The Syndicate

I think I selected every kill so blame me lol.

As for you Rico when you started ramping it up I literally posted in chat 'fuck this I ain't dealing with Rico' and killed you so I didn't have to contend with you. An honourable end.

I wasn't really killing vocal players I was just killing people who I hate playing against. Eventually I got rid of all of them but some schmo brought Jimmy back ffs. At the point where all the people I hate playing against were dead I just started killing people for no reason and kidnapping Scotty and Lorab. Oh btw I had two silences on 1 night in case that was confusing.

Well done on reading me like a book to Dom and whoever else did. Lorab I think pegged me super early on. JJJ at the end.

Sucks that SVS got night killed when she did. After Wilgy, Marmot and SVS got removed so early we were pretty screwed and INH got busy outside the game so I was alone pretty much the whole game. I just hard lurked for like 3 day phases and kept sending in kills hoping to throw people off.

Congrats to the winners. Sorry to Scotty who I repeatedly silenced for no reason other than amusement.

Rez plz

I am not really sure. All the people I had suspicion of are gone.

Boomslang wrote:I think Zuo Ci's analysis of leetic is spot-on. If we remove the last of the completely inactives, we can close the book on that entire line of reasoning for the identity of the YTs. I'll be placing a vote there today.

As for my other vote, I feel like a lot of my suspects are still in the poll. Blooper, Simon, Bass... Mac's desperation and rapid posting read as genuine to me; I can't see a baddie drawing all that attention to himself, especially in a game where inactives have gotten to coast so easily. Which leads me to question indiglo for continuing to jump down his throat. Will do some reading of that tomorrow.

Look at this intelligent man.

Sorry guys I'm just not up for this game at all. I'm having some serious personal issues right now. I'll keep playing on but I can't really work up the energy to do much.

Cheater

Send the finest warriors to my door. I will turn them all away. Even at my age I could cut through you all like a hot knife through butter.

So nobody is gonna post until deadline approaches and they will just come in and throw a vote my way. Phooey.

indiglo wrote:
DFaraday wrote:I could be way off base, but I'm getting the impression that Mac is Lu Bu. The non-Mafia aligned comment, how he put forth a theory on Lu Bu (and people do like to talk about their own roles), plus the fact that he beat a warrior yesterday and is confident about dueling again. If that's the case, I wouldn't be opposed to voting that way again.

On a side note, assuming there were no voting shenanigans yesterday, nobody who voted Bullz can be Wu.
I'm pretty sure Mac is Nan. We should still vote there, and simply ignore his protestations (as Zou put it).

On the side note, I looked into that possibility as well. There was no other 2nd place contender close enough to make a call about who is Wu that voted Bullz. Bullz had 8 votes total, and the next closest opponent was Ninja/Blooper with only 2 votes. So, some of those 8 could definitely have been Wu. But I like where your mind is at.

Pretty sure that I am Nan huh. I think you are Pop then. Prune Tracey.

Me Nan? That's unpossible.

Outed myself as a baddie how? Like who outs themselves as a baddie. The rationale on display is some of the worst I have ever encountered. Like I am fairly sure if I was observing from the other side I would be smart enough to know what I was doing but alas I guess I am just smarter than the average civ.

I am a fucking literal ninja.

If you guys try to lynch me I cannot be held accountable for my actions. I might just kill someone in combat again. Do you really want to take that chance?

I am like 95% sure that you are trolling me if you still think I am bad. This is a sick game and you are all in on it.

RIP Dom. I 100% did not kill you.

Legacy reads:

Everyone is bad

Here's how I observe today's play.

Step 1 - Mac makes accusation of Zuo Ci based on flimsy pretenses
Step 2 - Zuo Ci accuses Mac based on flimsy pretenses and points out Mac's flimsy pretenses
Step 3 - Mac points out the flimsiness of the pretenses
Step 4 - Zuo Ci continues to push case with flimsy pretenses
Step 5 - Other people scoff and quaff about how Mac is "squirming" which is code for "I'd rather not think of my own candidate today"
Step 6 - Mac rolls eyes
Step 7 - Mac has 7 votes

So much laziness. It's not really possible to defend yourself in the wake of overwhelming ignorance.

Come at me.

Please don't make me duel Bass.

So now pointing out dumb cases is squirming. Scotty is probably long conning us all with his silencing bukkake.

You are all bad.

What a load of garbage.

If y'all want to follow the nonsensical ramblings of a sockpuppet go ahead.

Zuo Ci wrote:I am called by nature to share my research.

MacDougall wrote:I would like to see Wilgy and JaggedJimmyJay in a duel. Who wouldn't?
There is no inspiration. This is not to be viewed with favor.

MacDougall wrote:
JaggedJimmyJay wrote:Hi Mac.
Don't look at me like that. I'm not even here yet. Stop it. I can tell what you're thinking.
The smell of fear is palpable.

MacDougall wrote:
JaggedJimmyJay wrote:By the way, why do you want Wilgy and I to kill each other?
I don't want to say it, people don't like it...
There is no inspiration. This is not to be viewed with favor.

