Return to “[END] Pikmin Mafia”
You just waitDragon D. Luffy wrote:Your post volume has hardly been what I'd call low, though.Scotty wrote:Yep. More of those to come, most likely. Again, time constraint plus I was the cop in that game. So...Dragon D. Luffy wrote:I'm looking at Scotty's posts in the Watchmen game.
I'm almost too lazy to do it because Scotty talks so much. There are those big wall of texts where he approaches the game from different directions and tries to engage different suspects.
While the ISO for this game is so much easier to read...
Anyway, more details when I finish.
Yep. More of those to come, most likely. Again, time constraint plus I was the cop in that game. So...Dragon D. Luffy wrote:I'm looking at Scotty's posts in the Watchmen game.
I'm almost too lazy to do it because Scotty talks so much. There are those big wall of texts where he approaches the game from different directions and tries to engage different suspects.
While the ISO for this game is so much easier to read...
Anyway, more details when I finish.
Now that you mention it, DrWilgy just zoomed in with an Epi vote after not really talking about Epi all game in a negative sense. He said he wanted to vote for Epi in Day 2 but knew sig was scum. But he never said why.Typhoony wrote:Ok Scotty, talk to me. Who do you think could be bad and why?
Typhoony wrote:You're being overtly "nice" to him. Imo it looks you are trying to get in his good graces. Examples of your buddying:Scotty wrote: "Buddying up"? Hardly. I respect his logic and his follow up this game. Don't know how that qualifies as buddying.In actuality, those comments are slightly snide and passive aggressive when I was feeling testy. Not being his buddy, guy.Spoiler: showTo me it looked like you were trying to make it seem like you were baddiehunting. You picked three names, you did a little bit of analysis on them, and then you go and vote someone else.I'm sorry you don't find me sincere. Messy, I'll admit. But I'm almost always honest.
Those 3 random people (which included you) are first impressions and first steps. I'm in a bit of a time crunch right now, so more to come.
So I haven't responded to what everyone else thinks. So? Didn't know that was required.
Not voting for any of the three is not necessarily a baddie thing, but the amount of effort you put in it, barely following up on the three, then voting Simon based partly on someone you suspect as well (Epi). It makes the whole point of you looking into the 3 moot. It makes it seem like you did it just because you felt you had to, not because you were genuinely looking for baddies.
As you said, there isn't a lot of info to go on without confirmed baddies. This was an attempt at 3 people I haven't looked at, and instead of voting for the one of the 3 that I distrusted the most (you) I went with one that I think could answer some hanging questions I have. I'm attempting to follow through with my conviction that one of Epi or Simon is bad, but am keeping the conversation open.Easy vote = lazy vote = more likely baddie vote.If you think I'm insincere, then go ahead and vote for me. Not much I can do about that.
Also, enough with this easy vote crap. What is wrong with the easy vote at this point in the game if the result is good? Why is it so easy? Because it sure looks like I'm alone on the matter like Kevin McCallister.
A lazy vote implies that I have no thought process behind my vote, and/or riding the Lynchoo choo train. I have done neither IMO
I want to look at other people as well today. No need to put all my energy in you.
Is there anyone that somebody wants me to look at?
FZ. wrote:I've had a very long day, and still need to make a cake for a party tomorrow before I go to bed. The 24 hour days are killing me. I don't have a lot of time. I'll say what I think for now, then I'll make the cake and get back when it's in the oven
I've read what Epi said about not being as sure about Simon and having just that post where he said he "thinks Sig is on his team" as his evidence. I think that's not enough for me to vote there, especially since my initial reaction to that post was that it was coming from a civ saying he thinks Sig is on his team because he felt he was good too, and then he changed his mind. Epi could still be right, but if Epi wasn't Simon's father, none of us would be voting for him, so I think we should let Simon get back into the game and start playing before we make any more judgements. That's my take on this.I'm all for Simon getting back into the game. As a matter of fact, I'm all for his opinion on...well, anything. His responses, while cute, haven't told me much about what he's thinking or who he suspects...I mean he voted sig "to break a tie" for goodness sake. This is still quite troubling to me.
As for Epi, my feelings haven't changed. I still say he wouldn't do that to Simon if Epi is bad. My faith in him wavered a little by everything that's happened, but I still believe I'm seeing civ Epi.
