The Syndicate

Jackofhearts2005 wrote: ↑Tue Oct 29, 2019 4:29 pm Nanook is a dirty dirty bet welcher.

I know right

From the 5 posts of TL thay I’ve read he seemed townie.

I suspect this sort of thing happens to him a lot when he plays outside his home community but who am I to stop you from ignoring the obvious scum in order to kill sweet TL instead.

vanity. wrote: ↑Tue Oct 29, 2019 4:17 pm i could kill drago here i think

That’s the spirit

Jackofhearts2005 wrote: ↑Tue Oct 29, 2019 4:17 pm

NANOOKTHEGREATANDFEARSOME wrote: ↑Tue Oct 29, 2019 4:11 pm

Jackofhearts2005 wrote: ↑Tue Oct 29, 2019 3:53 pm

NANOOKTHEGREATANDFEARSOME wrote: ↑Tue Oct 29, 2019 3:41 pm

nutella wrote: ↑Tue Oct 29, 2019 3:39 pm @NANOOKTHEGREATANDFEARSOME why the fuck is your vote still on me. I don't believe you have any reads of your own since you sheeped that for no reason and don't seem to have taken any stances since. Do you actually suspect me or do you just have zero original thpughts

I think you’re town but a bet is a bet

Oof.

So you’re scum or not playing to your wincon.

Cool cool.

Counterpoint: getting people to sheep me is good for my wincon

Counter counterpoint: If I respond to this, Nutella will think I’m buddying you and also, this is pretty bullshit so maybe I’ll vote you in a minute.

Go for it chief, whatever makes you happy

With a little cursing, there’s nothing that can’t be accomplished.

Wholesome af tbh

nutella wrote: ↑Tue Oct 29, 2019 4:14 pm

NANOOKTHEGREATANDFEARSOME wrote: ↑Tue Oct 29, 2019 4:13 pm Cause tbh I’d vote them over you even with the bet

Drago maybe. Texas nah.

Cool, let’s do that then!

[VOTE: Dragomir] aubergine

nutella wrote: ↑Tue Oct 29, 2019 4:13 pm

NANOOKTHEGREATANDFEARSOME wrote: ↑Tue Oct 29, 2019 4:11 pm

Jackofhearts2005 wrote: ↑Tue Oct 29, 2019 3:53 pm

NANOOKTHEGREATANDFEARSOME wrote: ↑Tue Oct 29, 2019 3:41 pm

nutella wrote: ↑Tue Oct 29, 2019 3:39 pm @NANOOKTHEGREATANDFEARSOME why the fuck is your vote still on me. I don't believe you have any reads of your own since you sheeped that for no reason and don't seem to have taken any stances since. Do you actually suspect me or do you just have zero original thpughts

I think you’re town but a bet is a bet

Oof.

So you’re scum or not playing to your wincon.

Cool cool.

Counterpoint: getting people to sheep me is good for my wincon

So you want to sacrifice a townie who has frankly contributed a lot more content than you for the sake of having cred. If that is good for your wincon then your wincon must not be a town one.

You have a very narrow view of how the game works but ok, go off

Cause tbh I’d vote them over you even with the bet

nutella wrote: ↑Tue Oct 29, 2019 4:11 pm

NANOOKTHEGREATANDFEARSOME wrote: ↑Tue Oct 29, 2019 4:09 pm

nutella wrote: ↑Tue Oct 29, 2019 3:46 pm

NANOOKTHEGREATANDFEARSOME wrote: ↑Tue Oct 29, 2019 3:41 pm

nutella wrote: ↑Tue Oct 29, 2019 3:39 pm @NANOOKTHEGREATANDFEARSOME why the fuck is your vote still on me. I don't believe you have any reads of your own since you sheeped that for no reason and don't seem to have taken any stances since. Do you actually suspect me or do you just have zero original thpughts

I think you’re town but a bet is a bet

Garbage reason to vote someone. Anti-town. Screw the bet it's dumb and LLD doesn't deserve that kind of positive feedback rn.

I mean

If you wanna make the same bet on someone I’m game

I just want sheeple to follow my wisdom when I start paying attention

No, I don't. This bet thing is anti-town. Don't do it.

Are you gonna vote drago or Texas with me?

