Return to “Spirited Away Mafia [ENDGAME]”
Ah okay, well I'll remember that next time I get a SK role :PSorsha wrote:It was, I liked the willow part.Epignosis wrote:Also, my endgame post was funny as hell.
I don't remember. Probably because it wouldn't have led back to any/many of ussig wrote:So, why did you kill me mafia?
Also thanks for the game MM/Epi I had fun when I was alive.
DO we all win?Metalmarsh89 wrote:Seems like all of the Syndicate games are ending today. I guess I'll just go ahead and end this one now. :P
And wait have we ever played before? I think we did in Turf Wars, but that didn't get brought up that much. How do you know I usually get mislynched for pingy not really pingy stuff?Soneji wrote:What I was saying is that I got pinged by a sig post, then thought about whether or not the reason for that was for the kind of thing players like sig normally get mislynched over and decided that it wasn't the case.
I wasn't fence sitting on Llama, I thought Matt was more likely to be mafia. For scotty I did a quick readover one of the things he said was that he thought I was civ, so I mentioned it. That alone is a weak reason to lynch someone.Soneji wrote:It is. Edgar Roni Figaro from FFVI, ladies man extraordinaire.Long Con wrote:That's Edgar in your avatar, right?
Sig, I am not discounting the possibility of LC as mafia having silenced himself, I have seen it done before on NF. My suspicion of Quin for it stems not from him stating the possibility, it is in the manner in which he had did it. If he had been upfront about it, I wouldn't have had an issue with it likely.
I didn't miss the main portion of your Scotty post, I just thought it was irrelevant to the point I was making. I want to lynch you for fence sitting on Llama and vying for town cred off that dead player.
Okay, since I have noticed on TS we do less kill analysis and while it can backfire on the civs, it will occasional help catch mafia. So I believed it was worth bringing up.Elohcin wrote:Not likely unless that's what the Mafia want you to think.sig wrote:So Scotty was killed, he thought I was good, and had Eloh, DF, and quin. He also brought up sprityo. Could he have been killed for suspecting the mafia?
Because your painting me out to be mafia when I'm not.DrWilgy wrote:Sig, you just tried to argue a rainbow list based completely on vote record... Why?sig wrote:Ummm I had my vote on the same civ twice, that should count for something. Especially since I was first on him both times.
Ah okay, I didn't think of that.Long Con wrote:That depends on whether or not the hosts allow teammates to send in actions for the inactives. I allow that when I host.sig wrote:Okay so I think one of the inactive players is the heads, and besides that I'm not quite sure.
This is really weak WIFOM reasoning. Since you've in the past defended me as mafia and civ you trying to get me lynched this game means you're right and I'm mafia? I doubt you'd defend me when I suspect you to be mafia or tried to get you lynched. This seems like such a mafia reason to vote for and try to push a lynch.Matt wrote: sig - Been no uing me since I sussed him. I pointed out to him that even when I'm bad, I always defend him against getting lynched early, and so it should be obvi that my suss of him was genuine but I suppose he doesn't gaf.
His defense of Matt was not only soft core, but strange. It boiled down to him saying he disliked the amount of votes on Matt, hinting that Matt wasn't scum since he had so many votes. However, Matt only had what 3 votes at that point? I viewed that as fear mongering.S~V~S wrote:I guess i was unclear, this happens em-bear-assingly often; sorry about that. What was off about his line of defense, and why would Matt flipping bad give you a stronger feel about DF?sig wrote:@Sorsha, I'm suspicious of MAtt not really of DF at the moment. However, his line of defense was odd?
Like I said he is null to me, his post about matt was pingy, but not that much. If Matt flips mafia which I believe he will it would make me more suspicious of DF.S~V~S wrote:Sure there is such a thing as civ behavior for individuals. Some more so than others depending on the situation. For the most part (everyone has exceptions) happy jolly joking Eloh has good BTSC; could be civ, could be bad. Cranky annoyed Eloh does not. This is mutually exclusive of tunneling. Based on this, not on tunneling, I would give only the bearest consideration to Eloh being bad. She seems annoyed in general with the way the thread is going (Quin wrote:I don't think there is such thing as 'civ behaviour', so I think it's pointless trying to discuss whether or not tunneling is civ behaviour or not.
