The Syndicate

speedchuck wrote: ↑Thu Jun 21, 2018 11:01 pm LET ME KNOW IF I FORGOT ANY RESULTS

Quin wrote: ↑Wed Jun 20, 2018 9:57 pm [VOTE: lunalee] aubergine

Quin wrote: ↑Wed Jun 20, 2018 9:55 pm cos guess what y'all?

im the real cop's message boy. and i sure as hell ain't working for you, lunalee.

Golden wrote: ↑Wed Jun 20, 2018 7:23 pm

Epignosis wrote: ↑Wed Jun 20, 2018 7:01 pmGolden's entire analysis is predicated on sig being bad. In everything I've seen from Lunalee, it's as though she takes for granted that sig was bad, and she knew it. Because if someone wants to have a go at me for my interactions with someone who has an unknown alignment, I'll flip tables. I see no table flipping.

But please, discuss the other section (or this one) if you will.

I'm not persuaded that Luna is a table-flipping kind of person, and I also don't see anything which suggests pre-knowledge that sig is bad (as opposed to just presuming it, which is sort of necessary to respond to my case), but do you see something in particular that I'm missing?

Epignosis wrote: ↑Wed Jun 20, 2018 7:17 pm

Lunalee wrote: ↑Wed Jun 20, 2018 7:16 pm

Epignosis wrote: ↑Wed Jun 20, 2018 7:13 pm *A cover up for what?

A cover-up for a more sinister role.

And "doctor" was the best anybody could do?

Epignosis wrote: ↑Wed Jun 20, 2018 7:13 pm *A cover up for what?

Spacedaisy wrote: ↑Wed Jun 20, 2018 6:49 pm Fine. You all win, I'll do what you want. Against my own feelings on this. [VOTE: lunalee] aubergine

You have someone who has claimed openly to not be civ aligned, and you want to believe them and possibly allow them the space to do what they want. We'll see how this goes. I hope you all are right.

Quin wrote: ↑Wed Jun 20, 2018 5:38 pm

Lunalee wrote: ↑Wed Jun 20, 2018 11:01 am

Quin wrote: ↑Tue Jun 19, 2018 11:27 pm

ColinIsCool wrote: ↑Tue Jun 19, 2018 11:18 pm Do we really think there are three town-aligned doctors in this game?

nah

This bothers me too. Wasn't it MacDougal, Scotty, and Epi? One of them may get my vote today.

meh. they don't have to be bad.

sprityo wrote: ↑Wed Jun 20, 2018 3:38 pm i also group turniphead with luna in that they havent done anything worthy to not be lynched as far as ive read

Quin wrote: ↑Tue Jun 19, 2018 11:27 pm

ColinIsCool wrote: ↑Tue Jun 19, 2018 11:18 pm Do we really think there are three town-aligned doctors in this game?

nah

Epignosis wrote: ↑Wed Jun 20, 2018 12:34 am I would lynch either lapluie or INH. I stand by my Zeph thing and lapluie is tied to that. INH needs to work on his script. Also, I don't think he's a civilian. He called himself "not a threat to the civilians" and no amount of shit he can throw at me in his script means that's the same thing as addressing the civilians in the third person. He called himself "not a threat to the civilians."

Golden wrote: ↑Wed Jun 20, 2018 6:03 am A brief Luna/sig interactive iso. Luna has a total of 19 posts before Quin dropped his bombshell, including:

Spoiler: show

Lunalee wrote: ↑Thu Jun 14, 2018 10:22 am @sig , what's with that "poker face" smiley you keep using?

Lunalee wrote: ↑Sat Jun 16, 2018 11:04 pm @sig , @Quin , if you're going to self-vote, at least give us a good reason to support you or not.

Lunalee wrote: ↑Sun Jun 17, 2018 3:20 pm

sig wrote: ↑Sun Jun 17, 2018 12:35 pm

speedchuck wrote: ↑Sun Jun 17, 2018 12:33 pm Night is half over and I'm missing a loooooot of night actions.

Never submit night actions that's my policy. Why hide your actions? I never do I'll tell you straight up what I plan to do. Which is why a vote for sig is a vote for open night actions. No more hiding no more fear no more control. Vote Sig a player you can trust.

Sig, your campaigning is gold. I'm voting for you. I believe I can count on you to sign that Bill of Rights with the most beautiful signature

[VOTE: sig] aubergine

Lunalee wrote: ↑Sun Jun 17, 2018 11:08 pm Haha, bravo sig.