Jackofhearts2005 wrote: ↑Tue Oct 29, 2019 3:53 pm

NANOOKTHEGREATANDFEARSOME wrote: ↑Tue Oct 29, 2019 3:41 pm

nutella wrote: ↑Tue Oct 29, 2019 3:39 pm @NANOOKTHEGREATANDFEARSOME why the fuck is your vote still on me. I don't believe you have any reads of your own since you sheeped that for no reason and don't seem to have taken any stances since. Do you actually suspect me or do you just have zero original thpughts

I think you’re town but a bet is a bet

Oof.

So you’re scum or not playing to your wincon.

Cool cool.

Counterpoint: getting people to sheep me is good for my wincon

nutella wrote: ↑Tue Oct 29, 2019 3:46 pm

NANOOKTHEGREATANDFEARSOME wrote: ↑Tue Oct 29, 2019 3:41 pm

nutella wrote: ↑Tue Oct 29, 2019 3:39 pm @NANOOKTHEGREATANDFEARSOME why the fuck is your vote still on me. I don't believe you have any reads of your own since you sheeped that for no reason and don't seem to have taken any stances since. Do you actually suspect me or do you just have zero original thpughts

I think you’re town but a bet is a bet

Garbage reason to vote someone. Anti-town. Screw the bet it's dumb and LLD doesn't deserve that kind of positive feedback rn.

I mean

If you wanna make the same bet on someone I’m game

I just want sheeple to follow my wisdom when I start paying attention

Texas Cloverleaf wrote: ↑Tue Oct 29, 2019 3:26 pm Like the amount of time spent arguing could have at least been spent trying to obvtown if you aren't going to solve

I use my time the way I choose to that will help me the most, and you can fuck off telling me how I “should” be using it.

nutella wrote: ↑Tue Oct 29, 2019 3:39 pm @NANOOKTHEGREATANDFEARSOME why the fuck is your vote still on me. I don't believe you have any reads of your own since you sheeped that for no reason and don't seem to have taken any stances since. Do you actually suspect me or do you just have zero original thpughts

I think you’re town but a bet is a bet

Texas Cloverleaf wrote: ↑Tue Oct 29, 2019 3:22 pm

NANOOKTHEGREATANDFEARSOME wrote: ↑Tue Oct 29, 2019 3:20 pm

Texas Cloverleaf wrote: ↑Tue Oct 29, 2019 3:11 pm

NANOOKTHEGREATANDFEARSOME wrote: ↑Tue Oct 29, 2019 3:09 pm

Texas Cloverleaf wrote: ↑Tue Oct 29, 2019 3:01 pm

NANOOKTHEGREATANDFEARSOME wrote: ↑Tue Oct 29, 2019 2:56 pm

Texas Cloverleaf wrote: ↑Tue Oct 29, 2019 2:53 pm

Why do my reasons need to be apparent

Oh the irony of bitching at me for not being transparent...then questioning why you need to be transparent.

On the contrary I've been very transparent about where I stand towards people, something you've done very little of

Naw, I’ve been reasonably transparent about who I think is town. You’re conflating not having a ton of reads with not saying any reads.

You don't think it's odd to have some 80 posts in the game but not have (m)any that take concrete stances?

Not really, no. I’m playing 2 minutes at a time basically, how the fuck do you expect me to have a bunch of concrete stances off that in a game with this many people and this many posts?

If you want my stance on something, ask. Otherwise assume thay it’s either in my iso or I don’t have a strong one

What do you think I've been doing? I've been able to dedicate no more time than you and come up with a handful of town reads and a scum target. I've been doing the bare minimum I'd expect the same from you

I have no idea what you’ve been doing, outside of being scum.

“I’m doing X you should too” is the worst reason to read someone, get over yourself.

Texas Cloverleaf wrote: ↑Tue Oct 29, 2019 3:11 pm

NANOOKTHEGREATANDFEARSOME wrote: ↑Tue Oct 29, 2019 3:09 pm

Texas Cloverleaf wrote: ↑Tue Oct 29, 2019 3:01 pm

NANOOKTHEGREATANDFEARSOME wrote: ↑Tue Oct 29, 2019 2:56 pm

Texas Cloverleaf wrote: ↑Tue Oct 29, 2019 2:53 pm

NANOOKTHEGREATANDFEARSOME wrote: ↑Tue Oct 29, 2019 2:52 pm

Texas Cloverleaf wrote: ↑Tue Oct 29, 2019 2:48 pm

Are you always this bitchy about a little pressure?

