The Syndicate

[insert hilarious entrance post here]

I'll make time for a catch-up, or at least a skim k.

G-Man wrote: ↑Sun Jul 02, 2017 6:35 pm I'm not so sure Fred is the right way to go today.

From what little I read last night, I think Mac stands out to me more than Fred. Below, I do not know why any of these are leaps of logic and the fact that they're being portrayed as though they are makes me cautious. I'll have to read more into this argument.

Spoiler: show

MacDougall wrote: ↑Sun Jul 02, 2017 8:40 am
Fredwood wrote: ↑Sun Jul 02, 2017 7:34 am
MacDougall wrote: ↑Sun Jul 02, 2017 7:23 am Your ping on me was based on me being right about who I voted for. You need better pings.
Now see, it's posts like these is why we can't be friends.

I gave you a meh clear, there's perfectly valid reasons for afk scum to come in and throw a vote on a teammate like that.

All my pings that you got is the chest thumping shortly after EOD after being quiet beforehand, and your reaction to me even suggesting there could be an alternate non-town motivation to your vote.
Okay bozo.

1. What's a meh clear? Is that some kind of throat lozenge?

2. You still haven't clarified this. You suggested that it was convenient that I appeared just after sprityo's flip as though to imply that I was around beforehand. You also suggested that if I was town and I was around (which you would need to be resigned to as fact to even reach this line of thought) I would have been pushing harder for my sprityo vote given that according to me I had a huge read on him (I didn't, I just trust my gut pings on early game posts and they are right 9 times out of 10 no hyperbole, I was just having some fun after the flip because I was excited).

So you are implying that I was here before the flip, by virtue of the coincidental timing of my celebratory posts, and that I am unlikely to be town because if I was, I would be pushing my sprityo votes sooner. Yet if I was Mafia and I was online before the end of day I would have had to have been being intentionally silent while sprityo got put into tie vote while my own vote which would easily be perceived as a chaos vote that meant nothing ergo could easily be moved without anyone really being able to hold it against me (and which exhibits behaviour that is demonstrably in line with both my mafia and my town meta), was still on sprityo. I simply could have moved my vote to the other person who had votes (assuming that all three of us are not Mafia friendz, which we definitely are).

So for your arguments to hold water, you would be required to believe that I was

1. Around at end of day before the lynch
2. Am Mafia
3. Intentionally threw a vote on teammate sprityo as my first post
4. Chose not to remove said vote at any time despite being able to
5. Likely a teammate of the other vote getter

Given the leaps of logic required to reach this conclusion as a genuine case I choose to believe that you didn't put any real thought into the hypothesis you were proposing lest you would have realised that it was highly improbable. This is most likely because of having an emotional reaction to my gesticulating about the flip ... probably because you were upset about said flip and feeling exposed as a result of having softly attempted to prevent the lynch of the deceased mafioso.

tl;dr u bad now faint

Fredwood wrote: ↑Sun Jul 02, 2017 7:18 pm Emotional, smh. I've been emotional one time during a mafia game, ask Quin. I don't see how aggressive ='s emotional.

I remember that this is a thing but I don't remember when this was a thing. It'd be neat if you could link that game.

Fredwood wrote: ↑Sun Jul 02, 2017 7:30 pm It was Phenom, not sure the day, but it's the legit time I remember ever blowing up. I can go diving for it

Were you not scum in that game?

Well, I guess it doesn't matter since you're arguing that you're not being emotional.

Dragon D. Luffy wrote: ↑Sun Jul 02, 2017 8:09 pm I just unwon a game of mafia.

https://forums.hero-academia.com/thread ... 14/page-48

I can feel your pain. I got recruited after clearing myself as a survivor and securing a win in ASOUE.

Sorry I missed the vote. I had the idea in my head that there was still loads of time left. I'd have wanted to catch up before I did anyway, which I haven't, so.

Gamestuff - Leaning town on Tink. I believe Eloh's testimony for reasons.

