The Syndicate

Long Con wrote:Scotty, tell me about the thing I was accusing you of... when you suspected me, then knew my role.

Ah yeah

After you questioned me again the other day about "10-4 ole buddy" I went back to the Pl you sent me, which i had explicitly written off, and realized the last bit of the jumbled dogcrap that was sent to me had a standalone like you said in thread, so I knew it was you.

That you kept pressing me to out you made me feel uncomfortable putting a target on your back so I just evaded it and called you civ in my eyes.

Mongoose you're too sweet.

Like a gummy bear, only you're a goose.

Huh. I was wrong about literally everyone's role except LC. Figured out juliets literally an hour ago when she referenced Denim Shirt again.

Thought Boom was the protector and protected himself N1, which is the most logical choice as a doctor if you don't trust anyone yet. But nijuu nailed it.
Thought nijuu was the Casual Friday poster. It had a lovely feminine quality to it that reminded me of nijuu. I do declare, JJJ!
Thought Quin was the Skinny Jeans and protected himself. But Boom did that [in error lol].

I didn't realize my power was a night action until Mongoose mentioned it in thread like day 3. And then i either was blocked or targeted the person that died that night, so really the only one I could affect was Made today. So...that's fine I guess.

Good call on Sorsha day 1, llama. I played along with the fact that Sorsha refused to play the Jean Pun game...but turns out it was spot on!

Yahooooo

Voted out 2/4 baddies ain't bad in my book!

Thanks for the game, Mongoose! Look forward to the next one! And grats felow civvies!

Long Con wrote:

juliets wrote:

Long Con wrote:Juliets was my one thing I could really count on besides Boomslang. Now I don't believe in nuthin' no more.

If Epi had voted INH, I would have voted there.

I've just about broadcasted who I am.

I told you, I have gotten no hints. I'll look again with hints in mind.

Look back through her history. Which role is brought up. I now feel more confident in who she is.

LC and Epi still haven't voted. 2 min

juliets wrote:

Scotty wrote:

That example of bad Made does look slightly different than this one.

Ok fam. Here's the deal.

I didn't suspect INH because I thought him to be the Denim Shirt. That is a prevailing judgment that is not necessarily backed up, and is more based on gut. His voting record is garbage, so I can't really defend that.

But I would warn that if you are to vote elsewhere besides Made, you should all solidify your votes there in case of those vote manipulations that may still be in play.

I'm pretty sure INH is not the denim shirt, but beyond that as I said before the only thing bad I see are his votes. There are 3 of us who haven't voted. If we don't all 3 vote INH then we will either have a tie which I don't see as a viable option or Made will be lynched. Time is short. I'd really like to know what you guys are thinking.

Then I have no idea who INH is and ima feel bad if Made gets mislynched without me properly looking at INH.

everyone else should vote either 1 of Made or INH.

Please.

I would have much chagrin if neither of y'all are bad and it's actually someone else. I don't know who it would be otherwise but I hope not to get to that level

Made wrote:So y'all know I got about an hour left at work, when I leave I'll have to vote.

Honestly your best bet if no one starts voting is an INH vote.

If you're not bad, that is.

That example of bad Made does look slightly different than this one.

Ok fam. Here's the deal.

I didn't suspect INH because I thought him to be the Denim Shirt. That is a prevailing judgment that is not necessarily backed up, and is more based on gut. His voting record is garbage, so I can't really defend that.

But I would warn that if you are to vote elsewhere besides Made, you should all solidify your votes there in case of those vote manipulations that may still be in play.

Made wrote:

Scotty wrote:

Made wrote:

Long Con wrote:Made, who is the last baddie?

I'll vote later.

I still think the last baddie is INH. His vote record is the worst still in the game, and his vote for me fits perfectly into the theory I had yesterday. Scotty is on my short list for blendy behavior, and claims of knowing mad roles as LC pointed out. Working atm so I'll be here pretty much till lynch so AMA

If I'm still blendy, then what are you?

I feel like blendy does less with how much you post and what you post about, so posting in abundance over mechanics verse posting only when you have somethimg to say about player behavior makes the difference.

That and ik my alignment.

I would hardly say my posts are marginally comprised of mechanics posts. Yea I had a handful early on, but I am actively trying to solve the game.

And those mechanics questions, btw, were also attempting to solve the game. I'm not ragging on your low posts. I believe in high quality over high quantity. But I don't remember the quality of your posts. Hell, your Wilgy vote was "I don't see it but I'll vote there kbye"

Epignosis wrote:I still think voting Wilgy instead of 3J Day 3 is a solid point in Made's favor. Scotty, and those suspecting Made, how do you interpret that?