So moving on to the other options:
1. Matt vs. Glorfindle- if I had to choose one baddie from that group it would be Matt. His suspicion is weak, he even says so himself, yet he keeps going after Glorfindle. My experience with civ Matt has been of him going after people for more elaborated reasons, whether they seem far fetched or not to others. He keeps pushing and usually gets attacked for it. Here, he's coming out and saying himself that his case is not that good. I don't know if that should make me feel better about him or worse. My initial answer to that would be better, but in a previous game, when I told Matt a baddie wouldn't be that obvious, he kept saying that that's exactly the reason a baddie would. So here we have him saying his suspicion is very weak, and he keeps saying he's a Pikmin. Two things I would say a baddie wouldn't do because it's too obvious, but if I follow his logic, maybe that's exactly what he's doing.
2. Typhony vs. Scotty- I'm going back and forth on Scotty. At first, I thought I liked his analysis on the 3 people he made, but Typhony has a point. Why choose these people? Why do that and then end up voting for Simon for practically no reason other than trusting Epi, when he's saying he's somewhat suspicious of Epi himself. Too much chaos here. It makes it look like he randomly chose 3 people to look like he's scum hunting.
K4J, there's a chance I might go with you on the Scotty lynch. I want him to answer these questions first.
I see more in a Simon vote than I do in the 3 that I listed. I will do more later. It's really been a time constraint thing, and instead of picking 3 people that were popular, I chose 3 of the less controversial people.
There's more, but there's a cake waiting to be made. I'll be back
lots of linki:
a.Scotty, I see you answered partially, but can you please look at my post and answer all the rest?
Are you referring to this post or another? I'll look
b. I forgot the Boomslang vs. Epi thing. While I think I'm seeing civ Epi, I get what Boomslang is talking about. Epi tends to ignore what he doesn't want to answer or makes jokes about it. Thing is, it's something he does as a civ.
Arg, terrible timing. I will answer, but I have to run right now. Be back in a couple hours. If you must vote me before then, do yo thing.FZ. wrote:I've had a very long day, and still need to make a cake for a party tomorrow before I go to bed. The 24 hour days are killing me. I don't have a lot of time. I'll say what I think for now, then I'll make the cake and get back when it's in the oven
I've read what Epi said about not being as sure about Simon and having just that post where he said he "thinks Sig is on his team" as his evidence. I think that's not enough for me to vote there, especially since my initial reaction to that post was that it was coming from a civ saying he thinks Sig is on his team because he felt he was good too, and then he changed his mind. Epi could still be right, but if Epi wasn't Simon's father, none of us would be voting for him, so I think we should let Simon get back into the game and start playing before we make any more judgements. That's my take on this.
As for Epi, my feelings haven't changed. I still say he wouldn't do that to Simon if Epi is bad. My faith in him wavered a little by everything that's happened, but I still believe I'm seeing civ Epi.
So moving on to the other options:
1. Matt vs. Glorfindle- if I had to choose one baddie from that group it would be Matt. His suspicion is weak, he even says so himself, yet he keeps going after Glorfindle. My experience with civ Matt has been of him going after people for more elaborated reasons, whether they seem far fetched or not to others. He keeps pushing and usually gets attacked for it. Here, he's coming out and saying himself that his case is not that good. I don't know if that should make me feel better about him or worse. My initial answer to that would be better, but in a previous game, when I told Matt a baddie wouldn't be that obvious, he kept saying that that's exactly the reason a baddie would. So here we have him saying his suspicion is very weak, and he keeps saying he's a Pikmin. Two things I would say a baddie wouldn't do because it's too obvious, but if I follow his logic, maybe that's exactly what he's doing.
2. Typhony vs. Scotty- I'm going back and forth on Scotty. At first, I thought I liked his analysis on the 3 people he made, but Typhony has a point. Why choose these people? Why do that and then end up voting for Simon for practically no reason other than trusting Epi, when he's saying he's somewhat suspicious of Epi himself. Too much chaos here. It makes it look like he randomly chose 3 people to look like he's scum hunting.
K4J, there's a chance I might go with you on the Scotty lynch. I want him to answer these questions first.
There's more, but there's a cake waiting to be made. I'll be back
lots of linki:
a.Scotty, I see you answered partially, but can you please look at my post and answer all the rest?
b. I forgot the Boomslang vs. Epi thing. While I think I'm seeing civ Epi, I get what Boomslang is talking about. Epi tends to ignore what he doesn't want to answer or makes jokes about it. Thing is, it's something he does as a civ.
