The Syndicate

Enrique wrote:
Boulders wrote:oh you know what you are doing? Of course you do, you are the person who chooses who dies or not despite having a system based on votes!
You could always read the roles

I'll do that

Enrique wrote:jk Bobby. I hope you play with us again.

ok man I can see that there is a reason other than fuckery. I tried everyone!

oh you know what you are doing? Of course you do, you are the person who chooses who dies or not despite having a system based on votes!

ok I'm mad now, there's fuckery afoot from the OP

Enrique wrote:Day 2

Bobby Baroo Bobby Baroo
I don't know what to make of you
You're in charge of every coup
that the feds set out to do
Tulip Baroo Tulip Baroo
There's an island off of Spain
Where it's snowing out of season
and they claim its cause of you
Tulip Baroo

Boulders has been lynched. He was Tulip Baroo.
You have 24 hours to send me your night actions.

Dana, DisPor, sig and sprityo will begin Day 3 with a vote against them. Make it two if they miss another poll.

HOW WAS I LYNCHED IF ONE PERSON GOT MORE VOTES THAN ME

a2thezebra wrote:No you didn't.

yes I did, maybe read the threads more closely

Boulders wrote:
skycatguylover98 wrote:
Metalmarsh89 wrote:
Boulders wrote:
a2thezebra wrote:He's stressed out, cut him a break.
this, breaks for everyone tonight (except Space Daisy, sorry bro)
You owe me a drink if you survive this.
if you're ever in the LA area, i'd be happy to provide you with a drink on the house at the bar i run: Jumping Off Bar, Grill and Dance Club

anyone saying that the drama between me, boulders and ekeknat is confusing seems suspicious to me. collectively, we have provided some of the most damning evidence so far in the game and that's really saying something with the whole scotty incident. the evidnece against nutella is really piling up in my opinion, although i could also vote to lynch ekeknat tomorrow because i believe he might be one of potassium's hired cyberstalkers from reddit.
that's funny because I thought ekeknat was working for you!

meaning I'll most likely be voting for him or nutella tomorrow

skycatguylover98 wrote:
Metalmarsh89 wrote:
Boulders wrote:
a2thezebra wrote:He's stressed out, cut him a break.
this, breaks for everyone tonight (except Space Daisy, sorry bro)
You owe me a drink if you survive this.
if you're ever in the LA area, i'd be happy to provide you with a drink on the house at the bar i run: Jumping Off Bar, Grill and Dance Club

anyone saying that the drama between me, boulders and ekeknat is confusing seems suspicious to me. collectively, we have provided some of the most damning evidence so far in the game and that's really saying something with the whole scotty incident. the evidnece against nutella is really piling up in my opinion, although i could also vote to lynch ekeknat tomorrow because i believe he might be one of potassium's hired cyberstalkers from reddit.

that's funny because I thought ekeknat was working for you!

Spacedaisy wrote:Good luck civs.

thank you!

Spacedaisy wrote:Lynch Nutella next guys I'm telling you, she is bad. Keep an eye on LC and DF Too

I'll keep your recommendations in mind

a2thezebra wrote:
Metalmarsh89 wrote:
a2thezebra wrote:linki - Ah you missed the part where he claimed to have never met him again!
He never met him twice? And then he met him?
No, he never met him, met him, and then never had met him before, again.

I think you are a little confused here, as I am, I said in the thread that I never met him IRL (because I really don't like bringing my personal life outside of the internet into my doings on the internet) and then of course it got out that I had met him IRL before.

What never changed, and you can look through the thread, is that he was never seen by me or anyone else (except ekeknat apparently) on the IRC that I admin. He has never been there before, and that is consistent with everything I've said.

a2thezebra wrote:He's stressed out, cut him a break.

this, breaks for everyone tonight (except Space Daisy, sorry bro)

Metalmarsh89 wrote:
Boulders wrote:
Metalmarsh89 wrote:I'm breaking the tie and going with Spacedaisy.
good man, thanks for believing in me
Actually, I listened to the fellow named ekeknat who said you're probably not bad.

On the other hand, you voted for somebody who you claimed to never have met, but later said you knew irl. Why did you deceive us?

I'm stressed out ok, cut me a break!

Metalmarsh89 wrote:I'm breaking the tie and going with Spacedaisy.

good man, thanks for believing in me

nutella wrote:okay all the skycat/boulders/ekeknat is annoying as hell and confusing

I have to vote really fast wtf i was not ready for a 24 hour day I have no idea what's going on but regardless of scotty's alignment I found the LC wagon yesterday sketchy af so I'll vote for daisy.