Sorsha bussed DDL. What do you make of that?

Epignosis wrote:I'm trying to see a clear picture of the whole team's activity.

Sorsha was a double busser (DDL and Wilgy).
Wilgy was a saver (DDL).
Made was a misser (Day 1) and potentially a busser (Day 3) when he had an avenue to be a saver.

I don't know. I just look at INH's votes and see him voting against lynching a bad guy at every turn.

INH is my other suspect, if Made isn't it. I thought I had a good idea of his role is the biggest reason I value a Made lynch.

As LC said, if we just lynch one of the 3 of us before LyLo, we're golden methinks

Made wrote:

Long Con wrote:Made, who is the last baddie?

I'll vote later.

I still think the last baddie is INH. His vote record is the worst still in the game, and his vote for me fits perfectly into the theory I had yesterday. Scotty is on my short list for blendy behavior, and claims of knowing mad roles as LC pointed out. Working atm so I'll be here pretty much till lynch so AMA

If I'm still blendy, then what are you?

Tick tock.

Made's still catching up.

I think it's been long enough.

Made

Made wrote:Thought the vote was later, but good result!

Will catch up after dinner

The bear is still eating, it seems

Long Con wrote:I mean, you had no problem at all with revealing that you thought Epi was Jean Genie. I don't understand what the difference is here.

And I really don't understand why you would list me under your suspects if you know my Civ role. And let me clarify by saying that it makes me suspicious specifically because it looked like you thought you could maybe get me lynched, but then changed your mind and decided to 'support' me.

The difference here is in the semantics. I thought Epi was the Jean Genie because of the writing style. I think the others are what they are because of thread based and maaaaybe other private evidence. You were a suspect for mine until I realized a thing.
I have no desire to continue to engage this topic, so I'm sorry if I am letting you down in that way. If you find that suspicious, I don't care.

Long Con wrote:

Scotty wrote:

Long Con wrote:If you're so Civ, Scotty... Made voter... why can't you be straight with me about my issue from earlier?

Why are you caught up in me answering that question? I think you're civ because I do.

That's not the point. Of course you think I'm Civ.

Should i not?

Really? Come on, Scotty. I'm being serious here.

Anyway, looking forward to Made catching up.

Even if I'm lynched tomorrow instead, whatevs. You'll lynch Made after.

Or Made, and then you? That's rhetorical.

I left INH on the list because while I'm confident I know his role, I'm not the most confident as I am about others.

What would happen if you revealed every single role you think you know?

I'm not gonna reveal every single role because why would I do that.
You might as well just reveal your own role and we can all rustle up a cup of tea with the hatter.

I'm actually curious why you are trying to get me to out you. Making me get really paranoid that you aren't who I think you are.

Epignosis wrote:Last mafia go.

Lion-o

Long Con wrote:If you're so Civ, Scotty... Made voter... why can't you be straight with me about my issue from earlier?

Why are you caught up in me answering that question? I think you're civ because I do.

Should i not?

Anyway, looking forward to Made catching up.

Even if I'm lynched tomorrow instead, whatevs. You'll lynch Made after.

I left INH on the list because while I'm confident I know his role, I'm not the most confident as I am about others.

My suggestions of lynch from here on:
Made>INH

Let's getter done.

I don't think anyone on the Sorsha train is bad.

Gg town we got this in the bag!

Either way there only 20 minutes left and only 2 of us have voted.

Don't pull a Made please and vote right before deadline

I support a Sorsha lynch today.

If that means anything to anyone. I've already voted for Made, who I still think is bad, but I wouldn't mind votes being thrown her way. Epi make s a lot of sense

Man, I really hope my assumptions about people are true. If LC and INH are not who I think they are, Im completely in the wrong direction.

I don't think I am tho.

Long Con wrote:

Scotty wrote:I think I know LC's role, I think I know INh's role, I think I know nijuu's role, I think I know Boomslang's role. I think I know my role. I think I knew Quin's role. Juliets said she had dropped hints somewhere, but I ain't seein em.

I think I know Juliets' role.

When did you figure out my role? Sunday evening you said this:

Scotty wrote:I think one or both of LC and llama are bad, yes.

And that does not indicate an understanding of what my role is.

Yes.

I think I know LC's role, I think I know INh's role, I think I know nijuu's role, I think I know Boomslang's role. I think I know my role. I think I knew Quin's role. Juliets said she had dropped hints somewhere, but I ain't seein em.

