The Syndicate

My role PM says I'm Adam West and am already dead. RIP.

Dyslexicon wrote: ↑Sun Jun 11, 2017 9:20 pm
DharmaHelper wrote: ↑Sun Jun 11, 2017 9:15 pm
Dyslexicon wrote: ↑Sun Jun 11, 2017 9:10 pm
DharmaHelper wrote: ↑Sun Jun 11, 2017 9:03 pm Heckin' nobody wants to talk to me I see how it is.
Tell me about yourself and your life. *leans closer*
I like long walks on the beach and complaining about INH games.
Sounds reasonable.

That is actually of interest to me. I haven't played any INH-games, but I would not be surprised if they were a bit crazy given the theme. How has other games from him been? What can we expect? o.o

Stop saying his name. That's how he draws his power.

So the maples formed a union
And demanded equal rights
'The oaks are just too greedy
We will make them give us light'
Now there's no more oak oppression
For they passed a noble law
And the trees are all kept equal
By hatchet, axe, and saw

Is someone being a ho?

Long Con wrote: ↑Mon Jun 12, 2017 8:38 pm I PMed Dizzy because we were online at the same time.

I didn't PM DH because I didn't plan to make a deal with him, because I was a fool to think we had an understanding in Survivor, and died the death of a buffoon because of it.

I did PM a couple of other folks, with basically the same offer. But those offers are not really valid anymore, because it's not a LMS game. I do like Dizzy's friendly attitude about it though. I guess I'll refrain from voting Dizzy for the first five days. (Although my offer was more like "until we're in the Final Five"... a concept that isn't the same in a regular Mafia game).

That makes things very easy for me.

timmer wrote: ↑Mon Jun 12, 2017 9:55 pm So... heard any good jokes, lately?

Stephen Strasburg

I am interested in the LC didn't see that there were alignments + Dyslexicon defending him + LC reinforcing his commitment not to vote for Dyslexicon.

That's a mighty powerful connection, all things considered.

Dyslexicon wrote: ↑Mon Jun 12, 2017 7:46 pm
DharmaHelper wrote: ↑Mon Jun 12, 2017 7:39 pm LMS-Gate doesn't concern me. Perhaps the only thing I am concerned with is that LC didn't offer me the protections he offered you.
Because he likes me better obvs.

Or maybe because he thinks I'm stupid enough to be played by him.

I'm inclined to vote Dyslexicon for this. It writes off the connection altogether while distancing at the same time.

Nasty.

I'm voting Dyslexicon.

Dyslexicon wrote: ↑Mon Jun 12, 2017 10:12 pm
Epignosis wrote: ↑Mon Jun 12, 2017 10:04 pmI'm inclined to vote Dyslexicon for this. It writes off the connection altogether while distancing at the same time.

Nasty.

I'm voting Dyslexicon.
Ok? That whole post is basically jokes.
So what did you gain from this? Am I scum? Are me and LC scum together? What's this connection about in your mind?

You summed it up for me.

sprityo wrote: ↑Mon Jun 12, 2017 10:19 pm
DharmaHelper wrote: ↑Mon Jun 12, 2017 10:07 pm My Role PM was just a Negan Gif and a link to two girls one cup.
this caught me off guard and it's the second funniest thing I've read all evening

Someone needs higher standards.

Dyslexicon wrote: ↑Mon Jun 12, 2017 10:21 pm
Epignosis wrote: ↑Mon Jun 12, 2017 10:14 pmYou summed it up for me.
That we are scum together? So this whole LMS-Gate is an elaborate and evil plot for LC to draw attention to himself on purpose while we have this whole convo on PM while we're really actually scum together? Can you use more words to describe your theory and exactly how this works for you, please?

Long Con had his own team kill him once.

I don't need to describe a theory that "works for me."

Dyslexicon broke another rule about using the host font. Modkill please.

