Search found 366 matches

by Marmot
Wed Jan 21, 2015 12:58 am
Forum: Previous Jobs
Topic: [ENDGAME]: Film Directors.
Replies: 3481
Views: 85581

Re: [Day 0]: Film Directors.

Ooh, look. Game.
by Marmot
Wed Jan 21, 2015 1:06 am
Forum: Previous Jobs
Topic: [ENDGAME]: Film Directors.
Replies: 3481
Views: 85581

Re: [Day 0]: Film Directors.

Welcome back Knucklegoose.

Also, I went with Robert Zemeckis, because Forrest Gump is a damn good movie, and I honestly don't know directors' names too well.
by Marmot
Wed Jan 21, 2015 7:02 pm
Forum: Previous Jobs
Topic: [ENDGAME]: Film Directors.
Replies: 3481
Views: 85581

Re: [Day 0]: Film Directors.

S~V~S wrote:This discussion has been awesome, it has given me some good ideas about what I would like to put on my "must see" list.
I still don't really have the urge to watch movies. :sigh:
by Marmot
Wed Jan 21, 2015 7:11 pm
Forum: Previous Jobs
Topic: [ENDGAME]: Film Directors.
Replies: 3481
Views: 85581

Re: [Day 0]: Film Directors.

in this moment i am bcaon
by Marmot
Wed Jan 21, 2015 7:22 pm
Forum: Previous Jobs
Topic: [ENDGAME]: Film Directors.
Replies: 3481
Views: 85581

Re: [Day 0]: Film Directors.

S~V~S wrote:You should not have done that :feb:
:blush:
by Marmot
Wed Jan 21, 2015 8:38 pm
Forum: Previous Jobs
Topic: [ENDGAME]: Film Directors.
Replies: 3481
Views: 85581

Re: [Day 0]: Film Directors.

thellama73 wrote:I mean, Tyler Perry makes the list but not Michael freaking Curtiz? I sense a bias towards modern directors at the expense of the classics.
Who do you think is funding this game?
by Marmot
Thu Jan 22, 2015 2:11 am
Forum: Previous Jobs
Topic: [ENDGAME]: Film Directors.
Replies: 3481
Views: 85581

Re: [Day 0]: Film Directors.

A Person wrote:I really am a film pleb, so I don't mind it.
Whatever a film pleb is, I am probably lower than that.
by Marmot
Thu Jan 22, 2015 4:18 am
Forum: Previous Jobs
Topic: [ENDGAME]: Film Directors.
Replies: 3481
Views: 85581

Re: [Day 0]: Film Directors.

Long Con wrote:
Dom wrote:*is definitely a film pleb*
Then there needs to be a lower status.

I have never seen Casablanca. I don't like old movies, I like modern ones. I saw Citizen Kane at some point, and I don't really remember a single frame of it, I just know it bored me. I saw Gone With The Wind recently, and I enjoyed Rhett Butler's character, disliked the main chick, and just didn't feel immersed or invested in the storyline all that much.

In a game such as this, where it seems that so many of you have such a deep respect and admiration for these artsy directors whose movies I will never see, and whose names I will never remember.

My top movie of all time is The Matrix, I think that is the most perfect movie I have seen. Second and third are Braveheart and Aliens.
I like The Hobbit and the Lord of the Rings, mainly because they capture the novels quite well (the latter more than the former). I also like The Green Mile and Dead Poet's Society, and that's about it.
by Marmot
Thu Jan 22, 2015 4:19 am
Forum: Previous Jobs
Topic: [ENDGAME]: Film Directors.
Replies: 3481
Views: 85581

Re: [Day 0]: Film Directors.

Ricochet wrote:
Long Con wrote:
I have never seen Casablanca. I don't like old movies, I like modern ones. I saw Citizen Kane at some point, and I don't really remember a single frame of it, I just know it bored me. I saw Gone With The Wind recently, and I enjoyed Rhett Butler's character, disliked the main chick, and just didn't feel immersed or invested in the storyline all that much.
I usually feel the same about the "Golden Age" Hollywood and old, cheap Sci-Fi movies. At least in case of the latter, I realize it's probably because of being fed too much blockbuster CGI these past decades.

