The Syndicate

You were terrible, the worst modding job I've ever seen.

Haha nice. When I was lynched I was afraid my ISO would become town's greatest ally after some accurate observations were being made in the wake of my death, but luckily you guys started overthinking and my splendid teammates made quick work of everyone.

That is a fake ass vote if I've ever seen one.

Long Con wrote:
a2thezebra wrote:
Long Con wrote:
a2thezebra wrote:
Long Con wrote:You both look bad right now to me.
Why is that?
This whole back-and-forth has reached the level of contrived.
So you're saying we're teammates? Okay.
That's the only possible meaning of "you both look bad", isn't it?

It's time to remove the tinfoil.

Long Con wrote:
a2thezebra wrote:
Long Con wrote:You both look bad right now to me.
Why is that?
This whole back-and-forth has reached the level of contrived.

So you're saying we're teammates? Okay.

DrWilgy wrote:Depends. Are you civ or mafia?

Long Con wrote:You both look bad right now to me.

Why is that?

That's a lie and you know it. Can we lynch this already?

Long Con wrote:
a2thezebra wrote:Your patterns, I've told you this before. This is Star Wars Wilgy on full display.
How sure are you about this? Have you been right about Wilgy in the past?

Of course I have. I know him from being baddies with him more than once.

Your patterns, I've told you this before. This is Star Wars Wilgy on full display.

Great, a self-preservation vote makes me a likely lynch. I try not to play darts on Day 2, I usually get that overwith on Day 1. I still don't see why DrWilgy isn't the obvious lynch.

birdwithteeth11 wrote:
a2thezebra wrote:But what motive do you have for asking someone that you feel is an over-thinker to analyze a certain area?
I'd rather have players that over-analyze and over-think. I think it's easier to catch baddie slips that way.

I agree, and that's not the point. My point was that it was odd for SVS to ask someone that she feels is an over-thinker to overthink a particular area.

birdwithteeth11 wrote:
a2thezebra wrote:
Long Con wrote:
a2thezebra wrote:Your meta's looking pretty bad right now Wilgy, to be honest.
What do you mean by this?
I mean that from what I know about Wilgy based on my experiences with him in other games, this feels way more like his baddie game than his civ game. I'm just being honest.
Just like you were so confident with sig?

Since I was wrong once does that mean I should just stop trying to read people?

A real knee-slapper.

DrWilgy wrote:
a2thezebra wrote:Where is this passion with your scumhunting efforts? Your only posts with relevant material are your defense posts, so your fate is already sealed.
I don't think that I have played defence at all this game.

Yeah that's a good one.

Where is this passion with your scumhunting efforts? Your only posts with relevant material are your defense posts, so your fate is already sealed.

DrWilgy wrote:I never stated anywhere that Sig should be lynched.

Well of course you're not going to outright say it when you're trying to set it up indirectly.

DrWilgy wrote:
DrWilgy wrote:Hmm... I had a theory that Zebra and Sig are on opposite teams. Anyone down to test that tomorrow?
Me at 6:45 pm thursday

a2thezebra wrote:Your meta's looking pretty bad right now Wilgy, to be honest.
You at 9:25 am yesterday

Right I'm definitely NO U'ing you...even though you have to show me the posts that I'm apparently NO U'ing.

Spare me the request good fellow.

Theory validation? Please.

DrWilgy wrote:Thank you for unstaplung my tongue LC. Took abit to heal but I'm able to speak again.

a2thezebra wrote:
Long Con wrote:
a2thezebra wrote:Your meta's looking pretty bad right now Wilgy, to be honest.
What do you mean by this?
I mean that from what I know about Wilgy based on my experiences with him in other games, this feels way more like his baddie game than his civ game. I'm just being honest.
Only liars claim honesty. Zebra every time you claim to have a grasp on my meta you are either wrong or nothing good comes out of it...

So here's where my opposite faction theory of Sig and Zeebs came from. They were the two who actively opposed the fallacy theories. Seeing the possibility of a baddie stating "hey let's not clear anyone immediately" to get some civvy points felt too easy. Hence why I asked the question regarding it. Sig opposed it and I didn't recall getting a clear response from Zeebs. Zebra then agreed with me on Sig's forceful demeanour and nuked him after having him "scummy meta read".

Now all of this had me thinkin one of the 2 were bad. I just don't know which.

Trying to set up two mislynches like no one's going to see through your motivations.

DrWilgy wrote:Zebra are you NO U'ing me?

You're kidding right? Take a look at the poll silly, you're NO U'ing me!

S~V~S wrote:Why do you think he is bad? I have problems getting past his increasingly zany game these days. I have problems seeing past it.

What am I missing?

I said this in a previous game and whether he realizes it or not Wilgy has a pattern. His approach to the game and his attitude towards it are indicative of his alignment. This is baddie Wilgy if I've ever seen him.

I'm not letting baddie DrWilgy slip by me again.

Don't sweat it G, it's not like I was going to vote to lynch you for lurking or anything...

I'm not saying I'm shallow, I'm just saying that I don't read people or figure out who I suspect by looking at details, nuance, breadcrumbs, etc.

What I do in this game is instigate content, see what happens, and vote based on the vibes I'm given. I do this as both civilian and mafia, all vibes.

Speak for yourself, my vibes come from surface-level observations.

I don't see it, whatever it is.