Dyslexicon wrote: ↑Mon Jun 12, 2017 10:33 pm
Epignosis wrote: ↑Mon Jun 12, 2017 10:29 pmLong Con had his own team kill him once.

I don't need to describe a theory that "works for me."
You need to describe it if you want to work together with people. If you don't want that that's your choice. But you leave a lot to be desired for me to understand where you are coming from.

---

I will ask everyone: What do you all think about what you gather Epi's theory is?

If I want to work together with people? I thought this was LMS.

Oh wait. No I didn't. Heh.

Look, I get people lynched for less than this. I make a good point, and people come in and go, "Epi makes a great point" and they vote. It's how it goes. I don't have to describe anything in this scenario, because I think people are just hoping to survive for a while.

Look! You already have two votes. More than anybody else.

If you must have something from me, here's this: I don't buy LC publicly affirming his deal with you while privately offering it to me (for a second time, this time saying that no one has to know about it). I flat out told him my opinion of him depended on your alignment. I am not making deals with devils who have too many hooves in the cookie jar. LC tried to get me in a deal with not voting for him, and that's fine if he believes this is a last man standing game, which I hope it is not, because those are not fucking Mafia games, and they should stop calling them Mafia, but my role gives me the slim hope that there are mafia to find, and I'm not interested in making vague deals with people, especially if those people make them with everybody and their brother and then everybody again behind the brother's back.

DharmaHelper wrote: ↑Mon Jun 12, 2017 10:53 pm Even *EPIGNOSIS* got a deal?!?!?

Twice. LC is like a bad car salesman.

Long Con wrote: ↑Mon Jun 12, 2017 11:01 pm
Epignosis wrote: ↑Mon Jun 12, 2017 10:50 pm
Dyslexicon wrote: ↑Mon Jun 12, 2017 10:33 pm
Epignosis wrote: ↑Mon Jun 12, 2017 10:29 pmLong Con had his own team kill him once.

I don't need to describe a theory that "works for me."
You need to describe it if you want to work together with people. If you don't want that that's your choice. But you leave a lot to be desired for me to understand where you are coming from.

---

I will ask everyone: What do you all think about what you gather Epi's theory is?
If I want to work together with people? I thought this was LMS.

Oh wait. No I didn't. Heh.

Look, I get people lynched for less than this. I make a good point, and people come in and go, "Epi makes a great point" and they vote. It's how it goes. I don't have to describe anything in this scenario, because I think people are just hoping to survive for a while.

Look! You already have two votes. More than anybody else.

If you must have something from me, here's this: I don't buy LC publicly affirming his deal with you while privately offering it to me (for a second time, this time saying that no one has to know about it). I flat out told him my opinion of him depended on your alignment. I am not making deals with devils who have too many hooves in the cookie jar. LC tried to get me in a deal with not voting for him, and that's fine if he believes this is a last man standing game, which I hope it is not, because those are not fucking Mafia games, and they should stop calling them Mafia, but my role gives me the slim hope that there are mafia to find, and I'm not interested in making vague deals with people, especially if those people make them with everybody and their brother and then everybody again behind the brother's back.
Jeez, you're impossible. I said that the deals were not valid because it's not LMS, and you spout some ominous shit at me. So I PM you and say "Hey fine, if you're upset, then we can have a deal. I didn't mean anything by it." Then you come in here and just throw it in my face like I'm trying to fucking do some double-dealing shit.

I don't know what alignment Dyslexicon is, obviously I can't win by voting for her though. If she's Civ, I helped lynch a Civ. If she's bad, then Epi leads the mislynch on LC. Great setup already.

You think I'm the one with a hoof in the cookie jar? You agreed to the original deal despite knowing it isn't Last Man Standing... and now you come in here and preach and huff about how you're "not interested in making vague deals with people".

I'm not upset. Your PM to me mentioned nothing about me being upset.