Dyslexicon wrote: ↑Sun Jun 25, 2017 1:34 pm
G-Man wrote: ↑Sun Jun 25, 2017 12:10 pm I like this whole trying to break the game open and looking for tactical advantage. Reminds me of the old days. Question for you big thinkers- if we pile up 3 evolution votes on a player who is mafia, what's to stop them from saying, "Hey, yeah, I evolved," when they didn't?
Pretty sure Mafia can evolve too - so nothing is stopping them no. That wasn't the point either.

Also, if this plan goes through, you should probably try to mandate people not just alternate between the same people if they're still alive. In theory, a baddie could just switch back and forth between their teammates if two baddies wind up in the evolution pool.
In theory they could. The hope would be that the collective reads are better than chance and that we force mafia to not vote each other - at the very least not use all their three votes on each other. The ties between who votes for who to get the evo points could also be read into later with flips etc, if the information is out in the open.

G-Man did not think the mafia could evolve. Why did you not think the mafia could evolve, G-Man?

Jackofhearts2005 wrote: ↑Sun Jun 25, 2017 1:53 pm
G-Man wrote: ↑Sun Jun 25, 2017 12:10 pm I like this whole trying to break the game open and looking for tactical advantage. Reminds me of the old days. Question for you big thinkers- if we pile up 3 evolution votes on a player who is mafia, what's to stop them from saying, "Hey, yeah, I evolved," when they didn't?

Also, if this plan goes through, you should probably try to mandate people not just alternate between the same people if they're still alive. In theory, a baddie could just switch back and forth between their teammates if two baddies wind up in the evolution pool.
Why wouldn't the bad guys evolve?

Mewtwo would lie, yeah, but the plan is designed to enpower the town, not catch the serial killer.

boo wrote: ↑Sun Jun 25, 2017 1:18 pm
Jackofhearts2005 wrote: ↑Sun Jun 25, 2017 10:33 am
Dragon D. Luffy wrote: ↑Sun Jun 25, 2017 10:15 am I have a question tho: how do we know mafia is keeping their side of the bargain? Are votes public?
If we want them to be.

If you me and Dizzy say we vote for Nutella and Nutella doesn't have a power, we know there is a baddie between the four of us.
No. There are roles that can't evolve. And why the four of you? LA not getting a power when three other people supposedly voted for her would say nothing about her alignment.
There is one town role that doesn't evolve and one indy. They'll just lie in that situation. Nbd.

Why did I choose those four? Cause they were the last four to post.

Why would one of those four be bad in that scenario? Cause either DDL, Diz or me didn't really evolve Nut or Nut is lying about not evolving. Ergo, one of the four (at least) is bad.

Jack thinks that Mewtwo is a serial killer. Why do you think that Mewtwo is a serial killer, Jack?

I am interested in the plan of publicly organising evolutions. I'm not caught up enough to know what went down with that strategy, but if it's still floating around... cool beans.

sprityo wrote: ↑Sun Jun 25, 2017 4:22 pm Jack is right in the aspect that trying to organize something may produce a good outcome, but ultimately nobody getting a power would be better than mafia. Especially since we still have our most powerful tool at our disposal, the lynch

A spitball: sprityo says this because neither him nor either of his teammates are likely to evolve with the names currently being thrown around. This would make these people look semi-decent:

boo
DFaraday
Fredwood
G-Man
nutella

Add Dyslexicon.

I didn't notice Jack made a list too, so add DDL and DrWilgy. That's a lot of names to really believe in (and totally not trying to save my own ass), but just for the sake of thinking it through, that leaves:

Domaquin
MacDougall
Neverwhere
Tink

Give me thoughts on these thoughts, people.

I'm only caught up to page 6, but I'll pick it up again in the morning. I'll give some proper reads then. Night.

Dom wrote: ↑Mon Jul 03, 2017 11:29 pm Even better lol bie

I'm Dom2.0.

G-Man wrote: ↑Mon Jun 26, 2017 8:05 pm
timmer wrote: ↑Mon Jun 26, 2017 8:02 pm Changed my vote, sinc eI don't feel like being dead just yet.
I voted for you Day 0, timmer, so I'd rather not vote for you now just to tie it up. I'd hate for you to be a civvie and discover that I wasted a vote on someone who died early.

