The Syndicate

Tranq wrote:Choutas. Because he voted for someone i think is civ (DrWilgy) and because Enrique (who also sounds civ) voted him.

Enrique wrote:I'm feeling inclined to vote Choutas. I know it seems practically out of nowhere, but what the hell was up with that misdirection earlier? And then he just disappears?

Yeah you know what I'm gonna need to hear more from him. In the meantime I feel perfectly comfortable placing my vote on him.

Choutas

Metalmarsh89 wrote:No, I'm a vanilla civ.

How did you come up with that quote so quickly after the day began?

DrWilgy wrote:

Metalmarsh89 wrote:DrWilgy, RadicalFuzz employed that exact same strategy in Talking Heads, stating that his behavior is bad, and that we should look at him because of that. It is most notable because he suggested a CFD one day, and afterwards pointed out how bad he looked for it. He was a civilian in that game.

Are you intentionally mimicking his behaviour? Do you have reason to defend me as a civilian?

Actually no. I wouldn't propose a CFD without proper belief behind the CFD. It was Day 1, no mafia btsc had happened yet. If we were to strike them with a strategy like that, it would've been most optimal when they had no way of discussing a reaction plan. Another point, is that Fuzz stated he should look bad for suggestion of a CFD because his CFD would've saved a baddie from lynch before my confirmation as bad, putting someone who was seen as maybe civ (at the time) under the lynching block vs a confirmed baddie.

I hope others begin to speak up soon.

Zebra are you suggesting that I am confident in not getting lynched? You are mistaken. The chances of me getting lynched seems to be increasing rapidly the more I discuss. That's kinda how the game works. Mafia generally want to halt civ evolution and adaptation, and that can be done most optimally through the killing of heavy speakers. If there's a chance to mislynch me for what I say, I have no doubt they won't take it. How is it bad for me to state that the game entered hard mode? Cop is our go to role. It devastates our chances of winning since he was hit.

Metalmarsh89 wrote:Come on Choutas, let's get 9,000 posts in this game. You and me.

DrWilgy wrote:

a2thezebra wrote:I initially voted for DrWilgy as a joke but I don't dig this:

DrWilgy wrote:Enrique gets my vote for now. I don't think "no lynch" has ever been a fantastic option for civilians in any game I've played.

As I said, I don't understand why you would vote for someone for showing interest in something they are unaccustomed to, whether it's pro-town or not. It seems opportunistic and too easy.

too easy indeed, if I wanted to put a vote on someone early and stick to it for purposes of mislynch I'd put alittle more effort into it, perhaps by playing off someone's opportunism?

Voting someone for showing interest in a mechanic they don't know about is fine when we have nothing else to go on, but I'll move my vote to Choutas for actually being on no lynch.

I mean... I'd rather have RVS than No Lynch, at least that way we get info. Even if I were to die via RVS, you may be able to pick out some baddies via vote patterns later on. The only times where I've seen a LYLO situation as civ (I say seen, because I was always dead at that point) were due to no lynching, so let's not do that.

Would y'all believe me if I said I was a Doctor? I don't think I've set my tempo yet... What do I do this game?

Metalmarsh89 wrote:

Tranq wrote:A no lynch sounds rather boring. How about a 13-way tie?

Russian roulette? You're a gamblin' man, Tranq.

Boomslang wrote:

Choutas wrote:Voting boomslang. I want an explanation of his cryptic username.

Come now, I might ask the same of you! Boomslang refers to an Australian snake I thought was super cool when I was like 12. It's also (as I discovered later) the name of a music festival in Kentucky.

JaggedJimmyJay wrote:It starts with just a little glance