My thing here, LC, is that you make these deals, but you can't honor them. Already Dys has two votes and you have one, but you won't vote to save yourself, I imagine (although I think you would).

My point is this: You two advertised early that you have a deal between you. If this is an LMS game, then I have a motive to break up that public deal.

If this is an actual Mafia game, then I have a motive to break up that deal (given my previously stated suspicions).

Dyslexicon wrote: ↑Mon Jun 12, 2017 11:09 pm
timmer wrote: ↑Mon Jun 12, 2017 10:54 pm @Dys, I think you understand me fine
No, I don't. That's why I'm asking.

Here's the thing based on what you've said:
- I take it that you assumed LC to know that he was anti-town.
- With this information LC chose to go into the thread claiming this was an LMS game.

My reaction to this is, why the hell would LC go into the thread claiming such a thing that would obviously draw attention if he didn't believe it to be the case?

I think there's very little chance that LC was lying about not knowing his role. I think he assumed this to actually be an LMS game, what would be the benefit of claiming it otherwise? Unless it was some sort of weird instigator/reaction fishing (which honestly I could see myself doing because lol).

This, however, does not say much about what role LC actually is after checking it. It just says to me that he thought it was LMS and was mistaken.

What I'm getting from you is that I have a very hard time understanding your thought process here. You seem to think LC basically willingly gave himself away as anti-town at the start of the game. This somehow makes you vote for me, and you claim this to be for reactions. You also seem evasive in my questioning.

If you are town, where am I mistaken in my reasoning?

I love defending civilians when I'm bad. It grants so much mileage.

thellama73 wrote: ↑Tue Jun 13, 2017 9:33 am ALl in favor of voting to lynch the most annoying player?

Why? So he can gain immunity for perpetuity because he successfully got himself lynched Day 1?

Long Con wrote: ↑Tue Jun 13, 2017 4:27 pm I'm going to place a vote on Epignosis.

a) because he's sketchy and/or hypocritical regarding making deals. Compare, if you will:

Epignosis wrote:Sun Jun 11, 2017 7:24 pm
Long Con wrote:Sun Jun 11, 2017 5:53 pm How about some sort of alliance, or perhaps a mutual non-voting clause until Final... Five?
Works for me.
^^ That's what he said when I PMed him.

Epignosis wrote: ↑Mon Jun 12, 2017 10:50 pm...LC tried to get me in a deal with not voting for him, and that's fine if he believes this is a last man standing game, which I hope it is not, because those are not fucking Mafia games, and they should stop calling them Mafia, but my role gives me the slim hope that there are mafia to find, and I'm not interested in making vague deals with people, especially if those people make them with everybody and their brother and then everybody again behind the brother's back.
^^ That's what he said publicly. And being two-faced is bad enough, but he tried to use it to invoke suspicion on me.

b) because I already asked him to comment on this, and patiently waited for him to come back and do just that, and he ignored it.

Hypocritical?

I have not voted for you. I am keeping my end of the bargain.

You are not keeping yours.

Ouch.

So there are a few revelations here.

First, Long Con has posted the PM he sent me and then voted for me when I didn't vote for him. That proves that he is not trustworthy (as thought we need any confirmation of that).

Second, Dyslexicon followed DH's vote against nutella quickly, and then, when LC made a move against me, joined his vote. Dyslexicon doesn't give me the impression of effort toward finding mafia. Neither does LC. He voted for me because I'm apparently a hypocrite (who still hasn't voted for him). I think he got spooked that I was going to come after him. And as for the being a hypocrite part, I criticized people making deals with a truck ton of people, not making deals in general. And frankly I don't give a shit if I'm a hypocrite. I do as I please.

Third, Dyslexicon just witnessed Long Con's vote for me and apparently there's something between them now. I maintain there was something between them all along.

Fourth, the new Power Rangers movie was ass garbage.

Long Con wrote: ↑Tue Jun 13, 2017 7:25 pm We do not have a deal, Epignosis. I'm not dealing with someone I can't trust.