Only when it’s dumb and goes away for no apparent reason

Why do my reasons need to be apparent

Oh the irony of bitching at me for not being transparent...then questioning why you need to be transparent.

On the contrary I've been very transparent about where I stand towards people, something you've done very little of

Naw, I’ve been reasonably transparent about who I think is town. You’re conflating not having a ton of reads with not saying any reads.

You don't think it's odd to have some 80 posts in the game but not have (m)any that take concrete stances?

Not really, no. I’m playing 2 minutes at a time basically, how the fuck do you expect me to have a bunch of concrete stances off that in a game with this many people and this many posts?

If you want my stance on something, ask. Otherwise assume thay it’s either in my iso or I don’t have a strong one

Texas Cloverleaf wrote: ↑Tue Oct 29, 2019 3:01 pm

NANOOKTHEGREATANDFEARSOME wrote: ↑Tue Oct 29, 2019 2:56 pm

Texas Cloverleaf wrote: ↑Tue Oct 29, 2019 2:53 pm

NANOOKTHEGREATANDFEARSOME wrote: ↑Tue Oct 29, 2019 2:52 pm

Texas Cloverleaf wrote: ↑Tue Oct 29, 2019 2:48 pm

NANOOKTHEGREATANDFEARSOME wrote: ↑Tue Oct 29, 2019 2:26 pm Oh wow look at thay as soon as her (?) “easy mis-kill” shows some teeth there’s someone else on deck. Such a surprise.

Are you always this bitchy about a little pressure?

Only when it’s dumb and goes away for no apparent reason

Why do my reasons need to be apparent

Oh the irony of bitching at me for not being transparent...then questioning why you need to be transparent.

On the contrary I've been very transparent about where I stand towards people, something you've done very little of

Naw, I’ve been reasonably transparent about who I think is town. You’re conflating not having a ton of reads with not saying any reads.

Benson wrote: ↑Tue Oct 29, 2019 2:56 pm

NANOOKTHEGREATANDFEARSOME wrote: ↑Tue Oct 29, 2019 2:52 pm

Texas Cloverleaf wrote: ↑Tue Oct 29, 2019 2:48 pm

NANOOKTHEGREATANDFEARSOME wrote: ↑Tue Oct 29, 2019 2:26 pm Oh wow look at thay as soon as her (?) “easy mis-kill” shows some teeth there’s someone else on deck. Such a surprise.

Are you always this bitchy about a little pressure?

Only when it’s dumb and goes away for no apparent reason

If you spent as much time reading the thread as you do pointlessly arguing your detractors, you'd be caught up by now.

Arguing is much much much faster than reading back, and much easier to do in quick bursts.

Texas Cloverleaf wrote: ↑Tue Oct 29, 2019 2:53 pm

NANOOKTHEGREATANDFEARSOME wrote: ↑Tue Oct 29, 2019 2:52 pm

Texas Cloverleaf wrote: ↑Tue Oct 29, 2019 2:48 pm

NANOOKTHEGREATANDFEARSOME wrote: ↑Tue Oct 29, 2019 2:26 pm Oh wow look at thay as soon as her (?) “easy mis-kill” shows some teeth there’s someone else on deck. Such a surprise.

Are you always this bitchy about a little pressure?

Only when it’s dumb and goes away for no apparent reason

Why do my reasons need to be apparent

Oh the irony of bitching at me for not being transparent...then questioning why you need to be transparent.

Texas Cloverleaf wrote: ↑Tue Oct 29, 2019 2:48 pm

NANOOKTHEGREATANDFEARSOME wrote: ↑Tue Oct 29, 2019 2:26 pm Oh wow look at thay as soon as her (?) “easy mis-kill” shows some teeth there’s someone else on deck. Such a surprise.

Are you always this bitchy about a little pressure?

Only when it’s dumb and goes away for no apparent reason

Oh wow look at thay as soon as her (?) “easy mis-kill” shows some teeth there’s someone else on deck. Such a surprise.