This sounds very silly to me. From my perspective, in a game where powers are essentially given by 'election', worrying about being counterproductive doesn't make sense when you should be worrying about whether you made a mistake in helping someone evolve.

I give general townie points to the people who were on the TSP lynch, even though he was set to be modkilled (though I might reevaluate depending on the timeline). Mafia could have taken out two townies on Day 1. Mafia being on that wagon doesn't make much sense to me at face value.

boo wrote: ↑Tue Jun 27, 2017 5:52 pm
nutella wrote: ↑Tue Jun 27, 2017 5:30 pm
nutella wrote: ↑Mon Jun 26, 2017 11:02 pm
sprityo wrote: ↑Mon Jun 26, 2017 9:14 pm I like starting at "everyone is innocent until proven guilty"as opposed to the "everyone is guilty until proven innocent" that many others view
In general, I start with the former as well. It's just that in this case, with Boo having asked about repeat targeting for evo votes, I think it is more likely that he is bad and was asking because he wants to evolve a teammate. It makes less sense for a civilian to want to repeat target evo votes, at least at the beginning of the game when we're not sure who's good -- it's better to spread them around among the people we think we trust.
Here's the post boo is taking all of these assumptions from. "Spreading votes around among the people we think we trust" is exactly what I am doing for the next few nights. I am not piling votes on one player, because for one thing -- bear with me here as this might be hard for you to understand -- it's not allowed. If it were allowed, I suspect only baddies would do it; I don't trust anyone enough at this point to give them evo points two nights in a row. And as I have said multiple times, I don't know whether LC and Speed intended for the pact to last longer, but I personally have not committed to it for more than two nights, so if I end up targeting one of them a second time after that it would be because I strongly trusted them.
Votes are being spread around, but you're probably going to die because votes aren't being spread around.

Wut?

This post does not make me happy. It turns the obvious (nutella's involvement in the evolution vote scheme making her a prominent night kill target) into an attempt to make nutella look contradictory, which seems to be boo's general thoughts about nutella's Day 1.

boo, what's your read on nutella now?

sprityo wrote: ↑Tue Jun 27, 2017 6:59 pm
nutella wrote: ↑Tue Jun 27, 2017 5:33 pm Anyway, I'm probably going to die anyway since it's public knowledge that I'm getting at least two evo votes
Sounds like a pity party, sorry Nutella.

They way you're going about dying is misleading in its own light. I mean you're saying that you're FOR SURE, 100% getting two evo points. If that's not a grab for attention, then I don't know what is. You're placing yourself on the very precarious town pedestal where if you don't die you become supa-town or highly suspicious mafia. But like you can't back your claims up with anything until you actually evolve. We don't have a way to confirm how many evo points you actually got. Or at least I assume?

What I'm getting at is stop doing that, and focus on solving the game instead of where YOU sit in it.

In reference to your suspicions however
boo wrote: ↑Tue Jun 27, 2017 2:00 pm [quote=nutella post_id=363207 time=<a href="tel:1498585942">1498585942</a> user_id=262]
As I see it, (since I didn't vote for one of them on night 0) I am voting for three different people on the first three nights of the game, which is as much "spreading" as is possible up to that point. After night 2, I will re-evaluate whether I want to stay in the pact or not, and I may well vote for someone else anyway. Get off my case, I'm just playing the game.
Oh, so you're giving your word to be part of a long term plan, which by your own logic is something baddies would be looking to do, and you're already planning ahead to when you'll break it. Cool.

What boo has said here is Definitely twisting of words and looks awful. If not that then it's jumping to conclusions/assuming things in a negative light. Nutella put forth a decent plan to assign her votes and you just said nope "this is what you're actually going to do, even though I can't tell what you're thinking." It's a bad strategy and I suggest you stop arguing it and accept that you did something bad before you get yourself lynched. If you have a problem with being lynched that is
[/quote]

sprityo condemns boo for his actions, but stops short of actually indicating suspicion. I did bold an exception, but that reads more of a 'this looks bad in a vacuum' type of analysis. I am intrigued by sprityo's choice of words. To call boo's opinions a 'strategy' gives me reason to think that boo's mindset is fabricated.

sprityo wrote: ↑Tue Jun 27, 2017 6:59 pm
nutella wrote: ↑Tue Jun 27, 2017 5:33 pm Anyway, I'm probably going to die anyway since it's public knowledge that I'm getting at least two evo votes
Sounds like a pity party, sorry Nutella.