Whom can you trust, LC?

Long Con wrote: ↑Tue Jun 13, 2017 7:36 pm Lame, you used "thought" instead of "though", so I can't really make sense of your post.

Doesn't matter, you directly and intentionally betrayed my trust when you brought my PM into the thread as a weapon against me.

What the hell are you even accepting a deal like that for, in a regular Mafia game? At least I have an excuse. You knew it was regular Mafia all along, and you still accepted the deal.

Ah, you caught me on a typo. Goodie for you.

Look at those adverbs though.

YOU DIRECTLY AND INTENTIONALLY BETRAYED MY TRUST

Who are you? M. Bison? A villain from a Steven Segal movie?

It's cute.

Your "trust" meant nothing when I realized you had peppered your "deal" to every bitch up in here. You aren't sincere. You were looking to get as many people as possible to not vote you until a certain point in time. That, to me, suggests a motive.

How do I know it's a "regular Mafia game?" It's INH we're talking about. He threatens us with phase one. I don't know any of that shit. I just know what my role says, and my role suggests hope that this is a Mafia game. And if it is, having you not vote for me is beneficial to me regardless, isn't it?

But you voted for me. So you are untrustworthy.

Anybody you strike a deal with in future? Buyer beware.

Dyslexicon wrote: ↑Tue Jun 13, 2017 9:20 pm
Epignosis wrote: ↑Tue Jun 13, 2017 7:31 pmSecond, Dyslexicon followed DH's vote against nutella quickly, and then, when LC made a move against me, joined his vote. Dyslexicon doesn't give me the impression of effort toward finding mafia. Neither does LC. He voted for me because I'm apparently a hypocrite (who still hasn't voted for him). I think he got spooked that I was going to come after him. And as for the being a hypocrite part, I criticized people making deals with a truck ton of people, not making deals in general. And frankly I don't give a shit if I'm a hypocrite. I do as I please.
1. I am very much trying to find scum, whether or not it's in the way you recognise or not. I will contest I'm one of the player having actually engaged with people for that exact reason.
2. I move my vote around a lot. I like it. It's a tool to find scum. It will end up on who I think is the best lynch.
3. Did you get that I never made any deal?
4. Can you clarify your correspondence with LC?

4. Clarify what? He posted it.

Dyslexicon wrote: ↑Tue Jun 13, 2017 9:20 pm
Third, Dyslexicon just witnessed Long Con's vote for me and apparently there's something between them now. I maintain there was something between them all along.
You really can't take a joke, can you?

I don't see what you said that was a joke.

Dyslexicon wrote: ↑Tue Jun 13, 2017 9:54 pm @Epi - LC gave you a deal offer not to vote you until the final five, and you said "works for me" or something like that. And then it all went to shit in thread. Is that right?

Dunno. Wasn't paying attention to the timing.

Dyslexicon wrote: ↑Tue Jun 13, 2017 9:54 pm Did LC offer the deal before or after he was made aware that this is not an LMS game?

Dunno.

Dyslexicon wrote: ↑Tue Jun 13, 2017 9:54 pm Why did yu accept the offer in the first place?

Someone said he wouldn't vote for me. It's hardly an offer.

What are you hoping to learn from this line of questioning?

Why did you vote nutella and then vote me?

Dyslexicon wrote: ↑Tue Jun 13, 2017 11:11 pm
Epignosis wrote: ↑Tue Jun 13, 2017 10:48 pm Why did you vote nutella and then vote me?
Because I like to move my vote around a lot to see what happens. Especially D1. I don't feel I have a very clear place I want to place it atm actually. Why does it matter?

You are a liar. You have not moved your vote around to "see what happens."

Dyslexicon wrote: ↑Tue Jun 13, 2017 2:09 pm
DharmaHelper wrote: ↑Tue Jun 13, 2017 2:08 pm Voted for Nutella.
Sheeping.

nutella never posted. Yet you moved your vote to me when LC did. So you voted nutella to see what happens? Nah.

