I intend to play more games on this site. You´re all a lovely bunch

Return to “Arkham Mafia [ENDGAME]”
Why?DharmaHelper wrote:Lets lynch Nero.
Explain. I just cast my voteEnrique wrote:I feel like a giant asshole right now
and this is gonna hurt me a lot but it's kinda important
I highly encourage a sig or nerolunar lynch today. NOT MATT.
ffffffff
Don't let his lead get wider. I was wrong.
i cant believe im doing this im so so sorry and would understand if this got me lynched, but i gotta at least try.
Epignosis/LC you are cruel cruel people.
I guess so. I just don´t see where the link between me and Enrique were outside of the fact that we both thought he was bad after he started throwing accusations left and rightTurnip Head wrote:I know you've never met Matt, but you basically just defined him as a mafia player.Nerolunar wrote:Enriques case seems alright, and I also don´t like how much he tunnelled on me on the ground of some vague conspiracy based on tone reading.
Baddie alarmBlack Rock wrote:I think I misunderstood. I will read you since you really want me to but I was only planning that at the time because I was trying to catch up through key players but I haven't bothered because I have changed tactics several times on how I am trying to attack the thread. I don't find you suspicious at this moment so I saw no point. Maybe your posts are insightful so I'll give it a shot.DharmaHelper wrote:I meant to say did I seem at all concerned with your post count :PBlack Rock wrote:Um yes.DharmaHelper wrote:Did I use the words "post count"?Black Rock wrote:I got distracted. Maybe after the lynch but you haven't interested me much the past few days to worry about it. I still haven't read most of the thread and this particular time I am just trying to keep up with current events.DharmaHelper wrote:My suspects thusfar, in no particular order:
SVS - I'm waiting for the shoe to drop on this one where I get accused of always doing this, or whatever, but I can't help legitimately finding the fact that she missed a vote after saying 10 minutes beforehand that she had to vote. Her explanations conflict with each other and don't make sense either. She got wrapped up in the Matt/Zebra conflict? OK ya sure. Except her "Better vote" post was her LAST POST before the 10 minute gap, her post following that was the one wherein she addressed her thoughts on Matt/Zebra. She had 10 minutes. Nobody'll follow me on this suspicion because I "always do this" or somethine lame but there you go. I probably won't vote for SVS today. I also intentionally put her at the top of this list after saying that it was in no particular order but that was only because I thought it was funny.
MP and Mac - For painting Scotty as confirmed civ and running with the Wilgy=Robin theory
Black Rock - TH's case covers this pretty well and it kind of bugs me she never followed through with a readthrough of me in particular because it's not like I'm buffing my post count or posting unnecessarily robust posts.
I see why Bea said she was highly criticized in the past by trying to get involved. Why is everyone worried about post count?
The point I was making with my post count is that my posts for the most part aren't that superfluous or difficult to follow. and I'm not posting like six or seven times in a row or using big fuck-off paragraphs or posting one sentence per line or anything that would make a sincere re-read of me implausible.
I am overwhelmed. I keep a tab open in my broswer and refreshes it occasionally. I hate having to read more than a few pages in one go, so I take it as it comes, especially that it´s Sunday and I don´t have anything else to do.Glorfindel wrote:I've had cause to come on and check this game thread a number of times today and I honestly can't recall an occasion where I have and Magnus (Nerolunar) hasn't been on as well and yet (once again) you post so infrequently my friend. I know this is all pretty heavy going and as you're new you are maybe feeling a little overwhelmed (as am I) but isn't there something you'd like to contribute or some observation you'd care to make
I imagine it might be because Im somewhat of an easy target, being new and all that. Can´t know for sure though, his accusations just seem so desperate.juliets wrote:Nero why would Matt be trying to frame you?
Partly. Enrique made a great case on him. I know for a fact that Im not the Joker, so Matt obviously targeted the real Joker but is trying to frame me, I think.a2thezebra wrote:Because of his desperation to suspect you?Nerolunar wrote:Im becoming more and more tempted to vote for Matt.
