The Syndicate

YOU WANTED TO KILL ME RIGHT OUT OF THE GATE LLAMA WHAT IS THIS

Well.

Congrats baddies. I probably wouldn't have done anything different if I were still alive, so I'd say you deserve it.

Sorsha wrote:I can't wait to say I told you so

Is this the lead up to a mafia flip?

Hi I'm Poppy.

Sorsha wrote:Actually no I don't ... you might actually prevent the kill tonight this way

Or the killer might refrain from killing to have juliets lynched.

Sorsha wrote:I wish you were visiting me

Me too. We could have a party.

Vompatti wrote:Because you would have been my next suspect k

So back to my first question, do you think I bussed Dana?

juliets wrote:
Quin wrote:
Quin wrote:I'm going to jail keep Sorsha tonight.
No I'm not. I'm visiting juliets.
Dang you're wasting your time but ok.

I know. But standard Syndicate rules apply.

Quin wrote:I'm going to jail keep Sorsha tonight.

No I'm not. I'm visiting juliets.

Vompatti wrote:
Quin wrote:
Vompatti wrote:
Quin wrote:
Vompatti wrote:
juliets wrote:Vomps who do you find suspicious?

Llama its just hard for me to believe you would forget our good time but ok.
If Dana is bad I'm voting for Sorsha next, or otherwise Quin k
Do you think I'm bussing Dana?
Why would I think that?
Because you based that post on the assumption that Dana was bad.
I just think Dana and Sorsha are probably in the same team k

Then why did you mention me?

I'm going to jail keep Sorsha tonight.

Hooray! I'm useful!

Vompatti wrote:
Quin wrote:
Vompatti wrote:
juliets wrote:Vomps who do you find suspicious?

Llama its just hard for me to believe you would forget our good time but ok.
If Dana is bad I'm voting for Sorsha next, or otherwise Quin k
Do you think I'm bussing Dana?
Why would I think that?

Because you based that post on the assumption that Dana was bad.

juliets wrote:Quinn have you played with dana before or somehow know fluff is not her default on day 1?

No. But considering she's abandoned her prior fluffiness after I called her out on it, I'd say that it clearly isn't her meta.

Sorsha wrote:Since there is an indy are there actually three mafia? Or just 2?

If three then there is some major bussing going on here

Nah, there's two, and they're both voting for me.

Dana wrote:
Quin wrote:HFRIEHGIUOHYPO4JGOPJGVROIPGHIOPGHTRIPVFRJEWHOFPVHJREOPBGVHEOPGVJEWPIOQHVBFE2QOPGHG4HU2G5UIGRHUI2GVPRB2QPGVBEOQGBVREGVBROPEGBNP

I could repeat my counter argument at you Dana, but that's all I feel like saying about that vote.
But your argument against me was that I didn't have any posts of value after night 1?

You are not Vompatti, so I can't read you the same way as I do him. Fluff is his default. It's clearly not yours, and as I said, I think you were using it as a crutch.

Dana wrote:
Quin wrote:HFRIEHGIUOHYPO4JGOPJGVROIPGHIOPGHTRIPVFRJEWHOFPVHJREOPBGVHEOPGVJEWPIOQHVBFE2QOPGHG4HU2G5UIGRHUI2GVPRB2QPGVBEOQGBVREGVBROPEGBNP

I could repeat my counter argument at you Dana, but that's all I feel like saying about that vote.
But your argument against me was that I didn't have any posts of value after night 1?

You are not Vompatti, so I can't read you the same way as I do him. Fluff is his default. It's clearly not yours, and as I said, I think you were using it as a crutch.

Vompatti wrote:
juliets wrote:Vomps who do you find suspicious?

Llama its just hard for me to believe you would forget our good time but ok.
If Dana is bad I'm voting for Sorsha next, or otherwise Quin k

Do you think I'm bussing Dana?

And I didn't say juliets because while she has a bad reason to suspect me, she doesn't look as bad as you or Sorsha.

HFRIEHGIUOHYPO4JGOPJGVROIPGHIOPGHTRIPVFRJEWHOFPVHJREOPBGVHEOPGVJEWPIOQHVBFE2QOPGHG4HU2G5UIGRHUI2GVPRB2QPGVBEOQGBVREGVBROPEGBNP

I could repeat my counter argument at you Dana, but that's all I feel like saying about that vote.

Who's still alive?

Sorsha wrote:
Dana wrote:
Sorsha wrote:
Dana wrote:
Sorsha wrote:
Quin wrote:
Sorsha wrote: I coulda also gone quin with my vote
explain
When I think of who woulda killed inh your name comes to mind.
Why is that? Just intuition?
Why did you cut out the rest of what I said? It was a continuation of my thoughts
I just wanted to ask about that one part and didn't want you to get confused about what I was responding to. I agree with the part about vomps, I just wanted to know if you had any other reasons about Quin.
I don't buy it from anyone who just lets vomps off the hook either, so theres vibes + his vomps dismissal

Explain to me why analysing Vompatti's posts for fluff is a worthwhile endeavor.