If you're going to have that discussion, you should be asking whether a certain person would do this if they were civ. With that being said, other than my brief encounter with her in Turf Wars, I haven't played with Elohcin, so I have no idea whether she would or would not tunnel as she is.not a criticism, Eloh, just an observation) and whil I am OK with it, I can understand why.
@sig,no opinionon DF?
Matt today, I'm still unsure on DF.Dom wrote:So, sig, do we lynch DFaraday or Matt?
I dislike this post, Matt only has three votes? DF is making it seem like he is being bandwagoned and most players are voting for him.DFaraday wrote:I'm not liking how many votes Matt is getting. He's acting weird, but it just feels Matt-weird, not shady baddie behavior weird.
It was unexpressed but yes I did.Dom wrote:you hAD suspicion of me?sig wrote:I'm not suspicious of sprit at the moment. Though I'd like to see more content from him.
I did have some suspicions of Dom, however that has abated.
I'm still fine with the Matt wagon.
So here is a question. How often on TS does the mafia team silence themselves?
@Don, what caught your eye? Matt's post or his point on me?Dom wrote:Unfortuantely not. :/DrWilgy wrote:D:
SVS should have high self confidence.
Dom, has your questions lead you to any interesting thoughts? I think it's odd that we have all these questions out of you yet no feedback responses.
*Kidnaps Sig*
This, thought, does catch my eye.Matt wrote: @sig dude in like every game we play together, you get lynched early, and whether I'm civ/indy/bad, I almost always say "omg we're lynching sig again? unbelievable". So for me to actually suspect you this early should tell you it's genuine.
Why yes, my suspicion is genuine, yes it is, genuine indeed.
DrWilgette wrote:I like Dr Wilgy as well, so preferably not. If you bite my little ones, though, you're a dead little Siggy.sig wrote:DrWilgette wrote:Hmmmm I see, so does that mean I can bite Mr.Dr.Wilgy as long as I don't eat his fingers.sig wrote:Welcome to the Wilgy household, Sig. Don't bite the birds or the cat and we won't kick you out :P . We don't have enough fingers to keep you fed, so you'll have to find something else to eat.
I think little Siggy needs to start planning an escape attempt from this crazy house.DrWilgy wrote:Dont test her Sig... If you ever had a time to think anyone was dangerous, now would be best.
Hmmmm I see, so does that mean I can bite Mr.Dr.Wilgy as long as I don't eat his fingers.DrWilgette wrote:It was a difficult decision seeing that I had to do some speed reading. Only a few suspicious things jumped out. I'm going to participate more now that I'm feeling better.sig wrote:Mrs.DrWilgette did a really last minute vote there.
Welcome to the Wilgy household, Sig. Don't bite the birds or the cat and we won't kick you out :P . We don't have enough fingers to keep you fed, so you'll have to find something else to eat.
I thought you were a Texan?thellama73 wrote:So it looks like you'll have to put up with a lot more of Ol' Kentucky Llama!
I could sic you on my neighbors, they probably won't shoot you and if so meh we'd have llama for dinner.thellama73 wrote:A wise choice. We make excellent pets.sig wrote:Mrs.DrWilgette did a really last minute vote there.
linki: Maybe Siggy wants a llama?
*Sig bites Wilgy's finger off*DrWilgy wrote:*Wilgy slams Sig's cage!*
Bad Sig! Bad! you sit! you stay! you behave and you'll get your treats!
Wait I don't remember agreeing to this.DrWilgette wrote:Nah, I'm not bad. You're just mad because I didn't want to tell you. What can I say, though, I made a bad intro by being absent all of day one. I've been quite sick.DrWilgy wrote:
Initial suspicions based on entrance:
Dom
Sig
Scotty
Sorsha
Quin
Sprityo
Dfaraday
Matt
Llama
Long Con
Sloonei
DrWilgette
SVS
G-man
DrWilgy
What say you bathousers?
Mafia in general or on the Syndicate?S~V~S wrote:Wilgette, what do you think of Mafia so far?
