My favorite Doctor has always been Tennant. <3
Juliets, the 11th Doctor was Matt Smith. The 12th is the current and it's Peter Capaldi.
Search found 407 matches
Return to “Dr. Who Mafia - Night 12”
- Mon Sep 22, 2014 11:11 pm
- Forum: Previous Jobs
- Topic: Dr. Who Mafia - Night 12
- Replies: 7359
- Views: 177109
- Mon Sep 22, 2014 11:17 pm
- Forum: Previous Jobs
- Topic: Dr. Who Mafia - Night 12
- Replies: 7359
- Views: 177109
Re: Dr. Who Mafia!
Enrique wrote:Dom! My favorite homophobic anti-emo jerk
- Mon Sep 22, 2014 11:28 pm
- Forum: Previous Jobs
- Topic: Dr. Who Mafia - Night 12
- Replies: 7359
- Views: 177109
Re: Dr. Who Mafia!
Doctor Donna is the saddest and best part of the entire series.bea wrote:To be fair, Doctor Donna is where it's at. Look - her name is even a smiley!!!
- Mon Sep 22, 2014 11:30 pm
- Forum: Previous Jobs
- Topic: Dr. Who Mafia - Night 12
- Replies: 7359
- Views: 177109
Re: Dr. Who Mafia!
You think so? I saw the first episode and found the writing to be quite awful.birdwithteeth11 wrote:Give Capaldi a full season, and I bet my answer to this will change. But for now, I would agree.MovingPictures07 wrote:It's obvious Tennant will win the poll, but IMO for good reason. He was just so perfect for the role it's not even funny.
- Mon Sep 22, 2014 11:43 pm
- Forum: Previous Jobs
- Topic: Dr. Who Mafia - Night 12
- Replies: 7359
- Views: 177109
Re: Dr. Who Mafia!
I really hated most of Smith's reign. I love Matt Smith, but I thought the writing was horrendous.bea wrote:I agree. There is a difference between the writing and the acting. I think the writing will catch up with the acting soon enough (I hope. ) I really did like the last two episodes though. Transitions are always difficult.Dom wrote:You think so? I saw the first episode and found the writing to be quite awful.birdwithteeth11 wrote:Give Capaldi a full season, and I bet my answer to this will change. But for now, I would agree.MovingPictures07 wrote:It's obvious Tennant will win the poll, but IMO for good reason. He was just so perfect for the role it's not even funny.
Anyway, I don't want to clog the thread with my pretentious 'Moffat Killed Who' rants.
- Mon Sep 22, 2014 11:56 pm
- Forum: Previous Jobs
- Topic: Dr. Who Mafia - Night 12
- Replies: 7359
- Views: 177109
Re: Dr. Who Mafia!
MovingPictures07 wrote:I know, I wanted both of these games to start so badly, especially this one, but them starting the same night will prove interesting for my schedule sometimes. Lol. But I'm sure it won't matter.Hedgeowl wrote:also omg 2 games starting on the same night??Dana wrote:Bea that was the best pun I've heard all night you are the best person omg
I kinda have a soft spot for 9 (that's eccleston right?) as the first doctor I saw, but miss tennant soooo much.
I have a soft spot for 9 too (Yes, Eccleston), I don't understand some of the apathy there.
- Mon Sep 22, 2014 11:57 pm
- Forum: Previous Jobs
- Topic: Dr. Who Mafia - Night 12
- Replies: 7359
- Views: 177109
Re: Dr. Who Mafia! - Day 0
I love Eccleson, but I just hated the farting aliens.MovingPictures07 wrote:Oh god, those things. Okay, terrible story arc, I will admit that.
- Wed Sep 24, 2014 12:24 am
- Forum: Previous Jobs
- Topic: Dr. Who Mafia - Night 12
- Replies: 7359
- Views: 177109
Re: Dr. Who Mafia! - Day 0
I can edit as well.MovingPictures07 wrote:That should not be why, no, the permissions are completely separate.Roxy wrote:Why can I edit in this forum? is it bc I am hosting the other game?
Let me look into this. I was pretty thorough in making sure I accounted for everything permissions-wise when instituting this shiny new subforum, but that doesn't mean something didn't fall through the cracks.
Did I miss where you talked more about this? Who are you talking?Made wrote:
Linki- ok this is just a petpeev, but people describing their own tells always makes me feel weird.
What constitutes clipping a quote?S~V~S wrote:Don't clip quotes. It looks bad, tbh.
- Wed Sep 24, 2014 1:37 am
- Forum: Previous Jobs
- Topic: Dr. Who Mafia - Night 12
- Replies: 7359
- Views: 177109
Re: Dr. Who Mafia! - Day 0
Good to know.Spacedaisy wrote:Oh crap. Yes you are missing one because I accidentally hit edit instead of quote on on Dom's post!!!fingersplints wrote:Am I missing another post from SD?
- Wed Sep 24, 2014 8:46 pm
- Forum: Previous Jobs
- Topic: Dr. Who Mafia - Night 12
- Replies: 7359
- Views: 177109
Re: Dr. Who Mafia! - Day 0
It's suspicious that he used it and credited exactly where he heard it?Enrique wrote:"Supatown" has been used twice in this thread... once by Made, as a standard LD statement, and then zeek using it "in llama's words." Zeek, this is your first game here, right? Not even a Side Mission before? Caught on quickly to the lingo. Is this something you learnt from your BTSC partners?
- Wed Sep 24, 2014 8:50 pm
- Forum: Previous Jobs
- Topic: Dr. Who Mafia - Night 12
- Replies: 7359
- Views: 177109
Re: Dr. Who Mafia! - Day 1
Oh... I just understood the bit about Llama.Enrique wrote:No. It's suspicious that he used it without any indication that he was around when it was used.
- Wed Sep 24, 2014 11:54 pm
- Forum: Previous Jobs
- Topic: Dr. Who Mafia - Night 12
- Replies: 7359
- Views: 177109
Re: Dr. Who Mafia! - Day 1
I find some of the points on Enrique to be valid. I do. However, I couldn't help but notice how hypocritical MP is being.
So now here you go trying to subtly push that my behavior was really forced and over the top, just like Dana, yet you're "not making any accusations"?
I don't buy it.
Am I bad or not, Enri?[/quote]
Seriously?