These quotes account for my 'gut feel' of luna being a teammate of sig. They have a 'team banter' vibe to them.

After Quin's bombshell, Luna's next two posts are:

Spoiler: show

Lunalee wrote: ↑Mon Jun 18, 2018 7:48 pm

Golden wrote: ↑Mon Jun 18, 2018 6:45 pm

sig wrote: ↑Mon Jun 18, 2018 6:40 pmEither way the idea of lynching me since I said I couldn't be lynched doesn't seem townie.

And this is complete bullshit

I called your bluff and now you're worried.

Glad I called it.

I think there's a decent chance you are a baddie who gains in power over time, and you're trying to delay being lynched for some reason. You've made claims of being indestructible and said you weren't worried about your campaign putting a target on your back for that reason. You said you weren't worried about being lynched because you won't be lynched. But I can smell the fear on your breath from here.

This is what I was thinking. It might be safest to lynch sig.

Lunalee wrote: ↑Mon Jun 18, 2018 10:11 pm Wait, why are you folks lynching sig? I need to catch up.

That's a very strange backtrack.

And then we get this progression:

Spoiler: show

Lunalee wrote: ↑Tue Jun 19, 2018 2:14 pm

sig wrote: ↑Tue Jun 19, 2018 10:33 am

Spoiler: show

MacDougall wrote: ↑Tue Jun 19, 2018 12:07 am Sig is your apparent inability to be lynched literally just today that it won't work?

Oh it'll work whenever I want, but it would be a waste for it to be used today. I won't have enough time in this timeline to make it worthwhile basically.

MacDougall wrote: ↑Mon Jun 18, 2018 11:12 pm

sig wrote: ↑Mon Jun 18, 2018 11:09 pm

MacDougall wrote: ↑Mon Jun 18, 2018 11:06 pm Sig are you a civilian? Yes or no?

If you are a civilian what will be the outcome of lynching you today? Is the outcome positive or negative? Why?

If you are a civilian does your continued existence beyond day 3 reap any benefit to the civilian cause?

Yes

there's no outcome of lynching me today since it won't happen but if it did it would be negative since you'd loose a civ, but there wouldn't be some cataclysmic event

yes in the sense that I'd be here to post and engage. However, it's not like some role actives if I'm alive after day 3.

Also I think y'all might've read a little bit to deep into my d/n 1 posts.

So if we attempt to lynch you today, it just fails? Or it redirects? Does the second person get lynched instead? What do you expect the outcome to be? Just your continued existence and a fart video?

So you are saying that all of your role stops being relevant come day 3?

If you are a civilian then us wasting a lynch on you here is a bad idea. Given we have several other people who have role claimed, perhaps the civilian duty you have here is to actually just enlighten us as to what it is that you do?

1. Everything resets and I leave you all for a better land BUT I wouldn't have been lynched.

2. No my role is relevant until I use it

3. I told you I can't be lynched that's my role power.

IF you try you fail and the timeline will be disrupted resulting in chaos. Or that's the theory anyway.

Also just to be clear if you tried to lynhc me day 3 it would also fail, but it would've been the optimal time for me to active my power. Or that's what I thought at first.

I don't really want to lynch sig today. I didn't know quite what to think of his claims earlier, but now I feel like he's being genuine.

Lunalee wrote: ↑Tue Jun 19, 2018 2:16 pm Also, I thought it was basically confirmed that INH was third-party. Is that a problem for town? Why is he tied with sig? I feel like we can do better than this.

Lunalee wrote: ↑Tue Jun 19, 2018 2:22 pm

Epignosis wrote: ↑Mon Jun 18, 2018 11:35 pm Let's do something more fun.

sig and INH are Booker DeWitt and Comstock. That is to say, both have been swept away by the Luteces. They're not here.

Who gets your vote and why?

Yes, I want to step away from the sig and INH drama. I feel it is distracting us from actually getting a scum lynch. Didn't Quin start this whole thing? I don't know if I want to keep Quin around. I feel like he introduced a class-A distraction to get suspicions off of his team.

I think potentially the worst look in here is 'I feel like we can do better than this' when we've been presented with a potential 50/50 shot. What's the size of the team - 3 or 4? So you'd have no more than a 25% shot the rest of the time...