Ah. Missed that. At what point in the sig train did he do that, I wonder?Matt wrote:Hmmm, just ISO'd you.agleaminranks wrote:Can I interject to mention that, with regards to Simon being Mafia, a lot of people are taking his age and inexperience into consideration. It might only be a matter of time before he role-outs himself due to aforementioned reasons. But I think until then I'm leaning a bit more towards civilian than baddie with regards to him, it seems like his defenses have been more out of frustration from an early onslaught and I too would probably get flustered if such a person was attacking me.
Anyway, I'm confused. At one point you say "atm I'm not sold on Scotty", then two posts later (in which you didn't mention Scotty in the middle post), you vote Scotty because of your thoughts on him.
Linki - Scotty, yes he accused sig of being Mafia.
Is there anyone here that you would accuse of being mafia?Glorfindel wrote:#6Matt wrote:MM - Get your vote off me, dude. Pikmin don't like getting votes. Apparently everytime a Pikmin gets a vote, the Rock and Winged Pikmin team up and throw feathers at those who voted Pikmin!
I know you don't want such a fate, so please, vote elsewhere.
"Buddying up"? Hardly. I respect his logic and his follow up this game. Don't know how that qualifies as buddying.Typhoony wrote:I don't even know if I want to vote Simon or Epi.
But okay. Scotty probably. For his D1 vote on sig, his buddying up to you and I felt his contributions today were not sincere. He picked 3 people at the beginning of the day to take a closer look at... and that didn't go anywhere. People gave their opinions on those 3, they too responded, he doesn't do much with it.
Instead, he goes back to his easy option - Simon, who he just voted.
As I said before, there is only minimal info here, but I still think info can be gleaned from these lynches. I'm looking at tendencies. And it is a bit early yet, I'll admit. But putting it out there helps me get a clearer picture so that when I look at you all again down the line (should I still be alive) I won't have to analyze y'all in your entirety.Typhoony wrote:Scotty, what do you think you can learn from voting patterns when there hasn't been a baddie lynched yet?
I'd also like to know how you came to the conclusion to research these 3 people, please.
I don't have the time in the weekends to properly play this month hence my D1 vote. (I'll be out of the country from Friday till Sunday, so don't expect much from me there either, except a post to vote).
I'm a tactical and analytical player who doesn't like saying redundant stuff and with the amount of voting manipulation the baddies can have (see the +2 to every pikmin in the game) I may give priority to that over actual suspicions when I vote.
If the game is at a later stage, I will probably let that go since Pikmin will be likely to have extra votes as well... Which makes it hard to be sure of any poll result by just looking at the poll.
And really, "so far his reads has been wrong"? Welcome to everyone in the game Scotty.
Kneel4justice:
I am suspicious of Scotty's sig vote. I was more suspicious of sig. Hence, I voted sig.
??? Are you playing tennis with a cricket bat?Metalmarsh89 wrote:Clearly I'm doing something wrong.
Not enough rainbowSpacedaisy wrote:I was doing my best MP impression for that last post.
I agree that Simon was the easier option- but easier doesn't always = wrong. I do continue to find myself swaying in the Trusting Tree (tm) in regards to Epi's innocence. I don't trust the guy- it would be unwise to do so to anyone in the game right now- but it doesn't mean I don't see his logic and am willing to run with it. If Epi is wrong, then he will have been wrong about 2 people, and I would be more willing to vote him. To make such a brash statement as his son is bad early game, I expect a result.kneel4justice wrote:RIP Sorsha.
Sorry for not being active throughout these last 24 hours, Scotty.
I just tried to catch up - noticed I had missed your response to my vote. To clarify, your explanation for voting Simon over Epi did not put me at ease, because I feel Simon is the much easier option. If you had actually trusted Epi, that would be another thing. However, you voted for Simon (partially) because of Epi's sureness, meanwhile you thought he could be scum. I do not follow that logic.
Also, your comments about tunneling do you no good in my book. It is like when people tell me I am not giving them a chance, when I am. If you give me things that make me feel better, then I will feel better, but if you give me things that I find suspicious, I will continue to be suspicious. And last day phase your vote for Simon was only adding onto my previous D1 suspicion, as I have explained.
He again pushes the idea that more votes need to be stacked on one player. He votes for sig when he has 6 votes- a margin of 3 with Simon- no mention of Simon before this.Typhoony wrote:I'm saving my vote to create the biggest distance possible between Simon and Sig. I'd very much prefer a Sig lynch fwiw, but a close lynch is a useless lynch in this game imo.
Metalmarsh89 wrote:I'm still catching up myself as well.
Are you a member of mafia Matt?
Metalmarsh89 wrote:Epignosis, are you a member of mafia?