So you agree-- Enrique is your greatest suspect.MovingPictures07 wrote:Wow, I actually agree here.Epignosis wrote:I waited until Day 1. But you, sir, are my greatest suspect.Enrique wrote:No. It's suspicious that he used it without any indication that he was around when it was used.
[quote="MovingPictures07"MovingPictures07 wrote: Fair, I don't feel very strongly about this Enrique suspicion, but I do believe in it, and I do think he very well could be bad. I wouldn't have voted him if we couldn't change votes, but since we can, thought I might as well.
So now here you go trying to subtly push that my behavior was really forced and over the top, just like Dana, yet you're "not making any accusations"?
I don't buy it.
Am I bad or not, Enri?[/quote]
Seriously?
- Fri Sep 26, 2014 1:28 pm
- Forum: Previous Jobs
- Topic: Dr. Who Mafia - Night 12
- Replies: 7359
- Views: 177109
Re: Dr. Who Mafia! - Day 1
What makes me furrow my brow is that you seem to be looking at Enrique (who I believe to be suspicious) partially because he is changing stance on you. However, you are doing a similar kind of waffling on him. It doesn't make sense to me.MovingPictures07 wrote:I'm confused, Dom, what do you find hypocritical? Is it not possible that I find Enri my greatest suspicion and yet I don't feel very strongly about it? Especially this early on?Dom wrote:I find some of the points on Enrique to be valid. I do. However, I couldn't help but notice how hypocritical MP is being.
So you agree-- Enrique is your greatest suspect.MovingPictures07 wrote:Wow, I actually agree here.Epignosis wrote:I waited until Day 1. But you, sir, are my greatest suspect.Enrique wrote:No. It's suspicious that he used it without any indication that he was around when it was used.MovingPictures07 wrote: Fair, I don't feel very strongly about this Enrique suspicion, but I do believe in it, and I do think he very well could be bad. I wouldn't have voted him if we couldn't change votes, but since we can, thought I might as well.MovingPictures07 wrote: So now here you go trying to subtly push that my behavior was really forced and over the top, just like Dana, yet you're "not making any accusations"?
I don't buy it.
Am I bad or not, Enri?
Seriously?
Or... are you talking about something else?
I'm likely to vote Enrique though. Your emotional spout read true to me.
- Fri Sep 26, 2014 1:29 pm
- Forum: Previous Jobs
- Topic: Dr. Who Mafia - Night 12
- Replies: 7359
- Views: 177109
Re: Dr. Who Mafia! - Day 1
Voting for Enrique.
- Sat Sep 27, 2014 3:15 am
- Forum: Previous Jobs
- Topic: Dr. Who Mafia - Night 12
- Replies: 7359
- Views: 177109
Re: Dr. Who Mafia! - Day 1
Hi everyone! I had a rather exhausting night and just caught up. I will do my best to comment appropriately.
There, however, IS something else I didn't clarify. Why did you get the two confused?
I will be honest, I found Juliets post confusion to be suspicious, but I am not sure I would have voted for her-- though, i don't feel like I'm a fair judge of this since I have retrospect at this point.
My Day 1 suspicion on Enrique can be summed up as follows (since people have asked):
I thought his "slip" that he had caught zeke in was very weak and convoluted. I thought he was pushing a lynch on what he thought would be an easy target. I felt his reaction was very insincere.
However, Made has my eye at this point, anyway.
I absolutely clarified this.Made wrote:Does anyone know how this post is suppose to be read, he never clarified what exact he felt was hypocritical.Dom wrote:I find some of the points on Enrique to be valid. I do. However, I couldn't help but notice how hypocritical MP is being.
So you agree-- Enrique is your greatest suspect.MovingPictures07 wrote:Wow, I actually agree here.Epignosis wrote:I waited until Day 1. But you, sir, are my greatest suspect.Enrique wrote:No. It's suspicious that he used it without any indication that he was around when it was used.MovingPictures07 wrote: Fair, I don't feel very strongly about this Enrique suspicion, but I do believe in it, and I do think he very well could be bad. I wouldn't have voted him if we couldn't change votes, but since we can, thought I might as well.Seriously?MovingPictures07 wrote: So now here you go trying to subtly push that my behavior was really forced and over the top, just like Dana, yet you're "not making any accusations"?
I don't buy it.
Am I bad or not, Enri?
There, however, IS something else I didn't clarify. Why did you get the two confused?
Explain to me how you "misread" my post. Explain to me that "misreading" my post would cause you to think I NEVER clarified on a post that I had made earlier.Made wrote: Also, thanks, misread Dom's post.
I will be honest, I found Juliets post confusion to be suspicious, but I am not sure I would have voted for her-- though, i don't feel like I'm a fair judge of this since I have retrospect at this point.
My Day 1 suspicion on Enrique can be summed up as follows (since people have asked):
I thought his "slip" that he had caught zeke in was very weak and convoluted. I thought he was pushing a lynch on what he thought would be an easy target. I felt his reaction was very insincere.
However, Made has my eye at this point, anyway.
- Sat Sep 27, 2014 10:17 am
- Forum: Previous Jobs
- Topic: Dr. Who Mafia - Night 12
- Replies: 7359
- Views: 177109
Re: Dr. Who Mafia! - Day 1
Made, why were you more concerned with something I did clarify rather than the thing I did not actually clarify?Made wrote:I skipped the quotes when i read you. So i read:Dom wrote:Hi everyone! I had a rather exhausting night and just caught up. I will do my best to comment appropriately.
I absolutely clarified this.Made wrote:Does anyone know how this post is suppose to be read, he never clarified what exact he felt was hypocritical.Dom wrote:I find some of the points on Enrique to be valid. I do. However, I couldn't help but notice how hypocritical MP is being.
So you agree-- Enrique is your greatest suspect.MovingPictures07 wrote:Wow, I actually agree here.Epignosis wrote:I waited until Day 1. But you, sir, are my greatest suspect.Enrique wrote:No. It's suspicious that he used it without any indication that he was around when it was used.MovingPictures07 wrote: Fair, I don't feel very strongly about this Enrique suspicion, but I do believe in it, and I do think he very well could be bad. I wouldn't have voted him if we couldn't change votes, but since we can, thought I might as well.Seriously?MovingPictures07 wrote: So now here you go trying to subtly push that my behavior was really forced and over the top, just like Dana, yet you're "not making any accusations"?