Dyslexicon wrote: ↑Tue Jun 13, 2017 4:47 pm I'm going to sheep LC's vote instead, because we're bffs and I'd like to hide behind his vote since Epi is giving me so much pressure. Wink wink.

You are evil.

Dyslexicon wrote: ↑Tue Jun 13, 2017 11:24 pm Wtf, are you kidding me with this? Nut didn't show up, I don't control that. It's in any case not just about Nut. Maybe someone else will hop on her wagon, or comment on it, or whatever. And then I got an idea to vote you instead, so I did, cause frankly I was bored. I'll move my vote around all day, and it's not A-B-C cause and effect style in my brain in case you haven't noticed.

I'm not saying you control when nutella shows up. You said you like to move your vote around to see what happens. You didn't wait long enough for anything to happen. For that reason, I don't believe the motive you gave for moving your vote to nutella when you did.

S~V~S wrote: ↑Wed Jun 14, 2017 12:29 pm Also stop eating the ear, no one ate the ear in the film.

Hey, spoiler tags please!

He really didn't say anything comprehensible. It looked like spam.

DrWilgy wrote: ↑Wed Jun 14, 2017 4:02 pm What if America lost the revolutionary war?

We'd be speaking English.

Middle of what chats? The ones where Wilgy includes me for no apparent reason other than his own amusement?

DharmaHelper wrote: ↑Wed Jun 14, 2017 4:24 pm
Epignosis wrote: ↑Wed Jun 14, 2017 4:19 pm Middle of what chats? The ones where Wilgy includes me for no apparent reason other than his own amusement?
Well you're steeped in the LC drama, and now you and G-Man and Wilgy are cavorting.

I mean, once is a coincidence.

So...people PMing me is "cavorting," which is a word I think you should look up before using.

DrWilgy wrote: ↑Wed Jun 14, 2017 5:06 pm Interesting.

G-Man has been protecting either Epi or Hazelnut. His vot pattern this cycle has been atrocious. Voting with momentum, but hardly willing to take the lead.

Once he no longer needed votes on Llama, he moved back to a wagon that wouldn't win.

I think you sent your PM to the three people you believe are bad. Did I solve the puzzle?

DrWilgy wrote: ↑Wed Jun 14, 2017 5:26 pm @Epi, nope I just wanted witnesses.

Why woud I suspect you at the time of that pm?

I don't know. It was deductive thinking based on your post saying G-Man was protecting me.

I wonder how many of you are using the BCC function.

I voted for nothing and S~V~S.

Spacedaisy wrote: ↑Wed Jun 14, 2017 9:09 pm Clearly Epi thinks or thought that dyslexicon and LC were teammates but I find it unlikely since I think LC is being truthful about the way things went down.

You find it unlikely that I think or thought they were teammates?

Spacedaisy wrote: ↑Wed Jun 14, 2017 11:12 pm No I think it's unlikely you are correct that they are baddies together

I see.

Are you of the opinion that both are innocent?

Dyslexicon wrote: ↑Wed Jun 14, 2017 11:27 pm I need to go to bed.

Before I do, I need to get this off my chest: Epi, if you happen to care about what alignment I am - If you try to fit me in the form of what YOU think is logical to do as a player you will fail to understand how I play and therefore fail to read me. When I left the thread you had thsi accusation that I should've waited for Nut to respond (I'm assuming that's what you're picking at) because I said I wanted to see what happen. I DID want to see what happened (the reason I chose Nut was because then she would be the biggest wagon which might've been fun), and then I wanted to see what happened when I voted you instead. I have many many many town games where I'll change my vote within minutes (and probably seconds) because I just change my mind or have many ideas/directions I want to go. This may not be the way YOU think or approach the game, but if you're trying to find a straight line in my play on D1 you will fail. I'm actually way more "consistent" when I'm mafia, cause then I actually care about that stuff. I feel I've had this conversation before on this forum. If you happen to be town in this game, and we play in a later game and a similar situation appears, I will be sure to remind you of this time. Clearly we have very different approaches, cause I can't wrap my brain around how you would ever find that actually suspicious at all - much less call it a straight out lie. You're not inside my head. But you could try, and I'll try the opposite. So that's what I have to say about that.

