Search found 9 matches
Return to “GAME OVER: BLUE vs. RED”
- Thu Mar 09, 2017 8:29 pm
- Forum: Previous Heists
- Topic: GAME OVER: BLUE vs. RED
- Replies: 1671
- Views: 41701
Re: Day 5- BLUE vs. RED
Alas, I have been killed.
- Wed Mar 08, 2017 6:53 pm
- Forum: Previous Heists
- Topic: GAME OVER: BLUE vs. RED
- Replies: 1671
- Views: 41701
Re: Night 4- BLUE vs. RED

I second that.Long Con wrote:Instant blame. New top suspect.MacDougall wrote:Whose idea was this?
- Tue Mar 07, 2017 9:58 pm
- Forum: Previous Heists
- Topic: GAME OVER: BLUE vs. RED
- Replies: 1671
- Views: 41701
Re: Day 4- BLUE vs. RED
Ow, that hurts.Long Con wrote:3. Where you stand on Floyd and why.
I stand on Floyd in the gutter, because that's where I assume he is lying, dead drunk or just plain dead. Does he get some sort of points for just signing up for Mafia games? I don't get this guy.
That's Epi's just being Epi. I find it hard to read him as civ or scum, but that's his style of play. To be honest, you also implement forced "false news" as well.notsawyer540 wrote:One question I would like answered is: Have I really been forcing evidence to fit my conclusions, or has Epi's Fox-News-style misrepresentation of facts and events fooled too many of you?
- Sat Mar 04, 2017 7:15 pm
- Forum: Previous Heists
- Topic: GAME OVER: BLUE vs. RED
- Replies: 1671
- Views: 41701
Re: Day 3- BLUE vs. RED
Going to place a vote on Jack for now.
Mac's also in my sights as potential scum. Although Swayer's perspectives on him could have been dictated more coherently (but heck, this is coming from me), I believe they extrude a real point.
Mac's also in my sights as potential scum. Although Swayer's perspectives on him could have been dictated more coherently (but heck, this is coming from me), I believe they extrude a real point.
- Thu Mar 02, 2017 5:31 am
- Forum: Previous Heists
- Topic: GAME OVER: BLUE vs. RED
- Replies: 1671
- Views: 41701
Re: Day 2- BLUE vs. RED
I know any excuse for low posting is going to be held against me, so I won't bother exclaiming one.
From my brief reads, I can take this:
As already stated, Wilgy lost his usual cherpiness when Jack's role was revealed. That's a subtle detail that's well-pointed out. I don't feel implied to label him as scum at this stage, but I'm open to any change.
With Jack's role revealed, I can understand the benefits of lynching and not lynching him. When I have the time, I might investigate his associations and statements before Night 1.
Heck, Long Con holds a strong stance of being the interrogator. It makes it difficult to assume his alliance. I've seen it in other games as well. I know I'm probably stating the obvious, but doesn't anyone else think likewise with me?
From my brief reads, I can take this:
As already stated, Wilgy lost his usual cherpiness when Jack's role was revealed. That's a subtle detail that's well-pointed out. I don't feel implied to label him as scum at this stage, but I'm open to any change.
With Jack's role revealed, I can understand the benefits of lynching and not lynching him. When I have the time, I might investigate his associations and statements before Night 1.
Heck, Long Con holds a strong stance of being the interrogator. It makes it difficult to assume his alliance. I've seen it in other games as well. I know I'm probably stating the obvious, but doesn't anyone else think likewise with me?
- Mon Feb 27, 2017 6:37 pm
- Forum: Previous Heists
- Topic: GAME OVER: BLUE vs. RED
- Replies: 1671
- Views: 41701
Re: Night 1- BLUE vs. RED
I'll bear the blame for missing the poll, I don't really have much of an excuse apart from being too engaged in my education.
Great voting guys. Man, Scotty's pic of a putrid, mutated creature makes me squeamish. It's not usually moral to lynch someone for posting an image, but this time it's justified.

Great voting guys. Man, Scotty's pic of a putrid, mutated creature makes me squeamish. It's not usually moral to lynch someone for posting an image, but this time it's justified.
notsawyer540 wrote:So is Ted Cruz dead or do we have to lynch him day 2? It says "he is" in the post where it says "he was" for Assange. So I'm assuming he have to lynch Jack next.

- Sun Feb 26, 2017 5:18 am
- Forum: Previous Heists
- Topic: GAME OVER: BLUE vs. RED
- Replies: 1671
- Views: 41701
Re: Day 1- BLUE vs. RED
Just an observation. You'd want to be on Clinton's side in this game, don't you?Elohcin wrote:No, but like llama and SVS, I am here to play, not debate.Scotty wrote:Lol do you not?Elohcin wrote:I don't know where to place my vote. The poll assumes we like Clinton. **scratches head** I think I will have to pick pantsuits.
What is sketchy about it?TheFloyd73 wrote:Hmm, seems a tad sketchy.Elohcin wrote:I don't know where to place my vote. The poll assumes we like Clinton. **scratches head** I think I will have to pick pantsuits.
By the way, cheers G-Man for the Hillary Points!
- Fri Feb 24, 2017 7:07 pm
- Forum: Previous Heists
- Topic: GAME OVER: BLUE vs. RED
- Replies: 1671
- Views: 41701
Re: Day 0- BLUE vs. RED
Hmm, seems a tad sketchy.Elohcin wrote:I don't know where to place my vote. The poll assumes we like Clinton. **scratches head** I think I will have to pick pantsuits.
- Fri Feb 24, 2017 5:56 pm
- Forum: Previous Heists
- Topic: GAME OVER: BLUE vs. RED
- Replies: 1671
- Views: 41701
Re: Day 0- BLUE vs. RED
Alright, let's get this show presidency on the road.