Votes Epignosis, and follows it up with a wall o text outlining Epi's apparent distancing, finding it odd that he voted for Simon while simultaneously saying he won't get lynched day 1.Metalmarsh89 wrote: Are you on sig's team Scotty?
Day 2: Votes SimonSpacedaisy wrote: I voted Enrique when he came and put a random vote on Glorfindel who I would like to see get a chance to enjoy a good game, so I didn't want him to be a random lynch victim on Day 1.
She ties up the vote between Simon and sig.Spacedaisy wrote: Because I think Epi is civ who truly believes his son is bad. And I think there is some merit to his reasoning. And I also have mild suspicion of sig, so either way I think we might learn something.
Tunneling much?kneel4justice wrote:Okay, I've gotta hurry up and get to studying because I have places to be later, so I am going to go ahead and vote now in case I can't later
Voting Scotty
Because he's my strongest suspicion. Today only reinforced that with his favoring of Simon's lynch over Epi's. I just find it convenient that he was apparently rather open to the idea of voting both, but went with the clearly easier target. His 'defense' (which I didn't feel there was much of, honestly) didn't make me feel any better about his actions. A few people saw same things that I was seeing with him so hopefully that means I'm onto something and not getting caught up. I'd suggest people actually give this option some thought.
Poll runs till Tue Dec 15, 2015 10:13 pm estDrWilgy wrote:How much time do we have left? Epi, yell at Simon for me.
OWWW GET IT OFFFFDrWilgy wrote:Where the flubnarg is SIMON!!
*A tattoo of a penguin seems to have appeared on Scotty's neck. It burns on touch.*
-I said I would entertain voting no-lynch in a set-up without this many variables. Not this game. Doesn't mean I don't hate it still. Day 1 is always grasping at straws.Typhoony wrote:What game mechanics are you talking about?kneel4justice wrote: Maybe it was just the game mechanics, but I still think there is the possibility of there being an agenda behind your vote. No way to tell, for now.
What about Scotty's posts pinged you?
Couple of small things pinged me about him during my skim:
- His talk about really disliking Day 1, even saying he would possibly advocate a no Lynch if the option were there.
- His sig vote was weird. He said he thinks Epi is on to something and votes him, and later says he voted Sig for a separate reason than what Epi brought up
That wasn't the question.Matt wrote:You wouldn't want a blue or winged pikmin?Scotty wrote:And for Wilgy- if I were a protagonist, I would currently have a randomly chosen pikmin out of 7 possible choices.
Am I doing that right?
DrWilgy wrote:Civ, but his posts seem to be jumbly mumbo butts.
Yeah I think I missed that one, or I just chose not to respond. I don't remember. The days blend together the older I get.kneel4justice wrote: Also - is it normal for Scotty to gloss over accusations as scum or civ? because he focused on my post about how people were treating Simon but not the one about why he chose Simon over Epi
Sure. Why not.Dragon D. Luffy wrote:Hey guys, since kneel2justice complained about we focusing too much on the same few players, and I kind of agree with him, I propose a little exercise.
Anyone who has time for it: tell us what you think of the following people. Those are all people I have seen little talk about in this game, so they could potentially be slipping under everyone's radars.
Drwilgy - He is only mentioned when people are referring to the Sig/Simon debacle, but what do people actually think about him?
FZ. - Epi said he thought she was town. Does anybody else have any opinion about FZ?
kneel4justice - Ironically, he is a good example of what he said himself. I don't think anyone has said anything about him in this game. Come on, people.
Metalmarsh - Okay this is Metalmarsh so people ignore him and his antics by default... but maybe we shouldn't?
I've skipped the ones who have little to no posts, since not talking about them is excusable, but all those players I mentioned have a lot of game presence but very little discussion about them.
Hey man, you're probably right to an extent. I've been viewing Simon as maybe a little older than he is, but at the end of the day, he signed up for it, and is Epi's son to boot. So I would assume he could handle some pressure. Therefore I hope to treat him equally to the extent that I can. I can be a little pointed with my accusations, I will admit. You're not the first person to ask 'Well what is he supposed to say to that?' But if Simon were to at least clarify his position, it would be welcomed. After all, if nothing changes he is headed to the noose today as of the current poll.kneel4justice wrote:See, it is things like this that are so weird to me. Like, what do you expect him to say? This is a difficult position for me to judge, because of his age. I bet it is difficult for him too. I do not know how to take his differing statements about being on sig's team or not being, because I am not sure how he plays/how advanced..I want to treat him equal, but seriously with this kind of pressure, it just seems like people are expecting a lot out of him and I'm not sure that it is fair to do so.Scotty wrote: I wonder where Simon ran off to, and if he intends to respond to his accusations.