VOTE DANA

thellama73 wrote:
Sorsha wrote:
thellama73 wrote:I wish everyone else would post lists like that. It would be helpful to see where everyone's thoughts are.
I think your list stinks. You can pretty much put the opposite of your reads down for what mine would be though
k. Anyone else?

not particularly.

Sorsha and juliets have bad reasons to suspect me. I'm calling a baddie team of Dana and Sorsha right now.

Sorsha wrote:
Quin wrote:
Sorsha wrote:poop sorry, work stuff.

I coulda also gone quin with my vote
explain
When I think of who woulda killed inh your name comes to mind.

Also letting vomps off the hook for fluffiness, I don't care if that's how he always is or not

I think you+ vomps= baddies

I don't care that you don't care. You can't expect me to find a reason to suspect or trust Vompatti based on his level of fluff.

what the fuck

so was that an indy or a baddie role?

Sorsha wrote:poop sorry, work stuff.

I coulda also gone quin with my vote

explain

Made wrote:wait no i'm not don't switch you vote to me pls quin
Vote DANA
to save self

i was so flustered i didn't even consider it

i just thought 'fuck, not again'

agleaminranks wrote:
thellama73 wrote:
agleaminranks wrote:I'm voting Quin. Die.
Any reason?
He voted for someone who was a townie. Didn't provide any reasoning. That's about it.

You didn't check in. You yourself said that was unforgivable, so I'm calling that a pretty good reason.

agleaminranks wrote:I'm voting Quin. Die.

hey what's up pal

Sorsha wrote:
Quin wrote:VOTE DANA

I only count one post of value in her ISO. The rest is fluff.
What about vomps?

You know what the problem is in comparing the two, I hope.

thellama73 wrote:
juliets wrote:Llama why made?

Quinn Dana hasn't played one of these before im inclined to give her the Botd .
I think I've explained my Made suspicion. His early cheerfulness and use of <3s feels fake to me, and the way he went after INH for voting a no show was disingenuous. Don't buy it.

I was reading his use of <3's as sarcasm, and I got a feel for his character in the last burglary so I can't say I agree with him being 'too cheerful'.

Don't feel great about the latter part, though. Just making things up for the sake of it being Day 1 doesn't sit well.

Dana wrote:
Quin wrote:VOTE DANA

I only count one post of value in her ISO. The rest is fluff.
We don't even have much information, how are there any posts of value at all yet?

We're not gonna get any information unless we talk. I think you're using your confusion as a crutch to not engage in discussion.

VOTE DANA

I only count one post of value in her ISO. The rest is fluff.

I've played them all. I was the Indy in the first, civ in the latest one.

I'm not buying that Made is bad anymore. I doubt he had INH killed.

insertnamehere wrote:
Quin wrote:Made, why'd you vote Aragorn who had one vote as opposed to Gleam who was in the lead when you were the other top lynch contender?
You were also the first to vote Aragorn, btw, Quin.

Just reminding everyone.

indeedio. Gleam only had one vote at the time, though.

Made, why'd you vote Aragorn who had one vote as opposed to Gleam who was in the lead when you were the other top lynch contender?

Made wrote:Ight everyone, Spot reads time!!!

made = bad

Quin wrote:VOTE AGEAK,MK

should i bother

VOTE AGEAK,MK

Hey Made,

Answer INH.

Dana wrote:This is so fast-paced I was not prepared for this. Is there even time for any actual analysis in a game like this?

ANALYSIS IS FOR THE WEAK JUST WORD VOMIT

Made wrote:
Quin wrote:
insertnamehere wrote:Agleam and Aragorn are both AWOL. It's my usual policy to vote an inact D1 of a burglary, so I'm gonna keep on keeping on.

VOTE AGLEAM
VOTE ARAGORN

hyuckhyuckhyuck
Why are you trying to save Agleam Tho

VOTING QUIN FOR SHIFTY SHFITYNESS AND OTHER BAD THINGS THAT ARE BAD

I'm on board lynching a no-show, just don't want to let one wagon run too far ahead of itself.

Interesting that the same thing went on in the other burglary and Made didn't say anything about it.

He was bad then, so I'll lean civ this time.

insertnamehere wrote:Agleam and Aragorn are both AWOL. It's my usual policy to vote an inact D1 of a burglary, so I'm gonna keep on keeping on.

VOTE AGLEAM

VOTE ARAGORN

hyuckhyuckhyuck

What a role that would be, huh?

Search found 53 matches