I am just as confused as you as to why people would say such nasty things about me

a2thezebra wrote:
S~V~S wrote:OK,I will just stop posting, see ya.

sometimes that is the best route of action, no need to be disappointed

a2thezebra wrote:
Boulders wrote:You know, it's kind of strange how you say skycatguylover98 is from the same IRC of you and me when I've never seen him before.
Blatant inconsistency, you must be trying to get lynched.

I've said before that I've never seen him on the IRC that ekeknat is saying we are from, so no, that is not an inconsistency.

ekeknat wrote:i'm just.... not.

compelling evidence

ekeknat wrote:
Boulders wrote:
ekeknat wrote:as far as me and typhoony's votes being placed at the same time... lol, I think if we were both baddies we would probably be a bit less conspicuous about voting and posting pretty much the exact same thing about a minute apart.
or you are new at the game and didn't think we would notice, if I could change my vote it would be to you because it is so obvious what you are trying to pull
alright bobby baroo. i'm not new to this game, actually

sig wrote:So Eke you are policy lynching since Boulder is annoying you!? I don't like this at all seems like a good scum reason to vote especially since you said you think he town. Right know I'm not liking Ekeknat or Zebra, for the phase I'll vote for eke.
i'm voting Boulders because even if he is town I know for a fact he's just in it to funpost at this point. Like, I know Boulders. I would go so far as to see we're e-friends outside of this game. And as such, I can see straight through this sheen of pretending to care about this game all the way down to the bitter cold apatheticness in his core. In his heart of hearts, he's just 'avin a giggle, m8s. And that's the darn truth. feel free to vote for me if that's bad reasoning, i'm shooting from the hip. It's better to have less confusion going on than more confusion, and Boulders in this game is confusion

a2thezebra wrote:That's cool, I just don't like how you actually think that Boulders would NOT do this if we were bad yet you're voting for him anyway.
well i think he's essentially useless and wasting our time with bull at this point. this is the most concrete opinion I have about what's happening right now so it's the one I'm going with. feel free to feel differently than me, but I think in a game like this we have time to work things out.

if yall find me suspicious feel free to vote for me. I would find it absolutely hilarious for me to go over Bobby here

I find it funny how you would say such things about me yet evade every question about you yourself being a baddie.

You know, it's kind of strange how you say skycatguylover98 is from the same IRC of you and me when I've never seen him before.

How do you supposedly know this skycatguylover98 then? How do I know you aren't saying all of this shit about me because you are in cahoots with him?

sig wrote:So Eke you are policy lynching since Boulder is annoying you!? I don't like this at all seems like a good scum reason to vote especially since you said you think he town. Right know I'm not liking Ekeknat or Zebra, for the phase I'll vote for eke.

I'm against the SVS lynch she seems civvie to me.

no he isn't annoyed he's obviously just taking advantage of the fact that others might also be annoyed like he supposedly is and wants me lynched so things are more easy sailing for him

ekeknat wrote:as far as me and typhoony's votes being placed at the same time... lol, I think if we were both baddies we would probably be a bit less conspicuous about voting and posting pretty much the exact same thing about a minute apart.

or you are new at the game and didn't think we would notice, if I could change my vote it would be to you because it is so obvious what you are trying to pull

S~V~S wrote:I never get overly engaged in being a civ unless I have identifiable civ teammates, like I did in LOST. So it will suck for my civ team if I die, but I would rather die & prove you wrong than have to deal with this constant poking.

God I know that feeling SVS, being picked on constantly. I hope you survive this night

Black Rock wrote:
Typhoony wrote:Voted Boulders. Nutella/lc don't have any votes, so voting him because he only seems interested in filling the thread with nonsense.
I am voting for Typhoony, this post/vote doesn't sit right with me.

thank you black rock

skycatguylover98 wrote:this is a form of censorship, i refuse to use it. sorry, s~j~s

