The Syndicate

Err... 35 through 45 I meant.

Looks like I will be starting on page 38 a d reading through 45.

Missed my second vote in a row. Been busy with teaching stuff with the start of the new year and all. I've been reading periodically. I have currently read pages 1 through 16, skimmed pages 17 through 24, and read pages 30 through 38. I don't recall half of what has happened to be honest. Mind you, my pages are grouped in 50s.

I recall Rico acting strangely which was clearly intentional based upon his role. This generated a lot of content from zebra who was night killed as mafia. Based on what several other people said this ended up making a lot of the day/night 1content useless to some degree with exception of creating an ISO.

As i read through pages 30 through 38, i didn't find anything that really stuck out to me. Then again I don't recall much either. I'm going to start rereading everything after night 1. Is there anything that I should pay attention to as i go over this?

JaggedJimmyJay wrote:

Metalmarsh89 wrote:

JaggedJimmyJay wrote:Maybe we should quote the entire thing again.

How do you currently feel about being red on multiple rainbow lists?

I care so much less than I have cared in years. It's a liberating feeling. I don't think I've done anything remotely suspicious, but I'm probably biased, yanno? I'm me.

Apethetic Jay has arrived... FIREBALL!

7

Haha, this is what I get for going to work another pages to read!

a2thezebra wrote:Trust your calls that I'm bad, as well as being teammates with b24 because we posted for the first time around the same time?

SO MUCH WINE, I'M FEELING BUZZED BRUHHHHHHHHHH

Wait was this a serious accusation?

No idea about any of the poll options, nor did I play in any of the games. I'm voting Watari because Death Note is awesome.

Long Con wrote:

bcornett24 wrote:

Long Con wrote:

MacDougall wrote:

Long Con wrote:

MacDougall wrote:

Long Con wrote:What I'm seeing here is, on the surface, a possible Boomslang-Tranq baddie teamup. That's just surface though, and I don't really think that's what's going on here.

However, my ideal civ-mindset would hold back and wait to see if anyone jumps on Tranq opportunistically, rather than defuse the situation with some textbook "let's not get too finger-pointy" sanity. Short-term "obvious Civ" statements can be long-term "don't worry about me, I'm cooler than being cool" baddie groundwork.

Weird post. Do not like.

What, were there "too many quotes" for your taste?

No, sorry I was agreeing with you. I was referring to Boomslang's post.

Phew! I thought I dun got meself lynched Day 1 already!

What is with this exchange?

Long Con, why even mention this?

Which part are you asking why I'm mentioning? I would normally assume it is the latest statement, but, as seen within the quoted exchange, that assumption is sometimes wrong.

This part. It makes no sense to me. Why even bother to post it? This looks like a scum team on the surface but it is probably not what it actually is it is just what it looks like on the surface? What? Your followup is even more messed up than the original post?

DharmaHelper wrote:

bcornett24 wrote:

DharmaHelper wrote:I wonder if 48 hours is enough time or not enough time.

...

Yes may I assist you?

Enough time for what?

DharmaHelper wrote:I wonder if 48 hours is enough time or not enough time.

...

Long Con wrote:

MacDougall wrote:

Long Con wrote:

MacDougall wrote:

Long Con wrote:

Epignosis wrote:

Boomslang wrote:Tranq's slip of calling Finn McMissile mafia (the role was part of a second civ team) is too easily fact-checkable to be intentional, imo.

It wasn't a slip. It was Tranq being a nub. Hence my opening post.

What I'm seeing here is, on the surface, a possible Boomslang-Tranq baddie teamup. That's just surface though, and I don't really think that's what's going on here.

However, my ideal civ-mindset would hold back and wait to see if anyone jumps on Tranq opportunistically, rather than defuse the situation with some textbook "let's not get too finger-pointy" sanity. Short-term "obvious Civ" statements can be long-term "don't worry about me, I'm cooler than being cool" baddie groundwork.

Weird post. Do not like.

What, were there "too many quotes" for your taste?

No, sorry I was agreeing with you. I was referring to Boomslang's post.

Phew! I thought I dun got meself lynched Day 1 already!

What is with this exchange?

Long Con, why even mention this?

My gosh, 345 posts to read...here we go.

Anything super important I should take not of as i read these 7 pages?