Epignosis wrote:

Scotty wrote:

Epignosis wrote:My concern with lynching Made is that he voted 3J Day 2. If he wanted to protect Wilgy, he had the avenue of precedent to vote 3J Day 3. He did not do this.

Epi who do you think is bad?

My vote is probably going to one of you, INH, LC, or Sorsha.

Yes, I realize Sorsha looks like an odd pick, but here's what I see:

Sorsha wrote:

insertnamehere wrote: Back in game-land, I do find it odd that people aren't agreeing with my case, but failing to raise any real points against it, or suggesting a practical alternative.

It's a well thought out case but what it comes down to for me is: If llama is bad why would he go after me like that? He would know I'm civ and what good would going balls to the wall and lynching a civ like that on day one do?

I am confident I can imagine an evil llama going after a civilian lynch victim Day 1 and getting away with it.

The underlined is a little confusing: Why would evil llama knowing someone is a civilian change the fact that he wants to lynch civilians?

This is all she said about DDL:

Sorsha wrote:I have the worst feels for the following people:

MM- he's been present and posting but not saying much game relevant. I know that's typical Marmot, especially day one but I think there has been comment worthy material here that I'd expect him to weigh in on.

Scotty- I don't like how he so easily jumped on llamas case on me. It was still day zero and he was already prepping to jump on a Sorsha lynch-train. Very unlike Scotty who is normally a low/no poster voter, especially day one.

DDL- maybe he's just busy but he was a big poster early in ASOUE as a civ and hasn't been yet here. He's been here but like Epi pointed out, hasn't said much.

A Person, blooper, Eloh- no content but have posted

Sorsha wrote:Voting DDL to break the tie again! So much fun

Let me ask everyone this: You're bad with DDL. He's getting votes but isn't around for whatever reason. Even if he were to survive and make it to Day 2, would he still not be a top candidate for the lynch? In other words, his days would be numbered. If you are bad, do you try to keep him around or do you try to salvage some credibility from his death?

In terms of the successful lynches, Sorsha has a nearly perfect record, voting at precisely the right time. Nobody at all is suspecting her.

So why haven't the Mafia tried to kill her yet?

Addendum: And holy crap there she is.

Well I'm glad we're on similar wave lengths there. I also found her post/vote in the DDL lynch opportunistic. I thought that of the voters on DDL that looked like they could be bussing, Sorsha was at the top. Then you. JJJ put a lot of stock if I recall in calling Sorsha one of the top civ reads from that lynch. I mean, she tied it up towards the end! But think of the mad civ cred that would wrack up. You started the suspicion, so your voting for him shouldn't come as a shock, and I would argue does make you look better.

But I'm still in the mind that one of the DDL voters is bad.

Epignosis wrote:My concern with lynching Made is that he voted 3J Day 2. If he wanted to protect Wilgy, he had the avenue of precedent to vote 3J Day 3. He did not do this.

Epi who do you think is bad?

I'm feeling good about a Made vote today.

Made

Made wrote:

Scotty wrote:Made's vote in the llama lynch? A half hour or so before deadline and bringing it awfully close (4-5) with Epi still left to vote. Why. Why we gotta bring it so close always, Made?

Scotty wrote: His vote comes on Wilgy as the 6th vote, when the next highest train was JJJ with 3 votes. So then this post seems...a bit stilted:

Made wrote:Won't vote JJJ because doing so making it possible for Wilgy or someone else to tie it up so voting Wilgy. I don't really see what's there, but a lynch is better than no lynch.

Doing so would make it possible for Wilgy or someone else to tie it up? Uh...yeah...if Wilgy and 1 other person in he last few minutes do that. But he just reminded the thread that doing so would result in a no-lynch, so that's probably not gonna happen.

Scotty wrote:Made Day 2 lynch:

Made wrote:Anyone else considering a vote on JJJ? I don't want to force a tie.

Made wrote:Voting JJJ

So he exclaimed that he didn't want to force a tie. Why not? If he doesn't know lynches don't end in a no-lynch yet, why is he bemoaning a tie?

But then a minute later he votes 6th on JJJ, TIEING it up with Quin.
So what was the point of that blurb?

Naw dog, you meant to keep it a tie.