Then:

Lunalee wrote: ↑Tue Jun 19, 2018 2:30 pm [VOTE: Quin] aubergine [citation]

and

Lunalee wrote: ↑Tue Jun 19, 2018 3:52 pm I'm going to put my vote on INH because I don't like how defensive he got about his role. But that makes a tie between him and sig. Ugh.

It's worth noting that last post is AFTER sig triggered the event but before it took place.

Looking through Luna's iso as a whole, I tend to find that she is team compatible with sig, and that's where my vote is going for now.

[VOTE: Lunalee] aubergine

Golden wrote: ↑Tue Jun 19, 2018 5:30 pm I have to say I don’t agree with inhs case on Luna, same behaviour as Ancient Greece, but I independently see her as compatible with a bad sig.

Kylemii wrote: ↑Tue Jun 19, 2018 4:56 pm hey what time does this phase end? im s little behind here and I need to know when to budget my time for ketchup

ColinIsCool wrote: ↑Tue Jun 19, 2018 2:33 pm

Lunalee wrote: ↑Tue Jun 19, 2018 2:22 pm

Epignosis wrote: ↑Mon Jun 18, 2018 11:35 pm Let's do something more fun.

sig and INH are Booker DeWitt and Comstock. That is to say, both have been swept away by the Luteces. They're not here.

Who gets your vote and why?

Yes, I want to step away from the sig and INH drama. I feel it is distracting us from actually getting a scum lynch. Didn't Quin start this whole thing? I don't know if I want to keep Quin around. I feel like he introduced a class-A distraction to get suspicions off of his team.

Why would scum Quin feel the need to gambit this hard D2? Who is “his team”?

Turnip Head wrote: ↑Tue Jun 19, 2018 2:26 pm I'm tossing Mac's name out there and I'm going all-in

Turnip Head wrote: ↑Tue Jun 19, 2018 2:20 pm I mean where did INH claim 3P?

Epignosis wrote: ↑Mon Jun 18, 2018 11:35 pm Let's do something more fun.

sig and INH are Booker DeWitt and Comstock. That is to say, both have been swept away by the Luteces. They're not here.

Who gets your vote and why?

sig wrote: ↑Tue Jun 19, 2018 10:33 am

Spoiler: show

MacDougall wrote: ↑Tue Jun 19, 2018 12:07 am Sig is your apparent inability to be lynched literally just today that it won't work?

Oh it'll work whenever I want, but it would be a waste for it to be used today. I won't have enough time in this timeline to make it worthwhile basically.

MacDougall wrote: ↑Mon Jun 18, 2018 11:12 pm

sig wrote: ↑Mon Jun 18, 2018 11:09 pm

MacDougall wrote: ↑Mon Jun 18, 2018 11:06 pm Sig are you a civilian? Yes or no?

If you are a civilian what will be the outcome of lynching you today? Is the outcome positive or negative? Why?

If you are a civilian does your continued existence beyond day 3 reap any benefit to the civilian cause?

Yes

there's no outcome of lynching me today since it won't happen but if it did it would be negative since you'd loose a civ, but there wouldn't be some cataclysmic event

yes in the sense that I'd be here to post and engage. However, it's not like some role actives if I'm alive after day 3.

Also I think y'all might've read a little bit to deep into my d/n 1 posts.

So if we attempt to lynch you today, it just fails? Or it redirects? Does the second person get lynched instead? What do you expect the outcome to be? Just your continued existence and a fart video?

So you are saying that all of your role stops being relevant come day 3?

If you are a civilian then us wasting a lynch on you here is a bad idea. Given we have several other people who have role claimed, perhaps the civilian duty you have here is to actually just enlighten us as to what it is that you do?

1. Everything resets and I leave you all for a better land BUT I wouldn't have been lynched.

2. No my role is relevant until I use it

3. I told you I can't be lynched that's my role power.

IF you try you fail and the timeline will be disrupted resulting in chaos. Or that's the theory anyway.

Also just to be clear if you tried to lynhc me day 3 it would also fail, but it would've been the optimal time for me to active my power. Or that's what I thought at first.

Golden wrote: ↑Mon Jun 18, 2018 11:34 pm

Lunalee wrote: ↑Mon Jun 18, 2018 11:30 pm

Golden wrote: ↑Mon Jun 18, 2018 11:22 pm Scotty is both town and doctor.

How are you so sure of that?

My entire role was literally 'find scotty', I just didn't know it was scotty, until I did.

Golden wrote: ↑Mon Jun 18, 2018 11:22 pm Scotty is both town and doctor.

