The Syndicate

I got those tasty tasty mintos one way or another.

It's a shame that I predicted the baddie count wrong. On that note GG Zebra. I didn't know when the best time to lynch you was either because you seemed to want to keep me alive.

Yay Grog!

@Scotty
Shit if I had kill power I'd axe vomps and zeebs as unreadables.

And the reason why I didn't hold your hand is because I had to know if you'd care about self preservation more than axing a baddie.

You weren't willing to hunt so I voted you.

I'm guessing that the baddie team is between Zeebs Scotty and Snow. The thing is if snow dog wins it was due to that ballsy banana play, I have no problem losing to that.

In regards to Vomps, I accepted defeat when I signed up for a game with him on the chance he's bad.

Metalmarsh89 wrote:Oops, I didn't see a dead player option.

It's ok, i approve your vote.

Hey Vomps. Can you vote Zebra tomorrow?

A shame

Lol, I guess the games a coinflip.

You had bananas for yourself earlier but no shenanigans now? If the game is over don't leave me in suspense.

Sorry today was a bitch. Voting Scotty. Gave him a chance.

Snow Dog was grog'd so there goes that opportunity to redeem yourself in my eyes Scotty.

Shadows are spoopy

And that's exactly why it makes sense.

Let Scotty choose. Will he do what is needed and trust me or will he trust himself and fight a tie?

So here's the thing. I'm 98% sure that there are shenanigans in play. A tie will result in better things for baddies than civvies.

Scotty if you trust me, vote Snow Dog. Otherwise you will die.

Long Con wrote:There's no situation that I can see here where Snow Dog could be bad. And if I didn't already think you were Civ, Wilgy, that last post is, in the parlance of our times, 'Civ as fuck'.

If Scotty is actually good, and there are two baddies left, then it's Vompatti and zebra. If there's one baddie left, then it's most likely zebra, and Vompatti just casually made a foolish mistake that could cost the Civs the game.

If that's the case, and it's by far the most likely scenario, then the best thing I can see to do is put the final two votes on zebra and cross our fingers.

LC if Scotty is good, what prevented Zebra and Vomps voting him if they are bad?

Long Con wrote:Maybe it would be helpful if you explained what you did mean then?

When I was saying that I was waiting for more votes it was for analysis.

If Scotty is Civ all the remaining baddies had to do was stack votes on him assuming that both Snow Dog and LC aren't bad.

If LC is bad, it means that the baddies threw their votes super early.

If Scotty and LC are civ were fucked.

I'm going to see if Scotty would rather gamble on a tie to lynch someone else, or save himself.

LC or Snow Dog if you are bad and threw your vote super early, that's ballsy and you have my respect.

Scotty wrote:
DrWilgy wrote:Yay! Baddies win!

3 votes placed on 2 civs
Wtf are you talking about.

DrWilgy wrote:I'm just waitin for another vote and a half LC. No worries.
Guys Wilgy just claimed baddie and no one is calling out his shit.

Vomps, I want you and I to vote him and someone throw some grog on me. He played his cards too early

Is this what you honestly believe Scotty? You honestly believe i threw everything at the last second?

I'm just waitin for another vote and a half LC. No worries.

Yay! Baddies win!

3 votes placed on 2 civs

Snow Dog wrote:
DrWilgy wrote:
Snow Dog wrote:
DrWilgy wrote:
Snow Dog wrote:
DrWilgy wrote:@LC yes

@Snow Dog where'd you get those bananers?
Ok I'm not sure I am allowed to answer that.
In this case, I'm to assume that you are Stan, Toothrot or a cannibal with Toothrot's Banana picker.
Makes no sense for me to be a cannibal. Why would I save LC?
He's your teammate.

.
There is no logic to that. If he were my teammate, I'd have saved him without saying anything.

Incorrect, you have only stated "Look I saved a Civ" since it happened. I believe you were going for cred to win this lylo.