Texas Cloverleaf wrote: ↑Tue Oct 29, 2019 2:12 pm

NANOOKTHEGREATANDFEARSOME wrote: ↑Tue Oct 29, 2019 1:56 pm

Texas Cloverleaf wrote: ↑Tue Oct 29, 2019 12:31 pm Nova: Apparently doesn't exist. Don't like the tone of their "reads" and gif reaction but not enough to go on


Nanook: iso is...remarkably empty. Mostly consists of kibitzing and throwaway comments. The occasional flash read. Almost no analysis. I can sometimes see parts where I think I can see a train of solving logic but a lot of this reads like coasting. No clear alignment markers but an excellent place to push on


[VOTE: Nanookthegreatandfearsome] aubergine

@Nanookthegreatandfearsome pick three people who are scum and explain why in no fewer than three sentences

I am coasting, thought I made that clear tbh. I mean I basically said that in my first couple posts didn’t I? Don’t think I’ve been bashful about it lol.

I’m not doing three sentences on why anyone is scum, lol. Talk to me D5ish and I’ll cooperate maybe.

You did make it clear but that doesn't fly anymore now that we've got nearly a full day cycle under our belt. You're going to commit to some stances about people and justify it or I'm going to get you lynched

I mean....no. I’m not. I’ve taken the stances I want to, you can find them in my ISO. I’m not going to pretend to have reads I don’t just to satisfy a two bit fear mongerer

I told you I’m not gonna pay a ton of attention to this game until it’s a smaller player count, you can try to kill me for it if you want, but it’s purely NAI. I don’t like games this big and I don’t have more time for it than I’m already spending, the only reason I’m here is cause I’m a sucker for an invitational.

But sure please continue trying to push me as your easy mis-kill, I respect you gotta do what you gotta do.

Now I’m going to work, probably don’t kill 112 they seem kind

Nanook: I’m gonna coast till the game is smaller, @ me then

Texas: Nanook is coasting! Here’s some busywork, the kind you’ve explicitly said you aren’t doing, now do it!

Nanook: ...........

Texas Cloverleaf wrote: ↑Tue Oct 29, 2019 12:31 pm Nova: Apparently doesn't exist. Don't like the tone of their "reads" and gif reaction but not enough to go on


Nanook: iso is...remarkably empty. Mostly consists of kibitzing and throwaway comments. The occasional flash read. Almost no analysis. I can sometimes see parts where I think I can see a train of solving logic but a lot of this reads like coasting. No clear alignment markers but an excellent place to push on


[VOTE: Nanookthegreatandfearsome] aubergine

@Nanookthegreatandfearsome pick three people who are scum and explain why in no fewer than three sentences

I am coasting, thought I made that clear tbh. I mean I basically said that in my first couple posts didn’t I? Don’t think I’ve been bashful about it lol.

I’m not doing three sentences on why anyone is scum, lol. Talk to me D5ish and I’ll cooperate maybe.

112 wrote: ↑Tue Oct 29, 2019 1:51 pm i don't have full energy for the game, haven't said much, understand why i'm being wagoned and w/e but still just gotta tell u all flat to your faces that you're wrong

In some places this is known as the nanook special. <3

Elephant wrote: ↑Tue Oct 29, 2019 9:55 am

NANOOKTHEGREATANDFEARSOME wrote: ↑Tue Oct 29, 2019 9:52 am

Texas Cloverleaf wrote: ↑Tue Oct 29, 2019 9:44 am

iaafr wrote: ↑Tue Oct 29, 2019 4:41 am also hows texas claim a mindmeld with nanook and then vote on the other side of the nutella eva dichotomy

which is probably town/town

theyre all scum

112/nanook/texas/michelle

i got 4 of em im satisfied with my d1

I have never interacted with Nanook??

There’s a Nutella/Eva dichotomy?

I recall colorful diagrams.

Oh boy

Texas Cloverleaf wrote: ↑Tue Oct 29, 2019 9:44 am

iaafr wrote: ↑Tue Oct 29, 2019 4:41 am also hows texas claim a mindmeld with nanook and then vote on the other side of the nutella eva dichotomy

which is probably town/town

theyre all scum

112/nanook/texas/michelle

i got 4 of em im satisfied with my d1

I have never interacted with Nanook??