Golden wrote: ↑Mon Jun 18, 2018 10:50 pm Now I'm worried about what luna does to speedchuck in the privacy of their own home when speed puts timers on the polls. I feel like we've walked in on something.

speedchuck wrote: ↑Mon Jun 18, 2018 10:42 pm

Lunalee wrote: ↑Mon Jun 18, 2018 10:38 pm @speedchuck can you please put an end-time on these polls?

Golden wrote: ↑Mon Jun 18, 2018 10:42 pm

Spoiler: show

Lunalee wrote: ↑Mon Jun 18, 2018 10:35 pm

Golden wrote: ↑Mon Jun 18, 2018 10:33 pm

Lunalee wrote: ↑Mon Jun 18, 2018 10:31 pm

Golden wrote: ↑Mon Jun 18, 2018 8:40 pm

Quin wrote: ↑Mon Jun 18, 2018 8:34 pm

sig wrote: ↑Mon Jun 18, 2018 2:57 pm @Quin



IS this still true in your mind?

ye



Why

Also could you explain your note a bit more? And why we should trust some random message.

Golden was quick to deny my info-dump before. Feels like he's your teammate and was protecting you.

No, I was quick to challenge it.

How many times do I have to say that I NEVER PROTECT TEAMMATES. Literally never because it is the stupidest thing to do.

Go read Economics, where I bussed my entire team early and rode it to the end. That's how you win as scum. Not protecting someone who had just been outed as having a 50% chance of being bad.

If you think you should get to say something and everyone just believe it without asking questions, you've got another think coming.

I would still keep a look out for WIFOM-Golden defending his team mates because he'll think we think he knows better.

If I thought that I wouldn't have to keep reminding people when they suspect me for the opposite.

Which is why you absolutely would have to remind people of your meta tendency to bus teammates for your ploy to work.

Luna, trust me when I say this...

Telling people things never makes them listen. You have to prove it to them over games and games and games before you can flip your meta on them. And it's only worth doing it in circumstances where it's particularly meaningful, because it undoes sooo much work, and you have to start building new metas from scratch.

When I bussed people in Economics, it worked particular well because I NEVER bussed people. It still works because of the way people perceive me. I can get a lot of civ cred through leading a successful lynch if I play my cards right. But also, it partly works because I frequently successfully lead lynches when town, too, so I'm 'on meta'.

I will flip my meta on people one day. But it won't be a day when I'm reminding you of the meta I'm going to flip on you, I promise you. I know enough to know I can never convince you of what I'm telling you and betray it all in the same game - you saw how hard I had to fight just to get people to pick a different poll option on a non-important poll in U-Pick. It's not that easy to get people to listen to what you're saying. I cultivate meta as a long con, not a short con, because that's what builds the successful flip.

(Plus, there's no value to me ruining my meta in that way in a game like this. I could just as easily defend my teammates given they wouldn't flip bad, and then claim I chose to play this game differently because of the different set up which enabled me to do it, but that it isn't a shift in my meta, just a particular circumstance that required different play).

Golden wrote: ↑Mon Jun 18, 2018 10:33 pm

Lunalee wrote: ↑Mon Jun 18, 2018 10:31 pm

Golden wrote: ↑Mon Jun 18, 2018 8:40 pm

Quin wrote: ↑Mon Jun 18, 2018 8:34 pm

sig wrote: ↑Mon Jun 18, 2018 2:57 pm @Quin

Quin wrote: ↑Fri Jun 15, 2018 2:31 am nutella is a civ and either one of mac and golden is bad

IS this still true in your mind?

ye

Quin wrote: ↑Mon Jun 18, 2018 12:36 am I'm currently thinking about a sig/Golden team.

Why

Also could you explain your note a bit more? And why we should trust some random message.

Golden was quick to deny my info-dump before. Feels like he's your teammate and was protecting you.

No, I was quick to challenge it.

How many times do I have to say that I NEVER PROTECT TEAMMATES. Literally never because it is the stupidest thing to do.

Go read Economics, where I bussed my entire team early and rode it to the end. That's how you win as scum. Not protecting someone who had just been outed as having a 50% chance of being bad.

If you think you should get to say something and everyone just believe it without asking questions, you've got another think coming.

I would still keep a look out for WIFOM-Golden defending his team mates because he'll think we think he knows better.