What's CGI?
by Marmot
Thu Jan 22, 2015 11:19 am
Forum: Previous Jobs
Topic: [ENDGAME]: Film Directors.
Replies: 3481
Views: 85581

Re: [Day 0]: Film Directors.

thellama73 wrote:Also, Long COn, Aliens is the second greats sci-fi/action movie ever after Terminator @, so good choice there, and Metalmarsh, I agree that the Green Mile is pretty good. I liked the ord of the Rings films (a surprsing amount of practical effects as opposed to CGI in those) but didn't like the Hobbit at all. I generally don't like CGI much because it looks so fake and takes so little imagination on the part of the filmmakers, and I feel like it often comes at the expense of story (looking at you, Michael Bay!).
Agreed. There were many moments in the Hobbit that were entirely too ridiculous (like Legosas stair-hopping in slo-mo), and didn't suit the nature of the film at all. I cringed a few times watching it.
by Marmot
Thu Jan 22, 2015 11:19 am
Forum: Previous Jobs
Topic: [ENDGAME]: Film Directors.
Replies: 3481
Views: 85581

Re: [Day 0]: Film Directors.

Ricochet wrote:
Metalmarsh89 wrote:
Ricochet wrote:
Long Con wrote:
I have never seen Casablanca. I don't like old movies, I like modern ones. I saw Citizen Kane at some point, and I don't really remember a single frame of it, I just know it bored me. I saw Gone With The Wind recently, and I enjoyed Rhett Butler's character, disliked the main chick, and just didn't feel immersed or invested in the storyline all that much.
I usually feel the same about the "Golden Age" Hollywood and old, cheap Sci-Fi movies. At least in case of the latter, I realize it's probably because of being fed too much blockbuster CGI these past decades.

What's CGI?
Computer-generated imagery.
Duly noted.
by Marmot
Thu Jan 22, 2015 11:49 am
Forum: Previous Jobs
Topic: [ENDGAME]: Film Directors.
Replies: 3481
Views: 85581

Re: [Day 0]: Film Directors.

A Person wrote:
Ricochet wrote:
thellama73 wrote:(looking at you, Michael Bay!)
Well he must be somewhere around here. :ninja:
He's probably just waiting for the thread to blow up.
Voting for Walt Disney might just do it.
by Marmot
Thu Jan 22, 2015 12:28 pm
Forum: Previous Jobs
Topic: [ENDGAME]: Film Directors.
Replies: 3481
Views: 85581

Re: [Day 0]: Film Directors.

You mean this? :drums:
by Marmot
Thu Jan 22, 2015 10:30 pm
Forum: Previous Jobs
Topic: [ENDGAME]: Film Directors.
Replies: 3481
Views: 85581

Re: [Day 0]: Film Directors.

thellama73 wrote:I'm gonna play chill this game, like a cool cat, daddio. Is that groovy with everyone?
Certainly.
by Marmot
Fri Jan 23, 2015 11:46 am
Forum: Previous Jobs
Topic: [ENDGAME]: Film Directors.
Replies: 3481
Views: 85581

Re: [Day 0]: Film Directors.

I'll be gone camping this weekend, so I may miss the Day 1 lynch, we'll see.

Also please don't lynch me.
by Marmot
Fri Jan 23, 2015 2:20 pm
Forum: Previous Jobs
Topic: [ENDGAME]: Film Directors.
Replies: 3481
Views: 85581

Re: [Day 0]: Film Directors.

Mongoose wrote:I'm home from work sick again today but I have to shimmy away for the landlord to show a prospective buyer the unit.

I'll have the Day 1 post up by 6pm EST. After that, we'll be on a more regular schedule. Thank you for your patience, and for joining in on the discussion. It should be a real fun time.

