The Syndicate

Yeah~ if the SK's and baddies all NK each other, then they will be forced to lynch civs, and they don't want to do THAT. That would be bad for "business".

Timmer, not Thomas.

And Lizzy, I trust you, part of why I told people not to follow my vote last night. I will go to my grave believing Llama is bad (and that will be right soon I expect), but I see what you are saying.

That was to Nevin, I kept running into linki

To be honest, it feels to me like you are trying to steer the thread, and your reaction to someone, me, stepping out of line, is typical of that. So helpful as you have been, I can't say I totally trust you.

I cannot visualize Sock Alex fashioning a game where one player can deduce all of the roles, allowing all the civs to fall in line behind that person and marching to victory. Anyone who knows me and my game will tell you I have ever marched to the beat of my own drummer. Hell so much so that my drummer isn't even a drummer, he's an accordionist Lol.

timmer wrote:If its any consolation I'm looking at the roles and not understanding what is going on here either lol but im not fully caught up!

Someone gave Llama a poetry curse (along with Devin), and he intentionally did not follow the instructions. Not sure why, but I know this is so. Llama cannot figure out why I might know this was the case re his poetry curse.

i suggest he read the roles. At this juncture, i am going to bed as I should have done hours ago.

That was aimed at Llama, not timmer

Not true.

I did see this, I was giving you another chance.

You are lying about your INTENTIONS, then.

Half way tho=rough your insanification, you suddenly started posting in stanza-poetry form. Why was that?

thellama73 wrote:

S~V~S wrote:OR Llama is really not reading the roles, or perhaps he is not reading his PMs. that could be too.

Whatever you think you know is wrong.

Um, nah. In any case, good night. And read those roles!

OR Llama is really not reading the roles, or perhaps he is not reading his PMs. that could be too.

thellama73 wrote:

S~V~S wrote:

thellama73 wrote:

S~V~S wrote: Yeah, you did.

There are ways for someone to know this.

What are they then? I'm sure the military would love to hear about the mind reading technology you have apparently developed.

Other players: You can see that what she is saying is nonsense, right?

But it isn't, and there are plenty of ways i might know this

Read the roles~

None of the roles allow you to read my thoughts, which is the only way you could know whether I was lying or not, which I wasn't.

Um, I did not need thought reading to know you were flouting your curse. You obviously missed something in the roles.

bea wrote:

thellama73 wrote:

S~V~S wrote:

thellama73 wrote:

S~V~S wrote:No, you intentionally flouted a curse. how do i know this? I just know it, lol.

Again, it is posts like this taht make you look bad.

You intentionally lied about the poll. I KNOW it.

No, Not like you intentionally lied about the curse. Think about what i am saying. REALLY think about it.

I honestly have no idea what you are talking about. You cannot know the inside of my mind, so you cannot know whether I lied or made an innocent mistake. It is impossible. And once more for the record, I did not.

I knew you knew

thellama73 wrote:

S~V~S wrote: Yeah, you did.

There are ways for someone to know this.

What are they then? I'm sure the military would love to hear about the mind reading technology you have apparently developed.

Other players: You can see that what she is saying is nonsense, right?

But it isn't, and there are plenty of ways i might know this

Read the roles~

thellama73 wrote:

S~V~S wrote:

thellama73 wrote:

S~V~S wrote:No, you intentionally flouted a curse. how do i know this? I just know it, lol.

Again, it is posts like this taht make you look bad.

You intentionally lied about the poll. I KNOW it.

No, Not like you intentionally lied about the curse. Think about what i am saying. REALLY think about it.

I honestly have no idea what you are talking about. You cannot know the inside of my mind, so you cannot know whether I lied or made an innocent mistake. It is impossible. And once more for the record, I did not.

Yeah, you did.

There are ways for someone to know this.

Linki~ Cake is awesome

thellama73 wrote:

S~V~S wrote:No, you intentionally flouted a curse. how do i know this? I just know it, lol.

Again, it is posts like this taht make you look bad.

You intentionally lied about the poll. I KNOW it.

No, Not like you intentionally lied about the curse. Think about what i am saying. REALLY think about it.

No, you intentionally flouted a curse. how do i know this? I just know it, lol.

Again, it is posts like this taht make you look bad.