There’s a Nutella/Eva dichotomy?

You’re badly misreading radishes tone and general approach imo

I want to TR radishes for the zoidberg reference tbh. Who doesn’t love a good zoidberg.

Master Radishes wrote: ↑Tue Oct 29, 2019 2:28 am

Master Radishes wrote: ↑Tue Oct 29, 2019 2:21 am

Benson wrote: ↑Mon Oct 28, 2019 7:40 pm

NANOOKTHEGREATANDFEARSOME wrote: ↑Mon Oct 28, 2019 7:38 pm Radishes I’m kinda surprised you’re playing so much today.

Different forum different belief in D1’s?

The big irony is that he told me pre-game that he would intentionally barely post on D1. Well so much for that.

Am I playing? Or am I just posting?

But more srs answer:

Nook - different forum, different size/style of game, different players, etc - if I don't post I'll fall way behind and never catch up; this way I feel like I at least have some handle on what's happening

Benson - I do consider this barely posting, Benson Also I've just had some good fortune in having it start on a weekend where I had some time to keep up.

This is reasonable, I accept this.

Ok guys and gals and thems, it’s been real but now I gotta force myself to pass out. I’ll be back tomorrow depending on when the deadline is

Oh cool, maybe he isn’t actually under the radar then lol

Pawn Lelouch wrote: ↑Tue Oct 29, 2019 1:39 am

Michelle wrote: ↑Tue Oct 29, 2019 1:08 am

Pawn Lelouch wrote: ↑Tue Oct 29, 2019 12:52 am So I just woke up and I have to ask before I make any proper posts. In what world am I considered part of LLD's clique when I explicitly turned down the invitation back in champs?

What time is it at you?

Little past midnight. Took an accidental impromptu nap.

Think it’s more about who Lexi put in it tbh

112 wrote: ↑Tue Oct 29, 2019 1:40 am I've been independently reading some of Tex's posts as scum but am willing to overlook it because I thought their entrance was quite respectable.

I read their first handful of posts and nothing since but they seemed fine in that handful

Drago, sorry. Poll says they have one vote but idk if there’s thread pressure on them outside that or not?

112 wrote: ↑Tue Oct 29, 2019 1:38 am

NANOOKTHEGREATANDFEARSOME wrote: ↑Tue Oct 29, 2019 1:36 am Hi guys my name is clem and I’m an insomniac here for the next 2-20 minutes, ama

could you close your eyes for 60 seconds and try to think of one person who's scum but slipping under the radar? just go all trancey in your headspace and try to work it out. it'll be fun.

If I close my eyes how will I look at the playerlist tho

Idk I haven’t read much of this game at all tbh, maybe 150-200 posts total. I guess I’d say maybe drogo, but they might just rub me the wrong way

I don’t think 112 should die today solely because I think they’re fun to play with, and I am aware that’s a shitty reason

Hi guys my name is clem and I’m an insomniac here for the next 2-20 minutes, ama

Creature wrote: ↑Mon Oct 28, 2019 10:51 pm basically (out of order)

Town:
Dragomir
iaafr
Creature
vanity.
Master Radishes
Texas Cloverleaf

Townlean:
MacDougall
nutella
Epignosis
Spiny Creature
sprityo
Pawn Lelouch
Evenstar

Null:
Benson
Quin
Lady Lambdadelta
Dom
Trustworthy Liberal
novaselinedear
Jackofhearts2005
Elephant

Scumlean:
Long Con
112
DFaraday
Hyena
Michelle

Scum:
TonyStarkPrime
Rej
juliets

I have the longest name and yet I’m not on your list wtf dude

Eh, poor phrasing. Finding your semantics-humping annoying would be better, I don’t know you well enough to have an opinion either way.

