote:HOLDEN! Don't mafia and drive! The game is not worth your life or that of anyone else on the road...
This exact dilemma has always made me pause in the no-info-dumping games. If I were in that position I'm not sure what I would do- I haven't yet had a role that I could do that, but I'm nervous in case I ever get it- I dunno if I would constantly go after the found Olaf in hopes that I will be some kamikaze and be lynched, thus making it glaringly obvious that the player I was jumping on is Olaf, or attempt to sprinkle on subtle suspicions over time, but not making it clear that he is bad. Either way, it's all down to making sure you don't get NK'd too early.Golden wrote:It would be insanely broken if you could infodump or if nightkills weren't immediately janitored - as it is, he could use both on baddies and we might never figure it out if he doesn't play it carefully.Nachomamma8 wrote:Klaus role seems insanely broken but I don't see why he would do anything except investigate two baddies.
Here is a civilian Klaus might look for - Hal.
That didn't answer my question.insertnamehere wrote:They don't sleep anymore on the beach.Scotty wrote:I don't wanna talk about Glorf's moral principals.
Look y'all, life is like a box of chocolates mmk? Sometimes you get cherry cordial, and you didn't want cherry cordial. Sometimes you pop an almond in your mouth and you're allergic to almond. Next time just stick to an apple or something that has no chance to let you down.
FUJI APPLE FOR OFFICE 2020Here's what I wanna talk about: the fires at the beach. Why were there fires at the beach?
And has anyone not checked in yet?
Cuz of the fire.
Are you the Donald's Toupeè?Metalmarsh89 wrote:If I won your vote, I'd throw it away.DrWilgy wrote:Hi everyone!
I'm having trouble keeping up. Someone win my heart and vote.
If I won your heart, I'd treasure its beauty.
Now that is an interesting thing. After night 1, of you have BTSC with someone, you might be talking with a double agent the next day. Sucks for you!DFaraday wrote:All players are recruitable, and still retain all abilities, as well as any BTSC they started with. Kills remain with the team, so if a cult-recruited baddie's mafia teammates are all dead or recruited, the team is eliminated and that player does not have a kill.Jackofhearts2005 wrote:Thanks, DF.
Same for me, usually, but I didn't want to assume.
Would the cult vanillaize its recruits? Can mafia members be cultified?
Nah, my job security is airtight. He can do the metaphors. I'll handle the shitty similes. (And the alliterations, aight?) i know that was assonance, you assQuin wrote:This guy is gonna give Scotty a run for his money in the metaphor department.Jackofhearts2005 wrote:You're watching a guy throw pretzels in the water and a) assuming he's fishing and b) assuming that throwing pretzels in the water will lead to catching fish.
I'm watching the same guy and saying he's not contributing to solving our food shortage.
No you're right. LC is Spider-Man and was reading the map upside down.Golden wrote:I think LC has his land and water backwards. I voted East because the pyramid looks good.
Thought edit - unless I am missing a compass somewhere that LC saw.
It is almost always followed by Day 1 hereJackofhearts2005 wrote:By the way, is Day 0 followed by Day 1 or Night 0?
Heheh yeah he's probably lying.Jackofhearts2005 wrote:I could get behind splitting the difference with alignment only flips. While no janitoring is more comfortable to me, I'm big on trying new things.
This seems like a terrible idea.Snow Dog wrote:I'm playing without reading my role.
If you're being truthful and you're town, this only hurts your performance.
If you're being truthful and you're scum, maybe you don't accidentally give yourself away with a scumtell.
You could also be scum and lying, using this as a shield. "Anything scummy I say can't actually be scummy cause I don't even know my alignment."
I'm with the marmot. You seem like a great first lynch.
