The Syndicate

Ha I was right about LC again. :P

which question?

and I just came on to see myself tied.

S~V~S wrote:I am gonna make it a three way & vote for sig. Let someone else be the decider

S~V~S wrote:
Long Con wrote:I came back from work to find a post that I had started and never posted before I left. So I'll give it now.

Scotty wrote:What do you think of Serge?
I feel like he's Civ. Unless he's known for playing in a wacky way as his usual meta (which I'm not familiar with), I think his "vote with any leading bandwagon" statement isn't one a baddie would likely make. Also, he kept going with the dragon thing, whereas if he and I were bad and it was a BTSC faux pas, he'd be more likely to want to sweep it under the rug.

That's my thoughts on Serge, I see that he has a few votes now anyway.
I thought he was trying to make a joke of it, actually.

sig wrote:
S~V~S wrote:
sig wrote:I don't think Serge would be a good lynch choice today, I think we should lynch Zebra for her purposeful misconstruction of the events regarding my vote and her attempt to bandwagon me based on not just weak but, also faulty and obvious incorrect logic.
Zebra tends to read into things in a much more byzantine way than most ever could. I think this is fairly normal behavior for her. Plus I am not seeing much of a bandwagoning effort on her part.

Why do you think Serge is a poor choice, your thoughts on Zebra aside?
Okay then.

I'm wary of a Serge lynch since it appears he might be lynched just for being a low poster, yes it's day 1, but having that attitude in such a small game is very very dangerous. I dislike MPs vote on Serge for that reason, we really don't have much room for error this game and just going after low posters won't help much.
But none of the votes on him are on him for being a low poster, except MPs before Serge came in last night and posted. The people who are voting for him seem to be voting for him for things that he has said.

What do you think of what he has said?

I was mainly talking about MP's vote.

I'm not seeing much from Serge that is scummy, however gut wise his posts do seem a little odd. However, I find it strange zebra isn''t defending him at all?

Long Con wrote:Good point on the low poster thing, S~V~S. I may have to put my vote on sig for not paying enough attention to get that right. That's a baddie indicator to me.

About an hour left to vote! Right now, my aim is at sig... but I'm here till the deadline, so I'll hold off on the hard vote until I see more opinions coming in.

Why? there was only two votes (counting Mps) on Serge when I said it. MPs reasoning was only that he was a low poster which makes me wary of the lynch.

Sorsha wrote:I could see my vote going to Wilgy- he has mostly joke posts and his serious, on-topic ones are about the gamblers fallacy thing. I don’t see how someones opinion on that would be an indicator of civ/bad leanings so its looking like fluff disguised as content.

I could see a sig vote- I think he’s over reacting to zebra voting for him, it also kinda bothers me that he wouldn’t at least wait to see if he had to vote the same way after the whole early end time mistake. The plus side is that he doesn’t seem to be pushing for a Wilgy wagon and I kinda like a Wilgy vote myself. .

I overreacted to someone who was completely ignoring an error in the polls and all my posts proving that is what I thought? Her main point agaisnt me is that I knew the phase wasn't going to end when I voted for Wilgy that is all she has. So I don't think I overreacted. It is a weak reason to vote for someone based around the fact there was an error in the poll. Also Llama said to revote in his post revote meaning vote for who we already voted for since votes are unchangeable.

S~V~S wrote:
sig wrote:I don't think Serge would be a good lynch choice today, I think we should lynch Zebra for her purposeful misconstruction of the events regarding my vote and her attempt to bandwagon me based on not just weak but, also faulty and obvious incorrect logic.
Zebra tends to read into things in a much more byzantine way than most ever could. I think this is fairly normal behavior for her. Plus I am not seeing much of a bandwagoning effort on her part.

Why do you think Serge is a poor choice, your thoughts on Zebra aside?

Okay then.

I'm wary of a Serge lynch since it appears he might be lynched just for being a low poster, yes it's day 1, but having that attitude in such a small game is very very dangerous. I dislike MPs vote on Serge for that reason, we really don't have much room for error this game and just going after low posters won't help much.

I don't think Serge would be a good lynch choice today, I think we should lynch Zebra for her purposeful misconstruction of the events regarding my vote and her attempt to bandwagon me based on not just weak but, also faulty and obvious incorrect logic.

@SVS yes so do you believe I'm mafia who pretended that I didn't know when the phase ended to vote? Which is what Zebra is saying.

I thought Serge was making a joke since your user title is Captain Obvious? Which does make me wonder why LC commented that portion was off.

sig wrote:So we have less then an hour to the deadline. That isn't good.

