The Syndicate

Long Con wrote:Nope. You were Blinkman, you could have blinked yourself right off the poll at any time, during any poll.

Long Con wrote:

Typhoony wrote:

DrWilgy wrote:I had fun. I think I was more curious about the world more so than anything else. I went to I7 twice just to see if others were as interested as I

I forgot to ask this earlier. Were you aware that you could have saved yourself from being lynched taking yourself off the poll at any point?

Ooo, yeah, that was an unexpected twist! Wilgy?

Bullzeye wrote:

Metalmarsh89 wrote:

Bullzeye wrote:

Bullzeye wrote:

fingersplints wrote:

Bullzeye wrote:I'm like 99% sure the Pixie is bad, so I'll be voting that way to confirm my suspicions.

Why were you so confident the pixie is bad and how does the post make you feel about this now?

Not sure how much I'd be allowed to say but the gist is I followed something I assumed came from her and it led me to almost die. Must have been a trick.

Following host clarification (Thanks LC! ) I can tell you all that I found a note saying there was a library full of juicy info at a certain square. Knowing the risks of blindly trusting an unknown person, I blindly trusted an unknown person and went to that square. That square did not in fact contain a library full of juicy info. It did not contain anything. It almost, however, contained my corpse as it's where I was when I got targeted for a kill. Since the Pixie is responsible for dropping notes about the place, I assumed that's who it was from and that it was all part of an evil baddie trap. I still think the note was from baddies, I just think they either used the Pixie's power somehow or did something else.

On that note, don't trust any notes you find promising info at a particular square. I'm not allowed to say specifically which one it was, and even if I did it wouldn't help because whoever left that note could just change the location they use.

There's no library? Well I'm glad I didn't visit it now.

Can confirm. No library. Not even so much as a picture book. Just murder.

MacDougall wrote:

Matt F wrote:

LoRab wrote:

Matt F wrote:I might have to reread Lorab as well. She voted for Mac the first two days juliets was on the chopping block, but on the third day voted for juliets after juliets had already taken 7 votes. Hmmmm

Please do. I have nothing to hide. If you have any questions, please ask. I'm civ, and all my actions have been civ. eye me all you want.

Right now Bullz has taken priority over both you and HBoy. However, feel free to post on your meds, I still think that would be epic

See this is a good indication that you have had one OH YEAH ping and now you're preparing to tunnel Bullzeye for the rest of the game.

Sorsha wrote:I think we've been over Floyd enough and it's time to finally get an answer on this so- voting Floyd.

Let's do it.

Wilgy come to the Floyd bonfire chode.

Golden wrote:Sorry Wilgy. The way the game works is not that you get to choose why I find you suspicious, however much you might prefer that.

Matt F wrote:Wilgy, get yourself over to the Metalmarsh bonfire. Juliets' teammate HBoy is over here, but we can all still work together to get rid of the crazy Doctor...

Hosts - If a Mafia team is eliminated, will we be told?

LoRab wrote:

DrWilgy wrote:

LoRab wrote:

DrWilgy wrote:

Golden wrote:It feels like a new post-juliets dawn where new suspicions need to come forth.

I have two clear thoughts so far. The first is that I can see a scenario where Dr Wilgy is bad and on the Cabal and they set up his 'death' knowing the night wouldn't count for cred. My impression from TH, and it was backed up somewhat when I asked about it in the thread, is that this is exactly the kind of gambit Wilgy would enjoy. It seems up his alley.

I am no longer intoxicated

Golden, how many times have we been on a team together? What makes you think this is up my alley?

You pretty just answered him by saying, "Wifom?" When, really, he was saying that this is totally something you would do. Also, it doesn't have to be up your alley or have been your idea, even. It could have been a scheme thought out by others on your team, and you cooperated with it. How would it not be up your alley, by the way?

And why did you ask people to night kill you? And why did you stop after night 6.1?

It also makes sense why LC would have told us late what the results of the first non-night were. Someone on your team reminded him.

Idk... Seems too simple... My schemes are more fun! Besides if I really wanted to have some clear, why would I ask people to kill me, rather than go with the flow? Just seems like too much work for something so insignificant. Also, why me rather than a teammate if that was the plan? Why wouldn't we save that play for when someone else needs an EZ clear.... Yes! This is why it's not my plan. Too many holes. Too many flaws. I wouldn't accept the plan even if it was my teamates.