They way you're going about dying is misleading in its own light. I mean you're saying that you're FOR SURE, 100% getting two evo points. If that's not a grab for attention, then I don't know what is. You're placing yourself on the very precarious town pedestal where if you don't die you become supa-town or highly suspicious mafia. But like you can't back your claims up with anything until you actually evolve. We don't have a way to confirm how many evo points you actually got. Or at least I assume?

What I'm getting at is stop doing that, and focus on solving the game instead of where YOU sit in it.

In reference to your suspicions however
boo wrote: ↑Tue Jun 27, 2017 2:00 pm [quote=nutella post_id=363207 time=<a href="tel:1498585942">1498585942</a> user_id=262]
As I see it, (since I didn't vote for one of them on night 0) I am voting for three different people on the first three nights of the game, which is as much "spreading" as is possible up to that point. After night 2, I will re-evaluate whether I want to stay in the pact or not, and I may well vote for someone else anyway. Get off my case, I'm just playing the game.
Oh, so you're giving your word to be part of a long term plan, which by your own logic is something baddies would be looking to do, and you're already planning ahead to when you'll break it. Cool.

What boo has said here is Definitely twisting of words and looks awful. If not that then it's jumping to conclusions/assuming things in a negative light. Nutella put forth a decent plan to assign her votes and you just said nope "this is what you're actually going to do, even though I can't tell what you're thinking." It's a bad strategy and I suggest you stop arguing it and accept that you did something bad before you get yourself lynched. If you have a problem with being lynched that is

sprityo condemns boo for his actions, but stops short of actually indicating suspicion. I did bold an exception, but that reads more of a 'this looks bad in a vacuum' type of analysis and says nothing about his overall opinion on boo. I am intrigued by sprityo's choice of words. To call boo's opinions a 'strategy' gives me reason to think that boo's mindset is fabricated.

a poor attempt at ebwop

sprityo wrote: ↑Tue Jun 27, 2017 7:01 pm The conclusion is this though, Nutella is better looking than boob by a good amount, but Nutella based solely off of her interactions with boo is a light town AT BEST

Here's a more ?direct? opinion on boo. nutella looks a good amount better than boo, but nutella is only a light town at best. I'm inferring sprityo was reading boo as at least light scum at this point.

sprityo wrote: ↑Tue Jun 27, 2017 7:27 pm
sprityo wrote: ↑Tue Jun 27, 2017 7:01 pm The conclusion is this though, Nutella is better looking than boo by a good amount, but Nutella based solely off of her interactions with boo is a light town AT BEST
i felt the need to further explain this, im not saying boo is NOT town, but in a comparison situation.

but i think ive covered the hot topic issues and players of yesterday and will be retiring to a nice evening of video games

MacDougall wrote: ↑Fri Jun 30, 2017 2:12 am I have no idea what is going on but spirityo gets my vote because of this post

sprityo wrote: ↑Sun Jun 25, 2017 1:32 pm Are y'all enjoying your day zero shenanigans? It's noon and I just woke up, so I can assure I won't be reading anything before this

Also hi jack. We'll see how much I can trust you.

lol

I'm on page 15 of my catchup and my leg hurts. Goodnight.

DrWilgy wrote: ↑Tue Jul 04, 2017 7:41 pm Thoughts on all players atm.

Boo - Where your head at? I need to reveiw your recent input. Following the Sprityo lynching I still feel good about you.

DF - I feel rather null towards you, but tone wise and meta related I read you as civ. Regarding Nutella's suspicion of you, I disagree. Reviewing that interaction, I felt that Sprityo was trying to focus on me rather you. If you were mafia, I think you would have caught my eye more.

DDL - I'm still suspicious of you. Your recent votes have been bad and idk know why you are voting Gman now.