I don't buy it.
Am I bad or not, Enri?
There, however, IS something else I didn't clarify. Why did you get the two confused?Explain to me how you "misread" my post. Explain to me that "misreading" my post would cause you to think I NEVER clarified on a post that I had made earlier.Made wrote: Also, thanks, misread Dom's post.But didn't realize this was a clarification of the hypocritical thing till MP pointed it out to me.Dom wrote:What makes me furrow my brow is that you seem to be looking at Enrique (who I believe to be suspicious) partially because he is changing stance on you. However, you are doing a similar kind of waffling on him. It doesn't make sense to me
The really shitty thing is I felt that Juliet's lynch was absolute bullshit. Simple phrasing change was a cardinal sin but everything that everyone else did, including but not limited to:
Mr's vote
SVS's removedness
Mp's stunt
Enrique's supatown
Elo's vote
Epi's Suicidalness
While i personally don't think any of these were vote worthy (Beside maybe Elo's vote), the fact that the above were acknowledge and deemed insignificant but juliet wasn't is bothering me.
Also, SVS, start playing better already, like real talk .
zeek wrote:Okay, so the Valeyard. He must be an Indy. One possibility we must consider is that should he be lynched he could appear as the Doctor. They are genetically the same, the Valeyard being the accidental result of an experiment to try to break the limit on regenerations.
That leave two roles unaccounted for. One could be indy and one civ, or they could be an extra mafia member for each team.
I see Davros, creator of the Daleks, as a possibility. But others fit better with the hidden element of the roles. Obviously the Silence have been mentioned and a lone Weeping Angel is possible. The Beast, a Zygon or Slitheen. Even the Vashda Narada, which are essentially flesh-eating shadows.
What's signficiant is that he was completely wrong about what I didn't clarify. Why?Enrique wrote:Dom, I'm afraid I don't really understand you right now. What's so terrible about Made missing your clarification? What about it makes him worthy of your eye?
zeek, I personally appreciate these contributions. I actually spent a bit reading the Doctor Who wiki today, and for the first time in my life considered watching the show Those last few possible roles you mention, what do you think they could be?
tbh I feel like the secret roles would be indies or maybe another baddie team, as opposed to civs and hidden Daleks/Cybermen. Plenty of roles in the list already have *secret* powers, what would be the point of adding more secrets to those teams?
In addition, how do you both "miss" something and "misread" it?
- Sat Sep 27, 2014 10:18 am
- Forum: Previous Jobs
- Topic: Dr. Who Mafia - Night 12
- Replies: 7359
- Views: 177109
Re: Dr. Who Mafia! - Night 1
I voted for a random planet tbh
- Sat Sep 27, 2014 10:30 am
- Forum: Previous Jobs
- Topic: Dr. Who Mafia - Night 12
- Replies: 7359
- Views: 177109
Re: Dr. Who Mafia! - Night 1
Please tell me how you know this.zeek wrote:Doubt it. And even if you were voting randomly you wouldn't have voted Alfava Metraxis and then changed.Dom wrote:I voted for a random planet tbh
I was faithful to my randomizer. I read four, accidentally voted one, and then changed my vote.
- Sat Sep 27, 2014 10:37 am
- Forum: Previous Jobs
- Topic: Dr. Who Mafia - Night 12
- Replies: 7359
- Views: 177109
Re: Dr. Who Mafia! - Night 1
zeek wrote:You use a randomizer for four options? How very dilligent.Dom wrote:Please tell me how you know this.zeek wrote:Doubt it. And even if you were voting randomly you wouldn't have voted Alfava Metraxis and then changed.Dom wrote:I voted for a random planet tbh
I was faithful to my randomizer. I read four, accidentally voted one, and then changed my vote.
- Sat Sep 27, 2014 6:58 pm
- Forum: Previous Jobs
- Topic: Dr. Who Mafia - Night 12
- Replies: 7359
- Views: 177109
Re: Dr. Who Mafia! - Night 1
kzeek wrote:Don't bother reviewing my posts, you will not find what you're looking for.
Yes, I do think Dom might be bad. Not sure on Made.
When I voted for Azure, I was the second vote, I think. I don't like how the pile up has been after that at all. I think I want to change my vote, but I don't like how pedantic seek is being about his option. I liked SVS's reasoning much better, but I almost don't want to vote that option to spite zeek.
- Sun Sep 28, 2014 12:43 pm
- Forum: Previous Jobs
- Topic: Dr. Who Mafia - Night 12
- Replies: 7359
- Views: 177109
Re: Dr. Who Mafia! - Day 2
Roxy, I appreciate your thoughts. I changed my vote to match my randomizer because I didn't at first. That's absolutely true. I, as a player reading this, would have a hard time believing it as well, but it is true.Roxy wrote:This exchange has me wanting to look closer at Dom. Why lie about a simple random vote? You voted one then changed your vote to another - that is NOT random in my book. Then you post to zeek a picture/cartoon - "stop patronizing me teacher" - as a way to laugh it off bit I ain't laughing tbh.Dom wrote:Please tell me how you know this.zeek wrote:Doubt it. And even if you were voting randomly you wouldn't have voted Alfava Metraxis and then changed.Dom wrote:I voted for a random planet tbh
I was faithful to my randomizer. I read four, accidentally voted one, and then changed my vote.
How is this even remotely civvie minded?? Its spiteful - not helpful at all.Dom wrote:k
When I voted for Azure, I was the second vote, I think. I don't like how the pile up has been after that at all. I think I want to change my vote, but I don't like how pedantic seek is being about his option. I liked SVS's reasoning much better, but I almost don't want to vote that option to spite zeek.
I'm sorry you think that is spiteful of me-- I mean, I did use the word "spite", but the way zeek pushed that option irked me. It really pissed me off. He was extremely rude and condescending towards me. It made me not want to vote the option he was voting for-- this is something I am sure you have felt before, Rox.
Are you implying that I voted close to the end?Enrique wrote:Dom's "random" vote then switched to compete with Alzarius was also something. For me the weirdest part about this whole thing is that it was such a close race to the end, but practically none of the Azure voters offered any reason other than "I like blue" or "randum."
I did not.
S~V~S wrote: I firmly believe this was a benefit poll. What this reminded me of more than anything was Dom & Rose' opening poll in Pixar at LP. I think it is possible that night polls will all have a point in this game; it is something Bea & I have done before when hosting.