Only if he'll fit in the bird's cage.DrWilgy wrote:*Pulls Sig out of his briefcase and shows Wilgette*
@Wilgette, can I keep'em? PLEASE PLEASE PLEASE!!! I'll take good care of him! feed him and water him regularly! I'll even take him for nice walks!
I haven't had time for much deep thought about suspicious activity. I'll contribute more tomorrow.
Nah I'm not mad, more like bemused. My record shows that as civ I've done things in the past that can be seen as worth lynching over, but making a joke about me being the only player to vote for the fly? It was a joke, to make it seem like something else is just weird.thellama73 wrote:See, this reads false to me. It sounds like baddie's I've seen who are mad at being caught for the wrong reasons.sig wrote:I've done nothing worth getting lynched over, Matt is being crazy and the fact LC is entertaining my lynch based around a day zero jokey post speaks for itself.
I disagree with llama here, and I dislike his accusation. However, I'm unsure if this makes him mafia. It does seem like he could've been trying to set you up, but as I said I'm not sure if that is the case.Sloonei wrote:Putting my vote on thellamaThis is the only post I've made that touches on the no lynch discussion at all:thellama73 wrote:I just thought Sloonei's reaction to my criticism of the no lynch option (which I make in basically every game) was a little defensive and OTT. It's only a slight ping, but I don't have anything much stronger to go on right now.S~V~S wrote:Why Sloonei? I see nothing alarming there.thellama73 wrote:Both Matt and Long Con are reading Civ to me, so I find Wilgy's accusation of chaos on LC weird. I guess I could vote for Wilgy today, but Sloonei still has my eye.Where's the overreaction to llama's involvement? What I did react to, however, was llama's extremely vague comment that Sloonei seems "a little off" as an extrenely weak way of stating a suspicion. He brushed it off by saying it's Day 1, and now he's backing up the suspicion again here with something that is entirely false. The Llama ain't looking good here.Sloonei wrote:Let's stop talking about no lynches now. Guess what movie I watched last night instead.
This post? It is interesting. I wouldn't say it is mafiaish or towny. I'd keep an eye on SVS, but would rather not lynch her.S~V~S wrote:This seems to be the trend lately, mining the thread with faux reads to catch people with later on. This kind of thing makes me nervous, but you ARE a Doctor. SoDrWilgy wrote:See the thing is, you were the one player I lied about on my list. I actually am reading you right below Sig. I thought this was odd though, considering that I do normally read you as bad. Your response... er lack of makes me think you have civ intentions.S~V~S wrote:Offhand, not much yet. Too much goofballyness. Did you see my earlier post @G Man? Where I asked if he was going to add some content to the haikus? I would expect to see more from LC and hopefully do soon.DrWilgy wrote:Ack! I have felt wrath!Quin wrote:DrWilgy, feel my wrath.
@SVS, do you have thoughts on players oustide of Matt? What do you think of Long Con's entry?
@Llama, who is bad?
@MyWonderfulWaifu, what do you think of my rainbow and the reasons behind my suspicion?
G-Man and Sloon are the only two who have addressed or at least questioned thier placement on my list. I'd be down for lynching LC, SVS, or Wilgette at this rate.
And why would I question your list? You generally tend to think I am bad, and you put yourself lower than I, lol. It was a day zero list
Do you think whether or not people question what is basically a throwaway list indicates their alignment?
Also, I don't believe that my list was throwaway. Tone reads are valuable.
G-Man and LC are the two I'm most concerned with at this point. G-Man's haikus (while have bettered my personal state) have yet to better the game state. LC's little contributions were that of chaos. Llama's response to Quin has be razzled as well. Llama is normally quick to punish a no lyncher, but to do so in a game where the option isn't available makes me read that he's trying force replicate habits.
Wilgette not answering my question puts her low on my list, but I can't tell if she legitimately didn't want to respond because it was me or if she didn't want to lie this early. Knowing her I could see both as possibility.
Linki - But I am mafia
I would expect amore involved bad LC, but if he had no show teammates,I can see it. Andyeah, I am waiting for those 18 haiku from G Man. I know self imposed posting thingies are GMans "thing" but he stillmanages to get topical content out there.