Snow Dog wrote:
DrWilgy wrote:
Snow Dog wrote:
DrWilgy wrote:@LC yes

@Snow Dog where'd you get those bananers?
Ok I'm not sure I am allowed to answer that.
In this case, I'm to assume that you are Stan, Toothrot or a cannibal with Toothrot's Banana picker.
Makes no sense for me to be a cannibal. Why would I save LC?

He's your teammate.

Long Con wrote:
DrWilgy wrote:Which is a fine thing to think, but I disagree.

@LC how did you know about this situation before it happened?

Long Con wrote:
Soneji wrote:
DrWilgy wrote:
Metalmarsh89 wrote:I want to lynch Long Con, and our only chance today is if DrWilgy joins me in forcing a tie (and someone has a wonderful item to use).

But I don't like ties either. This lynch is the worst.
I would like to join you but I don't trust Scotty ;__;

Do I vote Snow Dog, Ji-San or Scotty?
It doesn't matter much. If you're not voting Long Con then the lynch is set in stone on myself.
Not so set in stone. Maybe someone will use bananas and/or grog and make me get lynched.

I would totally get revenge on that person.
But I'm not referencing any situations before they happened, because that situation didn't happen. No one used bananas and/or grog to get me lynched.

Subject matter is different, but you called Item Shenanigans interacting with your potential death before it happened.

Snow Dog wrote:
DrWilgy wrote:@LC yes

@Snow Dog where'd you get those bananers?
Ok I'm not sure I am allowed to answer that.

In this case, I'm to assume that you are Stan, Toothrot or a cannibal with Toothrot's Banana picker.

Which is a fine thing to think, but I disagree.

@LC how did you know about this situation before it happened?

Long Con wrote:
Soneji wrote:
DrWilgy wrote:
Metalmarsh89 wrote:I want to lynch Long Con, and our only chance today is if DrWilgy joins me in forcing a tie (and someone has a wonderful item to use).

But I don't like ties either. This lynch is the worst.
I would like to join you but I don't trust Scotty ;__;

Do I vote Snow Dog, Ji-San or Scotty?
It doesn't matter much. If you're not voting Long Con then the lynch is set in stone on myself.
Not so set in stone. Maybe someone will use bananas and/or grog and make me get lynched.

I would totally get revenge on that person.

@LC yes

@Snow Dog where'd you get those bananers?

Long Con wrote:
DrWilgy wrote:There's a reason why I don't trust Snow Dog.

Bananas are more valuable to baddies than civvies.

Snow Dog. Why bananas over grog? Why not grog someone twice instead of banana lc twice?
Doesn't that have the same net result? Remove votes from one dude, or put votes on the other dude.

Nope, it's a survivalist vs activist mindset. A baddie normally takes measures to save themself rather lynch others.

Bananas are more valuable than that to a baddie because they know who to trust and who to save when shit goes bad.

Now I ask, would a civ get bananas and save them for themself or would a civ get grog and nuke who they found suspect?

There's a reason why I don't trust Snow Dog.

Bananas are more valuable to baddies than civvies.

Snow Dog. Why bananas over grog? Why not grog someone twice instead of banana lc twice?

Zebra can you comment on LC's vote analysis?

Snow Dog wrote:
DrWilgy wrote:Y didn't you say so from the start?
Say what?

That you were bananaing him?
When did you exactly banana him?

Y didn't you say so from the start?

But here's the thing LC. I'm actively thinking "what kind of role can just chunk 2 banana's someone's way?"

More or less my reads have been invalidated by this and I don't have thw time atm to reevaluate.

Not sure.

Snow Pupper infodumping skews my read and I'm frustrated due to this.

Why vote for you LC if he's just going to throw bananas onto you?

Opposite end is why infodump about saving someone unless they are your teammate or the savior is civ?