Please tell me what I have to "explain". I have explained what has been asked of me.DFaraday wrote:I think it's apparent that the Night Poll had some sort of effect. Zeek would have to be stupidly reckless to push so hard for an option he had no info on, and nobody would have info on the poll unless there was something to be gained from it.
Today I want to hear from Elo, Sabie, and Dom. I feel like they all have some splainin' to do. Now I want to do an I Love Lucy Speed Mafia
Did I miss where you were declared almighty, supreme god of the universe?zeek wrote:LogicMetalmarsh89 wrote:Did I miss something?DFaraday wrote:I think it's apparent that the Night Poll had some sort of effect.
I would hate to miss such an event.
Honestly, I'm looking at Made today.
- Sun Sep 28, 2014 12:50 pm
- Forum: Previous Jobs
- Topic: Dr. Who Mafia - Night 12
- Replies: 7359
- Views: 177109
Re: Dr. Who Mafia! - Day 2
Zeek, have you heard the phrase "wine in front of me"?
- Sun Sep 28, 2014 12:51 pm
- Forum: Previous Jobs
- Topic: Dr. Who Mafia - Night 12
- Replies: 7359
- Views: 177109
Re: Dr. Who Mafia! - Day 2
Zeek, what did you think of my post about Made?
- Sun Sep 28, 2014 1:22 pm
- Forum: Previous Jobs
- Topic: Dr. Who Mafia - Night 12
- Replies: 7359
- Views: 177109
Re: Dr. Who Mafia! - Day 2
I have explained this many-a-time now. I am sorry you don't like my explanation.DFaraday wrote:I'm wondering, if you just wanted to randomize and didn't actually care about the result, why you didn't just leave your vote on what you accidentally picked the first time. Since you had no disposition one way or another, it would be just as valid as whatever your randomizer said, right?Dom wrote: Please tell me what I have to "explain". I have explained what has been asked of me.
I used a randomizer. It gave me the option Azure. I quickly voted on my way out and voted for the first option--whatever it is called. I whispered, shit to myself, and changed my vote right away because I wanted to vote what the randomizer said. Honestly, I didn't think anyone would even notice. It took maybe 2 minutes total given that I was also packing my stuff up to leave. I apologize if you don't like this but I have said it many times now. Do not pretend that I haven't.
- Sun Sep 28, 2014 1:34 pm
- Forum: Previous Jobs
- Topic: Dr. Who Mafia - Night 12
- Replies: 7359
- Views: 177109
Re: Dr. Who Mafia! - Day 2
I can understand your concern, but I have answered to the best of my-- or anyone's for that matter-- ability.zeek wrote:I'm not entirely clear on your suspicions of Made, is it because he is unclear about your posts? Like he's trying to force suspicion on you over nothing?
The problems I have with your explanation are:
I don't buy that you used a randomizer for on four options.
Logically, an accidental vote is a random vote.
Obviously, you can't answer these criticisms if what you say is true. I don't know you - maybe you just religiously follow a randomizer, even for small polls, but it is odd.
I suspect made because I think he tried to get someone to run with a suspicion of me without building any case. He simply threw my name out there saying I hadn't explained something that I HAD explained.
However, he then said he MISREAD what I had said. how did he both miss it and misread it?
In addition, Made says that he missed my explanation for why I thought MP was being hypocritical.. however, people WERE waiting for an explanation on my Enrique vote. It makes me think he saw that someone was waiting for an explanation from me, and just assumed that was it. It's sloppy mudslinging if you ask me.
- Sun Sep 28, 2014 1:48 pm
- Forum: Previous Jobs
- Topic: Dr. Who Mafia - Night 12
- Replies: 7359
- Views: 177109
Re: Dr. Who Mafia! - Day 2
I have said all that I possibly can on the subject. There's literally nothing else for me to say. I am sorry you think this-- it was not what I was thinking when I was rushing out.Bullzeye wrote:I have no problem with him using a randomizer on four options. If that's what someone wants to do, so be it. What I don't get is why he would take it so seriously as to change his vote from what he accidentally chose to what the randomizer said. As you say, an accidental vote is just as random. It's not like anyone would have known and said "Oh Dom voted x when his randomizer clearly told him to vote y. Super baddie move tbh."zeek wrote:I'm not entirely clear on your suspicions of Made, is it because he is unclear about your posts? Like he's trying to force suspicion on you over nothing?
The problems I have with your explanation are:
I don't buy that you used a randomizer for on four options.
Logically, an accidental vote is a random vote.
Obviously, you can't answer these criticisms if what you say is true. I don't know you - maybe you just religiously follow a randomizer, even for small polls, but it is odd.
- Sun Sep 28, 2014 2:35 pm
- Forum: Previous Jobs
- Topic: Dr. Who Mafia - Night 12
- Replies: 7359
- Views: 177109
Re: Dr. Who Mafia! - Day 2
Precisely. I hope you do.Snow Dog wrote:So now it rests on whether we believe you...Dom wrote:I have said all that I possibly can on the subject. There's literally nothing else for me to say. I am sorry you think this-- it was not what I was thinking when I was rushing out.Bullzeye wrote:I have no problem with him using a randomizer on four options. If that's what someone wants to do, so be it. What I don't get is why he would take it so seriously as to change his vote from what he accidentally chose to what the randomizer said. As you say, an accidental vote is just as random. It's not like anyone would have known and said "Oh Dom voted x when his randomizer clearly told him to vote y. Super baddie move tbh."zeek wrote:I'm not entirely clear on your suspicions of Made, is it because he is unclear about your posts? Like he's trying to force suspicion on you over nothing?
The problems I have with your explanation are:
I don't buy that you used a randomizer for on four options.
Logically, an accidental vote is a random vote.
Obviously, you can't answer these criticisms if what you say is true. I don't know you - maybe you just religiously follow a randomizer, even for small polls, but it is odd.
- Sun Sep 28, 2014 2:50 pm
- Forum: Previous Jobs
- Topic: Dr. Who Mafia - Night 12
- Replies: 7359
- Views: 177109
Re: Dr. Who Mafia! - Day 2
Snow Dog wrote:Dom....can you explain it again?
