speedchuck wrote: ↑Tue Nov 21, 2017 1:54 pm
Kylemii wrote: ↑Tue Nov 21, 2017 12:40 am
We have an hour and a half left. The top three vote getters are Nutella, LC, and Jack.
If the best person to lynch today is anyone but one of those three then we need to decide that now before we get caught up in some vote-rush shenanigans
Dis post pinged me, you know what I'm sayin'?
Long Con wrote: ↑Tue Nov 21, 2017 1:58 pm
I don't know what you're saying; I don't feel the ping. Take me there.
Well, let's look at the post. What does it accomplish?
1. Reinforces the current lynch trains. If 0-1 of them are scum, then this is a decent move for scum. Having more than one scum in there is not likely. (Oh no, did I just assume their alignment? Don't even start with that.) Even with one scum in the three, it's easy to move away from one of them to make it between 2 people. Voters like having 2 options. Ask American politics.
2. Puts on a show of wanting an organized lynch, and of wanting participation, without actually adding anything to the reasons to lynch these three other than "they got votes on them already"
3. Vote rush shenanigans are chaotic, which might be good for scum . . . unless scum is composed of inactives or people not on that shortlist. In which case, a stable lynch is helpful. Townies should care more about who seems scummy rather than sticking to guns for the last hour and a half.
As for whether kyle agrees with looking at stable lynches, ask him for his opinion of Pirate Mafia D1.
Actually, I think someone has already done that.
Thus my ping