Not even comparable either, is it?

See, it's stuff like this that gets you lynched all the time.

thellama73 wrote:

Spacedaisy wrote:We don't know that yet Llama. It mentions both Bea and Vomps in that post as still being in the gas chamber. I suspect it was a tie.

Ties are resolved by Zodac. There still should have been a lynch, as Nev has pointed out numerous times in reference to me.

Yes Nevin points out all manner of positive things in reference to you. I think Daisys point was that since it was tied, we have no way of knowing who, if, anyone, was bad. And making that presumption as if it were fact tends to be, IMO, something baddies do.

Did you read the last page or so of posts after you voted? It might be a good thing if you did.

Spacedaisy wrote:We don't know that yet Llama. It mentions both Bea and Vomps in that post as still being in the gas chamber. I suspect it was a tie.

this x1000

Hes her husband.

The thing is, i don;t know that i trust you.

Mongoose wrote:

S~V~S wrote:Depending on how this comes out, i will have some serious eyeballs for those that heard a srs opinion on someones game, and voted anyhow.

Indeed, and I don't think it's going to end well.

Your pensive mongoose avi cracks me up every time i see it

Depending on how this comes out, i will have some serious eyeballs for those that heard a srs opinion on someones game, and voted anyhow.

<3

BDH's posts seem to give lots of people pause, but they vote anyhow. Good to know.

And sometimes things happen that are not in the secrets. In socl games, like ALL THE TIME.

Mongoose wrote:

Nevinera wrote:

Mongoose wrote: * I'll believe Nev about voting Llama being a fruitless endeavor. For today.

You 'believe' me? It's pure logic, there is no hidden information or claims of personal recognition of subtle cues.
All there is, in my opinion, is: We lynched him, and he didn't die.
That piece of information limits his list of possible roles severely, and *not a single one* of those roles can be lynched
in less than three tries (since we know delbert got at least two lynch stops).

I feel like you've been a bit condescending.

just a tad.

I don't think Devin is bad, bit I have no idea of his role.

Then again, it is totally possible that the two of you are totes manipulating me, since you two are the people most likely to be able to manipulate me.

Who is on your short list? Your long list?

juliets wrote:SVS, if you hadn't voted llama because he's not likely to die in the lynch, who would you have voted?

To be honest, i am not sure. I would have considered a Bea vote until BDH said what he said. The fact that the word thing did not apply to you as far as i am concerned could also mean it does not apply to her. Although that "supper" as "super" thing was pingy.

Linky @ FH~ I think maybe he just understands bea well.

I think he means he knows her, really, really, really, really well.

Um, I think it's kinda obvious, lol~

And FH, bea ALWAYS wants to be lynched when under suspish as a civ. As a HV player i thought you might remember that?

Personally, BDH, i have been kind of afraid to disagree with Nevin. Accusing people who don't see his logic of being drunk... and implying that people who speak their own minds don't make sense... I am liking you better, BDH, than i did before.

Linki@FH~ I get it. What i don't get is people talking as if they have figured out so many roles already. There are so many variables~ and not everyone notices everything. I am amazed that no one noticed two Moriarity role reveals, for instance, when the role says one. No one noticed this until i rejoined the game? I am the least observant person ever, lol.

thellama73 wrote:

S~V~S wrote:Well, people are saying that they know his role (??) and that it would be a waste, so I dunno if you should. I am not 100% sure he is any specific role, I am sure he lied, and then backpedaled about it. It's all in the thread. I do think he did so willfully, and I am not sure why anyone NOT a baddie would do so.

I hope you are seeing what I put out, JC~ you of all people should

I hope you are not bad, lol. If i missed it (I am not fully caught up today, we had Blizzard #7878957 today) did you say your opinion on Bea?

You can't be sure that I lied because a lie is all about motive, and you can't know my motive. If I didn't intent to deceive, it was, by definition, not a lie. I stated something that wasn't true, yes, but it was not a lie, because I believed it at the time.

I do have to say, this is one of the weasely-est statement i have ever read. Srs weasel, man, props. I really don't think you believed it. I know i don't believe it.

juliets wrote:

S~V~S wrote:Well, people are saying that they know his role (??) and that it would be a waste, so I dunno if you should. I am not 100% sure he is any specific role, I am sure he lied, and then backpedaled about it. It's all in the thread. I do think he did so willfully, and I am not sure why anyone NOT a baddie would do so.