- Sun Sep 28, 2014 3:04 pm
- Forum: Previous Jobs
- Topic: Dr. Who Mafia - Night 12
- Replies: 7359
- Views: 177109
Re: Dr. Who Mafia! - Day 2
MP, tbh, I'm not really seeing what you're seeing in either one of them-- I'm not even quite understanding your suspicion of Roxy. And with Sabie, I just hosted her, and she is behaving similarly, I think, and she was civvie.
What do you think of my thoughts on Made? You somewhat addressed it earlier, but it was rather vague and wishy washy-- which is exactly how I'd describe your entire gameplay so far.
What do you think of my thoughts on Made? You somewhat addressed it earlier, but it was rather vague and wishy washy-- which is exactly how I'd describe your entire gameplay so far.
- Sun Sep 28, 2014 4:09 pm
- Forum: Previous Jobs
- Topic: Dr. Who Mafia - Night 12
- Replies: 7359
- Views: 177109
Re: Dr. Who Mafia! - Day 2
Made, who do you think is suspicious
- Sun Sep 28, 2014 4:35 pm
- Forum: Previous Jobs
- Topic: Dr. Who Mafia - Night 12
- Replies: 7359
- Views: 177109
Re: Dr. Who Mafia! - Day 2
Is this what you're talking about, MP?MovingPictures07 wrote:
A response to Rox (which elaborates why I find her suspicious): Thank you for your thoughts. I'm sad to hear you don't "buy" my true intentions, but I suppose that's your right. I gave up my Enrique suspicion because his responses seemed genuine to me, and my back and forth with Dana made me reexamine the strength of my thoughts against him. On the flipside of your POV, I thought what Juliets did was incredibly suspicious and I'm still shocked she flipped civvie, to be honest. She must have just been WAY overthinking what she was attempting to post and her inability to attempt to decide things for herself seemed OOT moreso than normal. And personally, I have no reason to believe we're seeing a baddie Epig here, and despite the fact that I appreciate your contributions, I think some of them are off the mark. This is demonstrated especially since you suspect Hedge for thinking Epig's thoughts were valid; you even just essentially say you think she's bad because she disagrees with your assessment on the juliets situation. I am a civvie and I saw it unfold and I firmly believe juliets's actions were incredibly suspicious, so the fact that you're not willing to consider an alternative perspective as a possible civvie one seems suspicious to me. I am also suspicious of why you mention Elo's vote but not Sabie's (more on this later). Lastly, I get this "oh, the case on JC was so bad, how could anyone believe it?!?!?!" feel from you, which seems very opportunistic, especially since you weren't around (understandably for RL reasons, I won't blame you for that). It just strikes me as an easy way for a baddie to come in after the fact and be all, 'well, how could anyone believe that?? These people who did must be bad!!' Strikes me as suspicious as well. Additionally, I had my eye on you when you seemed to be setting up suspicion against me, but consequently never expressed any firm opinions about anyone at all, and now all of a sudden you have tons of opinions after being called out for it.
Again, I'm not so much seeing this. The one point that resonates with me is what you said about her retrospect approach to juliets. However, I did not notice that myself and would have to reread her-- which I cannot do right now.
- Mon Sep 29, 2014 12:25 am
- Forum: Previous Jobs
- Topic: Dr. Who Mafia - Night 12
- Replies: 7359
- Views: 177109
Re: Dr. Who Mafia! - Day 2
Roxy, just curious, why is it "unciv" like of me to say I am "spiteful" of something, but it is not unciv of you to say you are "resent"ful?Roxy wrote: I am not an opportunist MP. I resent the insinuation tbf. I was just giving my opinion on what happened day 0 and day 1. Sure hindsight is 20/20.
WhatMade wrote:I've been pinged hard by Epi all game. I find it sus how outspoken he's been. I get it's his meta, but as others have mentioned, he's been playing it hard, and i think it's a bluff. The thing that makes me think it's a bluff even more is because no one has called him on it.Dom wrote:Made, who do you think is suspicious
Going off of what i've been called for in the past, even during Monty where people had a chance to see how crazy i could be in misfits, Epi should be the middle of conversation and suspcion but he's not.
Had it been anyone else this post would be the front of discussionHad it been anyone else, this post would of been the front of discussionEpignosis wrote:I'm not careful.Made wrote:The Suicidal Civvie Gambit. Having been on the opposite side of this gambit, i must say, you can get a very fun chain of civvies dying if you're not careful. Assuming you and Enrique are civvie, this would lead to a train of more civvies jumping on to kill the person who killed the previous civvie.Epignosis wrote:I am telling you to vote for Enrique. What do I have to gain from this?
If he is lynched and is bad, then I get Night killed.
If he is lynched and is good, then I get lynched.
Which is par for the course for me.
Vote for Enrique.
Linki- Isn't Enrique already president?
Good night.Had it been anyone else this post would be the front of discussionEpignosis wrote:What the fuck with all these people missing votes? I love hosting and I have created many games, and it kills me when people don't participate. Granted, I don't know Dr. Who at all, just that it's some weird British mashup of Back to the Future and Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles.
That's all I know.
Still, if you signed up, have some fucking respect, yes? birdwithteeth is a lazy sack of shit. He acts like he likes prog, but that's horsewithteeth shit. He likes Devin Townsend, who just smashes strings and makes ugly faces. Give this "host" something to do. Okay? Fucker doesn't even cut his hair. And bea drinks. A lot. Maybe more than me. Fail to vote this time, and I hope she smashes an empty vodka bottle over your head. And then draws a dick on your face.
God bless you two.
Voted Enrique. Not changing this time.
I still think that juliet got lynched so easily because someone who was mafia was a top option for the lynch till Epi made his argument against JC, but i'm dropping it because the Rubber band theory seems to be hella strong rn .Epignosis wrote:It didn't mean you were bad. It meant you were suspicious.juliets wrote:Just keep telling yourself that that reworded post meant I was bad. Keep telling yourself.
What is your reasoning for suspecting him? That we aren't discussing him? What about these posts points towards Epi being bad?
If you think Epi's been outspoken, I think he can show you a whole new level.
In addition, while I love the secrets discussion going on, let's not forget that we have to lynch someone and that there are PLENTY of baddie roles to decode here.
I'm actually eyeing zeek for his focus on the Master, ignoring all other baddie roles, and even pointing out that the other baddies' secrets were up...
