The Syndicate

Oi... good game. I was absolutely destroyed lol. I didn't know how to react to ddl not defending himself, and I guess that cooked my goose.

Ok, here's an issue.

"I wanna lynch Wilgy because he's not very vocal"
"I wanna lynch Wilgy because he's now vocal"

Eloh, Boomslang and Scotty can I please have context as to how I'm forcing posts or suspicion unrelated to my post count?

JaggedJimmyJay wrote:

thellama73 wrote:Does anyone else think Wilgy's sudden spurt of activity reads a bit like "Dude, you're going to get lynched. Go defend yourself!" prodding from a BTSC team?

What I like least is the tinfoil on Boomslang -- it almost seems trendy at this point.

Wilgy, what leads you there? Hell, anyone who suspects Boomslang should answer that. Is it just that he was a failed night kill target, or are his posts suspicious?

It's a too good to be true scenario. His vote on DDL was a really good look for him even before his survival.

@JJJ, I've skimmed your ISO and I'm not sure any more. I've been tonal tunnelling it seems. Llama "seems ok to you" but why? Is this a null or a positive read? What is the primary reason for this read?

@Marmot that's difficult as mostly everything I have is tone. I still read you civ. I recall your baddies say the darnest things and it makes me want to review Scotty. He off voted and missed and this raises my eye. I want to see if I can read his doubt of boomslang is genuine or not. Something I would like to know Marmot friend is your current read of Epi and niju

What are common thoughts on Scotty and Sriracha?

@LC, why do I need to have a reason for asking questions? Also now that I've explained it, can I have a response to your reads on INH and Quin?

Long Con wrote:

DrWilgy wrote:INH, LC and Quin can I have you 3 let me know full reads on the other 2 in this group?

Why?

Niju, Marmot, and Epi can I have you 3 let me know full reads on the other 2 in this group?

Why?

This type of seemingly arbitrary grouping and cross-read requests is suspicious to me. Feels like you're caught in a baddie mode and are using thread techniques to stir up more interactions with players so that you can craft your own presence into something more Civ-seeming than it has been.

Two sentences, and you've planted the seeds for six different players to engage with you about players who are not you. I believe it's artificial.

These 2 groups voted together 2 days in a row. I'd like to know more about them.

Quin wrote:Wilgy, what's your GTH read on Boomslang?

Bad, but I know that's tinfoil. All rational thinking in the world opposes this thought.

JaggedJimmyJay wrote:I have been calling Marmot a civilian for the last four phases. Where do you get that idea?

Gimme a GTH read on Long Con in a world where I am a civilian.

If you are civilian, then I'd gth him bad. I don't think that you two are on the same team.

Sorry if, I missed/confused your thoughts, I'll go through your ISO now. You have made me doubtful.

Here's something that has me doubting that Eloh is bad, "would Mongoose give the information that is in Elohs head (from her last role) to an entire team?"

JaggedJimmyJay wrote:

DrWilgy wrote:I would've probably voted for JJJ yesterday had I been around, while mostly tonal, his stance on his suspects has been too rigid for what I expect of JJJ. I think a good comparison is his performance in Mad Max (civilian) where during my lynch he was jumping in and out of suspicion on multiple people. I'm not seeing anything comparable to Mad Max JJJ.

Name a suspect I have rigidly suspected other than Long Con. Then tell me what you think of Long Con.

Marmot.

In regards to LC, I reviewed his ISO upon you asking me this and realized that I think he's civ not based upon what he's said, but what you've stated (this is also on the premise that you are bad). In the scenario where you aren't bad, I have a solid null on him. I am in agreement with his views regarding your interactions with Marmot however.

Metalmarsh89 wrote:

DrWilgy wrote:Hey, sorry I've been gone. Getting ready for the new semester (along with Wilgette's parents visiting) has made me busier than expected.

I'm going to skim rq and post thoughts.

Are they as adorable as she is?

Yes, but only half as tasty.

So I'm caught up and I see that several of you would like to cook me. Makes sense as all I've provided the last 2 days are excuses.

@Marmot my top 3 suspects are Llama, JJJ and idk.

I would've probably voted for JJJ yesterday had I been around, while mostly tonal, his stance on his suspects has been too rigid for what I expect of JJJ. I think a good comparison is his performance in Mad Max (civilian) where during my lynch he was jumping in and out of suspicion on multiple people. I'm not seeing anything comparable to Mad Max JJJ.