weed smokin loser? never touched the stuff. i'm a businessman. if i did drugs, i'd do pure coke. but i don't. not my style. adrenaline's my drug. making decisions. that's a drug that'll fuck you down. not up, but down. if it fucked you up, then what? that means you came out of it losing. i don't lose. thing is, i win. potassium wouldn't know what winning was if he won it from one of his "tobacco" magazine sweepstakes. dude's a vindictive mess. see, i took over his bar. that was 6 years ago. i don't drink. i just decide who does. i'd stop gio after half a shirley temple. guy's not cut out for it. just like running a bar. that takes courage. lotsa danger in the biz. sketchy patrons, illegal alien prosties, prior owners w/ connections to reddit cyberstalking gangs... point is, not your daddy's car rental. not gonna call gio a loser. he's got his goons. fine, i got mine. i've offered a fair fight. no litigation, just fists. i offered litigation AND fists. no dice. stubborn, in denial vengeful SLUG. i think gio's probably a civvie. yeah, he's weird. but i say, "let him yap!" it's all the more material to establish myself. i'm in this game to win. i know my goons. you know yours. i admit my gio vote was premature. i'm thinkin nutella. fella had a weak response to my expose. seems a bit suss to me, but what do i know? i'm just a successful bar owner. sabotage? can't hurt me. i been thru it. i always come out on top. i always get fucked down. if you don't buy it, grill me. today i'm charcoal.

I really don't appreciate you bringing IRL stuff in here, you made me do it which caused all these other (originally) kind people to turn against me. Once again you manipulate people into hating me why do I even try having fun on the internet anymore I know you'll always come around and have me be the first to be kicked out...

a2thezebra wrote:
Boulders wrote:
a2thezebra wrote:Is a Day 2 policy lynch building? I smell salmon. And I hate salmon.

S~V~S
what do you mean by 'day 2 policy lynch building'
The previous two votes for you are policy lynch votes, meaning they made no indication that they are even suspicious of your alignment yet voted for you anyway because they don't like the content of your posts. That's a policy lynch. The only other vote for you comes from the one you claim has been "e-stalking" you. I don't know what's going on but like I said, I don't like the smell of it.

trust me I don't like being voted on for baseless claims either

Metalmarsh89 wrote:
a2thezebra wrote:
Metalmarsh89 wrote:Boulders has just proven he is a liar.

In his on-topic content, he claimed to not know Skycatdogglovepandabootylover, but than he later admitted to know him.
I have a theory that skyguy and Boulders are making all of this up just to fuck with us.
Do you think they have BTSC?

I do not own a single bitcoin (assuming that is what you mean)

S~V~S wrote:lol

I don't find this situation to be funny at all

a2thezebra wrote:Is a Day 2 policy lynch building? I smell salmon. And I hate salmon.

S~V~S

what do you mean by 'day 2 policy lynch building'

thanks guys and gals I really appreciate your support

S~V~S wrote:Guys, if you have anon game related wall of text to post, can you please put it in green?

When you are in "Full Editor"mode, you will see a button called "OT". That will color your text green. This way people with limited game time don't have to read posts not related to the game.

Thank You

but these posts are related to the game, we're in the same game together

ok so maybe I do know him IRL but he's some local weed smoking loser who wanted to use it as a stepping stone for more dangerous drugs and he came into my store one day asking for one of those weird pipes that you don't use for tobacco but other drugs (that I don't know about I only sell things for tobacco use) and he called my water pipes bongs which would imply that they are used for illegal drugs so of course I told him to get out and he gave me this weird look and said 'you'll regret this'

I haven't seen him IRL since but he's been e-stalking me since and you know druggies they can get real crazy real fast

guys please believe me he's using the same tactics that he's used on all of the other forum-based games i've played, there was never any restaurant I swear I am only a humble headshop owner never food, only huge water pipes and hookahs (for tobacco use only) I would never get into the food business I still have a scar on my hand from my first job at Wendy's years ago I don't want to experience that again

skycatguylover98 wrote:allow me to explain in further detail what i know about "boulders." my name is clancy smith. his name? giovanni potassium. i run a small, responsible bar in LA. so did he. same place. jumping off bar, grill and dance club. he fucked up, ya feel? it was friday i believe, sometime in 2010. potassium was scrambling to make the place look, smell, feel nice. but he's a fucking amateur. he was the owner, somehow. the thing is, he didn't run the place. i may only be a manager, but i run the place. i scrub it down, fix the leaks and do the bouncing. i'm a renaissance manager. gio ain't even a mere humanist. he knew the health fuzz we're coming. 10 rats scrambling round the sinks. prolly ate 8 of em, but the other 2 we're off. zip. zada. hiding. he's panicking. SHIT SHIT SHIT. it was too late. health fuzz found the 2 rats. place got shut down fast. a little TOO fast. anyways, i take over the place, but im good. i know how things work. i find solutions. i make the pieces fit. take the shitshow offa gio's hands for FREE. new future, right? wrong.