Remember to poke me with any questions and to poke Epi with any concerns. Have a wonderful day.
Ooh, wonderful, I can at least get my vote in before I leave.

I'll probably vote Ricochet since he will also be gone for a bit. ;)
by Marmot
Fri Jan 23, 2015 4:46 pm
Forum: Previous Jobs
Topic: [ENDGAME]: Film Directors.
Replies: 3481
Views: 85581

Re: [Day 1]: Film Directors.

birdwithteeth11 wrote:
Mongoose wrote:
It is now Day 1. You have 48 hours to determine who put the junk in the trunk.
I wouldn't mind putting my junk in your trunk IYKWIM.
Well, this got real quick.
by Marmot
Fri Jan 23, 2015 4:47 pm
Forum: Previous Jobs
Topic: [ENDGAME]: Film Directors.
Replies: 3481
Views: 85581

Re: [Day 1]: Film Directors.

thellama73 wrote:HOST: are votes changeable?
Nope.

I went ahead and self-voted since I won't be around. Have a good weekend y'all.
by Marmot
Fri Jan 23, 2015 11:13 pm
Forum: Previous Jobs
Topic: [ENDGAME]: Film Directors.
Replies: 3481
Views: 85581

Re: [Day 1]: Film Directors.

thellama73 wrote:We could all abstain from this lynch and let Metalmarsh lynch himself entirely by his own hand.
:feb:
Then these will probably be my last words. :rip:

It's been a fun ride fellow director peeps.
by Marmot
Mon Jan 26, 2015 3:07 am
Forum: Previous Jobs
Topic: [ENDGAME]: Film Directors.
Replies: 3481
Views: 85581

Re: [Day 1]: Film Directors.

MovingPictures07 wrote:Also, I understand spurring on-topic discussion is most favorable, but I don't want to harbor an environment where players are afraid to post OT in Day 0 because they fear it will get them lynched the following day. I just hate the idea of that. I know that if I'm super excited about a theme, and there's at least someone else to discuss it with, I have fun doing so.

All I know is I won't be casting a vote for Llama today. It's too soon, and at least he threw a theory out there.

Bass, I do agree that MM's self-vote is odd. I know he's done it before, but I still fail to see how it makes sense for civilians to do this. If you're a civilian, chances are you are the only person you know is 100% civilian. Why risk putting a vote on yourself when you at least have some chance of hitting a baddie with someone else? So what if you start a bandwagon? It's better than risking your own life, which YOU know is 100% civilian. Just seems silly to me. Always will.

Sorry folks, should have included all this in my previous post as well. Got "Submit" button happy. :P
Well, voting someone else right off the bat didn't work out for me last time. :p
by Marmot
Mon Jan 26, 2015 3:16 am
Forum: Previous Jobs
Topic: [ENDGAME]: Film Directors.
Replies: 3481
Views: 85581

Re: [Day 1]: Film Directors.

Ricochet wrote:The only thing I can trace back in the thread regarding MM's self-vote was that there was a lot of irony regarding MM being lynched again on D1, he excused himself for going on a boat trip, even more ironies about lynching him followed, to which he just said fine, I'll vote for myself, because I'll be away. He also voted himself knowing the vote is not changeable, judging from his post. It is an odd vote, indeed, but perhaps this whole thing can at the same time be considered to be completely ironical?
I did not know that I couldn't change my vote until after I voted. I was sharing the game mechanic with others because Mongoose had not yet said so.

The reason I voted is because often hosts will penalize players for missing votes. Since I was going to be gone all weekend, I voted early.
by Marmot
Mon Jan 26, 2015 3:27 am
Forum: Previous Jobs
Topic: [ENDGAME]: Film Directors.
Replies: 3481
Views: 85581

Re: [Day 1]: Film Directors.