K so few things:
First, as someone else already pointed out, between "Anyone considering JJJ" and "voting JJJ" someone pointed out the vote manipulator roles. While they aren't the worst thing in the world [When tie doesn't mean no lynch], you learn less from tie than you do otherwise.
On day 3, I felt JJJ was a better candidate than Wilgy, but my vote on him would have forced a tie. The logic done above was incorrect. There were 3 votes on JJJ and 5 votes on Wilgy when I voted. If I voted JJJ and Wilgy voted JJJ, there would have been a tie.
Lastly, I have to apologize for my vote yesterday. Traveling all day, I was able to keep up with thread during my bus ride and expected to be able to vote with reasoning from my computer once I arrived in my room. Unfortunately, I didn't reach a computer and had to rush to give my reasoning/vote by phone. I didn't bother checking the poll when I voted, and that was a mistake.

juliets wrote:Made, I mentioned before you were the second highest poster in the original Felt game. In a more recent game, Vocaroo, you were in the top 4 posters. Here, you are the lowest poster still alive and that includes me who's not been in the game as long. Is there a reason for this I should consider? It looks like you are trying to lay low.

In a word: College. I started class this week, and with a bunch on my plate, I haven't been able to really engage the game as much as I might like, but I'm still trying to get my reads and thoughts out whenever I can.

That said, I do not understand a Quin NK in the slightest. Will read him before the lynch with his alignment in mind.
linki:

Point 1:
Voting manipulator roles have very little to do with your argument though. Your argument was to put a vote on Wilgy so that Wilgy and others can't tie it up. You didn't say anything relating to the voting manipulator roles in that post. And that "you learn less from tie than you do otherwise" no, why? In almost all the games I've played on this site, ties get resolved in a coin flip, or someone has a power to choose. It's not on heists and special cases like this that it ends in a no-lynch. So I don't even know what you mean with "learning less".

Point 2:
Fair point. You're totally right, and that does make sense. My math was wrong. But even so, putting the responsibility on Wilgy not to tie it up is not that hard to do. If he ties it up and it ends in a No-lynch, that's on him anyway. That you voted for him 'even though you didn't see the case" is merely mustard on ice cream.

Point 3:
Having a busy life is not suspicious. But what's suspicious about this point is that, as we have witnessed over the course of a few cycles: you are cognizant of ties not ideal, you 'learn' ties end in a no-lynch, and then on the day-of-never-ending in which we had ample time to talk, you did a drive by vote right before EoD without looking at the poll. In other words, you could have just tied it without knowing.

Doesn't sound like your head is really in the game of avoiding ties, buddy bear

Well speak of the devil! Made's lurking. I think someone on his team told him he was being brought up.

Long Con wrote:I predict a Made lynch today.

Does that mean you suspect him?
Or that he will just accrue votes?

juliets wrote:Made, I mentioned before you were the second highest poster in the original Felt game. In a more recent game, Vocaroo, you were in the top 4 posters. Here, you are the lowest poster still alive and that includes me who's not been in the game as long. Is there a reason for this I should consider? It looks like you are trying to lay low.

Made's vote in the llama lynch? A half hour or so before deadline and bringing it awfully close (4-5) with Epi still left to vote. Why. Why we gotta bring it so close always, Made?

insertnamehere wrote:Can we also discuss how weird the Quin NK was, especially considering he would probably be a top candidate for today?

Feels like an odd choice to me.

Yea, as I said, I was gonna give Quin a trusty ole vote today but that was a waste of a prize.

In other news, I think I discovered Quin's role by looking through Day 2 EoD. Which I guess makes perfect sense with how it played out.

Made Day 2 lynch:

Made wrote:Anyone else considering a vote on JJJ? I don't want to force a tie.

Made wrote:Voting JJJ

So he exclaimed that he didn't want to force a tie. Why not? If he doesn't know lynches don't end in a no-lynch yet, why is he bemoaning a tie?

But then a minute later he votes 6th on JJJ, TIEING it up with Quin.
So what was the point of that blurb?

Naw dog, you meant to keep it a tie.

Oh, and one reason I don't like role hinting is that if it's assumed that everyone has been hinting at their own roles, who's to say the mafia haven't been looking and deducing it all the same?

Although I'm not very good at picking those up or dishing them out regardless

juliets wrote:

Scotty wrote: <snip>
A person, MP, DDL, Elo and Made missed the vote. Out of those, we know DDL was bad, A Person was indie, Elo was NK'd, and MPnowjuliets and Made were non represented in Day 1.

Llama, JJJ and I voted off the main wagons. Out of those, llama and JJJ have been NK'd. I was basically a non-factor on Day 1.

Now for inferences.
I find it more likely than not that the mafia would want to split up the voting in day 1. That one of the DDL voters is probably a busser. I find it highly unlikely that 2 are bussers. Because that's just metal.

