Return to “[END] Turf Wars: Battle of the Hosts”
Avant-hosting.MovingPictures07 wrote:It probably says something that I can look back on my hosting career (especially here) and my first thought is that this game is probably middle of the road or lower in terms of complexity or experimentation in my games.a2thezebra wrote:Fantastic game by the way. As much as I like to design unorthodox games I couldn't dream of conceiving something like this, let alone hosting it. Bravo hosts!
Haha I can't believe I get a banner for spamming Buffy commentary. I'll take it.MovingPictures07 wrote: Wear the banner with pride.
His most recent. It's on this page.Prisoner 509378 wrote:Apparently. Which one?a2thezebra wrote:Is everyone missing ika's most obvious baddie post yet?
Bingo.S~V~S wrote:The Wardens whole job here is to sow paranoia, WIFOM, etc.Prisoner 740359 wrote:Hmm, Warden putting Turnip Head on a blue pedestal...
Literally wrong.Golden wrote: There is literally zero doubt I'm on my civilian game for anyone who wants to even try thinking about it half-assed.
If you can write that's all that matters.Prisoner 740359 wrote:This isn't fair, homie50. I. Can't. Read.
It would have been an honor, I assure you.Prisoner 813142 wrote:Thank you for your prompt response. I like you. You have the right attitude for a trustworth henchman. If we had met years ago I'd have wanted you on my payroll.a2thezebra wrote:So there are non-player prisoners.Prisoner 813142 wrote:Okay, hold up. I don't speak freaky-deaky Dutch, okay? What on earth is CFF?a2thezebra wrote:But why gleam? Why not someone who was actually suspicious? For every CFD where you luck out (Fuzz) you get ten where you don't.indiglo wrote:@ Zebra - I'm pretty sure that's why many of us switched off of sig yesterday and onto Gleam. Granted, we were wrong... but hopefully you get the point. He hasn't been an easy lynch by any means. I talked myself out of it, as did many others for reasons you mentioned in your post.
CFD is Chinese Fire Drill. Everyone piles on a wagon out of nowhere at the very end of a day. It's a reckless and useless exercise that almost always helps mafia more than the civs.
Just because a case was made doesn't mean that it wasn't a CFD.indiglo wrote:CFD = Chinese Fire DrillPrisoner 813142 wrote:Okay, hold up. I don't speak freaky-deaky Dutch, okay? What on earth is CFF?a2thezebra wrote:But why gleam? Why not someone who was actually suspicious? For every CFD where you luck out (Fuzz) you get ten where you don't.indiglo wrote:@ Zebra - I'm pretty sure that's why many of us switched off of sig yesterday and onto Gleam. Granted, we were wrong... but hopefully you get the point. He hasn't been an easy lynch by any means. I talked myself out of it, as did many others for reasons you mentioned in your post.
Basically a very last minute, End of Day band wagon to lynch someone.
The Fuzz lynch was a CFD, and Zebra keeps saying the Gleam lynch was too, but it wasn't. There was a case made (by me) - it was wrong, but it wasn't a CFD.
Linki~
So there are non-player prisoners.Prisoner 813142 wrote:Okay, hold up. I don't speak freaky-deaky Dutch, okay? What on earth is CFF?a2thezebra wrote:But why gleam? Why not someone who was actually suspicious? For every CFD where you luck out (Fuzz) you get ten where you don't.indiglo wrote:@ Zebra - I'm pretty sure that's why many of us switched off of sig yesterday and onto Gleam. Granted, we were wrong... but hopefully you get the point. He hasn't been an easy lynch by any means. I talked myself out of it, as did many others for reasons you mentioned in your post.
Thanks in advance, I am interested with what you will conclude.Prisoner 509378 wrote:I don't know. Not Golden. I'll be genuinely quite surprised if it's him. I'll actually peruse the list and try to come up with some options when I finish my current project.a2thezebra wrote:Who is?Prisoner 509378 wrote:Golden is definitely not the warden. I say that with a great deal of confidence.
Who is?Prisoner 509378 wrote:Golden is definitely not the warden. I say that with a great deal of confidence.
But why gleam? Why not someone who was actually suspicious? For every CFD where you luck out (Fuzz) you get ten where you don't.indiglo wrote:@ Zebra - I'm pretty sure that's why many of us switched off of sig yesterday and onto Gleam. Granted, we were wrong... but hopefully you get the point. He hasn't been an easy lynch by any means. I talked myself out of it, as did many others for reasons you mentioned in your post.
lolGolden wrote:I don't think they are pointless. I mean, they might not be useful, but from my perspective the point is I'm having fun trying to guess.Prisoner 740359 wrote:Golden is the Warden, taunting the escapees with his pointless role-guessing shout-outs. Discuss.
