I thought it a less likely to be RVS since it was practically the vote alone without anything attached.Seanzie wrote: ↑Wed Jun 29, 2022 1:06 amWould my vote have been anything other than RVS to you at that point?MartinGG99 wrote: ↑Wed Jun 29, 2022 1:00 amit probably would've been some mix of stating concern over your decision to vote me and then emphasizing the need for postsSeanzie wrote: ↑Wed Jun 29, 2022 12:53 amWhat would you have responded, in that moment?MartinGG99 wrote: ↑Wed Jun 29, 2022 12:42 amall you gave was the "why vote me" dealio.....which then quickly got turned into that "I think Martin had something to prove" statement without giving me time to respond to your questionSeanzie wrote: ↑Wed Jun 29, 2022 12:30 amWhere did I say I'm not going to have interactions with you? Like what?MartinGG99 wrote: ↑Wed Jun 29, 2022 12:21 amMy position is that seanzie is worth looking into because he more or less said he wasn't going to do any interaction with me
by not doing that after my passive-aggressive post that implicitly referred to him
Also: I don't think anyone can be certainly wolf. No one can figure that out in 100 posts, at least in my personal experience.
What needs to happen is more things and more interactions. I've been trying to do that that with my earlier posts.
Last town game I had on another site, I lost to a wolf because there wasn't enough posts in the game. if there had been more posts that game, I would've been able to figure out who was more likely to be the wolf partner there, instead of just relying on my world-building bias. Admittedly though, it was only 300ish posts because it was a light-ish game, but I want to get the ball rolling this game just so we avoid the scenario of finding out there was too little to go on too late.
seems to me you had your read regardless of any interactions with me and were planning to stick with it, especially with "I think everyone should vote martin" emphasis post
I wanted to see what you'd do with a bit a pressure on you, and explained why I am wary of you when asked. I do have a read on you regardless of any interactions, but that read updates every interaction we have.
probably not any passive-aggressiveness in it though because at that point I would have yet to figure if this was how our interactions were going to end up being (and also you decided to interact instead of going hmmm or whatever vagueness again; you were being direct)
Which made me concerned since you know me and I would figure that maybe you could add something onto that to interact with me more. In my experience, votes without anything attached are votes that typically generate the least amount of AI stuff because reactions to them are almost always very straight-forward.
If you're asking what I think of it, at the point of you asking me why I voted you, then that's when I would start considering it more in either direction depending on our interactions.
