colonialbob wrote:Like you said, I did let votes fly. But I figured I'd ask about typical behavior here, since I've seen several examples of people getting meta-lynched for behavior that's not universally scummy, but for whatever reason is on that site, and I'd prefer avoiding that for myself. That's true no matter my alignment.
Plurality voting is "person with the most votes at end of day is lynched", either with or without a no-vote option. On the Realms we've typically played with majority voting, where somebody is lynched as soon as they get half+1 votes (ignoring shenanigans) and otherwise there's no lynch. It's a surprisingly different style. I prefer plurality, because IMO it makes voting patterns more meaningful.
That is fair. Would you consider yourself a careful player? Funnily enough, the first(ish) game I played here (Phenon) I did something pretty off brand to the site and was a huge controversy because of it. I liked how it ended up though.
Ah, I see. I've played with both, and I think plurality is easier.
MovingPictures07 wrote:Hey Dizzy, way to puke some reads out. What does "soul read" mean, like a tone-based read? If so, can you point me to a particular post or posts by nutella and LC that inspired your perspective?
Hey. I guess it's like gut read, but mixed with previous experience. So you can't soul read a person you haven't played with before. It's a thing on PerC.
I did point to the particular post of nutella though, pretty much the same as you said, though it was me-centered. I have the idea of being able to read LC on tone, and I don't really want to talk about how/why. Plus, I have questions to him now anyway. It's not a very strong read.
MovingPictures07 wrote:Dyslexicon wrote:No, wait, I'm voting MP cause it's always a good idea to kill him. \o/
This is becoming our thing now isn't it.
This will always be our thing. <3
gfishfunk wrote:Here is an idea. (I post them as I think of them)
Post ONE player you think is likely town. Very simple. If you say yourself, I vote for you.
mine: colonialbob.
Nutella
---
- I'm liking MP's contribution in the game. Not especially sold on him alignment wise, but sure he could be town.
- I like that Nifty is speaking highly of his own gut. It reads wanting to take responsibility or at least not give excuses.
- Some of the meta lists are interesting. I'm probably one of the players that knows fewer people here. Some of the lists didn't say much though, but I'm prone to writing too many words to so whatevz.
These are the players I've played with: Wilgy, Epi, Fred, Jack, LC, MP, Nut and Silver.
- Reading MP's meta of Llama, I feel like I can get that playstyle, and can be pretty much like that myself. That said it's probably not impossible for Llama to be any alignment here.
@Jack - You still didn't tell me who ABF is. =/ I also wonder what stock you put into the anti-alignments as this is a multifaction game?
@LC - I find your reason for suspecting me weird. Why do you base it on someone else's meta when you've just played two games with me, one where I was town and one where I was scum?
@MP - Did you ever expand on your Wilgy read? He isn't really standing out to me, so wondering about what you're seeing there.
I'm struggling a bit with getting strong reads. The only one that I have a bad feel of is Bob. I almost feel their treatment of me was a bit too nice. Also didn't like the carefulness in the beginning. Mostly this is a gut read.
Vote Bob
Come talk to me about why I shouldn't.
Would not want to lynch Nut, LC and MP.
If I were to give passes I would include Llama, Gfish, Nifty and Jack - some more for just providing content, and this game is already pretty slow.
I feel neutral on a lot of people.