I dislike MP's vote but seeing how little time we have I can see why he voted. I'll also believe that he is busy.

sig wrote:Helloooo?

There is eleven minutes until the deadline correct? And nobody is online and we have literally one vote in.

sig wrote:So I did some ISO almost nobody here. I'm not liking Wilgy, LC, or Epi.

Epi hasn't posted much and then came in at 4:44 and didn't say anything, I would consider voting here, but would rather not today.

Lc is a gut ping which usually happens to me. However, I dislike his SOrsha reasoning and his fake vote on DF was weird.

I'm going with Wilgy no on topic posts, and very few off topic posts, his one truly on topic post, is bad imo.

linki: I see Epi ninjad in and voted for MP.

Epignosis wrote:
S~V~S wrote:I thought we had 48 hours? That was what Llama had said in signups?

I am so sorry I missed it.
llama dun goofed.

Epignosis wrote:Dem P-Scores.

S~V~S wrote:I thought we had 48 hours? That was what Llama had said in signups?

I am so sorry I missed it.

thellama73 wrote:
Epignosis wrote:
S~V~S wrote:I thought we had 48 hours? That was what Llama had said in signups?

I am so sorry I missed it.
llama dun goofed.
I sure dun. I'm going to reset the poll for another day. Sorry everyone, you'll have to revote!

This is also why I voted for Wilgy again.

thellama73 wrote:
birdwithteeth11 wrote:
thellama73 wrote:
Epignosis wrote:
S~V~S wrote:I thought we had 48 hours? That was what Llama had said in signups?

I am so sorry I missed it.
llama dun goofed.
I sure dun. I'm going to reset the poll for another day. Sorry everyone, you'll have to revote!
I will hold you personally responsible for all failures.
In my defense, I think the site goofed instead of me. When I went to edit the poll, it was set for two days. No idea why it closed after one.

Anyway, Stanley Kubrick was famous for making actors do many, many takes, so let's go with that. Yeah, that's the ticket!

So yes I among other players thought the phase ended and was about to end, unless we all just pretended the phase was about to end? And I just made all those posts so I could vote earlier for Wilgy?

I think Zebra is mafia attempting to get me lycnhed. Otherwise I can't see an explanation for her vote and case. Or she is a paranoid civ since we won last game.

a2thezebra wrote:sig no one believes that you didn't know there was another twenty-four hours. This is a side mission.

Then they didn't read the thread before what we thought was EOD or Llama's posts or see that the poll did say it ended yesterday.

Also side missions aren't always 48/24.

It makes no sense for scum me to pretend that I thought the deadline was 24 hours early and vote for Wilgy just for what? The hell of it. That literally makes no sense what so ever. I thought we were about to be done this phase since that is what the poll said so I voted. Epi did the same is he mafia for voting so earlier?

And that was a quick weak reason for a permanent vote also zebra and unlike me you know you have another 24 hours.

a2thezebra wrote:
DrWilgy wrote: Sig did you just vote me for promoting discussion?
sig wrote:I'm going with Wilgy no on topic posts, and very few off topic posts, his one truly on topic post, is bad imo.

linki: I see Epi ninjad in and voted for MP.
What classifies a post as being bad? Gambler's fallacy has been brought up this game, so does that make my subject point irrelevant? I get the feeling that you are trying to strong arm me here Sig.
I think he is, he is. And it's a sorry excuse for a permanent vote.

sig

I finally know your meta sig, I've played enough games with you. You're bad and you're going down.

lol if your voting for me then you don't know my metaa. I had literally ten minutes to decide who to vote for. Since the poll read that the day phase ended today so yeah I voted and no it wasn't a sorry excuse for a permanent vote when the poll said the day was over. I waited until the very end of the phase to vote and he was the most suspicious. The fact your trying to scapegoat me over a misunderstanding about the poll is very very strange.

I already said I thought if we had already voted we had to revote for the player we voted for since votes aren't changeable? The only reason I thought Llama restarted the poll is so everyone else could vote. Did I mess up with that?

He was joking right?

I thought we had to revote for who we already voted for so I voted for Wilgy again.

@Gleam his one On topic post was pingy, and like I said I misunderstood when the poll ended so I voted for who was most suspicious at that time.

DrWilgy wrote:
S~V~S wrote:You first. Why?
Simply because if you are thinking about the gambler's fallacy it means you don't know who is on what team. I don't think RNG based patterns are what mafia are thinking of when the game begins either.