Though maybe you all have experience with him so know what to expect? It just strikes me as convenient that people are going after him. Am I being naive or what
OK, so who is your top suspect right now? Enrique? Me? Golden?kneel4justice wrote:Okay. I'm in two mindsets about Sig currently. If you were to have asked me after zebra's lynch what I thought about him, I would have definitely thought he was suspicious. Specifically the way he moved on so quickly to entertaining the idea of an Epi/Enrique partnership. When he suspected Enrique, it came immediately after I had just suspected him for taunting zebra (which I now would take back after he clarified what he meant by his post). But I was definitely pinged by that. So I started thinking in hindsight that maybe I was wrong not to suspect him...
But the problem is, I don't really like this whole Simon/Sig theory. Unfortunately it is difficult to judge Simon's statements about being on the same time (going from I think so, to no). But the fact that some suspicion started for something as simple as Sig saying that he wouldn't vote for Simon due to him laughing at a joke...that is ridiculous to me. Which seems to be part of the whole teammate theory. Like, those types of things are common on this site, plus - I can definitely see Sig just being nice to Simon, making him feel welcome in the game. So I feel like people who are using that (like Scotty had - are making something of nothing.
But I don't agree with the Epi suspicion. I am surprised that so many people are suspicious lol. Last game I played no one dared suspect him (admittedly, I was wrong about him being bad but still). I just see what Epi has done as a personality factor. Not something that is going to determine his alignment. As far as I am concerned, he's done similar tactics as civilian, and is probably more than capable of doing the same thing when bad. So really I need more time, I don't think his actions favor an alignment. But then again, I doubt he would gun for his own son as mafia.....like I think FZ was trying to say..then again, he's Epi. He strikes me as the type to want to show his dominance lol
This is what I got too.Typhoony wrote:So what you are saying is that you intentionally tried to dig your own grave to see who would bite?
Can you point out in your posts where you tried digging your own grave, ie what part of your posts would have been different if you did not have this plan?
agleaminranks wrote:I'm a big, manly dude who is in touch with his feminine side.Metalmarsh89 wrote:What do you think of the intense Day 1 rabble?agleaminranks wrote:I'm trying to catch up while taking a break from finals studying.
I'm voting for metalmarsh because 1. it's against the rules, and the rules can be darned and 2. I was not properly gendered.
This is some pretty intense Day 1 rabble so far.
What is your gender?
I think that Epignosis is really good at being an instigator, making wild accusations on not a lot of merit that could be taken a number of ways, then extrapolating information from people's reactions. Which he's done in darn near every game I've played with him at least. It could be a ruse to divert attention away but it could also be normal behavior. Given that I don't have enough info either way, statistically he's less likely to be a baddie, but I wouldn't be willing to instantly give him the civ credit either.
I hate day 1 and never having anything to go on so I did literally just take a shit vote.
I wasn't really convinced of Zebra's badness, she seemed like she was more just flustered trying to defend herself, having been lynched pretty early on in a different game if I recall. I would look more closely at the bandwagon votes for both her and the early bandwaggoning for Glorfindel (sp?) It would be a good place for a baddie to hide in plain sight.
The only solid inclination I have towards anyone at the moment is Scotty, he made a couple of posts attempting to vouch for the goodness of certain people, something I think is less likely to be hiding teammates and more likely to just be casting him in a good light.
kneel4justice wrote:Scotty, I am confused - can you clarify: do you or do you not think the Simon and Epi are teammates?
I think that I'm convinced.Epignosis wrote:"I'm convinced" vs "I think"Scotty wrote:Are you telling me I'm not convinced? Come on Epi, you know me by now. I get convinced pretty easily on scruples of information.Epignosis wrote:No you're not. Why are you "convinced at least one" of us is bad? At least one? There's only two of us.Scotty wrote:Yay for birds forgetting how to eat.
Voting Simon until I decide to put it on Epi later. I'm convinced at least one of them is bad.
The closed-mindedness here is telling as well- there's a spread of people to vote for, and you are setting yourself up to vote for me, meanwhile placating me in voting for Simon?
As they'd say in your corner of the world, "Bad look."
And yes, I think that at least 1 of you is bad. What's the hard part to understand there?
I'm not placating you. I just think Simon looks worse right now.
Which is it?
