The Syndicate

I really do want to know how I died, if the Chief did not switch it to me. Who reads me that badly?

Llama, how did the cook kill me? I had less votes, even with an extra 2, than the other person. I thought the Chief switched it to me. And i had Eloh pegged for the Chief due to that.

Epignosis wrote:

S~V~S wrote:

Epignosis wrote:

S~V~S wrote:

Epignosis wrote:

S~V~S wrote: but i was too busy being outraged by the ridiculousness of voting for people becasue baddies voted for the same person they did. WTF????? Not becasue of anything i did, but becasue a baddie voted the same way i did. Like baddies never spread their votes out, oh no.

Yep, that was all you had to get outraged about.

No, but it was a start. It was pretty outrageous, tbh, Your post pissed me off becasue it was so much bullshit, but it did not outrage me because it was also totally insincere You are not all that, much as you like to tell people you are. IRL, I am sure you really are all that, but that is not what we are dscussing now.

Can you imagine if we had dinner together?

I am sure it would be a lovely experience, i am probably about your Moms age, and i knit and make a killer authentic lasagna. I make a charming dinner guest.

We would probably, then, bitch each other out about lasagne techniques.

I have Sicilian grandmother techniques. Hard to beat

Epignosis wrote:

S~V~S wrote:

Epignosis wrote:

S~V~S wrote: but i was too busy being outraged by the ridiculousness of voting for people becasue baddies voted for the same person they did. WTF????? Not becasue of anything i did, but becasue a baddie voted the same way i did. Like baddies never spread their votes out, oh no.

Yep, that was all you had to get outraged about.

No, but it was a start. It was pretty outrageous, tbh, Your post pissed me off becasue it was so much bullshit, but it did not outrage me because it was also totally insincere You are not all that, much as you like to tell people you are. IRL, I am sure you really are all that, but that is not what we are dscussing now.

Can you imagine if we had dinner together?

I am sure it would be a lovely experience, i am probably about your Moms age, and i knit and make a killer authentic lasagna. I make a charming dinner guest.

Happy to oblige Bass <3

Epignosis wrote:

S~V~S wrote: but i was too busy being outraged by the ridiculousness of voting for people becasue baddies voted for the same person they did. WTF????? Not becasue of anything i did, but becasue a baddie voted the same way i did. Like baddies never spread their votes out, oh no.

Yep, that was all you had to get outraged about.

No, but it was a start. It was pretty outrageous, tbh, Your post pissed me off becasue it was so much bullshit, but it did not outrage me because it was also totally insincere You are not all that, much as you like to tell people you are. IRL, I am sure you really are all that, but that is not what we are dscussing now.

Mongoose wrote:

S~V~S wrote:I think MP made an interesting case, although I am not sure I see Ninjajujube as quite that ballsy. I am going to vote MR again. I think Blooper makes a good point, and he is unlikley to be lynched in any case. i am not going to hold my vote to save. It is what it is.

Well if I had seen this beforehand, perhaps we could have coordinated better. I was trying to save yo' butt.

Thank you, I appreciate it

but i was too busy being outraged by the ridiculousness of voting for people becasue baddies voted for the same person they did. WTF????? Not becasue of anything i did, but becasue a baddie voted the same way i did. Like baddies never spread their votes out, oh no.

Tonight, resist the Boddy, civvies. There is nothing that can be said about you that will make you bad.

Linki, lol. Um no, Epi. I have the armor of my civvieness, and the likes of you can't scare me.

I AM SUSPICIOUS OF YOU EPI.

VERY MUCH SO.

How can you say i have no suspicion? And since when is not having tunnelvision a baddie thing? People always suspect me for having tunnelvision, now you suspect me for not having it?

OH HNO it ended as I was posting

I think MP made an interesting case, although I am not sure I see Ninjajujube as quite that ballsy. I am going to vote MR again. I think Blooper makes a good point, and he is unlikley to be lynched in any case. i am not going to hold my vote to save. It is what it is.

