Boomslang wrote: ↑Sat Aug 12, 2017 5:21 pm
Don't try to blame this on me, Wilgy. You could've tied the vote, or literally anyone else could have. I actually made a decision.
I legit said "I don't have to vote" and left. I saw there was a tie and was content knowing Neverwhere would die. If I was around to tie it up I would have. Idk what you wanted from me m8.
You also posted that you voted around 7:21... not even 10 min until the poll closed. Even if I was here to tie it up you gave us 9 min to rework something that was coordinated well in advance. Something that others made the decision to do.
It seemed that a majority of people wanted to reevaluate my claim as well. You, by yourself, decided against that when you placed your vote.
Now, Eloh was there. Idk why she didn't point out that this would have murked up the test plan. I guess she did a little... the time constraint was also there. W/e
All I know is that you took a gamble via voting. You wanted to punish a no show and you did. Now civs need to hunt to win. I don't think testing me is too wise at this point.
Hmm...
You could always test me through voting me and the person you find most suspicious up to a tie. I won't die because I put myself last as the tie priority (duh) and the other player will die.
I don't know what more you want from me other than this. I helped the civs, and then called a tie with utmost confidence.
I'm rambling now... I guess this is because part of me still wants civs to win even though I don't need them to. I guess that's just the friendly neighborhood indy that I want to be inherently. I know civs won't win of they choose to not believe me.
I will vote for myself. Tie me up with whom you find suspect and that'd be that.