If you are trying to claim your innocence by presenting me with a skeleton key regarding how you play when you're good and how you play when you're bad, as though you aren't capable of emulating the former in the latter situation, I'm sorry:

Spacedaisy wrote: ↑Wed Jun 14, 2017 11:29 pm
Epignosis wrote: ↑Wed Jun 14, 2017 11:15 pm
Spacedaisy wrote: ↑Wed Jun 14, 2017 11:12 pm No I think it's unlikely you are correct that they are baddies together
I see.

Are you of the opinion that both are innocent?
I have no opinion on dyslexicon at this time. I only have the opinion that LC is likely civ.

Everybody is "likely" civilian.

Unless INH made up something where there are more mafia than civilians and they only have open BTSC like everybody else.

Which would be kind of neat.

Long Con wrote: ↑Thu Jun 15, 2017 12:10 am It sounds interesting, but mutiny is generally a negative kind of thing.

Depends on the master.

Sloonei wrote: ↑Fri Jun 16, 2017 12:04 pm
Spoiler: show
Long Con wrote: ↑Fri Jun 16, 2017 10:14 am
DharmaHelper wrote: ↑Thu Jun 15, 2017 8:27 pm
Sloonei wrote: ↑Thu Jun 15, 2017 8:26 pm
DharmaHelper wrote: ↑Thu Jun 15, 2017 8:23 pm
Sloonei wrote: ↑Mon Jun 12, 2017 12:14 am I'm interested in the public vote as a scum hunting mechanism.
Did you ever make something of this, Sloonei?
No.
Could you?

So... what does it mean to vote someone for protection? You think they're Civ? You just want them to make it further?

DharmaHelper and speedchuck voted for nutella to be protected last night. Contrast that to Sloonei's instant vote on nutella today. I'd like to hear you gentlemen talk that out a little.

G-Man and Long Con both voted DH for protection. I gave my reason, but I haven't looked back to remind myself of G-Man's. I want vote-order to be part of our polls again as well. I'd like to easily be able to see who voted for someone when it was clear S~V~S was winning, if that happened. You know, that kind of thing.

Sprityo self-voted. Kind of tragic.

Timmer, Spacedaisy, and Epignosis voted S~V~S, and Epi cast the "deciding" vote. Given that I think Epi is bad, I would say that makes S~V~S look a little better, because I don't see why a baddie would vote to protect a teammate in this situation. The situation being that baddies don't need protecting because they're the ones killing.

S~V~S, nutella, Llama, Rico, Sloonei all voted one-offs.

Ok, Sloonei, I have tried to set the stage for using this as a scum-hunting mechanism. Perhaps some of your ideas on that front will be easier to process no?
@Long Con, why do you think a baddie would be unlikely to vote for a teammate in the protection poll? If they're the ones performing the kill, it does not matter one way or the other who they vote to protect. They could theoretically choose to protect a teammate. There is very little risk with the potential for a reward (a town vigilante, perhaps, could attempt to fire on said teammate).

My thought process on this vote is that scum would generally be less careful with their votes. They know who they are killing, so it does not matter who they vote for. Players who gave no reason or frivolous reasons would be worth looking at. I know I gave no reason. I was away on sick person business for most of the night and realized about 15 minutes peior to the deadline that I had not cast a vote yet. Epi dies early in a lot of games and I had a slight inclination to town read him, so he was my first instinct. My vote didn't seem to matter much anyway.