If I thought that I wouldn't have to keep reminding people when they suspect me for the opposite.

sig wrote: ↑Mon Jun 18, 2018 10:27 pm

Lunalee wrote: ↑Mon Jun 18, 2018 10:26 pm @insertnamehere and @sig , assuming Quin has been mis-led by this pm, do you think it likely that you could both be aligned?

If he was mislead it would be by mafia so we're both not mafia yeah.

He could be indy, but i doubt it.

Golden wrote: ↑Mon Jun 18, 2018 8:40 pm

Quin wrote: ↑Mon Jun 18, 2018 8:34 pm

sig wrote: ↑Mon Jun 18, 2018 2:57 pm @Quin

Quin wrote: ↑Fri Jun 15, 2018 2:31 am nutella is a civ and either one of mac and golden is bad

IS this still true in your mind?

ye

Quin wrote: ↑Mon Jun 18, 2018 12:36 am I'm currently thinking about a sig/Golden team.

Why

Also could you explain your note a bit more? And why we should trust some random message.

Golden was quick to deny my info-dump before. Feels like he's your teammate and was protecting you.

No, I was quick to challenge it.

How many times do I have to say that I NEVER PROTECT TEAMMATES. Literally never because it is the stupidest thing to do.

Go read Economics, where I bussed my entire team early and rode it to the end. That's how you win as scum. Not protecting someone who had just been outed as having a 50% chance of being bad.

If you think you should get to say something and everyone just believe it without asking questions, you've got another think coming.

sig wrote: ↑Mon Jun 18, 2018 10:17 pm Like I'm honestly shocked that in a role madness closed set up game everyone's just believing some random PM with information.

Golden wrote: ↑Mon Jun 18, 2018 6:45 pm

sig wrote: ↑Mon Jun 18, 2018 6:40 pmEither way the idea of lynching me since I said I couldn't be lynched doesn't seem townie.

And this is complete bullshit

I called your bluff and now you're worried.

Glad I called it.

I think there's a decent chance you are a baddie who gains in power over time, and you're trying to delay being lynched for some reason. You've made claims of being indestructible and said you weren't worried about your campaign putting a target on your back for that reason. You said you weren't worried about being lynched because you won't be lynched. But I can smell the fear on your breath from here.

Turnip Head wrote: ↑Sun Jun 17, 2018 4:07 pm @Lunalee would you like to be president sometime? And do you think you might campaign a tad less obnoxiously than sig has?

I'm looking for a new horse to back. I've got a lot riding on who's in charge round these parts, you see. Both today AND tomorrow AND yesterday

sig wrote: ↑Sun Jun 17, 2018 12:35 pm

speedchuck wrote: ↑Sun Jun 17, 2018 12:33 pm Night is half over and I'm missing a loooooot of night actions.

Never submit night actions that's my policy. Why hide your actions? I never do I'll tell you straight up what I plan to do. Which is why a vote for sig is a vote for open night actions. No more hiding no more fear no more control. Vote Sig a player you can trust.

Quin wrote: ↑Sat Jun 16, 2018 11:13 pm

Epignosis wrote: ↑Sat Jun 16, 2018 11:12 pm

sig wrote: ↑Sat Jun 16, 2018 11:08 pm

Quin wrote: ↑Sat Jun 16, 2018 10:55 pm elect me please i'm gonna make the syndicate great again™

Build bridges not walls

an accurate representation of sig's leadership ability

Scotty wrote: ↑Sat Jun 16, 2018 8:41 am

Zephyrus wrote: ↑Sat Jun 16, 2018 8:24 am

Scotty wrote: ↑Sat Jun 16, 2018 7:40 am

Spoiler: show

Zephyrus wrote: ↑Sat Jun 16, 2018 7:04 am

Scotty wrote: ↑Fri Jun 15, 2018 4:48 pm

Zephyrus wrote: ↑Fri Jun 15, 2018 4:18 pm

Epignosis wrote: ↑Fri Jun 15, 2018 2:56 pm

I can only conclude from this that you have no suspects.

Yeah. I'm never any good on day one.
I guess it's time to work on that, though.

What do you base your D1 votes on?

Well, I normally do an initial lynch on people to get them talking, and then I'll vote for the person who seems scummiest or whose lynch will yield the most information.

Choutas wrote: ↑Fri Jun 15, 2018 5:51 pm

nutella wrote: ↑Thu Jun 14, 2018 11:43 pm Yeah I don't suspect zephyrus but if y'all wanna bite Epi's bait I'm watching

Why don't you suspect him? Wasn't that a weird ass post? I posted the same thing as scum last game and everybody called my bullshit.
He's suss as sin.