Due to this I can no longer make an accurate read that isn't impacted by the skewing of game rules. Assuming game rules are followed, I'm to assume what snow dog said is a lie and shpuld vote both him and you. Assuming game rules are broken I'm inclined to believe that Scotty and Zebra are bad.

Guys what the hell?

@Host will we be notified of a team's loss?

Vompatti wrote:He said so much positive about me I didn't even fit on the chart.

Vomps can I have a turnip?

@Scotty probly 1-2 cannibals left and a single pirate.

Zeebs if you were bad would you tell me?

Snow Dog wrote:
Snow Dog wrote:Don't worry LC. You may yet survive.

DrWilgy wrote: Snow dog's quote here is the least genuine thing I think I've read.

Nope, I still call bs. You don't tell someone you vote for Don't worry unless you are full of jank and are upto shenanigans.

Scotty wrote:
DrWilgy wrote:I believe this vote spread confirms my suspicion. Scotty and Snow Dog are both baddies.
Another reason why I didn't vote for Mac is I AGREE with his thoughts on you, Wilgy. Why are we partners? Where does Mac fit into it? How many baddies do you think are left? And have you checked your role yet?

Mainly because Snow Dog won't play devil's advocate. A civ mindset would be open to expressing even slight causes concern as even if it was damn near nonexistent. Civs don't know who to trust.

Mac doesn't fit into it. He's unrelated.

Probably 3

Nope.

Scotty wrote:
Snow Dog wrote:Don't worry LC. You may yet survive.
It's true. Grog could be in play.

And you back him up here after my question hasn't been answered.
Snow dog's quote here is the least genuine thing I think I've read. Why would someone point this out to someone that they voted for? Also why would someone point this out to someone they voted for, when they wouldn't play devil's advocate when asked?

What would give you this idea Snow Dog?

I believe this vote spread confirms my suspicion. Scotty and Snow Dog are both baddies.

Mislynching Mac isn't the worst case scenario.

Snow Dog wrote:
a2thezebra wrote:It is in your best interest to co-operate.

It really is. Now Snow Dog, play devils advocate and throw dirt on Scotty if you have to. I will vote for one of you two as I'm 80% sure that lynching LC will not end a baddie faction.

Marmot Friend...

I'll always remember you. I'll keep you close in my heart as always.

Snow Dog, why should I lynch Scotty instead of you?

Scotty, why should I lynch Snow Dog instead of you?

Snow Dog. I currently oppose a LC lynch. While it may be needed in the future, now is not the time.

Die wanna wagna

Right-Up

Snow Dog wrote:Dr Wilgy decided not to vote at all.

I totes missed it. I have no regrets tho.

Scotty wrote:
DrWilgy wrote:
Metalmarsh89 wrote:I want to lynch Long Con, and our only chance today is if DrWilgy joins me in forcing a tie (and someone has a wonderful item to use).

But I don't like ties either. This lynch is the worst.
I would like to join you but I don't trust Scotty ;__;

Do I vote Snow Dog, Ji-San or Scotty?
Well gee, Wilgy. Why is that?

Because you keep changing your mind about me.

Triggering my first girlfriend induced ptsd.

Metalmarsh89 wrote:I want to lynch Long Con, and our only chance today is if DrWilgy joins me in forcing a tie (and someone has a wonderful item to use).

But I don't like ties either. This lynch is the worst.

I would like to join you but I don't trust Scotty ;__;

Do I vote Snow Dog, Ji-San or Scotty?

MacDougall! When did the fire die? You don't seem you.

How many cycles until it's too late? ~[ ⇀ ‿ T ]

Soneji wrote:
DrWilgy wrote:Would you rather my blackmail be non-casual?
You might need to read your role PM for that

Don't tell me how to live my life

Would you rather my blackmail be non-casual?

Snow dog, go ahead and vote. If you vote the right person I'll not vote for you.

After reviewing Niju's posts, I have come to a conclusion.
...
...
...I'm not a cannibal.

Discuss.

Search found 109 matches