The Syndicate

Are y'all enjoying your day zero shenanigans? It's noon and I just woke up, so I can assure I won't be reading anything before this

Also hi jack. We'll see how much I can trust you.

If you start out the game contradicting yourself, then you'll never be suspected 10/10 fool proof strategy

speedchuck wrote: ↑Sun Jun 25, 2017 2:06 pm Anybody disagree with "Fred, Tony, LC, Nutella, Speed" as the list of five preferred Evo's on Day 0?

I already threw my vote in there. If someone doesn't want me in there because I helped come up with the idea, swap me out for Sprityo maybe. But unless there are objections, this'll do for D0.

On N1, we can do public assigning.

Where are we getting this list from? A first come first serve or are we simply just following like sheep?

Or is this a synopsis of people who have been known to be town in a game (even though that's honestly not the best way to go)

Why would we need a deadline for opinions? I mean I get deadlines force reads out of people but there's no way to enforce that without guaranteed consequences

Jack is right in the aspect that trying to organize something may produce a good outcome, but ultimately nobody getting a power would be better than mafia. Especially since we still have our most powerful tool at our disposal, the lynch

So I don't get the purpose of putting 6 names down. From what I can read in the OP it's just one person you vote for. But my list is as follows:

Speedchuck - because we're CPI buddies
Dom - because I'm afraid of Dom. Always.
Jack - because I "like" jack as a person
DrWigly - because he's a doctor
LC - because I like LC as a person
Mac - because I haven't seen Mac in forever it feels like

Fredwood wrote: ↑Mon Jun 26, 2017 1:17 pm (seriously not serious about being serious about that)

Is the day almost over already? Oh golly

Dyslexicon wrote: ↑Mon Jun 26, 2017 7:00 pm I'm voting Jack for literally no reason. Sue me.

I'm voting jack for realistically no reason. Please give me $8000

I mean TSP could replace in since he is the first one lynched. Unless that's a no go

What a cutie

IT'S TIME TO D-D-D-D DDDDDIE

Jackofhearts2005 wrote: ↑Mon Jun 26, 2017 8:17 pm Feeling better about DDL.

Hate the votes for no reason.

Your reputation precedes you, Jack

*jazz hands*

Let's see if I can put together something from this fairly straightforward day 1 during tonight.

nutella wrote: ↑Mon Jun 26, 2017 9:04 pm Damn, I missed it. Sorry. Got caught up in a few errands and forgot to pop back on.

I agree with LC's suspicion of Boo. I think it's very likely Boo asked that question from a baddie perspective, and his defense about "civ thinking from a baddie mindset" is weeeeaaak. Occam's razor tells me Boo is mafia.

I feel like I'm naturally inclined to disagree with this im concept, but quote me exactly what you're talking about and I'll see

I like starting at "everyone is innocent until proven guilty"as opposed to the "everyone is guilty until proven innocent" that many others view

When I say many others, I refer more to my past experience and not in the current

nutella wrote: ↑Tue Jun 27, 2017 5:33 pm Anyway, I'm probably going to die anyway since it's public knowledge that I'm getting at least two evo votes

Sounds like a pity party, sorry Nutella.

They way you're going about dying is misleading in its own light. I mean you're saying that you're FOR SURE, 100% getting two evo points. If that's not a grab for attention, then I don't know what is. You're placing yourself on the very precarious town pedestal where if you don't die you become supa-town or highly suspicious mafia. But like you can't back your claims up with anything until you actually evolve. We don't have a way to confirm how many evo points you actually got. Or at least I assume?

What I'm getting at is stop doing that, and focus on solving the game instead of where YOU sit in it.

In reference to your suspicions however

boo wrote: ↑Tue Jun 27, 2017 2:00 pm [quote=nutella post_id=363207 time=<a href="tel:1498585942">1498585942</a> user_id=262]
As I see it, (since I didn't vote for one of them on night 0) I am voting for three different people on the first three nights of the game, which is as much "spreading" as is possible up to that point. After night 2, I will re-evaluate whether I want to stay in the pact or not, and I may well vote for someone else anyway. Get off my case, I'm just playing the game.