Hedgeowl wrote:

S~V~S wrote:She was not a lone baddie, like say Mr Boddy, working it out on her own. I would look to people actually making a case on MR as being bad as her teammates

lol. I know someone

linki didnt he already vote you?

he did, i missed that. Last I saw he was saying he had not voted me yet.

Listen guys, whatever line of bullshit he drops on you after he gets my lynched, don;'t believe it. I did not deserve to be lynched, I did not act like a baddie, becasue I am not one. I do believe him to be the LMS role that needs everyone else dead to win, though. Not sure what Elos deal is, but maybe you should lynch her for voting for a civvie for no real reason

xoxoxo

Epignosis wrote:

S~V~S wrote:No, not really. Sabie as a baddie still had teammates helping her out.

Clearly.

Come on, say it, no more pussyfooting around it. You are making the implication i am bad. Shit or get off the pot, Epi. Commit.

She was not a lone baddie, like say Mr Boddy, working it out on her own. I would look to people actually making a case on MR as being bad as her teammates

No, not really. Sabie as a baddie still had teammates helping her out.

I do

I meant that the next few games, when a baddie votes for the same person after Elo, I am gonna give her some flak. Some good natured flak, but flak nevertheless.

I will remember it. Oh hell yeah.

I meant for future games. Voting people becasue a baddie voted for the same person they did after them.

This is a reallllllllyyyyy bad precedent to set. Really bad.

So you are voting for me because of what a baddie did? Becasue of what a third party did? Really?

Elohcin wrote:I feel like Epi made a good point about how you could be Sabie's teammate and I don't feel like you could defend that. You can tell me why you voted, but that doesn't change Sabie's behavior.

Nevermind....haha what Epi said!

This is what Epi said in the most recent post. You voted for me becasue of adverbs? Or becasue Sabie voted the same way I did? Again, as I told Epi, next time a baddie follows YOUR vote, you can rely on me to vote for you

Epignosis wrote:

S~V~S wrote:And i can't help what Sabie did. Next time a baddie follows YOUR vote in a game, Epi, I will point this out.

Have I used too many adverbs?

One adverb is often too many.

You may notice, that, despite my devil-may-care demeanor, I have not actually voted for you. Unfortunately, you continue to carry on as though the world is dead set against you. Pardon me.

(I hope everyone is reading my posts as a debonair southern gentleman from New Orleans in the 1920s)

I always react strongly to votes against me, or to people making cases against me. If I am to be lynched, I want the record clean and in the open in the thread.

I am not a baddie, and any kind of point that implies I am is a false point.

I am hoping to hear Elos actual reasons for voting me.

And i can't help what Sabie did. Next time a baddie follows YOUR vote in a game, Epi, I will point this out.

Have I used too many adverbs?

You have "read enough"? What exactly does that mean?

I want it out in the thread

Why? What have I said that makes you think I am bad?

Mr Boddy is not just a non killing Indy, he is a LMS. That means he wants everyone else dead. LAST MAN STANDING.

I am not a baddie, and don;t know who they are. I would prefer to lynch them, but I DO know who I think YOU are.

By allmeans lynch me, vote for me. It won;t help you much. I did not try to kill you, and i don;t know who did.

Since Epi & Mrs Epi might be voting me, I will hold my vote for now.

Canucklehead wrote:

Epignosis wrote:
What I find especially noteworthy is that sabie12 voted alongside you right after. She did so without posting. Eventually she came back and said this:

sabie12 wrote:Honestly I have no idea what's going on because I'm out and I just had to vote.

Of all the people on the list, all fourteen people, why MR? Why would someone who, for her first time being bad, follow your vote?

This is an interesting observation, Epi. It does seem a bit odd for sabie's "random" vote to follow SVS's. Perhaps sabie just glanced in the thread for the most recent vote and plopped hers there? Or perhaps she followed her teammate? It's definitely something to think about...

Of course, SVS can't be expected to account for or answer for someone else's actions, so I'm not sure how you expect her to respond to your questions....or are they just rhetorical?

But my vote was not random. At the time Sabie voted, she did not even have any votes. I would be more worried about later votes, not earlier ones, as save attempts, plus it's such a small baddie team.