[/quote]Prisoner 509378 wrote:Is a frantic defense of a baddie typical baddie behavior? Is it typical of sig? This is an easy accusation to render. Is there a specific moment that pinged you strongly enough to shed the doubts associated with this kind of read (suspecting a player for defending a baddie)?Epignosis wrote:I am most suspicious of sig because of his frantic defense of Fuzz, his willingness to allege anybody and everybody, and accusing people for doing or saying things he himself has done and said.
A Dragon D. Luffy lynch has much higher odds of being useful to town than a sig lynch. Fact.Epignosis wrote:I have two threads to read tonight and limited time, so:
Dear prisoners:
I am most suspicious of sig because of his frantic defense of Fuzz, his willingness to allege anybody and everybody, and accusing people for doing or saying things he himself has done and said.
I am second most suspicious of DDL, mainly because after gleam got lynched, DDL acted as though sig's lynch was a foregone conclusion.
I would like your criminal expertise in this, because I'm voting one of these bee-yotches.
Sincerely,
Piper Chapman.
The conclusion that I have come to is that it seems like you wanted to accuse her of narrow focus at some point today but got impatient waiting for a proper opportunity.Quin wrote:Okay, then what conclusion have you come to based on that post?a2thezebra wrote:Everything matters.Quin wrote:I don't think it needs to be directed at me for me to say things. Would it have looked better if I didn't quote her at all? It really doesn't matter.a2thezebra wrote: But that post that S~V~S made that you responded to had nothing to do with you. It seems like you wanted to accuse her of narrow focus at some point today but got impatient waiting for a proper opportunity.
linki: You're interpreting it that way. It was a rhetorical question.
Everything matters.Quin wrote:I don't think it needs to be directed at me for me to say things. Would it have looked better if I didn't quote her at all? It really doesn't matter.a2thezebra wrote:But that post that S~V~S made that you responded to had nothing to do with you. It seems like you wanted to accuse her of narrow focus at some point today but got impatient waiting for a proper opportunity.Quin wrote:I mean I'd like to see what suspicions SVS has that are not me.a2thezebra wrote:What do you mean by this?Quin wrote:I'd like to see what other suspicions you may or may not actually have.S~V~S wrote:Since ika was the counterwagon to Fuzz who WAS bad, I find it hard to see him as bad, although I guess anything is possible.
But that post that S~V~S made that you responded to had nothing to do with you. It seems like you wanted to accuse her of narrow focus at some point today but got impatient waiting for a proper opportunity.Quin wrote:I mean I'd like to see what suspicions SVS has that are not me.a2thezebra wrote:What do you mean by this?Quin wrote:I'd like to see what other suspicions you may or may not actually have.S~V~S wrote:Since ika was the counterwagon to Fuzz who WAS bad, I find it hard to see him as bad, although I guess anything is possible.
What do you mean by this?Quin wrote:I'd like to see what other suspicions you may or may not actually have.S~V~S wrote:Since ika was the counterwagon to Fuzz who WAS bad, I find it hard to see him as bad, although I guess anything is possible.
You don't think more than one major wagon at one time can be bad?S~V~S wrote:Since ika was the counterwagon to Fuzz who WAS bad, I find it hard to see him as bad, although I guess anything is possible.
Be my guest.Prisoner 509378 wrote:I'm not here to bargain either. I've just come here from jail, I have immediately set to my task, and that is all anyone can possibly ask of me. Your request is unreasonable. Mine is not. If you will not answer it, then I will assume you have no answer and color you a suspect accordingly.a2thezebra wrote:No. You don't understand.Prisoner 509378 wrote:I'm not here for jokes. Why did you vote for ika?a2thezebra wrote:I think him and the warden are in cahoots.Prisoner 509378 wrote:I just got out of jail. I'm never going back. That means I'm not planting my flag into any camps until I know I've made the best principled choice.a2thezebra wrote:What lynches are you sold on, 509?
You've voted for ika, I see. Why?
Answer my question and I'll answer yours.