Oh, so you're giving your word to be part of a long term plan, which by your own logic is something baddies would be looking to do, and you're already planning ahead to when you'll break it. Cool.
[/quote]

What boo has said here is Definitely twisting of words and looks awful. If not that then it's jumping to conclusions/assuming things in a negative light. Nutella put forth a decent plan to assign her votes and you just said nope "this is what you're actually going to do, even though I can't tell what you're thinking." It's a bad strategy and I suggest you stop arguing it and accept that you did something bad before you get yourself lynched. If you have a problem with being lynched that is

Dieodhakrojake I broke quote, mods plz fix

The conclusion is this though, Nutella is better looking than boob by a good amount, but Nutella based solely off of her interactions with boo is a light town AT BEST

In my gut i want to say i trust DDL a lot even though looking at his ISO didnt give me a whole lot to go off of outside of his dislike for timmer and a scuffle with jack.

I saw some things about LC and speed being tossed around too. LC mostly, like nutella was against boo on his whole concept, which is correct. but i think why i keep seeing the names together is how he discusses with speedchuck a sort of vote alliance thing for tonight. and.... thats really it? not much else i can go on, he's essentially same level as nutella in terms of what he's doing. only nutella has been more argumentative about it and LC was taking pot shots here and there.

Speedchuck, starts out with some nice pro-towny things. he at least talks about it and not too much (which in retrospect makes him look better than how jack was arguing it) but thats because theres not much. and then he just kinda misses out and asks for a recap, so eh.

and then i wanted to cover jack since i just HAVE to, being he is who he is. we've gotten quite the "friendship". (i also just realized this post is half the people on my list, hmph. interesting) So overall jack actually.... looks good. i mean his disagreement with DDL wasnt a two sided thing, they both have their reasons. i would side with DDL on it based my personal opinion since having all vanilla towns is lame. but jack makes some decent posts in his actual banter, and he also throws down his opinions of people which is more than a lot of players have put out (then again it's day 1 and i can relate that it's hard to get reads sometimes)

I think that should be good, in retrospect, if i was to go into my list of 6, the other three, Dom, Mac, and DrWilgy, well i couldnt do the former two, and will change them if they dont show up tomorrow (the phase), and DrWilgy doesnt have enough for me to judge him im pretty sure. (at least, if im remembering right)

sprityo wrote: ↑Tue Jun 27, 2017 7:01 pm The conclusion is this though, Nutella is better looking than boo by a good amount, but Nutella based solely off of her interactions with boo is a light town AT BEST

i felt the need to further explain this, im not saying boo is NOT town, but in a comparison situation.

but i think ive covered the hot topic issues and players of yesterday and will be retiring to a nice evening of video games

hm.

interesting.

I wasn't about to say, why is DF on the chopping block? Last I thought, you were the only one with suspicion on him, Wilgy?

I was about to say*

I'm also going to be voting boo, since he was the only one that had appeared off yesterday, and I'm not understanding the case on timmer so this also is a reason for me to vote boo.

DDL, can you tell me in short the single glaring issue of why timmer is the better lynch candidate?

so for my understanding Nutella, you're saying your whole spiel yesterday, was in fact wrong and you're second guessing now, and timmer is the better choice?

Well, not wrong, but misjudged.

boo wrote: ↑Wed Jun 28, 2017 6:19 pm

sprityo wrote: ↑Wed Jun 28, 2017 6:05 pm DDL, can you tell me in short the single glaring issue of why timmer is the better lynch candidate?

