The Syndicate

Lynch me so Dom won't need to find a replacement. Also, I guess this will be much more help than me being in the game anyway.

Yeah, I'm not going to do anything anymore since I'm doing absolutely nothing anyway. I try to help as best as I can, and I guess me and Mafia don't fit. Good luck, everyone.

@DrumBeats absolutely nothing? Just get rid of me.

I specifically asked Epignosis why he only voted once and he replied.

Sorry if I can't quote a ton of posts, I really don't feel like I'm getting better playing Mafia just on my phone. My mindset can't just get back on my previous way of scumhunting which involves quoting almost every post of every player. So I guess my only real worth in playing these games here are my votes, and I try to use them in the best way I can. Also I have a really bad case of tunnel vision.

My main beef with Epi was wheb he refused to use two votes in one of the polls. In that poll, the names were Michael, Dwight, Gabe, Ryan, and others. So it turns out Gabe and Ryan are scum. Looking at the other folders now, he and timmer didn't vote for Corporate too. Timmer and Epi voted for Dwight on the first poll I mentioned.

Scotty wrote:In case no one noticed, Darryl and Gabe have been revealed.

Serge wrote:The question is probably "should we open more folders?"

So I'm not sure why people are voting no. Vote yes.
A bit presumptuous, aren't we?

Serge wrote:
fingersplints wrote:
Serge wrote:I think the "no" voters consist of the scum team.
Why? Revealing roles would benefit baddies too. They want to see what the civvies are working with. Plus it seems pretty stupid for an entire team to vote the same way on a extremely vague night poll in my opinion. I don't see it, and this honestly makes me feel worse about you.
If you look at the role list a ton of civ roles have been revealed. I'd rather we know what's happening than not. Why even vote folders and people in the previous night polls, then? I suspect Epignosis and I suspect Timmer to a lesser extent(lone post about Angela seems to be distancing from the civ lynch). Also, since we didn't know what the poll was for, they could vote with impunity.

@Dom did the night poll end with nothing happening because it's a draw or did you randomize the winning choice?
Why are you acting like there was a definitive in the night poll? The question could have been "Are you bad?" Hell, it could have been "Are you a supporter of genocide?"

My point is: jumping on someone for an ambiguous night poll is just clutter, and not an informative way to call someone out.

I am being presumptious because I want to speculate. And you're wrong about Gabe, we already voted for him to be revealed. The other new role revealed is Ryan, so I guess something did come from the poll last night. Also, it fits Ryan's character to turn out to be scum.

fingersplints wrote:
Serge wrote:
Epignosis wrote:
Serge wrote:Weak sauce.
Says the guy who thinks he can nail mafia by night polls.

I'm voting either you or Sorsha today.
I'm more offended to be called acting. I have never feigned ignorance.

Vote me. You know you want to.
Why is this offensive? Someone is acting. That's the game.

Offensive is a poor word choice, I guess.

I will vote for timmer.

Epignosis wrote:
Serge wrote:Weak sauce.
Says the guy who thinks he can nail mafia by night polls.

I'm voting either you or Sorsha today.

I'm more offended to be called acting. I have never feigned ignorance.

Vote me. You know you want to.

I'm definitely not acting new. Weak sauce.

fingersplints wrote:
Serge wrote:I think the "no" voters consist of the scum team.
Why? Revealing roles would benefit baddies too. They want to see what the civvies are working with. Plus it seems pretty stupid for an entire team to vote the same way on a extremely vague night poll in my opinion. I don't see it, and this honestly makes me feel worse about you.

If you look at the role list a ton of civ roles have been revealed. I'd rather we know what's happening than not. Why even vote folders and people in the previous night polls, then? I suspect Epignosis and I suspect Timmer to a lesser extent(lone post about Angela seems to be distancing from the civ lynch). Also, since we didn't know what the poll was for, they could vote with impunity.

@Dom did the night poll end with nothing happening because it's a draw or did you randomize the winning choice?

No info.

I'll be voting for Epignosis.

I think the "no" voters consist of the scum team.

indiglotkilled

Michael has been killed? What? Also Dom, the poll says it should run for at least 50 minutes more, so I'm confuzzled.

Wouldn't the result be randomized in case of a tie? I think one side should win. We don't know if scum knows these questions, and if they do then the votes could reflect alignment.

This is going to look bad for either sides if it's indeed about the role reveals.

LoRab wrote:Voted no for the tie, just because I'm in that kind of mood. Also, what if the question is, "should we reveal no more roles this entire game." Seems just as likely as all the roles, tbh.