S~V~S wrote:
a2thezebra wrote:But what motive do you have for asking someone that you feel is an over-thinker to analyze a certain area?
Becasue I am seeing something I thought was obvious? And usually I expect Rico (or you for that matter) to pay more attention to nuance than I?

What motive do you have for trying to turn this into something sinister?

That's what I'm trying to do, I'm trying to figure out what you're getting at (if anything, you could just be trying to look like you're contributing) and if what that is happens to be something sinister than I want to be aware of it. What makes you think I ever pay attention to nuance? I'm all about vibes.

But what motive do you have for asking someone that you feel is an over-thinker to analyze a certain area?

S~V~S wrote:
Ricochet wrote:
S~V~S wrote:Ricochet, I recommend that you reread sigs ISO, and think about what he said.

Linki~ you're a zebra, maybe>?
What should I focus on or try to extract from it?
Dude, you're usually the guy who reads too much into things, not me

Then what are you getting at by asking someone who reads too much into things to read a certain thing and to think about it?

Ohhhhh brilliant. And here I was thinking that the missing "h" may have been deliberate.

Nasville zoo? I don't get it.

Scotty wrote:
a2thezebra wrote:
Long Con wrote:
a2thezebra wrote:Your meta's looking pretty bad right now Wilgy, to be honest.
What do you mean by this?
I mean that from what I know about Wilgy based on my experiences with him in other games, this feels way more like his baddie game than his civ game. I'm just being honest.
Just like you felt confident sig was bad based on knowledge of his meta?

Shhhhhh we don't talk about things I'm responsible for.

Long Con wrote:
a2thezebra wrote:Your meta's looking pretty bad right now Wilgy, to be honest.
What do you mean by this?

I mean that from what I know about Wilgy based on my experiences with him in other games, this feels way more like his baddie game than his civ game. I'm just being honest.

I could get behind a Wilgy or Serge lynch.

Your meta's looking pretty bad right now Wilgy, to be honest.

DrWilgy wrote:
a2thezebra wrote:Goddammnit sig, why are you so scummy as town and so innocent as scum?
*tries to talk*

Iwfff Thig ith althwayth thummy ath town, yet you know Thig'th meta, doth that make you bad for thcum weading Thig for being thcumy?

I wasn't scum-reading him for being scummy, I was scum-reading him because it seemed like he was trying to win everyone over.

Epignosis wrote:
a2thezebra wrote:Goddammnit sig, why are you so scummy as town and so innocent as scum?

a2thezebra wrote:
DrWilgy wrote: Sig did you just vote me for promoting discussion?
sig wrote:I'm going with Wilgy no on topic posts, and very few off topic posts, his one truly on topic post, is bad imo.

linki: I see Epi ninjad in and voted for MP.
What classifies a post as being bad? Gambler's fallacy has been brought up this game, so does that make my subject point irrelevant? I get the feeling that you are trying to strong arm me here Sig.
I think he is, he is. And it's a sorry excuse for a permanent vote.

sig

I finally know your meta sig, I've played enough games with you. You're bad and you're going down.
Fail.

I didn't actually mean the latter, that was just to pressure him to a reaction. I base my reads off of reactions to pressure. You should know this by now.

Goddammnit sig, why are you so scummy as town and so innocent as scum?

sig no one believes that you didn't know there was another twenty-four hours. This is a side mission.

sig wrote:
a2thezebra wrote:
DrWilgy wrote: Sig did you just vote me for promoting discussion?
sig wrote:I'm going with Wilgy no on topic posts, and very few off topic posts, his one truly on topic post, is bad imo.

linki: I see Epi ninjad in and voted for MP.
What classifies a post as being bad? Gambler's fallacy has been brought up this game, so does that make my subject point irrelevant? I get the feeling that you are trying to strong arm me here Sig.
I think he is, he is. And it's a sorry excuse for a permanent vote.

sig

I finally know your meta sig, I've played enough games with you. You're bad and you're going down.
lol if your voting for me then you don't know my metaa. I had literally ten minutes to decide who to vote for. Since the poll read that the day phase ended today so yeah I voted and no it wasn't a sorry excuse for a permanent vote when the poll said the day was over. I waited until the very end of the phase to vote and he was the most suspicious. The fact your trying to scapegoat me over a misunderstanding about the poll is very very strange.

Excuse me? This is insulting. Are you just assuming that I'm not even going to read the posts you write? We both know that you didn't vote at the end of the phase because we're not even at the end of the phase yet. I don't believe that you didn't already know that it wasn't the end of day yet when you voted. Tsk tsk.

Is this a doppelganger? Your name is capitalized.

DrWilgy wrote: Sig did you just vote me for promoting discussion?
sig wrote:I'm going with Wilgy no on topic posts, and very few off topic posts, his one truly on topic post, is bad imo.

linki: I see Epi ninjad in and voted for MP.
What classifies a post as being bad? Gambler's fallacy has been brought up this game, so does that make my subject point irrelevant? I get the feeling that you are trying to strong arm me here Sig.

I think he is, he is. And it's a sorry excuse for a permanent vote.

sig

I finally know your meta sig, I've played enough games with you. You're bad and you're going down.

LC, unless I'm mistaken, just indirectly admitted that his reasoning for not voting Sorsha today isn't solid.

Stupid math.

Betting with the odds eh? I can dig it. Not my style though, I rarely leave out any options for a Day 1 lynch besides myself.

Maybe saying "I am here" was enough for him to town-read her.

I get BWT being a common Day 1 lynch target and all but what about Sorsha?

Search found 58 matches