Are you telling me I'm not convinced? Come on Epi, you know me by now. I get convinced pretty easily on scruples of information.Epignosis wrote:No you're not. Why are you "convinced at least one" of us is bad? At least one? There's only two of us.Scotty wrote:Yay for birds forgetting how to eat.
Voting Simon until I decide to put it on Epi later. I'm convinced at least one of them is bad.
The closed-mindedness here is telling as well- there's a spread of people to vote for, and you are setting yourself up to vote for me, meanwhile placating me in voting for Simon?
As they'd say in your corner of the world, "Bad look."
Keeping it in mind, but the difference here is that it's his own son. Are you also Epi's son?Dragon D. Luffy wrote:I believe Epi could bus Simon so early because has has bussed me that early in another game.
Not that I buy that theory yet, but we should keep it on the table.
Yes, dad.Epignosis wrote:That wasn't an argument. That was an allusion.Scotty wrote:His argument when he switched off Simon was a little flimsy (the cheese standing alone argument)
Dunno.Metalmarsh89 wrote:Actually Simon gave different answers.
Once he said I think so.
Later on he said I'm not.
Are you on sig's team Scotty?
The thing I'm getting at is...didn't Simon vote for DrWilgy for voting sig?Metalmarsh89 wrote:If Simon says to vote for sig, would you vote for sig?Scotty wrote:I imagine you both in the same room: Epi silently screaming and Simon heartily chuckling.Simon wrote:No whyEpignosis wrote:SIMON
Are you bad?
How would you know?Simon wrote:I'm not SIG's teammate. I was confused before. But I know now.
Would you vote for sig, Simon?
I imagine you both in the same room: Epi silently screaming and Simon heartily chuckling.Simon wrote:No whyEpignosis wrote:SIMON
Are you bad?
How would you know?Simon wrote:
I should have voted this guy instead of Soneji (who- by the way- I read as civilian based on those insightful snipe posts before deadline. I just wish he posted sooner, or else I would have voted differently)agleaminranks wrote:I'm trying to catch up while taking a break from finals studying.
I'm voting for metalmarsh because 1. it's against the rules, and the rules can be darned and 2. I was not properly gendered.
This is some pretty intense Day 1 rabble so far.
So it would appear that Epi saw something fishy from the get-go and chose to share it with us. This could be baseless, and I suppose is hardly evidence, but we don't know everything he knows in regards to what happens outside of the forum. We also don't know if Epi is just putting this out there for people like me to bug out on. Either way, it adds to the fire.Epignosis wrote:Before the game began, I explained to him that he is not allowed to talk to me about this game at all. He has his own device now for posting and voting, and even any technical help he requires must be obtained from his mother. The only thing I know that you don't is that yesterday he was giggling like a little school girl.
Yes, dad.Epignosis wrote:You are a fool. Sober up.Scotty wrote:Im mostly drunk but even intoxixated I can see that that lynch shouldn't have happened.
I think next lynch should be either Epi, sig, or Simon. At least 1 has to be Mafia, no?
Twas I.Epignosis wrote:Who was the other sig voter that moved?
I mean, if that is what you have to add to the discussion, then that's pretty piss poor.Typhoony wrote:Is this enough?Scotty wrote: In other news, I want to hear more from Typhoony and Soneji.
How did I bandwagon on Epi's ideas? I was first to vote for sig, and for a reason separate to what Epi brought up.kneel4justice wrote:Thanks for the input on Sorsha. With the feedback I've gotten, I can't say that I am suspicious of her. Plus, while I disagree with her opinion on Epi, she at least has a valid reason..I was just thrown off because I didn't expect it from her.
I will say that Scotty caught my eye. He bandwagoned off of Epi's ideas, and said that he thought he might be onto something (in regards to sig/Simon). Which, I cannot understand because I felt that Epi's posts were so obviously not to be taken seriously?? At first I thought Scotty's vote was a joke, but then I saw he stood by that later on. The fact that he suspects sig for not voting for Simon because he laughed at his joke is beyond me.....I seriously don't see how that is scummy.
Also..his talk about how he might vote for low posters instead is concerning to me, but that might just be a personal thing. I just think - if you are truly suspicious of sig, why aren't you sticking with that?
I agree with what FZ (BTW, I am so happy to play with you again too) said about zebra, though I was hesitant, because I've only played one game with her. But, it appears to be night and day, she was so heavily invested and posting in Talking Heads....and now appears to be on the quieter, less involved side, but yeah, I'm definitely hesitant to base a suspicion off of only one game.
Oh - and thanks MP for adding an official gender guide!
