Marmot wrote: ↑Sat May 15, 2021 12:53 pm
Syn wrote: ↑Sat May 15, 2021 12:41 pm
Marmot wrote: ↑Sat May 15, 2021 12:29 pm
Syn wrote: ↑Sat May 15, 2021 12:21 pm
Marmot do you have any current thoughts and not just quotes of things that happened twenty pages ago where you say things that were already said by three other people
Why you make such blanket untrue statements Syn?
Is there something specific you want my opinion on?
I have no intention of giving you the answer, no. You're certainly capable enough of coming up with something yourself.
I don't like your original post. It's the second time this game you've backhanded me this game, and I don't see the issue here. If you want my thoughts on something, I'll give them to you. I have been posting my thoughts. I don't see a problem with responding to something that came from pages ago, I'm not going to completely ignore everything that's not the last two pages. If three other people have already said the same thing? I don't really know that if I'm in the middle of catching up.
I'd prefer if you could address the concerns you have specifically. Do you have an issue with people responding to something from earlier in the thread? Or is it that it's already been talked about?
just like the first time you said this, it's not a backhand if I am directly addressing you
the issue is that you're saying nothing new
you're safely uninvolved in the discourse
you have no stakes in the conversation if you're just rehashing things already addressed long ago
it distracts from the current and forces everyone to redo the past
marmot is posting and replying to people! well, no, not really. marmot is looking at things that happened before and has just rewritten a few replies made by other people to project the image of confrontation and involvement.