The Syndicate

Quin wrote:What was your reason for killing me, pirates? I wouldn't have been surprised if I was lynched the day after if you'd left me alive.

I killed you because I actually thought you were bad lol

I wouldn't be surprised actually if we're all good and llama is just fucking with us.

Gee I wonder what "Don%27t+click#p312384" means.

Does anyone want pasta? I have ziti, rigatoni, and radiatore.

Vompatti wrote:Would you believe me if I told you I'm not bad?

No, because process of elimination says that you are.

Scotty wrote:I'm now still confused which of you is bad.

But such is the story of this game for me.

I'm very confused as to what Vomps is doing if he were bad, because wouldn't he just have voted zebra and be done with it?

I haven't checked my rolecard tbh

Vompatti wrote:I would have randomized had I wanted to.

Follow your heart.

If that means changing my mind on a whim then I'm going to own that shit, you best believe.

Vompatti wrote:
a2thezebra wrote:
Vompatti wrote:
Scotty wrote:
a2thezebra wrote:Shit, I just realized Vompatti is bad. Are votes not changeable on the final day?
I would be down.
That's just because you're misinformed.
You're pretty well-informed I bet.
Not really, but at least I stand by my decisions.

I do whatever the fuck I want.

Vompatti wrote:
Scotty wrote:
a2thezebra wrote:Shit, I just realized Vompatti is bad. Are votes not changeable on the final day?
I would be down.
That's just because you're misinformed.

You're pretty well-informed I bet.

Shit, I just realized Vompatti is bad. Are votes not changeable on the final day?

You deadies are pushing it

:P

Vompatti wrote:Would you believe me if I told you I have a feeling both of you are bad, so I voted for Scotty to make it a tie?

I'm pretty much in the same boat, so I'll also vote Scotty. Viva pure gut!

This is mafia yo. Deceit, manipulation, and interrogation is the name of the game, and some of us play aggressively. Don't dish it if you can't take it!

I just checked and there is no role called "The Banana King". What even the fuck?

Stop making it personal Dog.

Did you get llama's permission for that?

No can do, it's night time.

linki - welp

You wouldn't say "I'll play my way you play yours" to someone that claimed mafia.

Snow Dog wrote:I'll play my way, you play yours.

Sure, just letting you know that your "way" is anti-town.

See what? If you are in fact civ then that makes it all the worse that you would damage the civ cause by going out of your way to make yourself appear desperate and disingenuous. It's unintentional (?) WIFOM on your part to ask everyone else what you need to do to make yourself more "obviously" civ. All you're doing with that is making yourself look more suspicious, which is great if you're bad and awful if you're civ.

DrWilgy wrote: I'm guessing that the baddie team is between Zeebs Scotty and Snow.

That's pretty good, my personal guess is that it's between you, Scotty, Snow, and Vompatti.

Snow Dog wrote:
a2thezebra wrote:The Lookout saw something untrue every night. Maybe that explains Long Con's constant bullshit?
What explains yours?

I am so relieved I was right about you LC. Shame I could do nothing this time. Now who doesn't believe I am civ?

My entire reputation is built on throwing shit at the wall and seeing what sticks. That's what explains mine.

The underlined portion does NOT look good.

Snow Dog wrote:
Scotty wrote:
Snow Dog wrote:
Scotty wrote:
DrWilgy wrote:Hey Vomps. Can you vote Zebra tomorrow?
Who ya gonna kill tonight?
Okay Scotty. Who is bad?
1. Wilgy
2. You or zebra.

Or it could be Vomps for all I know. I've been fucking wrong all game
Isn't it obviously not me? What more do I need to do?

Annnnnd this looks even worse. Unless you're confirmed civ, which you're not, that kind of rhetoric is alarming. What makes you think you're obviously civ? You know just saying that you're obviously civ doesn't make everyone believe it automatically right? And what kind of civ asks the question "what more do I need to do" to look civ?

The Lookout saw something untrue every night. Maybe that explains Long Con's constant bullshit?

Whatever.

Snow Dog wrote:More likely The Navigator i think.

This is plausible, but the undeniable co-ordination between DrWilgy and Long Con leads me to think that it's more likely that they are teammates.

Your move, DrWilgy.

a2thezebra wrote:
a2thezebra wrote:
a2thezebra wrote:Try harder.

Long Con wrote:
a2thezebra wrote:Whenever I read Wilgy as bad and proclaim it, he always gets on my case immediately and doesn't stop bothering me about it until one of us is dead.
Prove it.

Sure, just remind me which games I read Wilgy as bad and proclaimed it.