He's the skatiest of skating by type of baddies. Granted, I haven't played in about a year, but that's always been his style in games I've played with him when he has been bad. He has a much greater thread presence when he's civ. Even. If he's busy, which I can accept is possible and or likely, he puts more explanation into votes. He's done this two days in a row now, so it's not a one off. That's baddie Timmer. I think the fact that la is willing to chance seeing if I'm right, when she and I haven't been seeing eye to eye, says enough about his game from someone else who is familiar with him.

Thank you for the response, but I was asking DDL

DrWilgy wrote: ↑Wed Jun 28, 2017 6:41 pm my own personal chopping block. Players I thought I'd like to murk.

Confirmed, DrWilgy wants to "beat the living shit out outta someone"

About to leave gym, let's see what I missed

Fredwood wrote: ↑Wed Jun 28, 2017 8:35 pm

sprityo wrote: ↑Wed Jun 28, 2017 8:34 pm About to leave gym, let's see what I missed

He says innocently

Throwing shade now Fred? What have I done to you?

If any irks me more, It's snide comments.

Hmph!

Golly it's like I have a lot of irrelevant content and no one else does? At least to scale......

If it was so irrelevant it could've been left out, but whatever. I'm known to be irrelevant until the town runs out of ideas. When's the last time you've ever seen me lead something?

Ebwop: I should've added a "not to mention" in the beginning of that last sentence. It doesn't match what I was trying to say

@DrWilgy, my list has changed. Quite drastically in fact due to 1/3 being dead. I would add DDL to the list since he is a prominent player in my opinion, And I would take off Dom since he has yet to appear. You are hesititantly on there still solely because I need 5-6 players but you haven't done anything spectacular to have me want to keep you there. I'll also add Nutella as a hesitant since she appears to be wanting to do the right thing but I'm not 100% sold on it. I think. This all coming without checking back on information is what I'd have my list at now. I'm keeping mac on the list since he has at least appeared and I'm interested in seeing what he does.

Finally, the original list I made, was for all the reasons I listed. Nothing more nothing less. Hence why you're now a hesitant instead of "lol cause he's a doctor"

So if you wanted an updated list it'd be

LC
DDL
Nutella
Mac
*DrWilgy

Question, why is Nutella and fredwood in that list?

Fredwood in general is looking better than you Gman.

I haven't really noticed Nutella much today, but I'm confident almost no one would vote for her. I feel like you added her in the for no apparent reason.

I'd like to throw in, that I'm not entirely sure where you're getting the whole list from in the first place. Sidestepping a good half of the player base? Like you place either a "doesn't look good" or a "looks good, but then bad" on most everyone in the list you made. Excluding DF and DDL as the most prominent looking among the bunch. Back to the 5 people you mentioned though. In my eyes you've listed them as follows:

Disagreement man
Somewhere
Hazelnut friend
Fluffy
I do what I want.

Realistically, you could've replaced 3 or 4 of these people with other players and still be about the same kind of list

To directly answer your question, I'd pick tink, I don't think I'd pick everywhere since I haven't checked on their content. But I'd much rather lynch someone like DrWilgy, boo, Dom/Dyslexicon/Eloh, and Gman. Not to say I have evidence on them, but that I don't feel it in my gut that they're whole-y town sided. Something more so I should review over tonight since I'll be driving home and more than likely miss the lynch. In which case, I'm leaving my vote on tink.

Neverwhere* my apologies on saying everywhere

Linki: okay. But the reasons you listed to suspect Nutella and fredwood, I don't have a problem with. Focusing on mechanics is a perfectly valid thing to talk about, at least in early game, While Nutella was just wrapped up in an argument. So I would expect the word count to be hugher up, probably less neat

Linki2: 1. Yes, overall civviness with a few minor things I don't entirely agree with
2. I honestly couldn't tell you at current so I'll have to get back to you on a re-read

I might be able to make it home before Day ends. But until then I'll be unable to respond, ciao

DrWilgy wrote: ↑Sat Jul 15, 2017 9:53 am Shame someone knew to kill you right off the back am I right?

That would be my doing

This is a false fallacy. I already die before day 4 enough as it is