Linki, lol, no. I don't have a kill this game. If I did I would not kill you first since I killed you first last time I had a kill. Llama had to write it as he did, or you would be revealed as Mr Boddy, IMO. I really think you are he. But I had nothing to do with the kill attempt on you.

No wait, lol, I can't. Time to reread.

Epignosis wrote:

Mister Rearranger wrote:So Epi, do you advocate voting SVS over a low-poster/vote-misser?

Cause I found myself agreeng with your earlier notion that a teammate maybe found among the Day 0/Day 1 low-posters.

I'm thinking it over.

Worried about how it will make you look when I flip civ?

I voted for MR for the exact reason I said, his early vote. Which is a fairly awesome reason for day one. And Mr Boddy attempted to direct my vote today. I said no way, and he published info about my role in the thread. Personally, I think Epi could be Mr Boddy, but I could be wrong. That died/survived thing along with Llamas not saying how non-kills would be portrayed makes me think that.

So i am going to vote Epi.

Epignosis wrote:

S~V~S wrote:Yes, it does. But a 6 in 7 chance of being good, and I am in fact good.

I would advise all civvies to not allow yourselves to be blackmailed. You have nothing to hide, just like i had nothing to hide.

Weeeelllll...more on this.

I am currently busy in the Dr. Who Memorial Library. I shall meet you in the Billiards room momentarily.

Gee we're playing in two games together and you are making moves at me in two games

Of all night powers, one of the ones I like least (when I am targeted by it) is the vote force. I love Llamas mechanism for allowing it to be circumvented. There was nothing Mr Boddy could possibly know about me to make me anything other than a civvie, so i had no fear of what he might say.

@Llama~ not sure if you already answered this, but does Mr Boddy have a kill? The role does not specify. Just the blackmail, and the survival of the first attempt on his life. Also, Llama, how are fail kills written?

Yes, it does. But a 6 in 7 chance of being good, and I am in fact good.

I would advise all civvies to not allow yourselves to be blackmailed. You have nothing to hide, just like i had nothing to hide.

Goodbye, Hello Epi

This highly raises the odds of you being trustworthy. While it is possible that you are Mr. Boddy, it is only 1 in 13 or so, which is pretty slim.

Also Mr Boddy, I do indeed have a male role, and do not respond well to blackmail Make of THAT what you will

MovingPictures07 wrote:Elo, she did vote Sabie... that was my point. How am I reaching? She clearly kept trying to push Sabie and MR's situations as being equal, once Sabie even entered the conversation, and before that she was clearly trying to push an MR vote.

Then she later votes Sabie and says Sabie's was the "most opportunistic" yet just three posts before she was essentially equating them in suspicion.

The thing about Bloopers vote, though, was that she was the third vote for Sabie, when MR had two and there were still several people to vote. That seems like a rash move for a teammate. But I have to agree with you regarding her posts. MR was not all that, I only voted for him because of his vote, becasue of the posting thing, i had no real suspicions of anyone at that point.

I asked my nephew, the fraternity brother, and it was not a good thing.

I never say no to brandy

Epignosis wrote:

S~V~S wrote:Yay! Awesome and unusual result for day one

Not unusual result when I'm around.

Don't even, lol

Yay! Awesome and unusual result for day one

That should have been "vote", not "cote"

And hopefully we all vote.

12

I don't want to cote for any nubs on Day One~ I do not want to go random either. I think I am going to vote MR for voting Epi so early.

10

No, actually, MP. The posting contest on day 1 has kinda confuzzled my radar totally.

8

I also have to make a quick decision, since I am not a fan of random.

6

OK, I was thinking 2 teams, but yeah, the poll.

4

Well, thanks for Clarity, Sir Llama. Your game your rules

3

I don't know, I think you should have to start over...

But it is what it is.

2

I thought Blogs meant they had to work together re posting?

This seems to be a trend recently, people thinking others are talking in thread like they are in a chat room. I do it too, but I have noticed more of that recently.

21

Why do you think he's bad? Theorizing? As a knocker, I don't love that theory, but it does make sense.

20

Absolutely not, darling. Do you have any thoughts on who is?

3