The Syndicate

I just wanted to be the best
like no one ever was

Any way we could get a deadchat somewhere? That'd be cool.

Good luck town!

I have a bad feeling about G-man too but want to keep him alive for a bit and see if he delivers on analysis.

I'm not voting in ties just to turn the most powerful civilian weapon we have, the lynch, into an unstable role analysis tool that kills the revealed player.

Not sure if all that makes sense.

But yeah, if the tie was decided like that, then that's cool.

boo wrote: ↑Wed Jun 28, 2017 6:19 pm
sprityo wrote: ↑Wed Jun 28, 2017 6:05 pm DDL, can you tell me in short the single glaring issue of why timmer is the better lynch candidate?
He's the skatiest of skating by type of baddies. Granted, I haven't played in about a year, but that's always been his style in games I've played with him when he has been bad. He has a much greater thread presence when he's civ. Even. If he's busy, which I can accept is possible and or likely, he puts more explanation into votes. He's done this two days in a row now, so it's not a one off. That's baddie Timmer. I think the fact that la is willing to chance seeing if I'm right, when she and I haven't been seeing eye to eye, says enough about his game from someone else who is familiar with him.

This is part of why I'm voting for him. Assuming people know his meta. He was around more in Blue Velvet. Until he went 3P. (Am I remembering right?)

Anyway, I don't want to lynch Boo, because even though I disagree with stuff he says, I feel like it all comes from town motive and perspective. It's a little like playing with... Quin maybe?

Less than three hours left. I'm going to be at church when the poll ends. And we still deal with no-shows and 7 people that aren't voting.

With you on that DDL

Yeah, I don't think I agree with the Boo lynch.

Fredwood wrote: ↑Wed Jun 28, 2017 11:23 am Speed's is more specific and open to debate (thought it's interesting to note that Dys isn't on this list)

Oh, yeah. Thanks for the tip. I'll add Dys to my mental list. Not to my previous one, because editing isn't allowed.

And sure, NK analysis isn't strong, but it's *something* worth looking into, for me at least. It'll get the ball rolling. It's looking likely that my vote will move around.

We're in a speed game, and there are already less than 11 hours left in D2. Clock is ticking.

Go ahead and throw votes down or provide reads or label your suspicions, people. We don't win mafia games by rushing last minute votes.

So nobody can go more than two. Same principle holds.

By the way, keep in mind: I think every pokemon has 2 evolutions. If someone gets over 6 points (we can't ask them or know for sure, but y'know. Estimate.) it isn't helpful.

Let's say that you form a triangle and everybody votes for each other (A good strategy. Beneficial and guarantees a certain amount.). Then don't do it for more than 3 nights. That would be stupid.

Is this right?

Darn. I wanted to keep Jack around.

Feel like Sprityo and Fredwood might have killed Jack n1. Maybe DDL. Gut feelz.

boo wrote: ↑Tue Jun 27, 2017 4:58 pm
nutella wrote: ↑Tue Jun 27, 2017 4:37 pm
boo wrote: ↑Tue Jun 27, 2017 4:35 pm
nutella wrote: ↑Tue Jun 27, 2017 4:10 pm I personally am not particularly impressed with Boo right now. He's twisting everything into an interpretation that fits his preconceived notion that I must be bad, and he keeps twisting beyond recognition what I have said about what I think baddie motives would do, when I have clearly explained why everything I have done makes total sense with civ motives. I was going to give my votes to Speed or LC anyway since I have been getting strong civ vibes from them; they just decided to make it into some official thing that I'm benefitting from by getting two evo points tonight. I'm happy to agree to that, because I think my role could be a pretty helpful one when it evolves. I have made no explicit promises to stay in their exchange for more than two nights, but I might if I continue to trust them. Boo has been willfully misinterpreting everything I have said on this topic.
No, I've quoted you contradicting yourself multiple times. I haven't twisted anything you have said, you have said things and then taken actions that are in direct contradiction to what anyone reading what you have said should rationally expect.

...No, that's just simply not true.
Prove it.

Burden of proof is on the accuser. Which is you.

I missed a good chunk of yesterday's end of day. Can I get a brief on what the Timmer case was? I'm assuming there wasn't one on Jack.

