The Syndicate

DharmaHelper wrote:Which of these is most likely:

A) There was a lynch switch
B) Floyd's results were sent to the other thread
C) Soneji was the only lynchee

Long Con wrote:BWT, Wilgy, sig, Sorsha, Floyd... those are the players that I feel most negative about in this here Hatch. BWT and Floyd are low-posters as I recall, maybe the lowest? Sorsha is down there as well. sig, I think some of his posts made me suspicious. I'd love to be able to look back over that one. And dear Wilgy... maybe I don't suspect Wilgy so much.

This doesn't need to be about low-posters yet though. 48 hours in this Hatch, right?

sig wrote:Oh I'd also add on to Wilgy

Didn't you suspect Golden? If so why are you pursing someone who he was agaisnt? Espaiclly since he defended Mac.

Sorsha wrote:That's Floyd being Floyd. That's how I explain it.

DharmaHelper wrote:Uh oh I switched to LC so that Floyd/Sig would be tied

U H O H

Long Con wrote:

DrWilgy wrote:

Long Con wrote:What if Floyd is silenced?

Idk. He was here earlier today.

Floyd isn't a bad vote really. Kinda the same case as Sig in which I'd be OK with him being lynched for the sake of advancing discussion. My reason to vote Sig over Floyd is that Quin thing.

...but you wouldn't consider your statement as among the scummiest of the game?

Long Con wrote:What if Floyd is silenced?

Professor Farnsworth wrote:Wilgy, why did you vote me?

Long Con wrote:I'm disappointed with the activity in here. Sig hasn't even posted, I'm thinking maybe we should just do the Main Thread a favour and lynch him today, to end the sig debate and get to start a little fresher on Day 3.

Long Con wrote:

DrWilgy wrote:Here's the Priz meme again.

I'm in.

No, that's over. Priz meme doesn't mean BTSC anymore. It's an accepted nickname.

LoRab wrote:

DrWilgy wrote:

LoRab wrote:Thus far, BR, Professor Farnsworth, Sig, and Floyd haven't posted yet. Yes?

Just to track if someone is silenced....or someone is pretending to be.

I would hope that silencing wouldn't be a thing in a scenario where we are split into groups.

Why not? If there is a silencing role or roles, I'd assume that role/those roles would still go through...I don't see why not?

LoRab wrote:Thus far, BR, Professor Farnsworth, Sig, and Floyd haven't posted yet. Yes?

Just to track if someone is silenced....or someone is pretending to be.

LoRab wrote:

DrWilgy wrote:

LoRab wrote:OK, agreed with all who stated above that it's really annoying to not be able to see the main thread, in order to see what was said previously. As is obvious, I suspect Wilgy, although less so than Day 1, based on lynch result--knowing that mafia has game-related roles (or at least some mafia), the slip seems less likely to be a slip. That said, his defense still doesn't sit right. And I still don't like that he never answered my question about why he automatically went to the conclsion that the first player to post about being from a game was lying about what game they were from, and what motivation he thinks they would have for lying about what game they were from.

There could be countless motivations for a player to come out lying. As mafia to look contributory, to draw information, or even set up the long con. As civilian, to start discussion w/o revealing too much info, to safely check and see if others would like to mass role claim, bait baddies to reveal info.

Also it wasn't just the fact that he was first, it was that he claimed a game that we all knew existed from the purchasable items. I did already explain this and im not going to go in circles. Your persistent suspicion of me without knowing this is not a good look.

Really just annoyed that I asked you a direct question in the last round that you never answered. Now you have. Sorry if direct questions annoy you.

I'm not sure I truly understand your thinking, but I accept that it is your thinking. And my challenge with it is that it was the first. I understand the second or third person claiming, as it's already been established that people are saying what games they are from. It seems more likely to me that a baddie would just not say what game they are from until it's a thing that people are saying what games they are from. I think this may be a matter of different ways of thinking. As I said, you've moved down on my suspicion list. If there were a full game list, you'd probably be negligible by now.

Sorry you think that asking questions isn't a good look. Since, that's kind of how I learn things.

Quin wrote:

timmer wrote:

Quin wrote:

timmer wrote:

DrWilgy wrote:Timmer, why was Quin a contender for your vote?

Without my posts from earlier, I can't remember for sure. I read all of day 1 in a single block and pasted as I went so I could reference it all and now it is gone.

I do remember that quin was one of the people who quickly pOsted about how mac had a game listed in his role but that wasn't the main thing.

I honestly can't remember lol. This is why we have post histories for those of us with really poor short term memory.

I 'member.

Quin, why did I suspect you, lol?

You thought that mentioning that I thought DH was luring a night kill was fishy.

LoRab wrote:OK, agreed with all who stated above that it's really annoying to not be able to see the main thread, in order to see what was said previously. As is obvious, I suspect Wilgy, although less so than Day 1, based on lynch result--knowing that mafia has game-related roles (or at least some mafia), the slip seems less likely to be a slip. That said, his defense still doesn't sit right. And I still don't like that he never answered my question about why he automatically went to the conclsion that the first player to post about being from a game was lying about what game they were from, and what motivation he thinks they would have for lying about what game they were from.