I've explained that I was busy with exams. All I did was make a post hyping up the thread and showing that I'm alive. It's hardly suss as sin.
And, if you're talking about me voting lapluie, read above.

lapluie wrote: ↑Fri Jun 15, 2018 11:37 pm Wow could you at least @ me if ur gonna lynch me zyph thx

Sorry.

I normally do an initial lynch on people to get them talking
I lol’d. Good one, even though I’m sure this isn’t a joke.

Do you feel like your lynch of lapluie is getting him talking? Right now it appears that you ordered Haricots Verts with the expectation of cake and when the green beans show up you just nod and continue patiently waiting on your cake.

I just thought I'd give them a little more time. Chill.
@lapluie, who do you think is scummy? Answer quick, because I'm getting into loads of trouble.

I’m chilling, I have a fan blowing on my feet

Also what does it mean to vote for someone on D1 that will yield the most information? That’s a catch-all reasoning, because lynching anyone yields the most information. We have no information.

I don’t believe that you actually care about what lapluie has to say. By your own admission, you have no suspects.

Might want to at least look at some more people, ZMan (can I call you ZMan?)

MacDougall wrote: ↑Fri Jun 15, 2018 10:23 pm Luna do you think ColinIsCool?

Scotty wrote: ↑Fri Jun 15, 2018 10:23 pm @Lunalee how would you describe your scum game in a few descriptive words, seeing as we were just scummates and you’ve finally dipped your toes in the mildewy side of the pond?

Epignosis wrote: ↑Thu Jun 14, 2018 10:41 pm

Zephyrus wrote: ↑Wed Jun 13, 2018 2:00 pm
Let's do some time stuff!

Invited people to do stuff.

Has done nothing.

[VOTE: Zephyrus] aubergine

Epignosis wrote: ↑Thu Jun 14, 2018 10:59 pmWho objects?

Scotty wrote: ↑Wed Jun 13, 2018 7:01 pm

Epignosis wrote: ↑Wed Jun 13, 2018 7:01 pm

Scotty wrote: ↑Wed Jun 13, 2018 6:59 pm

Golden wrote: ↑Wed Jun 13, 2018 6:30 pm

Turnip Head wrote: ↑Wed Jun 13, 2018 4:59 pm What happens if we run into a version of ourselves from the past?

Did your past self meet you? If not, then this can't happen.

There's only three plausible options:

1) There is a singular universe, and so your experience of the past is exactly what happened; or
2) There is a multiverse, in which case if you meet a version of yourself from the past, that person is not you; or
3) There will be plot holes in your life story.

Don't forget, retrocausality is about the future effecting the past. So, it's possible you could create the multiverse, but it's also entirely possible that the point of this game is to demonstrate that retrocausality is an illusion designed to keep you pacified.

*affecting

Golden's use of "effecting" is correct.

*currect

Golden wrote: ↑Fri Jun 15, 2018 10:26 pm

Lunalee wrote: ↑Fri Jun 15, 2018 10:24 pm

Golden wrote: ↑Thu Jun 14, 2018 11:09 pm At the moment I don't have a great number of reads. But I have active town reads on Kyle, sig, and probably Mac

@Golden , do you really have such a good handle on people's metas that you can "town read" Kyle, sig and Mac on day one? Seems strange to me.

No.

Reads are always subject to change. I’m not going to hold off making them because I might be wrong.

Golden wrote: ↑Thu Jun 14, 2018 11:09 pm At the moment I don't have a great number of reads. But I have active town reads on Kyle, sig, and probably Mac

Epignosis wrote: ↑Fri Jun 15, 2018 3:21 pm

Lunalee wrote: ↑Fri Jun 15, 2018 3:13 pm

Epignosis wrote: ↑Fri Jun 15, 2018 2:56 pm

Zephyrus wrote: ↑Fri Jun 15, 2018 12:00 pm

ColinIsCool wrote: ↑Fri Jun 15, 2018 8:33 am Zephyrus and Quin, who do you think we should lynch?

lapluie. If I'm going to be lynched on the grounds that I'm not contributing, let's not pretend I'm the only one.
[VOTE: lapluie] aubergine

I can only conclude from this that you have no suspects.

But really, how can anyone have suspects on day 1?

Who is getting your vote today and why?