I have for some time now.Prisoner 277058 wrote:If you don't think ika slipped do you think ika is bad?a2thezebra wrote:That or mistaken.Prisoner 277058 wrote:So you're calling that person a liar?a2thezebra wrote:It's not true. ika knows what ika knows, but no conclusions of that nature can be deduced from the thread.Prisoner 277058 wrote:See now things are interesting. I read just a few pages back some yuckity yuck said that ika showed knowledge she shouldn't have had. Is that not a slip?a2thezebra wrote:ika didn't slip.Prisoner 208986 wrote:Ok, I'm here a little late. First has someone already explained the ika "slip"? If so I'll go back and find it. If not could someone explain it?
That or mistaken.Prisoner 277058 wrote:So you're calling that person a liar?a2thezebra wrote:It's not true. ika knows what ika knows, but no conclusions of that nature can be deduced from the thread.Prisoner 277058 wrote:See now things are interesting. I read just a few pages back some yuckity yuck said that ika showed knowledge she shouldn't have had. Is that not a slip?a2thezebra wrote:ika didn't slip.Prisoner 208986 wrote:Ok, I'm here a little late. First has someone already explained the ika "slip"? If so I'll go back and find it. If not could someone explain it?
No. You don't understand.Prisoner 509378 wrote:I'm not here for jokes. Why did you vote for ika?a2thezebra wrote:I think him and the warden are in cahoots.Prisoner 509378 wrote:I just got out of jail. I'm never going back. That means I'm not planting my flag into any camps until I know I've made the best principled choice.a2thezebra wrote:What lynches are you sold on, 509?
You've voted for ika, I see. Why?
It's not true. ika knows what ika knows, but no conclusions of that nature can be deduced from the thread.Prisoner 277058 wrote:See now things are interesting. I read just a few pages back some yuckity yuck said that ika showed knowledge she shouldn't have had. Is that not a slip?a2thezebra wrote:ika didn't slip.Prisoner 208986 wrote:Ok, I'm here a little late. First has someone already explained the ika "slip"? If so I'll go back and find it. If not could someone explain it?
ika didn't slip.Prisoner 208986 wrote:Ok, I'm here a little late. First has someone already explained the ika "slip"? If so I'll go back and find it. If not could someone explain it?
And if you have no morals?Prisoner 277058 wrote:I couldn't possibly comment. It is my understanding however that the goal is to lynch those with whom your morals conflict.a2thezebra wrote:Why hello. Who should we lynch?Prisoner 277058 wrote:Prison did not agree with me.
I think him and the warden are in cahoots.Prisoner 509378 wrote:I just got out of jail. I'm never going back. That means I'm not planting my flag into any camps until I know I've made the best principled choice.a2thezebra wrote:What lynches are you sold on, 509?
You've voted for ika, I see. Why?
Why hello. Who should we lynch?Prisoner 277058 wrote:Prison did not agree with me.
What about questions you would like to ask yourselves?Prisoner 509378 wrote:There are questions we cannot answer, and answers we do not have.indiglo wrote:@Prisoners, are you going to be out of prison permanently now? Or is this limited time only? (I'm asking due to my own time constraints.) If you can tell me, of course - please no more killing of civ prisoners.
Is that so? We'll see about that.Warden wrote:I run the lynches around here and you won't catch me breaking any rules like Mr. Con just did.Golden wrote:I wonder what would happen if we lynched the warden...
ur badSloonei wrote:Whoops my vote suddenly slipped and now it's on agleaminranks.
Your behavior during the previous lynch...Matt wrote: Btw, way to be Zeebs! Let's get that ika! Also, don't like that I'm orange on your list.
I'm not even sure if I should tell you at this point, but fuck it. How about an M?Golden wrote:If you don't like letter C, what letter would you like?
I never intend to.S~V~S wrote:No, I know why I do; so do you, I told you why. I wish I knew why you do the same to me, though.a2thezebra wrote:And you wonder why you drive me bat-shit insane sometimes... :PS~V~S wrote:Yet I still doQuin wrote:If you did, you cannot stand by what you said. An entire night phase and a day phase was spent establishing those points.S~V~S wrote:I did ISO you. I stand by what I said.
We're done here.Golden wrote:the objective signs sig is bad
Did I? I forgot.ika wrote:Hey zebra what happened to the scum read of silver actually, in night you called her scum but now she's town so tell me what's going on there
And you wonder why you drive me bat-shit insane sometimes... :PS~V~S wrote:Yet I still doQuin wrote:If you did, you cannot stand by what you said. An entire night phase and a day phase was spent establishing those points.S~V~S wrote:I did ISO you. I stand by what I said.