We know 1 baddie (Wilgy) attempted a save attempt on the llama wagon. Were there others in LC/INH? Dunno.

Made and [juliets] were absent, and I find it also likely that one of them is bad and missed the vote entirely. OR chose a different wagon, which would leave me. But since I know I'm good, I'm looking squarely at juliets and Made.

I have my doubts about INH and LC being bad, tbh, Based on thread context and personal gut.
Which could mean that both juliets and Made are bad, or one of them is bad and 1 of the DDL voters is driving the last bus to Clarksville.

I can't defend on MP missing the vote other than to say Im pretty sure he was at a conference and that's why he missed (I read that somewhere but can't remember where). Also, as JJJ pointed out I could have easily slid by that first night I was in the game because I subbed in just hours before the lynch vote but I participated in an open and honest way. I did the same yesterday as I assessed who to vote for even though my final vote was obviously wrong. I know I am good Scotty so by your logic that would leave either you or made or both as baddies. I will assess you both at some point today. I have no wish to out myself but have also hinted at my role. I will look for your hints when I take a look at your posts.

I understand the original crux for your argument for being good was that a "bad" Mp "would never" vote for himself. but I also know that Mp would never want to miss a vote. If he were so busy in a conference and hadn't had a chance to look at the thread for suspects, what would a bad Mp had done? That's why the entire "he wouldn't this as bad" meta argument is BS to me. Because if he "wouldn't have" done something, then he "would have" done something else. I know if I had absolutely no leads, haven't read the thread, and was bad to boot, I wouldn't stick my neck out on a random player to have to defend against should it be a suspicious decision. Naw, I'd probably vote myself too.

That being said- I agree that you have been nothing but honest and open since subbing in, and I haven't really suspected you for it. Haven't really looked at your voting yet.

As of right now, I'd still suspect Made above you.

I want to look at Made and juliets because I think that would be more fruitful.

I've been harping at Made on occasion for coming in towards the end and making some votes that make my sphincter seize up.

On day 3- the Wilgy lynch- he comes in asking about whether or not ties end in no-lynches. Which on the surface sounds like someone even-keeled and looking for answers to prevent a no-lynch. But that question had already been posed by someone else and answered, so it's not like Made is the white knight asking that question. To me this comes off as someone that has read through the thread, knows a tie ends in a no-lynch, but decides to ask it again anyway to pose as a concerned denizen of the friendly Jean variety.

His vote comes on Wilgy as the 6th vote, when the next highest train was JJJ with 3 votes. So then this post seems...a bit stilted:

Made wrote:Won't vote JJJ because doing so making it possible for Wilgy or someone else to tie it up so voting Wilgy. I don't really see what's there, but a lynch is better than no lynch.

Doing so would make it possible for Wilgy or someone else to tie it up? Uh...yeah...if Wilgy and 1 other person in he last few minutes do that. But he just reminded the thread that doing so would result in a no-lynch, so that's probably not gonna happen.

He then offers his reasoning: "I don't really see what's there, but a lynch is better than a no-lynch"
Taking no credit for his vote, and in a sort, devaluing the suspicion for Wilgy. Might as well be playing Rugby blind.

Made hasn't missed a vote since Day 1. He's been active enough that he will post at least once a day in the thread, and is then probably around to send in a Night action.. Ima keep looking at his stuff, but he's skyrocketed to my #1 suspicion.

Epignosis wrote:I don't see what's tricky about it. The smarter Day 3 move for me in the scenario you are describing would have been to vote for Wilgy too, but I voted for the independent.

I agree. i do agree.

Ok then Epi: hypothetically if there were a busser on the Day 1 DDL wagon and it wasn't you, who would it be?

We've already been over this, and JJJ has already laid this out, but I'm rehashing it for patterns.

On Day 1, we had 2 trains: DDL and llama. We know:
Wilgy, a baddie, voted with 3 others for llama to save DDL and bring the vote total to 4-3 Llama-DDL.
INH, LC and Quin all voted for llama. Of those, Quin was NK'd, so that leaves LC and INH up in the air.
Sorsha snuck in a tying vote very close to deadline (~10-15 min before) and Epi closed the door right before deadline (~5 min?).

A person, MP, DDL, Elo and Made missed the vote. Out of those, we know DDL was bad, A Person was indie, Elo was NK'd, and MPnowjuliets and Made were non represented in Day 1.

Llama, JJJ and I voted off the main wagons. Out of those, llama and JJJ have been NK'd. I was basically a non-factor on Day 1.