- Mon Sep 29, 2014 12:56 am
- Forum: Previous Jobs
- Topic: Dr. Who Mafia - Night 12
- Replies: 7359
- Views: 177109
Re: Dr. Who Mafia! - Day 2
Bye.zeek wrote:Give it a rest, will you? My focus is on the Master because its the first one I tried to crack. I'd say theres a possible REVELATION in my findings, that Lucy Saxon is out there. I'll have a go at the others in the morning. Sorry for directing people toward decodable baddie secrets. How villainous. I'll just focus entirely on the lynch and not help at all. Like you.Dom wrote:In addition, while I love the secrets discussion going on, let's not forget that we have to lynch someone and that there are PLENTY of baddie roles to decode here.
I'm actually eyeing zeek for his focus on the Master, ignoring all other baddie roles, and even pointing out that the other baddies' secrets were up...
Reactions to decoding are very interesting.
I really need to sleep now
- Mon Sep 29, 2014 1:03 am
- Forum: Previous Jobs
- Topic: Dr. Who Mafia - Night 12
- Replies: 7359
- Views: 177109
Re: Dr. Who Mafia! - Day 2
All I meant is that I thought it was strange that we only did one role, and one member seemed more exuberant about it than others. It made me think he might be avoiding doing those. I also meant to point out that we haven't really discussed the lynch much. I think this is intentional. Zeek acted as if I've been on his case all game-- when that is simply not the case. "Give it a rest, will you?" Seriously? I have said I thought you were civ until now. You have done one thing that caused me to suspect you and you act as if I have hounded you all game.
Now, I would LOVE to decode these secrets, but I would also LOVE some discussion on who we should lynch. And that hasn't been happening.
Next time I'll quit my job and not study for exams to solve a word puzzle. Clearly, I do nothing to add to games and I am simply a burden to other players.
BTW, Canuck, I luffs you lots and hope everything's alright <3
Now, I would LOVE to decode these secrets, but I would also LOVE some discussion on who we should lynch. And that hasn't been happening.
Next time I'll quit my job and not study for exams to solve a word puzzle. Clearly, I do nothing to add to games and I am simply a burden to other players.
BTW, Canuck, I luffs you lots and hope everything's alright <3
- Mon Sep 29, 2014 1:11 am
- Forum: Previous Jobs
- Topic: Dr. Who Mafia - Night 12
- Replies: 7359
- Views: 177109
Re: Dr. Who Mafia! - Day 2
I understand that, but until Dana there was no attempt to decode anything but The Master. That strikes me as odd. And it also strikes me as completely intention to focus all of our attention during the day on secret hunting and no time for lynch suspects and then scramble for a lynch at the end. I am not blaming it all on Zeek, but he certainly stood out the most to me. His reaction was completely out of left field.Enrique wrote:Dom, The Master was the only baddie/indie role we had at the time. The Daleks and Cybermen were added later.
I do, however, redact my statement where I stated that Zeek pointed it out that the others were updated, I went through his posts and misremembered and misaccredited him with that.
- Mon Sep 29, 2014 2:12 am
- Forum: Previous Jobs
- Topic: Dr. Who Mafia - Night 12
- Replies: 7359
- Views: 177109
Re: Dr. Who Mafia! - Day 2
I just feel uncomfortable that we have less than 24 hours and not a lot of direction or discussion has been dedicated to lynch suspects. If I had the time or patience for the Secrets, I would certainly help, but until we have a letter or two more, I am horrible with this.Dana wrote:I disagree, I don't find it very odd at all. The Master has a pretty long secrets thing, and this stuff is more difficult than I first thought. It took me over an hour to get the little amount that I just did, so I don't find it suspicious that zeek and others were only focusing on the one that was up first. I don't see it as anyone trying to shift the conversation away from lynch suspects, I only see it as trying to gain more information, which will only benefit us all.Dom wrote:I understand that, but until Dana there was no attempt to decode anything but The Master. That strikes me as odd. And it also strikes me as completely intention to focus all of our attention during the day on secret hunting and no time for lynch suspects and then scramble for a lynch at the end. I am not blaming it all on Zeek, but he certainly stood out the most to me. His reaction was completely out of left field.Enrique wrote:Dom, The Master was the only baddie/indie role we had at the time. The Daleks and Cybermen were added later.
I'm still likely voting Made.
- Mon Sep 29, 2014 10:10 am
- Forum: Previous Jobs
- Topic: Dr. Who Mafia - Night 12
- Replies: 7359
- Views: 177109
Re: Dr. Who Mafia! - Day 2
If Zeek would actually read my posts about him, it'd be helpful... I've never advocated once for his lynch-- I simply said one thing I noticed. I will not tolerate being lied about.
Roxy, I look forward to your response to me.
Roxy, I look forward to your response to me.
- Mon Sep 29, 2014 2:35 pm
- Forum: Previous Jobs
- Topic: Dr. Who Mafia - Night 12
- Replies: 7359
- Views: 177109
Re: Dr. Who Mafia! - Day 2
What are you even talking about???????zeek wrote:And yet you expect me to be.Dom wrote:If Zeek would actually read my posts about him, it'd be helpful... I've never advocated once for his lynch-- I simply said one thing I noticed. I will not tolerate being lied about.
You're mudslinging, Dom. Trying to see what sticks. Whats the difference between Made's misreading and yours?
While I believe you are mincing, I can understand your point.Roxy wrote:Dom - being spiteful is being mean. Being resentful is that you are uptight about being called something you feel is not true.
They do not mean the same thing.
I DO NOT WANT YOU TO BE LYNCHEDzeek wrote:I agree, but everything I said was accruate from my perspective. I believe he's trying to muddy my name with HIS inaccurate descriptions of last night. Did I say he's advocating my lynching? I did not. I said he's trying to influence people to vote for me through those inaccurate descriptions.Long Con wrote:I always work hard to ensure my accusers are held accountable to truth and accuracy, because I feel the same way.Dom wrote:If Zeek would actually read my posts about him, it'd be helpful... I've never advocated once for his lynch-- I simply said one thing I noticed. I will not tolerate being lied about.
STOP LYING ABOUT WHAT I have SAID
You stood out to me, LC did not. I didn't discourage decoding. I encouraged lynch talk.zeek wrote:I'm voting Dom.
I didn't like his "random" vote. I didn't like his reluctance to move his vote. I don't like him discouraging decoding. I don't like him singling me out, when Long Con did most of the work on the Master. I don't like his twisting of the facts.