MacDougall wrote:Oh look a guy who I voted for on day 1 got lynched and is bad and this time I didn't actually try making a case on him. New strategy.

Wassup Glorfindel with ignoring my comment? You scared there buddy?
To claim credit where there is no inspiration. This is not to be viewed with favor.

MacDougall wrote:I don't feel like Dom is bad, so sending him to fight the Marmot isn't jiving with me.

I don't think Marmot is a good candidate either. I don't like that the case has trace elements of Wilgy wifom in it. Wilgy is a savant of causing wifom to work the way he wants. I feel like he would be expecting Metalmarsh to get suspicion from that post. I also think Metalmarsh is playing the game way too casual considering his situation.

The only person with a vote who I am feeling neg about is Russtifinko. So I will be voting for Russ and trusting my feel on Dunny from Day 1.
The rodent spirit animal was slaughtered because his affiliation with the doctor was visible in nature. To resist his destruction for the reasons stated appears as a disconnect with the truth of the universe. I am inspired to pursue the destruction of he who spoke it. To make a mistake is to be human. This does not appear as a mistake. It appears as a conscious resistance to the destruction of the second Nanman on the second day.

Those who the Nanman have murdered are those who have threatened the Nanman. This is the way of MacDougall.

Buuuuuullllllshit.

To throw that joking comment I made in there proves you have an agenda.

You speak like you know met yet if you knew me you would know better than to point at that post and give it any credence at all.

I don't thino any of the dead ever really cast suspicions on me either, so if that is my way why is dom alive?

Zuo Ci wrote:
MacDougall wrote:I am to be destroyed because I made a case against you? That's not in the spirit of the game.
You are to be destroyed because of your Nanman scent. You are to be destroyed because you pretended I declared to the gods that you suck, or that such a declaration would have meaning.

Your hiding nonsensical reasoning behind your schtick.

Faraday how do you get a civ read on Bass?

DFaraday wrote:I did a reread over Dom and Boomslang and reviewed their votes (all of the above, incidentally, is extremely tedious and time-consuming; it's one of the reasons I don't like case building, along with not wanting to die). Anyway, I feel alright about Dom, but if I had to guess a baddie alignment, I'd say Nanman; he makes very little mention of any of the Nanman and didn't vote for any of them as far as I can see; he did briefly suspect MP and voted Daisy, so I think it's less likely he's YT. But either way, I don't have a strong suspicion of Dom.

As for Boom, I slightly amend my earlier statement regarding him and Mac; I'd slightly prefer voting Mac. Upon review, I noticed that Boom voted MM on Day 1 as well as Day 2, and was the first to vote INH on his lynch. That does it a bit less likely that he's Nanman.

I still believe that Mac isn't a baddie per se, but rereading his exchanges with Dom and others really struck me by his wording. He framed the case against him only within the terms of him being on a baddie team, specifically referred to himself as "non-mafia aligned", and seemed particularly interested in Lu Bu. I'm thinking Mac is indy, and as far as I can tell, all of the Indies are or can be bad news.

My list as it stands (before analyzing Quin, Indiglo, Mata, Bass, Scotty, and Ninja):

Scotty (pretty heavily anti-Nanman at least, seems legit)
Quin
Indi
Mata
Bass
Dom
Boom
Bullz
leetic
Simon
Aragorn
Mac (as an Indy)
Ninja (I still think she's bad news)

I am not an indy and I too was silenced so if apparently repetitive silencings are enough for Scotty to be Captain Townman then I should be too.

Zuo Ci wrote:
MacDougall wrote:
Zuo Ci wrote:I would see MacDougall destroyed. The scent of the Nanman is strengthened. To slaughter those who speak is an evil to be attributed to this one. It is his way. Those who threaten the Nanman are killed by the Nanman. MacDougall does not suffer threats. His vote for the doctor on the first day is not meaningful. He resisted the destruction of the rodent spirit animal based upon his concern about the doctor's manipulation. It was transparent.
OMGUS from the orient.
This spirit stood against you before you stood against this spirit. Your attempted placing of a yellow turban upon this spirit's head has been rebuked soundly. You are to be destroyed.

I am to be destroyed because I made a case against you? That's not in the spirit of the game.

Zuo Ci wrote:I would see MacDougall destroyed. The scent of the Nanman is strengthened. To slaughter those who speak is an evil to be attributed to this one. It is his way. Those who threaten the Nanman are killed by the Nanman. MacDougall does not suffer threats. His vote for the doctor on the first day is not meaningful. He resisted the destruction of the rodent spirit animal based upon his concern about the doctor's manipulation. It was transparent.

OMGUS from the orient.

I don't think he needs to be trying to lead us astray to be nefarious. He can be genuinely scum hunting.

I think that you are probably right about who he is but I don't think that makes him the same guy he was before. What if he is the 'apparition' that YT dude summons? YT did have a smaller team tha Nanman. Perhaps this is the balancing mechanic. Summon an aparition sock that a dead player controls. Joins your team but can't perform kills?

The guy who inherits the YT kill is still alive. So that means most likely there is a YT alive. That means it is either one of the absentees or something else. Zuo Ci is a big something else.