Very nice case Enrique.Nerolunar wrote:I wonder why you took my theory as hard proof that I believe you´re civ. As Enrique himself mentioned we can´t be sure that the Joker works that way and blocks are a thing too.Matt wrote:
Enrique who I'm betting is partners with Nero, so if I do get lynched, DO NOT let him get away with saying "Oh I guess Nero is good then", because I'm betting that's exactly what he'll say when I flip and I'm not mafia.
I specifically mentioned that I was just brainstorming for you guys to understand that I'm not at all convinced by myself. Just getting some thoughts out there, you know?
This is going in my signature.Matt wrote:
Regardless, I think Nero should be lynched on grounds that he's my partner, your partner, Enrique's partner, the Joker, the Riddler, the Gingerbread Man, and Toto.
Thank you sig. Im doing my best.sig wrote:Just a quick little note I think Nero has only played like one game, without a theme/abilities nearly as complex as this.
Where is Eke, Floyd, and Equivocate I'd like to see some more posts from them.
Count me in on this. I can barely defend myself on account of these accusations.You'd have to ask Matt, it makes no sense to me either. As far as I can tell Enrique suspects Nero but Matt took the fact that Enrique thought Matt+Nero were teammates and formed a conspiracy theory out of it.
I wonder why you took my theory as hard proof that I believe you´re civ. As Enrique himself mentioned we can´t be sure that the Joker works that way and blocks are a thing too.Matt wrote:
Enrique who I'm betting is partners with Nero, so if I do get lynched, DO NOT let him get away with saying "Oh I guess Nero is good then", because I'm betting that's exactly what he'll say when I flip and I'm not mafia.
How exactly is talking about Robin "laying our information"? Most people advocate that Wilgy was Robin and he is dead. What happened last night is still a mystery and it´s not going to solve itself. Every lynch and NK should be used to gather information and to eventually arrive at conclusions. Being stale and avoiding burning subjects is far worse.sig wrote:We don't know for sure if it was robin or not though, and laying out the information is different then the amount of focus your putting on Robin imo.
Nope.Enrique wrote:Nero are you the Joker?
I was almost about to mention it :PTurnip Head wrote:I don't know why I've been calling you Neru all this time. Your name is clearly Nero.
Metalmarsh please explain why you voted for Zebra at the beginning of Day 1. To me it felt very rushed, especially considering we had a whole day ahead of us to discuss.Nerolunar wrote: Im lacking scum reads on people right now. I don´t like how Metalmarsh instantly voted for Zebra, especially when we had a whole day ahead of us. Im still reading Zebra as slightly scummy, but Metals behavior still strikes me as odd. Elaborate on that please.
Sorry Glorffy, but this seems kinda tryhard. We get you´re a nice person :PGlorfindel wrote:I'll get back to you when I can Sig about your questions - thank you for posting them here for me.sig wrote:What do you think of Zebra with her info sharing, then after getting heat claiming it was a trap?
Why should we look into the map people more?
Also I've never been proven wrong in this context since I've never lead a lynch successfully on a civ before, but there is a first time for everything. I'll ISO and do a quick read over of your past two games and see what I see, but I think I'm right and that you are anti town this game.
As for your ISO, please be my guest. I am not afraid of an honest, transparent evaluation of my posts as it could only bear out the truth...
"I do none harm, I say none harm, I think none harm. And if that not be enough to keep a man alive, in good faith, I long not to live."
Thomas More - A Man for All Seasons.
I AM a mess.Typhoony wrote:If there's one player in the game who advocated for sharing the info, it was sig. It's hard to read his posts and think otherwise.
I believe I have read everything, though I do sometimes skip large walls of text that happens in large discussion. Fx some of Zebras earlier explanation posts.Turnip Head wrote:I guess that means you didn't read Page 18 then? How convenient.Nerolunar wrote:Did go on yesterday and read from page 19-23 but didn´t have time to post.
I might have glanced over you then. Sorry about that.Bullzeye wrote:I don't know if I like being lumped in with those two. I may be a low poster but I now have seven times as many posts as either of them do and did say before the game began that I'd be missing the first few days. I didn't actually expect to be home until today, but work stuff came up so I came back early. I've made an effort to get myself involved and find some investment since I got back whereas Bubbles and Floyd seem not to have made an effort at all.Nerolunar wrote: I wish Bullzeye, Bubbles and Floyd would post more. Im interested in hearing some thoughts from them.