Epignosis wrote: ↑Mon Oct 28, 2019 10:36 pm

NANOOKTHEGREATANDFEARSOME wrote: ↑Mon Oct 28, 2019 10:32 pm

Epignosis wrote: ↑Mon Oct 28, 2019 10:31 pm

NANOOKTHEGREATANDFEARSOME wrote: ↑Mon Oct 28, 2019 10:30 pm

Epignosis wrote: ↑Mon Oct 28, 2019 10:29 pm

NANOOKTHEGREATANDFEARSOME wrote: ↑Mon Oct 28, 2019 10:28 pm

Epignosis wrote: ↑Mon Oct 28, 2019 10:22 pm

"They" is a plural pronoun. There are a group of people listed here. nutella is one person and merits a singular pronoun. No, it wasn't obvious.

“They” is commonly used as a pronoun for a person of uncertain gender (or sometimes as a chosen pronoun, such as in the case of 112). It is or should be obvious from context that “they” referred to Nutella in this case, as I was being asked a direct question about them.

That it's commonly used as such doesn't mean I understood your meaning. It wasn't obvious.

It was if you’re not busy nitpicking and pulling semantics bullshit.

I am no longer interested in this conversation, use your context clues.

Am I pulling semantics bullshit?

If I am, then what is my motive?

It’s obnoxious, doubt it’s AI.

It wasn't obnoxious. I did not know your meaning. Hence what you said was not obvious. You adding "obviously" and a question mark was obnoxious. You could have politely answered my question instead of assuming certain motivations about my asking for clarification.

Still, thank you for your answer anyway. I understand.

I didn’t assume motivations—finding you annoying is not the same as thinking you’re being intentionally annoying.

And yes, it was obnoxious to me. I don’t care if anyone else found it obnoxious or not.

TonyStarkPrime wrote: ↑Mon Oct 28, 2019 10:33 pm

Epignosis wrote: ↑Mon Oct 28, 2019 10:31 pm

TonyStarkPrime wrote: ↑Mon Oct 28, 2019 10:29 pm Alright grammar prescriptivists, the meaning wasn’t clear, it’s now been clarified, let’s move on

[VOTE: TonyStarkPrime] aubergine

ooh someone doesn’t like being called a prescriptivist

I like you

Epignosis wrote: ↑Mon Oct 28, 2019 10:31 pm

NANOOKTHEGREATANDFEARSOME wrote: ↑Mon Oct 28, 2019 10:30 pm

Epignosis wrote: ↑Mon Oct 28, 2019 10:29 pm

NANOOKTHEGREATANDFEARSOME wrote: ↑Mon Oct 28, 2019 10:28 pm

Epignosis wrote: ↑Mon Oct 28, 2019 10:22 pm

NANOOKTHEGREATANDFEARSOME wrote: ↑Mon Oct 28, 2019 10:09 pm

Epignosis wrote: ↑Mon Oct 28, 2019 10:05 pm

Who is "they?"

Nutella, obviously?

"They" is a plural pronoun. There are a group of people listed here. nutella is one person and merits a singular pronoun. No, it wasn't obvious.

“They” is commonly used as a pronoun for a person of uncertain gender (or sometimes as a chosen pronoun, such as in the case of 112). It is or should be obvious from context that “they” referred to Nutella in this case, as I was being asked a direct question about them.

That it's commonly used as such doesn't mean I understood your meaning. It wasn't obvious.

It was if you’re not busy nitpicking and pulling semantics bullshit.

I am no longer interested in this conversation, use your context clues.

Am I pulling semantics bullshit?

If I am, then what is my motive?

It’s obnoxious, doubt it’s AI.

Epignosis wrote: ↑Mon Oct 28, 2019 10:29 pm

NANOOKTHEGREATANDFEARSOME wrote: ↑Mon Oct 28, 2019 10:28 pm

Epignosis wrote: ↑Mon Oct 28, 2019 10:22 pm

NANOOKTHEGREATANDFEARSOME wrote: ↑Mon Oct 28, 2019 10:09 pm

Epignosis wrote: ↑Mon Oct 28, 2019 10:05 pm

NANOOKTHEGREATANDFEARSOME wrote: ↑Mon Oct 28, 2019 8:43 pm

Lady LambdaDelta wrote: ↑Mon Oct 28, 2019 8:35 pm @Pawn Lelouch
@Evenstar
@NANOOKTHEGREATANDFEARSOME

Come vote Nutella.

-Mute

They’re town tho

Who is "they?"

Nutella, obviously?