I didn't think of this until now, but the optimal strategy for that poll would have been to tie it up. Assuming the protection would be randomly distributed, there would have been a slim chance that the mafia kill would have dudded.

Are you lynching Ricochet because you believe he's bad and you need him dead to win, or are you lynching Ricochet because he is being annoying?

nutella wrote: ↑Fri Jun 16, 2017 8:31 pm @Dys hope everything's ok

I'm sorta tempted to vote for Rico because I'm pretty damn sick of the annoyingness, but Epi's pushing me to reconsider since I don't really think Rico necessarily looks like/is behaving like a baddie. Like, he could be "hiding behind" the singsong bullshit and the no-u pattern, but I don't have a particularly strong reason to think that. But the more he's getting pushed on it and remaining stubborn, the more I'm doubting his innocence... idk. WIFOM and all that jazz. If I can't make up my mind on Rico I might join DH in voting for G-Man -- the points there don't feel like much but it's more than I have on anyone else.

I'm "pushing" you?

Please stop spamming my inbox about Ricochet. Say what you want to say about him in the thread.

Does anybody honestly believe Ricochet is "hiding" behind his gimmick?

Every time someone suggests that, I roll my eyes.

I think he's doing what the hell he wants to do. It says nothing of his alignment to me. If you're lynching him because he's not playing the way you want him to, fine, but be honest about it. Don't act like he's bad because you don't like what he's doing.

DharmaHelper wrote: ↑Fri Jun 16, 2017 10:51 pm Oh also I meant to add that it is becoming a distraction and at some point you have to weigh how distracted you want to be versus how much you give a shit and stuff.

That was supposed to be my final point

He's only a distraction if people choose to be distracted by him.

He's not standing next to anybody blowing an air horn.

speedchuck wrote: ↑Fri Jun 16, 2017 11:44 pm
Epignosis wrote: ↑Fri Jun 16, 2017 10:35 pm Does anybody honestly believe Ricochet is "hiding" behind his gimmick?

Every time someone suggests that, I roll my eyes.

I think he's doing what the hell he wants to do. It says nothing of his alignment to me. If you're lynching him because he's not playing the way you want him to, fine, but be honest about it. Don't act like he's bad because you don't like what he's doing.
Assuming Rico keeps this thing up: What could he do that would make you scumread him?

You're acting like Ricochet is failing to provide commentary in his posts. Commentary is there. I have agreed with some of the things he has said. So, to answer your question, he would have to do or say something I find suspicious. That hasn't occurred.

Long Con wrote: ↑Sat Jun 17, 2017 12:29 am Epignosis. You have pretty much only focused on Dyslexicon as a suspicion.

False.

Long Con wrote: ↑Sat Jun 17, 2017 12:29 amHow does Dizzy's imminent replacement affect your opinion, and who else do you think is bad?

You are asking me questions to ask me questions.

Long Con wrote: ↑Sat Jun 17, 2017 1:12 am No, I'm asking you questions because all you're doing is accusing Dizzy and defending Rico, and laying low.

I'm not laying low. I've had other stuff to do, like finish a book for speedchuck and have nijuukyugou over and fix a friggin $10,000 air conditioning. It isn't like anything compelling is going on in here anyway.

Your question to me implies that someone's role changes when he or she gets replaced. It doesn't. Because it doesn't, my opinion of Dyslexicon (or anyone) won't change because of a pending replacement.

I don't think you think I'm bad. You're nibbling. You're not making any real effort of pursuit. You're not voting for me today. You're not trying to get other people to vote for me today. Your treatment of me reminds me of Mass Effect when a) you weren't a civilian, and b) you nibbled ("You got nervous"). You are manufacturing little things to come at me with. Civilians have no reason to do this. Mafia do. This time, I'm laying low.

Okay, let's say I am. I'm laying low.

When was the last time you saw me lay low when I was bad?

Search found 185 matches