Snow Dog, Wilgy's just trying to distract you from the truth with his shenanigans. Whenever I read Wilgy as bad and proclaim it, he always gets on my case immediately and doesn't stop bothering me about it until one of us is dead. This time, he didn't even address it, despite that I've been reading him as civ all game and my flip-flop came out of nowhere with no elaboration. Look at Wilgy's posts and Long Con's posts today...that's co-ordination right there. Think for yourself.

You're a great wombat, Vompatti.

Vompatti and Scotty, I'm asking you two to vote for Long Con. There's significant evidence that he's bad and no remotely decent case against Scotty.

Holy shit. It's Long Con and Wilgy.

I just want MORE clarity, LC.

a2thezebra wrote:
a2thezebra wrote:Try harder.

a2thezebra wrote:Try harder.

Long Con wrote: I don't understand what you mean.

Long Con wrote:Uhhh, how does this sentence not indicate that I get it

Long Con wrote: I don't understand what you mean.

Long Con wrote:Uhhh, how does this sentence not indicate that I get it

Long Con wrote: I don't understand what you mean.

Long Con wrote:Uhhh, how does this sentence not indicate that I get it

Long Con wrote: I don't understand what you mean.

Long Con wrote:
Golden wrote:Oh, sorry, you probably call that a Hoover.
I call it a vacuum. Who calls it a Hoover? That's just a brand of vacuum. We have central vac in our house, and it rocks my world.

a2thezebra wrote:Nothing has value in a vacuum.
What vacuum? What kind of information would I have to introduce in order to make voting records have value? I did analyze them with game-related information. As in, the timing of their votes, and how much they mattered / were influential to the baddie getting lynched. I don't understand what logic you're using to just disregard voting records. Tell me what it would take to make voting records a more valid source of information to you!

a2thezebra wrote:Stop going out of your way to miss the point.
I don't understand what you mean. There is no deliberate misunderstanding or deception in a single thing I have said to you.

Using any one element of the game to justify reads while excluding other elements goes directly against town's interests. I don't know how many times in how many different ways I have to say this for you to stop pretending that you don't get it.

Golden wrote:
a2thezebra wrote:Nothing has value in a vacuum.
You've obviously never gone digging through that bag of dust for the money you just accidentally sucked up.

Uh maybe I don't vacuum? Ruuuuude

Stop going out of your way to miss the point.

Long Con wrote:
a2thezebra wrote:
Long Con wrote:
a2thezebra wrote:Based on Day 7 posts and nothing else whatsoever (see what I did there?) I give Scotty a 60% chance of being bad and Long Con a 95% chance.

*votes Long Con*
Not a surprise.

When Wilgy and Vompatti both have voted for baddies from both teams, when those votes mattered... that is a relevant thing. All the creative arguments in the world can't take away from that. Sure, a baddie can backstab his teammate, but it's far more likely that those two were not teammates of the baddies they helped lynch. I'm not fucking majoring in creative writing here. Right?
I don't know, are you? I didn't mention Wilgy or Vompatti in the post you're quoting so I don't get the point you're making.
Ok, I will clarify the point further.

You called my voting analysis trash, and proceeded to have a tirade (is that fair?) about how looking at any factor in isolation was worthless. I just want you to acknowledge that that analysis of Wilgy's and Vompatti's voting records has some undeniable value when considering whether or not they're bad, which, I understand, would be in direct contradiction to your earlier "tirade".

Nothing has value in a vacuum.

DrWilgy wrote:Yay! Baddies win!

3 votes placed on 2 civs

Who is bad?

Long Con wrote:
a2thezebra wrote:Based on Day 7 posts and nothing else whatsoever (see what I did there?) I give Scotty a 60% chance of being bad and Long Con a 95% chance.

*votes Long Con*
Not a surprise.

When Wilgy and Vompatti both have voted for baddies from both teams, when those votes mattered... that is a relevant thing. All the creative arguments in the world can't take away from that. Sure, a baddie can backstab his teammate, but it's far more likely that those two were not teammates of the baddies they helped lynch. I'm not fucking majoring in creative writing here. Right?

I don't know, are you? I didn't mention Wilgy or Vompatti in the post you're quoting so I don't get the point you're making.

Users browsing this forum: a2thezebra and 25 guests

Come at me

Based on Day 7 posts and nothing else whatsoever (see what I did there?) I give Scotty a 60% chance of being bad and Long Con a 95% chance.

*votes Long Con*

Snow Dog wrote:I don't know what lylo is.

LyLo = Lynch or Lose

Search found 240 matches