S~V~S wrote:
thellama73 wrote:You really wouldn't vote for someone you thought was bad because they are new, SVS? I find that very strange.
Thats the old school way. You don't vote for nubs on Day One. They never come back if you do, lol. And being right in one game is trumped by getting a new cultist...um, player in the long term. Yeah. Plus it's just polite. It's one of those things like not voting for the silenced or insanified.
Then perhaps you should talk to Mongoose and tell her not to make consecutive Day 1's.
by Marmot
Mon Jan 26, 2015 3:34 am
Forum: Previous Jobs
Topic: [ENDGAME]: Film Directors.
Replies: 3481
Views: 85581

Re: [Day 1]: Film Directors.

MovingPictures07 wrote:- I appreciate the reasoning for not voting MM, but I still HATE self votes. If I wanted to avoid suspicion on D1, I could just say, "self-voting, really busy, see you guys later!" And I already explained the logic for why it makes no sense for a civilian to do it, ESPECIALLY at this stage (later on, as a tactical emotional move, OK, but still). Anyway, I'm not sure on MM, which is why I didn't end up voting for him, but I think I'd rather see him go at this point of MM, Llama, and BWT.
I don't feel right placing my vote randomly, even on Day 1. I don't feel any other player deserves to receive my vote, which could be easy prey for other players later on in the day. If you're wondering about my previous Day 1 vote, I made all my explanations in that game, so look over there. And yes I have recently self-voted in a game, but that was Oblique Mafia, which I think is excused from any meta-gaming.
by Marmot
Mon Jan 26, 2015 3:43 am
Forum: Previous Jobs
Topic: [ENDGAME]: Film Directors.
Replies: 3481
Views: 85581

Re: [Day 1]: Film Directors.

MP, why don't you come and address MattMatt's self-vote?
by Marmot
Mon Jan 26, 2015 2:10 pm
Forum: Previous Jobs
Topic: [ENDGAME]: Film Directors.
Replies: 3481
Views: 85581

Re: [Day 1]: Film Directors.

timmer wrote:Also, I don't think there is anything to Rico's lack of answering the are you bad question. If he were bad, I think his teammates would have told him to answer it, and his responses would have been different.
So Rico is good? That is the implication I got.
by Marmot
Mon Jan 26, 2015 2:21 pm
Forum: Previous Jobs
Topic: [ENDGAME]: Film Directors.
Replies: 3481
Views: 85581

Re: [Day 1]: Film Directors.

No pings. Everything seems honky-dory right now. But I skimmed last night after getting home, and was rather tired. Vote records may be the best place to start, since it is rare to get such bonus material on Day 1. Contrary to MP, I think random votes are far more suspect than self-votes. As a baddie, I have 'random voted' before, but it's an excuse to vote for someone for no reason, and it typically isn't actually random.

Linki: wombatist
by Marmot
Mon Jan 26, 2015 2:26 pm
Forum: Previous Jobs
Topic: [ENDGAME]: Film Directors.
Replies: 3481
Views: 85581

Re: [Day 1]: Film Directors.

thellama73 wrote:
Metalmarsh89 wrote: Linki: wombatist
Just be glad I'm not a newtist. :P
Don't look at me. I've gradee-ated! :D
by Marmot
Mon Jan 26, 2015 2:32 pm
Forum: Previous Jobs
Topic: [ENDGAME]: Film Directors.
Replies: 3481
Views: 85581

Re: [Day 1]: Film Directors.

Long Con wrote:
timmer wrote:
Made wrote:
Long Con wrote:
Made wrote:Yo, just a quick thought i want to get out while i'm thinking about it. Does talking about a player play style/tendencies this early in the game kinda taint possible future "AHH GOTCHA" moments later in the game?
I don't understand, explain more.
Like Hawthorne effect kinda.

So let's say it's agreed that I'm a very outspoken player, unafraid to offend. If I'm meek and submissive, then that's a ping against how I normally play. If the game starts and everyone's like "Yeah man, Made, he's such a feisty one" Baddie Made would attempt to play to his feisty tendencies more than he might otherwise. Through this we'd lose an opportunity to spot a baddie Made.
This is an interesting question. People who can "read" a player's baddie or civvies game can be one of the more dangerous mafia factors out there. And you are right, it's possible that if someone comments early on that someone is quieter than normal and they are quiet when they are bad or whatever, it can indeed cause the player to shift play style and cover their tracks. But just as some players are good at reading the play style, they are also often good at catching the reversal, knowwadimean?