"They" is a plural pronoun. There are a group of people listed here. nutella is one person and merits a singular pronoun. No, it wasn't obvious.

“They” is commonly used as a pronoun for a person of uncertain gender (or sometimes as a chosen pronoun, such as in the case of 112). It is or should be obvious from context that “they” referred to Nutella in this case, as I was being asked a direct question about them.

That it's commonly used as such doesn't mean I understood your meaning. It wasn't obvious.

It was if you’re not busy nitpicking and pulling semantics bullshit.

I am no longer interested in this conversation, use your context clues.

I do think Mac’s idea is decent by the by, I would’ve just sorted alphabetically but it’s fine. I would encourage the people that have time to do it to do so.

Epignosis wrote: ↑Mon Oct 28, 2019 10:22 pm

NANOOKTHEGREATANDFEARSOME wrote: ↑Mon Oct 28, 2019 10:09 pm

Epignosis wrote: ↑Mon Oct 28, 2019 10:05 pm

NANOOKTHEGREATANDFEARSOME wrote: ↑Mon Oct 28, 2019 8:43 pm

Lady LambdaDelta wrote: ↑Mon Oct 28, 2019 8:35 pm @Pawn Lelouch
@Evenstar
@NANOOKTHEGREATANDFEARSOME

Come vote Nutella.

-Mute

They’re town tho

Who is "they?"

Nutella, obviously?

"They" is a plural pronoun. There are a group of people listed here. nutella is one person and merits a singular pronoun. No, it wasn't obvious.

“They” is commonly used as a pronoun for a person of uncertain gender (or sometimes as a chosen pronoun, such as in the case of 112). It is or should be obvious from context that “they” referred to Nutella in this case, as I was being asked a direct question about them.

I’m probably not gonna do that tbh I’d have to spend an hour straight in thread and that seems unlikely to happen rn. Just gonna stick to semi-random pop ins and pings.

Epignosis wrote: ↑Mon Oct 28, 2019 10:05 pm

NANOOKTHEGREATANDFEARSOME wrote: ↑Mon Oct 28, 2019 8:43 pm

Lady LambdaDelta wrote: ↑Mon Oct 28, 2019 8:35 pm @Pawn Lelouch
@Evenstar
@NANOOKTHEGREATANDFEARSOME

Come vote Nutella.

-Mute

They’re town tho

Who is "they?"

Nutella, obviously?

MacDougall wrote: ↑Mon Oct 28, 2019 9:49 pm

Evenstar wrote: ↑Mon Oct 28, 2019 9:00 pm

NANOOKTHEGREATANDFEARSOME wrote: ↑Mon Oct 28, 2019 8:58 pm

Lady LambdaDelta wrote: ↑Mon Oct 28, 2019 8:45 pm

NANOOKTHEGREATANDFEARSOME wrote: ↑Mon Oct 28, 2019 8:43 pm

Lady LambdaDelta wrote: ↑Mon Oct 28, 2019 8:35 pm @Pawn Lelouch
@Evenstar
@NANOOKTHEGREATANDFEARSOME

Come vote Nutella.

-Mute

They’re town tho

But what if

they weren't

-Nyx

Counterpoint: they probably are.

wow, nanook has an opinion on something

Regardless of the content, I am glad that Nanook is dissenting from Lexi. It's what I'd expect Nanook to do as a civilian here. I can't see him ever blindly following her again, at least without her establishing a lot of town equity first.

I have never blindly followed Lexi but ok, we’ll pretend that’s what I was doing, sure.

MacDougall wrote: ↑Mon Oct 28, 2019 9:45 pm

NANOOKTHEGREATANDFEARSOME wrote: ↑Mon Oct 28, 2019 9:44 pm

MacDougall wrote: ↑Mon Oct 28, 2019 9:39 pm

Lady LambdaDelta wrote: ↑Mon Oct 28, 2019 8:35 pm @Pawn Lelouch
@Evenstar
@NANOOKTHEGREATANDFEARSOME

Come vote Nutella.

-Mute

You guys operating as a little unit again is pretty lame. Just sayin'.

I tried to do it with you dude but you left me out

I left you out? Last I checked we was solid. I've just been asleep/busy for the last 14 hours. If anything you just got bored and did other things lol.

This is also a distinct possibility, yes