Dizzy - time to die homie.

Fredwood - I also dislike your vote pattern. I agree with suspicions voiced against you. Mainly Mac.

G-Man - You are one of the few I feel is legitimately hunting... or at least encouraging hunting.

Mac - This guy was too pumped after Sprits death to be bad.

Neverwhere - also somewhat null. I can see you being bad while knowing to ask the right questions, but... your asking the right questions and it makes me feel good about you.

Quin - bruh, you need to stop this lengthy catch up and share recent opinions.

Tink - where u at fam?

Tl;dr let's kill Dizzy, fred, or ddl in that order.

I'll give a current rainbow list after coffee. I'm currently in the mood to lynch boo.

Which is where I've just voted k

G-Man wrote: ↑Tue Jul 04, 2017 8:45 pm If we all end up voting for different people for an 11-way tie, I'm gonna cry.

best idea ever

DFaraday wrote: ↑Tue Jul 04, 2017 8:57 pm Quin, why boo?

I just said stuff about him last night. I think it's on the last page.

Quin wrote: ↑Tue Jul 04, 2017 9:00 pm
DFaraday wrote: ↑Tue Jul 04, 2017 8:57 pm Quin, why boo?
I just said stuff about him last night. I think it's on the last page.

Page before last. Woops.

Rainbow list incoming.

A quick rainbow. There's a lot of gut involved so I intend to check them and adjust based on what I find. I find that I've got a lot of null reads still so I might go through my neutral reads individually at some point. I do have some notes, I guess.

Fredwood
Tink - I'm taking Eloh's insistence that Tink is town into account. She was an evolved psychic type, which is the type I'd most associate info-gathering or likewise powers with.
Dragon D. Luffy

DrWilgy - I'm least impressed with my own placement here, because he's contributed enough to have a proper read on. He'll be the first I look at in more detail.
Dyslexicon
DFaraday
Neverwhere

MacDougall - Just the one instance I found, but he's not been here enough to give me more avenues to read him.
G-Man - I'm seeing a different G-Man in this game than usual. I realise he's a lot busier than usual which could be responsible, but I'm still a bit iffy overall.
boo - I've said a bit about him in the past few pages. I think he makes a compatible teammate for sprityo, and his own argument against nutella reads phony to me.

G-Man wrote: ↑Tue Jul 04, 2017 9:59 pm I just watched fireworks. Not great ones, because Pennsylvania bans good fireworks. Battery at 3%. I'm going to vote for Fred because he was on my original suss list. I suspect he's probably the indy, though. Check y'all when I can plug in. This day was a royal mess. We need to do a lot of talking tonight and lay out a lot of reads with reasons.

Why Fred over others on your original sus list? If I'm looking at the right post, a number of them are still alive.

I'm having a crisis about whether to force a tie to save a gut town read.

I do think boo would just be the better overall option, though.

Dom wrote: ↑Wed Jul 05, 2017 9:33 am
Quin wrote: ↑Mon Jul 03, 2017 11:30 pm
Dom wrote: ↑Mon Jul 03, 2017 11:29 pm Even better lol bie
I'm Dom2.0.
tbh dom 1.0 is far superior and less buggy

I'm not buggy, I'm quirky!

boo wrote: ↑Wed Jul 05, 2017 9:50 am Hey everyone. Try actually reading what la said before she died and go, "derp, lets obviously lynch DF now."

She did the work for you. And we still can't get it done? For real?

I still can't figure out who la is.

Neverwhere wrote: ↑Wed Jul 05, 2017 6:07 pm Reading back over my own posts, I'm inclined to side with boo and say I'd be interested in a DFaraday lynch. I remember reading back through Sprityos posts Mac and DFaraday stood out as people sprit was possibly defensive of.

What do you think of the things I had to say about boo?

MacDougall wrote: ↑Wed Jul 05, 2017 8:19 pm That's a very useful graph G-Man. Thank you for taking the time to make it.

Dragon D. Luffy wrote: ↑Wed Jul 05, 2017 6:49 pm I'm gonna keep the meta theory that Mac is civ when he is being rude and unlikable.