next year. set up the yelp page. boom, internet traffic. more people know bout the biz. things looking up. the day comes round. april 4 2011. several new reviews? gettin real popular huh. turns out, not true. thing is, potassium. hired some suckas. http://www.yelp.com/biz/jumping-off-bar ... os-angeles. libeled me good. a little TOO good. small speed bump for me, though. i see whole pictures. i find solutions. call gio out. had his number, we saw the same prosty. paid her off. things looking up again. got my dad on the case; dad's a lawyer. understands the law. even uses it. said see ya in court. that was that, i thought. nah, gio's pretty crafty. "fair use parody law." smug face like he outta law school. took the bar. passed. i saw the facade. i see whole pictures. now the dude stalks me. hired a cybergang from reddit. real scary site. fulla lowlifes. can't even play a simple game of forum mafia w/o being followed. stress is unbearable. might kill self. haven't written will yet. dad's on it.

long story short, boulder's a real life baddie. lynch the sad man.

LIES, ALL LIES I AM THE ONE BEING STALKED IF YOU BELIEVE HIM YOU ARE SHEEP

Typhoony wrote:Ok, so do Boulders/guylover/ekeknat all know each other irl? Gimme the context here, I want to understand what the hell is going on

I don't know any of them IRL, I know ekeknat on IRC but Skycatguylover98 has never been there (luckily)

ekeknat wrote:
Long Con wrote:
Boulders wrote:
I reserve the right to make my own decisions without having to explain them.
Ok, but not explaining may get you some serious suspicion.
Not to explain for Boulders, but because I have a feeling he's not going to explain in any sort of terribly rational manner, I'm just going to go ahead and say that it is probably some dumb meta shtuff on his part. They do know each other from the same IRC channel and Bobby's perfectly aware of that. As such, being blunt, the read to be had on Boulders is he's just trolling

Uhh, friend I have no idea what you are talking about. You must be confusing this Skycatguylover98 for you, because I know YOU from IRC and not him. There has never been a single case of someone joining our irc named Skycatguylover98. Being an Admin of said IRC I have good authority to say such a thing. Now PLEASE stop making baseless claims against me.

a2thezebra wrote:
Boulders wrote:
a2thezebra wrote:
skycatguylover98 wrote:damn everyone here is like civilized and shit. but w'ere also bad?? strange world...
I can already tell you're going to be difficult to read.
DO NOT TRUST A WORD HE SAYS!!! HE MIGHT TRY TO SAY SOMETHING ABOUT ME THAT YOU SHOULD UNDERSTAND IS NOT TRUE AT ALL!!!
Do you suspect him or are you just being goofy right now? Why did you prefer to join the lesser of two bandwagons (Long Con over Scotty) rather than vote for him? Are you going to vote for him today?

I reserve the right to make my own decisions without having to explain them.

a2thezebra wrote:
skycatguylover98 wrote:damn everyone here is like civilized and shit. but w'ere also bad?? strange world...
I can already tell you're going to be difficult to read.

DO NOT TRUST A WORD HE SAYS!!! HE MIGHT TRY TO SAY SOMETHING ABOUT ME THAT YOU SHOULD UNDERSTAND IS NOT TRUE AT ALL!!!

Scotty wrote:
Boulders wrote:
Boulders wrote:
Boulders wrote:yooo haha
heyyy lol
oyyy jaja
You're a special kind of boulder, aren't you?

hiiii hehe

Boulders wrote:
Boulders wrote:yooo haha
heyyy lol

oyyy jaja

Boulders wrote:yooo haha

heyyy lol

yooo haha

I'm happy that nobody died!

though I'm a little confused as to why nobody died, I thought that the person with the most votes is the one who gets lynched

S~V~S wrote:' sup Boulders?

about to drop someone off somewhere then I'll be back to continue watching the thread

I'll be back in about an hour and a half to continue this fun game of finger pointing

Metalmarsh89 wrote:I think I'll have more to say after this lynch happens, depending on who is ultimately lynched.

Linki: Boulders... I really like boulders. Why are you just hopping onto the bandwagon?

because I'm a noob

a2thezebra wrote:But are you suspicious of him?

I'm just hopping onto the bandwagon

a2thezebra wrote:What do you mean by this exactly?

more people are suspicious of him being a baddie

a2thezebra wrote:
Boulders wrote:if it is at all possible for me to change my vote (as I did not even mean to vote in the first place) I would like to change it to Long Con as well!
Why Long Con and not skyguy? I asked you before, and you said he was the only one you suspected. Where does your suspicion of Long Con come from?

I can only vote for one and it's obvious nobody else would vote for him so why waste it when I could vote for someone who has a lot more immediate potential (funny considering it is already wasted)

if it is at all possible for me to change my vote (as I did not even mean to vote in the first place) I would like to change it to Long Con as well!

Search found 65 matches