Come at me, bro
I wanted us to be wary of getting mired in decoding talk and then a rush lynch at the end-- like the one that's happening right now.zeek wrote:It's one thing wanted to focus on the lynch, it is another to be smeared for attempting to decode secrets that had only just been revealed. Moreover, being suspected for apparently focusing on a role.
To clarify this entirely, the Master is most likely the most dangerous role in the game and it was the easiest to discern the opening sentence. I got the first half, and when Long Con filled in so many bits it felt like we were on a roll. I don't even understand why Dom thinks I stood out in that endeavour, I sucked. It felt very forced to try and turn that into a suspicion.
I am perfectly happy to drop the decoding for now. There's nothing else I could really do seen as I'm five hours (at least) ahead of most of you guys.
WhySnow Dog wrote:Don't want to miss te vote so voting Dom....for now!!!
Off to work. So if I'm not actively decoding you know why.
- Mon Sep 29, 2014 9:18 pm
- Forum: Previous Jobs
- Topic: Dr. Who Mafia - Night 12
- Replies: 7359
- Views: 177109
Re: Dr. Who Mafia! - Day 2
I'm catching up and am on page 32. I need Togo voted made for now
- Mon Sep 29, 2014 11:30 pm
- Forum: Previous Jobs
- Topic: Dr. Who Mafia - Night 12
- Replies: 7359
- Views: 177109
Re: Dr. Who Mafia! - Day 2
<3<3S~V~S wrote:My niece just had a baby <3 her third son, he is named for my husband
I think you're reaching here.MovingPictures07 wrote: You didn't voice suspicion of me; you said the fact that S~V~S and I were "buddy buddy" was concerning. You never said you suspected me. In fact, given you defended me hard for most of the game, I was shocked when you came back to respond and found me full on suspicious.
It's almost like I warned that this may happen when we spent about half the day not talking about suspects at all.MovingPictures07 wrote:This whole lynch is definitely shady. I will go down until the end saying that I really see nothing suspect about what Epig has been doing this game.
It's almost as if I tried to warn us about this. It's almost as if the accusations against me for saying this are complete bullshit because I was 100% right.
- Mon Sep 29, 2014 11:49 pm
- Forum: Previous Jobs
- Topic: Dr. Who Mafia - Night 12
- Replies: 7359
- Views: 177109
Re: Dr. Who Mafia! - Day 2
It wasn't directed at you in particular. I'm just annoyed with how I came under fire simply because I warned this lynch would end badly because all the discussion would get lumped into a mad rush at the end.MovingPictures07 wrote:I don't understand; your last sentence, are you referring to my suspicion of Daisy? Because Epig is getting lynched.Dom wrote:<3<3S~V~S wrote:My niece just had a baby <3 her third son, he is named for my husbandI think you're reaching here.MovingPictures07 wrote: You didn't voice suspicion of me; you said the fact that S~V~S and I were "buddy buddy" was concerning. You never said you suspected me. In fact, given you defended me hard for most of the game, I was shocked when you came back to respond and found me full on suspicious.It's almost like I warned that this may happen when we spent about half the day not talking about suspects at all.MovingPictures07 wrote:This whole lynch is definitely shady. I will go down until the end saying that I really see nothing suspect about what Epig has been doing this game.
It's almost as if I tried to warn us about this. It's almost as if the accusations against me for saying this are complete bullshit because I was 100% right.
I'm willing to take a step back and think about it, anyway.
RIP Epig.
- Tue Sep 30, 2014 8:50 am
- Forum: Previous Jobs
- Topic: Dr. Who Mafia - Night 12
- Replies: 7359
- Views: 177109
Re: Dr. Who Mafia! - Day 2
How is this not true?zeek wrote:Also
This isn't true.Dom wrote:It wasn't directed at you in particular. I'm just annoyed with how I came under fire simply because I warned this lynch would end badly because all the discussion would get lumped into a mad rush at the end.
RIP Epig.
In the last few hours of the lynch, there were over 7 pages of posts (at least, in my post per page settings) and you're telling me there wasn't rushing going on? It felt like a mad house as I read. You're simply disagreeing with me to disagree with me or you're telling an alternate narrative to fit your needs. I'm sorry I was right about what would happen if we spend half the day not discussing anyone, but you don't get to say I was wrong. At the beginning of the decoding stuff, Epig was not a real lynch candidate... he wasn't until very late in the day, if I recall correctly.
Your version of the facts is so skewed. It's a world where I don't want anyone to decode anything (far from the truth), a world where I think you're bad (though, you make it easier to think that way), a world where I made up accusations against you (I pointed out one thing and you act like I've presented my closing argument), and a world where Epig's lynch wasn't a totally avoidable thing had we not rushed at the end (which it was).
Now I'm not tooting my own horn here, all I'm saying is: waiting until the end of a lynch to discuss anything creates a sense of panic amongst civilians. This panic can easily be manipulated by baddies. This is absolutely what happened with Epig. If I had time, I'd love to reread the interactions that lead to Epig being lynched.
- Tue Sep 30, 2014 12:25 pm
- Forum: Previous Jobs
- Topic: Dr. Who Mafia - Night 12
- Replies: 7359
- Views: 177109
Re: Dr. Who Mafia! - NIght 2
I voted
- Tue Sep 30, 2014 12:26 pm
- Forum: Previous Jobs
- Topic: Dr. Who Mafia - Night 12
- Replies: 7359
- Views: 177109
Re: Dr. Who Mafia! - NIght 2
I changed my vote
- Tue Sep 30, 2014 12:45 pm
- Forum: Previous Jobs
- Topic: Dr. Who Mafia - Night 12
- Replies: 7359
- Views: 177109
Re: Dr. Who Mafia! - NIght 2
I changed my vote again
- Tue Sep 30, 2014 1:34 pm
- Forum: Previous Jobs
- Topic: Dr. Who Mafia - Night 12
- Replies: 7359
- Views: 177109
Re: Dr. Who Mafia! - Day 1
I don't think so.Turnip Head wrote:zeek wrote:Come on, no more pretending. Admit it.
Some will understand this, some will not. But I believe you, sir, are mafia.zeek wrote:That's nothing to do with my thoughts on you. Which I will explain closer to Night's end.