I hope you are seeing what I put out, JC~ you of all people should

I hope you are not bad, lol. If i missed it (I am not fully caught up today, we had Blizzard #7878957 today) did you say your opinion on Bea?

Ok, yes i do see why some people are saying it would be a waste and I'll revisit that before I make a final decision.

Unfortunately, at this point in time I think bea is probably bad. You may not share that opinion and if you don't, I would love to know why. Maybe you can open my eyes to something I'm overlooking.

No, I think so too, very likely, unfortunately. I thought Bea could be bad before the Rumple words thing. I found the case on her re the words more convincing than the one on you, as well. I went to RM & searched your posts for the word "Specific" and you had 48 posts with that word, over 10% of your posts had it. Some had it more than once. So I am not going to condemn you over the use of a word you obviously use a lot.

linki @Llama~ I have reason to believe otherwise. It;s in the thread

Well, people are saying that they know his role (??) and that it would be a waste, so I dunno if you should. I am not 100% sure he is any specific role, I am sure he lied, and then backpedaled about it. It's all in the thread. I do think he did so willfully, and I am not sure why anyone NOT a baddie would do so.

I hope you are seeing what I put out, JC~ you of all people should

I hope you are not bad, lol. If i missed it (I am not fully caught up today, we had Blizzard #7878957 today) did you say your opinion on Bea?

Becasue this is how she acts. Sorry if you don;'t agree with my vote.

It is my experience that when people say they "Know" who is and isn't who, half the time they are wrong. I follow my own suspicions. Perhaps they will coincide with yours, perhaps not.

Lizzy wrote:I went with the usual. I don't agree with any of the leads thus far - some will probably end up in civs being lynched and others in no lynches.

I like this. Although i do not think I agree with your choice, I like that you are doing what you think is best. That is what i like to do, it is not always popular, but I think it is the correct thing to do.

Devin, it was a lie. He flouted his curse. He is bad.

Although apparently I guess i don't know what I am talking about, lol~ you all can just ignore me.

Also, Devin, I am not bad (although you have been wanting to find an excuse for thinking me so). I think anyone who has played many games with me, or who I have hosted, or especially who i have cohosted with, should know that.

thellama73 wrote:

blindfaeth wrote:I think SVS has a point, it does seem like so many people dropped their suspicion of llama rather quickly after Nevin and DH posted their analysis.

Doesn't that say more about them than me?

No it says you worked hard to keep out of the public eye, being as blendy as possible.

You lying about that curse and attempting to flout it brought you back to the forefront of my mind, so I reread you and am convinced the people who made the case against you were correct to do so.

I will pull up quotes tonight.

and sorry Nevin~ I guess I am a bit over sensitive after the way this game started for me but no matter what fancy analyses you produce, I know in my heart that Llama is bad.

thellama73 wrote:

S~V~S wrote:So the thoughts of others are wrong?

Often.

The point was you were implying this was all on me
And when I was came back into the game, you were the major suspect. You survived the lynch, and slid by.

So the thoughts of others are wrong?

My thoughts combined with theirs are formidable.

You were bad then, you still are.

You're a liar (game wise) and I won't le this go.

If you really really want me to start quoting the lists against you from a few days ago I will. There were a lot of them and they all made you look bad.

Read up on why you suspected him before, guys. YOU WERE RIGHT.

Well, I am that sure, as were ten people the other day.

[quote="thellama73"]I'd also like to add that I think SVS' whole "Let's hurry up and start a bandwagon on llama a day early while he's not around" thing is fairly lame.[/quote™]

Early? The lynch lasts two days. And you miraculously appeared when I got into it with Nevin over you.

S~V~S wrote:Start a bandwagon? You were the lynch leader a say ago. Don't blame me , I am just reminding the turn people who coated for you before Nevin flooded the thread with analysis for other baddies.

Ack phone post, a day ago not a say ago, and they voted for you (ten people) not coated.

Hoping people forgot about you what with the word analysis,?

Start a bandwagon? You were the lynch leader a say ago. Don't blame me , I am just reminding the turn people who coated for you before Nevin flooded the thread with analysis for other baddies.