Yeah, should we reveal no more roles doesn't roll off the tongue like should we reveal the remaining roles :P

I hope the question is "should we reveal all the remaining roles". That would be awesome.

Also, she's hot.

fingersplints wrote:
juliets wrote:
Serge wrote:The question is probably "should we open more folders?"

So I'm not sure why people are voting no. Vote yes.
"No" people what do you think the question is. I'm tempted to vote no just because more votes are going there.
This:

Ricochet wrote:Is Hilary Swank hot or not?
...is actually something they poll the whole office on. I think it's split 50/50, until Angela, who previously refused to vote on moral reasons, says Hilary's "hot as heck."

I think Rico meant it as an off topic joke, but it actually is fitting since Matt/Angela was just lynched.

Since Angela said she's hot then shouldn't people voting yes?

The question is probably "should we open more folders?"

So I'm not sure why people are voting no. Vote yes.

Yes or No? Can it get any more ambiguous?

Voting yes.

Angela is a civ. Look at Dom's lynch title: "No. No."

Should we vote Angela/Payroll on the next set of folders? That of course includes corporate/Jan/Robert

I know nobody likes Angela but she has to be civ, right?

Yowch.

Reveal that role!

@DrumBeats I liked your case on Matt. The next day I'll prpbably still vote for Epignosis.

Epignosis didn't vote for Gabe. I rest my case.

I think if Michael and Andy both die then the Mafia will win or will control some sort of game mechanic. Maybe Michael's the one picking these polls?

Actually, it says Holly is as weird as Michael. Still, Michael's role might be crazy. But I guess it wouldn't make sense for one to be civ and one to be a baddie. Okay, I'll vote other too.

fingersplints wrote:
Serge wrote:We need to learn Michael's role. He's pretty important, Andy will replace him so it's either a powerful role and will be alignment-indicative.

Hey Epignosis, you still have another vote you can cast. Why only choose Dwight who is almost sure to be civ?
When we don't have all the baddie roles revealed you think we should reveal the number 1 civvie? I don't think Michaels a wildcard at all. why would you even think this?

Look at Holly's role. It is implied that Michael's role is probably unbalanced, which might make him a baddie. Though as you said this could go both ways.

The names we want are corporate and management. If Jan and Robert California's names appear we need to vote for them.

Taking note of people who don't vote Gabe.

We need to learn Michael's role. He's pretty important, Andy will replace him so it's either a powerful role and will be alignment-indicative.

Hey Epignosis, you still have another vote you can cast. Why only choose Dwight who is almost sure to be civ?

Epignosis wrote:Serge is bad.

Serge wrote:I do think JJJ and Quin are both at the same team.

Quin feels like he's on the forefront of scumhunting but what I feel he's doing is intentional chaotic brewing of the mechanics and roles stew. That post, #savemepandanderin (as if hashtags weren't bad enough) serves just to confuse people. Since it's been given the go ahead by Dom, it means his role is not at all connected with Pam and Erin, but in the off chance that it'll plant the seeds of doubt on anyone's mind that he is indeed related to them, he took that chance. Also, it is pure nonsense in the context of the game to post and I can only see someone as scum would make the effort to do.

JJJ on the other hand, GTH is quite uncharacteristic of you. You also forgave Quin. Also, bad vibes. I don't feel Superman JJJ right now, but Lex Luthor JJJ. Jesse Eisenberg Lex Luthor.
"GTH is quite uncharacteristic of you."

That's bad distancing, folks.

Gabe is almost surely scum. I voted Michael too, he feels like a wildcard.

SVS's role could might as well be a townie role. Erin's role to stop a lynch is almost the opposite of this role.

SVS, do you deny the allegations?

Turnip Head wrote:Someone here is responsible for sending in the lynch hammer. I'm not going to outright assume it was SVS, but it was definitely someone who was around in the last 30 minutes. They just narrowed down their own identity considerably.

Not me.

Oh wait, Holly is civ. Quin is not bad! But still Quin is dead.

Probably, but let's hold off on seeing anyone as confirmed civ. Have to say there's a good chance as that's the only thing that happened. It's like Erin's power.

Though Holly was one of the sweetest person in The Office, I have to say

Holly's corporate! She's bad! Quin is bad! Quin is dead!

Whaaaaaaat

Oh wait, those who die don't get their roles revealed?

See, we got one baddie. Angela could swing both ways but if it's management + corporate as baddies I think we did good with the voting last night.

Search found 91 matches