I wanted to die because I didn't wanna play at the time... Better! I didnt wanna catch up DX

I do enjoy the speculation regarding the delay. Y'know... Considering this isn't the only time it has happened. Was this speculation genuine though... That is the questionoly.

Linki - Timmer, IDK bae. If those coincidences or gambits were forced to get me somewhat "cleared" as others described, it seems to be doing a pretty shitty job

In response to your wifom switcheroo goodness, I do think you would do it. I'm not sure your teammates would give you the chance to "accept" it, as I don't know who they are, but I know sometimes folks run with ideas before waiting to hear other views, why wouldn't you just ask for a replacement if you didn't want to play, I'm guessing that LC was reminded at other times about things he forgot to post (but your death is the only one connected to a baddie team, and why would anyone else necessarily want the result public, other than those who carried out the kill--and how would anyone other than the person that made it happen know that the original result was supposed to be in the post), why would the baddie team even care unless the result was significant, and yes the speculation is genuine.

And to your linkitis: sometimes plans don't go as planned.

LoRab wrote:

DrWilgy wrote:

Golden wrote:It feels like a new post-juliets dawn where new suspicions need to come forth.

I have two clear thoughts so far. The first is that I can see a scenario where Dr Wilgy is bad and on the Cabal and they set up his 'death' knowing the night wouldn't count for cred. My impression from TH, and it was backed up somewhat when I asked about it in the thread, is that this is exactly the kind of gambit Wilgy would enjoy. It seems up his alley.

I am no longer intoxicated

Golden, how many times have we been on a team together? What makes you think this is up my alley?

You pretty just answered him by saying, "Wifom?" When, really, he was saying that this is totally something you would do. Also, it doesn't have to be up your alley or have been your idea, even. It could have been a scheme thought out by others on your team, and you cooperated with it. How would it not be up your alley, by the way?

And why did you ask people to night kill you? And why did you stop after night 6.1?

It also makes sense why LC would have told us late what the results of the first non-night were. Someone on your team reminded him.

Golden wrote:It feels like a new post-juliets dawn where new suspicions need to come forth.

I have two clear thoughts so far. The first is that I can see a scenario where Dr Wilgy is bad and on the Cabal and they set up his 'death' knowing the night wouldn't count for cred. My impression from TH, and it was backed up somewhat when I asked about it in the thread, is that this is exactly the kind of gambit Wilgy would enjoy. It seems up his alley.

juliets wrote:

Turnip Head wrote:C'mon mang I can't hold your hand. Look at her posts from the past couple of cycles and tell me if it feels like a civvie in danger, or a baddie lying just low enough until she can squeak by with some vote trickery.

I have responded to everything I can respond to. For all of those saying it's my tone or something similar there's not a lot I can say about that except I have the same tone every game, whether I'm good or bad. It's a mistake to use my tone as the reason to vote me. Many of the people who are doing that haven't played with me before or haven't played with me for a long time. Not all but many. So I dont want to repeat myself over and over. And as for finding baddies, anything I pointed out would be seen immediately with suspicion just because it's me who's pointing it out, or worst case, i would point out some baddie behavior and everyone would think they were civv.

So I don't know what else you want me to say. I see no reason why I wouldn't be lynched today and to whoever said it earlier today (Mac I think) I had no idea Mac would be lynched.

LoRab wrote:

MacDougall wrote:

LoRab wrote:i've read between the lines and i agree with dom.

On which point?

that you're bad.

DrWilgy wrote:

LoRab wrote:that said, I agree with mac's current 2 suspects.

ntioned juliets before. dr w is making me suspish by clearly paying attention, but not really contributing to conversation. jokey, but on topic, short posts. just doesn't feel like a civ play.

Ha! You think I'm paying attention.

Well, if you weren't, then how would you have known to respond?

LoRab wrote:that said, I agree with mac's current 2 suspects.

ntioned juliets before. dr w is making me suspish by clearly paying attention, but not really contributing to conversation. jokey, but on topic, short posts. just doesn't feel like a civ play.

Matt F wrote:I picked Fall because I figured I might fall off the poll.

MacDougall wrote:Keep those votes coming team.