In the one game where I caught him as scum, he was being civil and likable.

So he's probably a civ here.
I can point to many of my Mafia games where I was bad and a prick.

Just out of curiosity which was the scum game that you caught me in that I was being nice?

That being said, this is a play at emotions. What about my posting in this game has been "rude and unlikable"? Was it the part where I have a scum read on you?

Dragon D. Luffy wrote: ↑Wed Jul 05, 2017 6:54 pm
DFaraday wrote: ↑Wed Jul 05, 2017 12:35 pm
boo wrote: ↑Wed Jul 05, 2017 9:50 am Hey everyone. Try actually reading what la said before she died and go, "derp, lets obviously lynch DF now."

She did the work for you. And we still can't get it done? For real?
If by work you mean "point out when Sprit correctly said I wasn't on the chopping block", then yeah, she did the work. I wouldn't even call what he said defending me.

Mac raises some intriguing ideas about DDL. I've been reading him as civ all game, mainly because he contributes a lot. I'm still leaning for a Wilgy lynch right now though.
On a scale of 1 to 10: how does your opinion of me depend on other people making "intriguing" reads of me, specially if they are voting for me near the end of the day?
I don't understand this post. Who voted for you near the end of the day? Is 1 a lot or 10? How much or how? It's a weird post.

Neverwhere wrote: ↑Wed Jul 05, 2017 6:07 pm Reading back over my own posts, I'm inclined to side with boo and say I'd be interested in a DFaraday lynch. I remember reading back through Sprityos posts Mac and DFaraday stood out as people sprit was possibly defensive of.
And then I voted to lynch Sprityo in such a way as to not earn any credit for it. Intelligent move.

Another example of MacDougall talking about how unreasonable it is to suspect him in the context of something that's actually very reasonable to suspect him for.

That's in reference to your sprityo vote, by the by. Is it not baddie compatible for a teammate to vote for sprit at a time where he'd taken practically zero heat the entire game thus far?

I recall a lot of mechanics talk by Luffy in the beginning of ASOUE, and he was town. I don't think it's odd for him.

Well that's nice.

If we're thinking it's a missed nightkill, Tink and Dizzy come to mind first. Tink's been gone since Night 1, and Dizzy never posted during the night. I think everyone else did, though I'll verify that.

boo and Wilgy also didn't post during the night.

DrWilgy wrote: ↑Wed Jul 05, 2017 10:51 pm
Quin wrote: ↑Wed Jul 05, 2017 10:41 pm If we're thinking it's a missed nightkill, Tink and Dizzy come to mind first. Tink's been gone since Night 1, and Dizzy never posted during the night. I think everyone else did, though I'll verify that.
Quin. Your drunk. Go home.

the thread title didn't get updated to show 'Night 5' when you posted

plz 4giv

DFaraday wrote: ↑Wed Jul 05, 2017 10:53 pm
Quin wrote: ↑Wed Jul 05, 2017 10:41 pm If we're thinking it's a missed nightkill, Tink and Dizzy come to mind first. Tink's been gone since Night 1, and Dizzy never posted during the night. I think everyone else did, though I'll verify that.
We've been getting kills every night up until now though. I guess Tink could have been sending kills up to this point, but it doesn't seem likely to me.

i'm not sure who's ISO i was looking at when I said Dizzy had posted up until now. i may as well be drunk.

Quin wrote: ↑Wed Jul 05, 2017 10:59 pm
DrWilgy wrote: ↑Wed Jul 05, 2017 10:51 pm
Quin wrote: ↑Wed Jul 05, 2017 10:41 pm If we're thinking it's a missed nightkill, Tink and Dizzy come to mind first. Tink's been gone since Night 1, and Dizzy never posted during the night. I think everyone else did, though I'll verify that.
Quin. Your drunk. Go home.
the thread title didn't get updated to show 'Night 5' when you posted

plz 4giv

rule out boo in some hypothetical where the baddies missed a kill as well k

ill stop embarrassing myself now

DrWilgy wrote: ↑Thu Jul 06, 2017 9:13 am The actions of mafia are full of manipulation and lies.