Sig did you just vote me for promoting discussion?
sig wrote:I'm going with Wilgy no on topic posts, and very few off topic posts, his one truly on topic post, is bad imo.

linki: I see Epi ninjad in and voted for MP.
What classifies a post as being bad? Gambler's fallacy has been brought up this game, so does that make my subject point irrelevant? I get the feeling that you are trying to strong arm me here Sig.

It seemed bad like mafia bad, it was mainly a gut read. It seemed like you could be setting up for a wagon and I thought I only had like ten minutes to make up my mind. So it was a rushed vote. If I'd have realized I had 48 and not 24 I wouldn't have voted for you.

How am I strong arming you?

@LC okay, I'm also less suspicious of LC/Wilgy now that I know we've got an extra day. I guess I need to replace my vote on Wilgy though.

I'm not sure about Epi his last second vote on MP seems weird.

Seeing how Epi took the time to come in and vote it makes me less likely to think he is mafia, though he could be mafia taking advantage of a no show town in an attempt to lynch MP, I doubt that though.
I also like SVS, besides that not much to go on.

So I did some ISO almost nobody here. I'm not liking Wilgy, LC, or Epi.

Epi hasn't posted much and then came in at 4:44 and didn't say anything, I would consider voting here, but would rather not today.

Lc is a gut ping which usually happens to me. However, I dislike his SOrsha reasoning and his fake vote on DF was weird.

I'm going with Wilgy no on topic posts, and very few off topic posts, his one truly on topic post, is bad imo.

linki: I see Epi ninjad in and voted for MP.

Helloooo?

There is eleven minutes until the deadline correct? And nobody is online and we have literally one vote in.

Long Con wrote:Fake-Vote DFaraday

Sorry for multi posts, LC why did you place a fake vote on DF?

So we have less then an hour to the deadline. That isn't good.

I dislike MP's vote but seeing how little time we have I can see why he voted. I'll also believe that he is busy.

DrWilgy wrote:I think someone who embraces the gambler's fallacy is more likely to be civ than someone who activly opposes it.

Discuss.

I don't see why? I think it can be used by civ or mafia, and isn't alignment indicating unless someone uses that to defend someone who flips mafia.

Long Con wrote:Well hey, if either of them does some obvious scumslip, all bets are off, of course.

There's a baddie role that has BTSC with Civ role. What reason does he have to ever go in there?

Why wouldn't they?
I'm not sure I like LCs Sorsha thoughts. I understand it, but after getting mafia so often it makes me think probability wise she is more likely to get it then other players. :P
I don't plan to lynch her today though.

Good JJJ I'm mad that I wasn't first!
Yell at everyone who posted before me please, orrrrrr send me back in time so I can be first either works. :P

Also I hate to jump right into game stuff, but I'm going to we're at 9/4/1 and that is at the start of the game. So I'd say we need to be very careful. We don't need to focus on Hunting Barry atm since he does need to kill one mafia member, and 1 to 2 civs is worth one mafia member imo. However, if we are to lynch Barry it wouldn't be a big deal. I do think we need to be careful about who to lynch and not rush into things this game since we are operating under a very tight margin of error.

sig wrote:Ninth.......
Tenth,

a2thezebra wrote:First~~~

Zebra was first that means she is mafia and excited to play lets lynch her. :P

Ninth.......

a2thezebra wrote:First~~~

Zebra was first that means she is mafia and excited to play lets lynch her. :P

The Syndicate

Search found 25 matches

Re: Barry Lyndon - Day 4

Re: Barry Lyndon - Day 1

Re: Barry Lyndon - Day 1

Re: Barry Lyndon - Day 1

Re: Barry Lyndon - Day 1

Re: Barry Lyndon - Day 1

Re: Barry Lyndon - Day 1

Re: Barry Lyndon - Day 1

Re: Barry Lyndon - Day 1

Re: Barry Lyndon - Day 1

Re: Barry Lyndon - Day 1

Re: Barry Lyndon - Day 1

Re: Barry Lyndon - Day 1

Re: Barry Lyndon - Day 1

Re: Barry Lyndon - Day 1

Re: Barry Lyndon - Day 1

Re: Barry Lyndon - Day 1

Re: Barry Lyndon - Day 1

Re: Barry Lyndon - Day 1

Re: Barry Lyndon - Day 1

Re: Barry Lyndon - Day 1

Re: Barry Lyndon - Day 1

Re: Barry Lyndon - Day 0

Re: Barry Lyndon - Day 0

Re: Barry Lyndon - Day 0