Nothing has improved my read on Llama, but his discussion with Quin yesterday has actually reinforced the negative tones I felt before. I suppose something that does make me doubt my original read on Llama slightly is the lack of INH. I don't know where his suspicion of Llama went even though it was similar to mine.

The part that throws me for a loop is that I feel no reason to remove the possibility that JJJ and Llama are teammates. A pattern of 2 high posters would normally cause me to assume that only 1 of them could be bad, but I do not feel that this time.

I'm finding it difficult to actually say that I have a 3rd suspect, but that could also be due to how pivotal this game has been. If I couldn't place a vote on Llama or JJJ, I may vote for INH or Epi.

INH, LC and Quin can I have you 3 let me know full reads on the other 2 in this group?

Niju, Marmot, and Epi can I have you 3 let me know full reads on the other 2 in this group?

Hey, sorry I've been gone. Getting ready for the new semester (along with Wilgette's parents visiting) has made me busier than expected.

I'm going to skim rq and post thoughts.

Hey everyone, sorry I was away. I got sick the other night and my schedule has been backwards since.

I'll attempt to catch up now.

A Jean genie? What'n tarnation!

I'll take it

Voted the Llama.

Long Con wrote:

DrWilgy wrote:

Epignosis wrote:

DrWilgy wrote:

The last time Wilgy posted this face when someone didn't do what he wanted, he was bad.

You aren't wrong. What game was this though?

Linki - I remember that post. 1 second.

You never followed up on this. Felt like a nice, solid citation was coming.

It was, but then school stuff got in the way. The tl;dr is I agree with the case. Putting Sriracha in the blending player category felt more condemning than his vote. what did llama expect after calling her out? Was he hoping she would go "and here's a case?"

Now that Llama is catching up, I hope to have a response soon.

Scotty wrote:

DrWilgy wrote:I'm caught up. I'm just going to blame Marmot friend for my troubles.

Someone interact with me.

Yeah, see this is the type of thing bad Wilgy and MM did in Three Kingdoms as baddie partners. The only thing missing is Wilgy telling MM to come back into BTSC.

Scotty, you should've pm'd me in btsc before saying that.

@Llama, after calling out Sriracha did you honestly expect her to be a hunter?
Also -

thellama73 wrote:

JaggedJimmyJay wrote:

thellama73 wrote:Vote Sorsha. Locked In. Final Answer.

Are votes changeable?

No, which I rather wish I had remembered before casting mine.

Why did you wish you had remembered before casting your vote if you were locked in and this was your final answer?


I disagree with the Marmot Friend vote and will oppose his lynch today.

@Epi this one.

Epignosis wrote:

JaggedJimmyJay wrote:

Epignosis wrote:It was an opportunity to take a jab at llama. You don't pass those up.

Understood.

Whaddya think of Sorsha?

She responded in a way I would have expected if she were good, I guess. When we were bad together last time, she came after me snottily. Last time when she was bad and I wasn't, she came after me snottily. llama and I think similarly, so maybe her response is an indication that she isn't bad.

Or maybe she's just snotty to me.

It's also been your general tone as well. It's off from what I'm used too.

Epignosis wrote:

DrWilgy wrote:

The last time Wilgy posted this face when someone didn't do what he wanted, he was bad.

You aren't wrong. What game was this though?

Linki - I remember that post. 1 second.

insertnamehere wrote:@LC and Wilgy: Would either of you be down for a Llama lynch?

He's the most solid negative read I have right now, so I'm inclined to vote in his direction.

Mine as well, but my read is entirely tone. What triggers your suspicion inh?

Mongoose wrote:

JaggedJimmyJay wrote:Mongoose: just FYI that your link to Elohcin's posts actually directs to Epi's.

Oooh, thanks for that heads up, sug. I will QC all the other links tonight as well as add a link for Dr Wilgy.

Yay me!

Long Con wrote:

DrWilgy wrote:I'm caught up. I'm just going to blame Marmot friend for my troubles.

Someone interact with me.

Hey Wilgy...pretend stuff people said to each other was said to you, and respond.

Interacted!

But there's too much to address. The only two I'm concerned with atm are Llama and Epi, but Epi has already addressed the post that gaveme the heebie jeebies.

Specifics LC!

Long Con wrote:A Series of Unfortunate Events Mafia.

I don't have a system to determine which low posters are bad, besides lynch em all and let God sort em out...but I do have some sure-fire advice to increase your chances of lynching Mafia: don't lynch me.

Same tbh

I'm caught up. I'm just going to blame Marmot friend for my troubles.

Someone interact with me.

Hola!