Dragon D. Luffy wrote: ↑Thu Jul 06, 2017 5:30 am
Quin wrote:Wed Jul 05, 2017 10:37 pm I recall a lot of mechanics talk by Luffy in the beginning of ASOUE, and he was town. I don't think it's odd for him.
I'm a tournament pokemon player.

Im having a field day with this game.
Speaking of which, when will the next VGC format be announced?

@Domoquin, have you finished forming a read of me? Do you have any questions? what do you think?

I'm still down for murking the ever-missing Dizzy. This shit's getting ridiculous.

I did just now. My only real qualm is that I don't understand how sprityo's lack of condemnation of low-posters influences your read on Dizzy. Can you elaborate on how Dizzy is a compatible teammate?

As for you, I'm content with a light town read. You don't steer me any which way, but the lack of pings on Day 6 is a point in your favour.

MacDougall wrote: ↑Thu Jul 06, 2017 3:29 am I think most likely scenario is a miss. Possibly whoever is Mew has a protection ability of some kind.

It could be a miss, but everyone but Tink and Dizzy were around Night 6, so it's unlikely. Correct me if I'm wrong, but Tink and Dizzy can't both be bad if this is the case, because they've both been gone for ages and night kills kept coming in after sprityo died. If it's a miss then someone posted but forgot to send in their night action.

It's very likely not an intentional miss to make us look at absentees, because again, everyone (bar the two) were here.

boo wrote: ↑Thu Jul 06, 2017 9:42 am I still want to lynch DF. He knows why.

I don't.

I am a little disappointed by lack of discussion around boo. He tied for the lynch on Day 2. What happened?

Quin wrote: ↑Tue Jul 04, 2017 8:11 am
sprityo wrote: ↑Tue Jun 27, 2017 6:59 pm
nutella wrote: ↑Tue Jun 27, 2017 5:33 pm Anyway, I'm probably going to die anyway since it's public knowledge that I'm getting at least two evo votes
Sounds like a pity party, sorry Nutella.

They way you're going about dying is misleading in its own light. I mean you're saying that you're FOR SURE, 100% getting two evo points. If that's not a grab for attention, then I don't know what is. You're placing yourself on the very precarious town pedestal where if you don't die you become supa-town or highly suspicious mafia. But like you can't back your claims up with anything until you actually evolve. We don't have a way to confirm how many evo points you actually got. Or at least I assume?

What I'm getting at is stop doing that, and focus on solving the game instead of where YOU sit in it.

In reference to your suspicions however
boo wrote: ↑Tue Jun 27, 2017 2:00 pm [quote=nutella post_id=363207 time=<a href="tel:1498585942">1498585942</a> user_id=262]
As I see it, (since I didn't vote for one of them on night 0) I am voting for three different people on the first three nights of the game, which is as much "spreading" as is possible up to that point. After night 2, I will re-evaluate whether I want to stay in the pact or not, and I may well vote for someone else anyway. Get off my case, I'm just playing the game.
Oh, so you're giving your word to be part of a long term plan, which by your own logic is something baddies would be looking to do, and you're already planning ahead to when you'll break it. Cool.

What boo has said here is Definitely twisting of words and looks awful. If not that then it's jumping to conclusions/assuming things in a negative light. Nutella put forth a decent plan to assign her votes and you just said nope "this is what you're actually going to do, even though I can't tell what you're thinking." It's a bad strategy and I suggest you stop arguing it and accept that you did something bad before you get yourself lynched. If you have a problem with being lynched that is

sprityo condemns boo for his actions, but stops short of actually indicating suspicion. I did bold an exception, but that reads more of a 'this looks bad in a vacuum' type of analysis. I am intrigued by sprityo's choice of words. To call boo's opinions a 'strategy' gives me reason to think that boo's mindset is fabricated.
[/quote]

Bringing this poorly quoted paragraph up again. I bolded the entire paragraph of what I'm talking about. I am most interested in thoughts about sprityo's use of words. He called boo's thoughts on nutella a 'strategy' which is never something I would call civ behaviour.

Search found 126 matches