Quin wrote:Tell me your thoughts about Zuo Ci, Mac.

A random entrant late in the game posting in roleplay mode and acquiring utterly no suspicion at all.

I wanna see Zuo Ci duel Leetic.

Day 5.

Bugger about the LoRab. I guess nutella was the town crier dude.

Voting for Lorab and Simon.

Since the day Metalmarsh perished and was found to be a rebel I have harboured regret. That I came so close to enabling one capable of such vile evil to avoid the kiss of steel and the justice therein. I have lost faith in myself. All that remains is the husk of a man once full of jubilance. A husk filled with despair, doubt and dread. All I can do to numb the pain is research dank memes. Harambe memes are a favourite.

MacDougall wrote:
Zuo Ci wrote:
MacDougall wrote:What's not to trust?
The sound of your name causes you to perspire, and the odor carries a faint scent of the Nanman. In my meditations I was stung by the memory of the treacherous rodent spirit animal of the nameless one, and of your own inaction in pursuit of his execution. Remind us as you might of the good doctor and your part in his end, but know that the hourglass has turned over and over since that day. Let free your words of innocence or be judged by nature.
My inaction in pursuit of Metalmarsh's lynch was because the pursuit was illogical. I was wrong about it. Big deal. Being wrong doesn't make me bad.

So the indie who cannot be night killed hasn't been lynched therefore is alive therefore either the last YT or he himself is alive and inactive.

Zuo Ci wrote:
MacDougall wrote:What's not to trust?
The sound of your name causes you to perspire, and the odor carries a faint scent of the Nanman. In my meditations I was stung by the memory of the treacherous rodent spirit animal of the nameless one, and of your own inaction in pursuit of his execution. Remind us as you might of the good doctor and your part in his end, but know that the hourglass has turned over and over since that day. Let free your words of innocence or be judged by nature.

I know you aren't accusing me of only responding because someone mentioned my name. I ain't about that life. I have been on a vision quest for the past few days in the forest with no contact with the outside world.

My inaction in pursuit of Metalmarsh's lynch was because the pursuit was illogical. I was wrong about it. Big deal. Being wrong doesn't make me bad.

I'm not a mafia player but if you want me to duel that's okay because I ain't about this life.

What's not to trust?

I doubt it will be a resurrection. I agree with Sloonei.

What can I say. You are pingy today.

Okay Dom.

Dom wrote:
MacDougall wrote:Dom I don't understand your question tbh.
You're just full of double standards and rules that don't seem to have internal logic.

When you were civ, you decided, even though you had never played with me before or only just once or twice , that you knew my game. You went hard after me. You weren't wrong in those games, BUT when I said that you didn't know my game at all-- you levied even harder attacks against me.
But when the tables have turned and now people suspect YOU, you cry out that your accusers *don't really know your game*.

OK. I'm not archetypical. That's not the point. The point is that at this point, many Syndicaters have played with you far more than once. We might not be *experts* on you, but we definitely know you better than you knew me in our first game together.

So to claim that it is suspicious for me to do something because you knew it was part of my bad game when you had never played with me before AND THEN to go on--several games later--saying the same thing I did when we HAVE played with you now SCREAMS to me as someone just repeating hollow statements in an attempt to save your own skin.

You keep repeating that you probably aren't Yellow Turban or Nanaman because tht means we shouldn't lynch you when there are several indepdendent candidates for lynching. Your actions SCREAM bad, but--hey-- maybe I just haven't played with you enough.

I made a you don't know my game well enough to use meta against me argument one time in this game against one player in a very specific context. You are talking like I have played that card ruthlessly on everyone which is untrue.

It is true that you did do what I am doing as Mafia against me but I am certain you would have made the same defenses against me in those games if you really were a civ. Do you agree?

I also haven't kept screaming those points. I posted a couple times. You are exaggerating a lot to enhance your point here. I as a civ have a responsibility towards self preservation as much as any baddie. Your exaggeration isn't a bad sign. That's a civ tell in Mac land but it isn't a good way to lynch right.

Of your several paragraph attempt to frame a serious argument towards my lynch you haven't referenced a post specifically. That is a real good sign your case is based on emotions. It is lazy case building.

You are tunneling me because you are Dom and I am Mac and you can't help but take an adversarial position against me. It is the way of things.

As wifom as it is, if I was bad you would be my first kill in any game.

Dom I don't understand your question tbh.

Sloonei elaborate on your gth scum read of me. I find it interesting that you said nothing of me like that until I criticised you.

Also what kind of discerning civ absolute reads anybody the way you read Bass and Quin. Matter of factly declaring them civ is very much the same reason I criticised you in the first place. You are manipulatively controlling the discourse. Darth Sloonei.

I am not bad. Not everyone exhibits your scum behaviour. You are not archetypal.

That is a really good way to exclude all the people who didn't do the exact thing you suggested for an entire days conversation on the first post of the day.

Also that is a bit of an unusual kill for the Nanman MO. Sorsha wasn't exactly loud. Perhaps something changed on the team. The death of a ringleader perhaps?

Search found 133 matches