I recommend you give yourself up though, if the other mafia team doesn't kill you, easier for your teammates....zeek wrote:I'm not pulling it out of my ass and you will get your clarity. Later. Frankly I'm hoping the other mafia team take you out. I will endeavour to post my reasoning as soon as I can, but there is a lot more that I need to observe before I can do that. It's not prudent to do so now.Did we ever find out what this was all about?zeek wrote:I'm not sure I can elaborate on enrique
- Tue Sep 30, 2014 3:29 pm
- Forum: Previous Jobs
- Topic: Dr. Who Mafia - Night 12
- Replies: 7359
- Views: 177109
Re: Dr. Who Mafia! - Day 2
Do you just disagree with me to disagree with me? Do you get off from it?zeek wrote:How is this not true?Dom wrote:zeek wrote:Also
This isn't true.Dom wrote:It wasn't directed at you in particular. I'm just annoyed with how I came under fire simply because I warned this lynch would end badly because all the discussion would get lumped into a mad rush at the end.
RIP Epig.
In the last few hours of the lynch, there were over 7 pages of posts (at least, in my post per page settings) and you're telling me there wasn't rushing going on? It felt like a mad house as I read. You're simply disagreeing with me to disagree with me or you're telling an alternate narrative to fit your needs. I'm sorry I was right about what would happen if we spend half the day not discussing anyone, but you don't get to say I was wrong. At the beginning of the decoding stuff, Epig was not a real lynch candidate... he wasn't until very late in the day, if I recall correctly.
Your version of the facts is so skewed. It's a world where I don't want anyone to decode anything (far from the truth), a world where I think you're bad (though, you make it easier to think that way), a world where I made up accusations against you (I pointed out one thing and you act like I've presented my closing argument), and a world where Epig's lynch wasn't a totally avoidable thing had we not rushed at the end (which it was).
Now I'm not tooting my own horn here, all I'm saying is: waiting until the end of a lynch to discuss anything creates a sense of panic amongst civilians. This panic can easily be manipulated by baddies. This is absolutely what happened with Epig. If I had time, I'd love to reread the interactions that lead to Epig being lynched.[/quote
I wrote a big long response but I got logged out and I'm tired. So...
YOu didn't warn us it would end badly, you said you didn't want to rush the lynch.
The was half the Day Phase left at that time.
If the vote was rushed it had nothing to do with decoding, more to do with people not being around until the night.
You came under fire for accusing me of only decoding the Master, when if was revealed first - before the others - and was the easiest.
Saying you thought I was suspicious so early after getting them discouraged others.
Anyway, we can do this indefinitely if you want but its boring me bickering like this. I did not vote Epig and I never thought about voting Epig. The same is true of you. If you really think the vote was manipulated I want to hear your thought on who may have been responsible.
juliets, I don't find him suspicious at the moment, no.
You are being so particular. I didn't warn it would end badly, I said I didn't want to rush the lynch.
Well, GEE I WONDER WHY
Seriously, I don't know what your problem is. You are coming up with reasons to disagree with me that are ridiculously paper thin. I have acknowledged areas of real suspicion, clarified what I can, and it was up to you to believe me. You are either letting a confirmation bias get in your way or you're shady as hell.
Before alive would be still.zeek wrote:I saw the min-ep, Snow Dog! Nice for Paul McGann to finally get a comeback.
This is the only one I have got anywhere with.
Cyberman Head wrote:If you manage to find your body (a -a------ --t------- ----t) at some point in the game, you gain an extra amount of votes for the next lynch determined by the -a-- ------- on your team are -t--- alive.
Before on... members?
I wonder if this role is like the team I was on in Avant Garde Mafia 2.
- Tue Sep 30, 2014 3:29 pm
- Forum: Previous Jobs
- Topic: Dr. Who Mafia - Night 12
- Replies: 7359
- Views: 177109
- Tue Sep 30, 2014 10:58 pm
- Forum: Previous Jobs
- Topic: Dr. Who Mafia - Night 12
- Replies: 7359
- Views: 177109
Re: Dr. Who Mafia! - NIght 2
My thoughts on Epig's voters are as clear as the reasoning against him.zeek wrote:Dalek Sec wrote:If someone targets a member of your team with a night action, you can project(?) a -a----- ---------t on them. A ---- -- t--- t-----. If --a--, the night action ---- --t---- a-- --- ---- a ---- again(?). If taken, --t---- -a-----. -- t-- ---- -a--- --a-- -- t-- ------ ----, that --a--- ---- --t -- a--- to -----t----- target your team -- a-- -a- (--t---- -- ----- --t--) --- t-- ---a----- in the game. If taken, the night action still ---- --t----, --t t---- any of -t--- -----t-.
linki-
Dom: Don't be an asshat, thats one or two of the rules. Think me shady if you want but I do not get off disagreeing with you. I am bored by it, I stated that. I am pursuing things I feel you are misrepresenting. I have also said I want your opinion on the votes for Epig, which you have not given. You are perpetuating this butting of heads now. I want to drop it for now as I can't get a clear view of you being embrawled in an argument with you, I want distance from it to consider everyone on an equal ground.
This is a very good point, SVS.S~V~S wrote:I am still surprised that Blooper can discuss the "fast & furious" Epi lynch without mentioning Daisy. Looking forward to hearing her answer.
MP, is there anything in the game that you HAVE felt strongly about??MovingPictures07 wrote: Essentially, it was that some of her actions appeared to be contrived and her positions seemed questionable. Namely, she appeared to be suspicion mongering when unnecessary (saying that the fact that S~V~S and I aren't at each other's throats as "concerning").
For the record, I currently don't feel quite as strongly about it as I did yesterday (not that I was crusading her as bad then anyway, but it was my best suspicion), but I'm still mulling things over.
- Tue Sep 30, 2014 11:36 pm
- Forum: Previous Jobs
- Topic: Dr. Who Mafia - Night 12
- Replies: 7359
- Views: 177109
Re: Dr. Who Mafia! - NIght 2
This has me worried about you tbh.MovingPictures07 wrote:Dom, an addendum: I suppose I've felt temporarily strong about various suspicions I've had throughout the game, but the lasting strength of the arguments didn't really stand up when I took a step back. If that makes sense.
you seem to be setting fires and then walking away from them. At first, I thought itwas you playing carefully... but you haven't stuck to a suspicion all game.