Now for inferences.
I find it more likely than not that the mafia would want to split up the voting in day 1. That one of the DDL voters is probably a busser. I find it highly unlikely that 2 are bussers. Because that's just metal.

We know 1 baddie (Wilgy) attempted a save attempt on the llama wagon. Were there others in LC/INH? Dunno.

Made and [juliets] were absent, and I find it also likely that one of them is bad and missed the vote entirely. OR chose a different wagon, which would leave me. But since I know I'm good, I'm looking squarely at juliets and Made.

I have my doubts about INH and LC being bad, tbh, Based on thread context and personal gut.
Which could mean that both juliets and Made are bad, or one of them is bad and 1 of the DDL voters is driving the last bus to Clarksville.

Long Con wrote:Why shouldn't we vote for Scotty?

1) I didn't vote for you yesterday when I could have
2) I'm not about hinting my role in games, but I ostensibly have.

Otherwise, meh. I dunno.

Epignosis wrote:

Scotty wrote:

Epignosis wrote:I wouldn't have thrown DDL under the bus. Not twice. In retrospect I feel bad about doing it the first time.

I want to get off Mr Bones' Wild Meta Ride.

Wouldn't = / = didn't.

Epignosis wrote:I don't know why Scotty has to name the only two possibilities that exist: Either I am good or I am bad.

What else could I be?

Exactly. It was more of a stream of consciousness. I thought you were indie at worst as the Jean Genie, but because the only one with secrets has died, I don't think it was you. That and I've been conveniently lumping you in with civvies because you made the DDL case.

What's convenient about that? Why is it harder to believe that I'm a civilian than it is to believe I am bad?

Because I wouldn't put it past you to have some tricks up your sleeve a la originally driving a bus on someone.

More importantly, you're not the only person I'm going to look at today, you're just the first person on my radar. You know how I operate.

Epignosis wrote:

Long Con wrote:

Epignosis wrote:

Scotty wrote:Either Epi is another civ that I am about to go after a la Downton Abbey, or he is baddie McBadderson. If he is bad, he bussed DDL early without any qualms. Impossible? No, more likely than other options. But still a quandary

Another gripe.

What other civilians did you go after "a la Downton Abbey?" Please explain that to me.

I thought he was talking about going after Civ Epi in Downton Abbey.

That's what I thought too, but that's not what his sentence actually says.

I will strangle you with your own syntax, Scotty.

Get in here and answer my punctuated questions before I get my period and put a semi up your colon.

I went after a few of them in DA, the premiere being you. We both did. I think that's why mafia didn't kill us to the end. Still don't know how we pulled that game off.

I would still type that sentence now and when I was hastily typing between scenes in my show last night, Epi. But English teacher's gonna English teach I guess.

Epignosis wrote:I wouldn't have thrown DDL under the bus. Not twice. In retrospect I feel bad about doing it the first time.

I want to get off Mr Bones' Wild Meta Ride.

Wouldn't = / = didn't.

Epignosis wrote:I don't know why Scotty has to name the only two possibilities that exist: Either I am good or I am bad.

What else could I be?

Exactly. It was more of a stream of consciousness. I thought you were indie at worst as the Jean Genie, but because the only one with secrets has died, I don't think it was you. That and I've been conveniently lumping you in with civvies because you made the DDL case.

Wow. Ok.

Which one of you jeans is a pair of corduroys?

I used my prize last night. On Quin.



So I know one of you bad guys is active enough to be killing before Mp/SD subbed out.
We know the Jean Genie is some sort of advent to a role that hasn't been disclosed. Could have been llama. I dunno. For whatever reason, Mongoose hasn't revealed any secrets for that role even though we lynched him. I think it more likely he was that.

Which is a quandary, because I figured Epi was that role. But now I am not so sure.

Either Epi is another civ that I am about to go after a la Downton Abbey, or he is baddie McBadderson. If he is bad, he bussed DDL early without any qualms. Impossible? No, more likely than other options. But still a quandary

Man sorry llama. Wish we knew more about his secret role.

Yo Quin, you said you figured out who you think the Denim Shirt is.

Care to enlighten?

Quin wrote:

Scotty wrote:why do you people make the vote so close to a no lynch right up to the deadline?

I sat there thinking after I placed my vote 'Will they tie it in the next four minutes?'

My answer was 'Absolutely.'

and it always seems to be Made making those too close for comfort votes...

why do you people make the vote so close to a no lynch right up to the deadline?