Long Con wrote: ↑Tue Jun 27, 2017 7:50 am
nutella wrote: ↑Tue Jun 27, 2017 2:09 amPoor presuming on your part. Speed and LC are the two players I trust most at this point (despite the fact that they missed the rule).
Cool, you just became the third Musketeer. We both choose you tonight and you alternate between us. Cool?

In.

Hope we aren't making ourselves a group target here, but whatev. If they kill someone early, that person is likely vanilla.

Epignosis wrote: ↑Mon Jun 26, 2017 11:38 pm No autocorrecting my name. That's a paddlin.

Whatever you say, Eli.

Aye, capn

For the most part, I either haven't seen you guys in a while or never have played with you. I feel bad voting to lynch basically anyone. Not much regarding reads has happened. Pah.

Fredwood wrote: ↑Mon Jun 26, 2017 3:24 pm
speedchuck wrote: ↑Mon Jun 26, 2017 3:12 pm Coordinating is not game-breaking. Sorry Jack.

But I must disagree. Coordinating, even without confirmed results, still provides RESULTS. And that's what we want. We want evolutions to happen. We want Raichus and Venasaur and Charizard and whatever else, I haven't played pokemon.
Rather accurate, all are evolved pokemons.

Though I wouldn't even know if half this list evolved...Gen 1 purist

Technically, I've barely played to the first tourney in Pokémon yellow, so I guess I can agree. The heck is a Pichu, right?

Coordinating is not game-breaking. Sorry Jack.

But I must disagree. Coordinating, even without confirmed results, still provides RESULTS. And that's what we want. We want evolutions to happen. We want Raichus and Venasaur and Charizard and whatever else, I haven't played pokemon.

Dragon D. Luffy wrote: ↑Mon Jun 26, 2017 2:27 pm Thunderdoming.

This is my new favoritest mafia term.

Theres a metal song with that name. Imma post it later.

I've seen so much thunderdoming on this site. I'm so glad I have a name for it.

linki: Apparently, Dom hasn't posted. Nevermind. Perhaps Dyslexicon instead?

It seems like a good idea.

Ey, Fredwood's online! What do you think, Fredwood?

Should we lynch Dom?

Neverwhere wrote: ↑Mon Jun 26, 2017 11:20 am
speedchuck wrote: ↑Mon Jun 26, 2017 11:17 am
Neverwhere wrote: ↑Mon Jun 26, 2017 10:59 am Well shit, sorry to Nutella who i accidentally lynched. Got confused about what that was.
I panicked for a second, but you only voted for nutella, didn't lynch her. And I think votes are changeable in this game.
You're going to hate me, can you explain the votes to me again? It's amazing how much I've forgotten in 2-3 years. So what is that vote for? Will there be another vote up for the lynch?

It is a vote for the lynch. But just a single vote.

At the deadline on the above poll, the player with the most votes will be lynched. You can change your vote at any time up till then. So it's not really something worth apologizing for. We'll all have votes on us at one point or another.

Neverwhere wrote: ↑Mon Jun 26, 2017 10:59 am Well shit, sorry to Nutella who i accidentally lynched. Got confused about what that was.

I panicked for a second, but you only voted for nutella, didn't lynch her. And I think votes are changeable in this game.

Well, that's done. I guess, if we did well, some people will have abilities this D1. That's cool.

Epignosis wrote: ↑Sun Jun 25, 2017 9:39 pm We are accepting votes until 8am EST tomorrow because of poor wording in one of the posts. Future evolution votes will occur during Night phases.

Cool. We might be able to coordinate.

And by we I mean you guys. Tell me who to vote for by tomorrow, and I'll try to get it in.

Dragon D. Luffy wrote: ↑Sun Jun 25, 2017 4:32 pm Oh nvm there are already people saying "fuck consensus" and sending their votes.

I sent my vote after the first list, and before objections. I'd like groupings of votes, and I don't care where they go.

sprityo wrote: ↑Sun Jun 25, 2017 4:22 pm nobody getting a power would be better than mafia.

Not really.

We've been through this, but basically: Mafia knows who the town are. Town doesn't know who the mafia are. So townies are looking for direction, info, and power, where mafia is looking for misdirection and power.

Mafia powers hardly matter unless town has powers too.

I sent in my points to LC, who was on the first list. I hope at least some people will follow the lists. Anything to group points is better for town than not. We can plan better when more people check in and night one approaches.

G-Man wrote: ↑Sun Jun 25, 2017 2:56 pm
G-Man wrote: ↑Sun Jun 25, 2017 2:49 pm
speedchuck wrote: ↑Sun Jun 25, 2017 2:06 pm Anybody disagree with "Fred, Tony, LC, Nutella, Speed" as the list of five preferred Evo's on Day 0?

I already threw my vote in there. If someone doesn't want me in there because I helped come up with the idea, swap me out for Sprityo maybe. But unless there are objections, this'll do for D0.

On N1, we can do public assigning.
If I understand you right, your Evolve Vote list is comprised of people you feel inclined to trust based on prior experience with them?
Is my understanding correct?

*kicks iphone for quote fail*

Ask JoH. He came up with the list.

I wouldn't come up with a list and put myself on it. And I'm perfectly fine with having a list of 6.

Anybody disagree with "Fred, Tony, LC, Nutella, Speed" as the list of five preferred Evo's on Day 0?

I already threw my vote in there. If someone doesn't want me in there because I helped come up with the idea, swap me out for Sprityo maybe. But unless there are objections, this'll do for D0.

On N1, we can do public assigning.

Dyslexicon wrote: ↑Sun Jun 25, 2017 1:52 pm
speedchuck wrote: ↑Sun Jun 25, 2017 1:48 pm I also don't think we have time to organize, but what if we bias the game to get role powers for people?

Like, form a pool of six-ish candidates and encourage people to throw their points into that pool?
Time when? For N1?
If you narrow down to six candidates it would be much better to just assign who votes for who so all six would be boosted. If you do it half way then chances are only a couple or three of those people would evolve. Why not do it all the way?

Nah, for Day 0. Like, right now.

Night 1 would work with assigned votes.

linki: sounds good, JoH

I also don't think we have time to organize, but what if we bias the game to get role powers for people?

Like, form a pool of six-ish candidates and encourage people to throw their points into that pool?

My first game with no role-claiming. I'll be interested in seeing how this goes.

Do evolve me rather than Jack. He doesn't even want it. And I play like crap when I'm vanilla. See: Every game I've ever evered. If you want good speedchuck, you'll evolve speedchuck into good speedchuck.

Cool. Who wants to pile all the points on one person?

The Syndicate

Search found 38 matches

Re: Pokemon Mafia [Night 9]

Re: Pokemon Mafia [Day 4]

Re: Pokemon Mafia [Day 3]

Re: Pokemon Mafia [Night 2]

Re: Pokemon Mafia [Night 2]

Re: Pokemon Mafia [Day 2]

Re: Pokemon Mafia [Day 2]

Re: Pokemon Mafia [Day 2]

Re: Pokemon Mafia [Day 2]

Re: Pokemon Mafia [Day 2]

Re: Pokemon Mafia [Day 2]

Re: Pokemon Mafia [Day 2]

Re: Pokemon Mafia [Day 2]

Re: Pokemon Mafia [Day 2]

Re: Pokemon Mafia [Night 1]

Re: Pokemon Mafia [Night 1]

Re: Pokemon Mafia [Night 1]

Re: Pokemon Mafia [Night 1]

Re: Pokemon Mafia [Night 1]

Re: Pokemon Mafia [Day 1]

Re: Pokemon Mafia [Day 1]

Re: Pokemon Mafia [Day 1]

Re: Pokemon Mafia [Day 1]

Re: Pokemon Mafia [Day 1]

Re: Pokemon Mafia [Day 1]

Re: Pokemon Mafia [Day 1]

Re: Pokemon Mafia [Day 1]

Re: Pokemon Mafia [Day 1]

Re: Pokemon Mafia [Day 1]

Re: Pokemon Mafia [Day 1]

Re: Pokemon Mafia [Day 0]

Re: Pokemon Mafia [Day 0]

Re: Pokemon Mafia [Day 0]

Re: Pokemon Mafia [Day 0]

Re: Pokemon Mafia [Day 0]

Re: Pokemon Mafia [Day 0]

Re: Pokemon Mafia [Day 0]

Re: Pokemon Mafia [Day 0]