What pings me more, for a Day 1, is when people bring that kind of thing up way early. I was very curious to see what would shake down from Vomps getting called out on Day 1, and part of my reread is to go and write down which people had glommed onto that. Calling Vomps out that early seemed odd to me, BUT I also know there are a few people who like to shake the tree on Day 1, so I considered it more of a potential gambit than a baddie move. More interesting to see who followed.
I thought it was more of a gambit on Llama's part, given that he did some analysis on the responses to it. Of course, the best baddie way to do something like that is to do something with serious intent, but to leave a back door of "it was a gambit". And now Llama is after Vompatti for realsies, it seems, so not sure where I fall on that one. I still don't know why he's so focused or sure about Vomps.

I can see the advantage of, instead of immediately analyzing a player's style at the outset, just taking notes and making it a case later. Then you don't affect the analysis be exposing that it's happening. That sounds like some advanced Mafia playing, requiring a reliable idea of how a player acts normally in previous games. A player would have to act the same way over several games in order for an analysis of their past behaviour to be viable.

Thanks for clarifying, Made, I think I got your point now!
:ponder:

I missed this in my stupor-read last night.
by Marmot
Mon Jan 26, 2015 2:34 pm
Forum: Previous Jobs
Topic: [ENDGAME]: Film Directors.
Replies: 3481
Views: 85581

Re: [Day 1]: Film Directors.

Canucklehead wrote:
FZ. wrote:Can we please get the results ASAP?
FZ, is there any particular reason you needed the results ASAP, or are you just super impatient? :dance:
I can certainly think of one reason that did not need addressing.
by Marmot
Mon Jan 26, 2015 2:41 pm
Forum: Previous Jobs
Topic: [ENDGAME]: Film Directors.
Replies: 3481
Views: 85581

Re: [Day 1]: Film Directors.

You forgot one llama

Digressollamamanifestanism: Stating your strongest suspect, then proceeding to talk about anything and everything but that person before finally voting him/her.

First Appearance: :mafia:
by Marmot
Mon Jan 26, 2015 2:54 pm
Forum: Previous Jobs
Topic: [ENDGAME]: Film Directors.
Replies: 3481
Views: 85581

Re: [Day 1]: Film Directors.

:haha: I fear that llama has just set himself up to be the brunt of many funnies.
by Marmot
Mon Jan 26, 2015 4:08 pm
Forum: Previous Jobs
Topic: [ENDGAME]: Film Directors.
Replies: 3481
Views: 85581

Re: [Day 1]: Film Directors.

MovingPictures07 wrote:I find self-votes and random votes BOTH suspicious. I'm not sure which I find more suspicious. However, I find the rationale for a self-vote, if someone is civilian, makes much less sense. At least with a random vote, there is a reason that someone else could be bad, and I'm not. With a self-vote, if you're a civilian, your chance of lynching a baddie with your vote is 0%.
If you can point to one instance where a player self-voted, and was lynched that same day as a result (civ or otherwise), then MAYBE I will reconsider my feelings on it. :)
by Marmot
Mon Jan 26, 2015 4:38 pm
Forum: Previous Jobs
Topic: [ENDGAME]: Film Directors.
Replies: 3481
Views: 85581

Re: [Day 1]: Film Directors.

thellama73 wrote:Also, SVS also said she doesn't like to vote for players who can't defend themselves and she was the first vote for BWT. Why not pick on her for a while?
Can I pick on you for wanting to lynch vomps even though I don't know why?
by Marmot
Mon Jan 26, 2015 4:55 pm
Forum: Previous Jobs
Topic: [ENDGAME]: Film Directors.
Replies: 3481
Views: 85581

Re: [Day 1]: Film Directors.

FZ. wrote:
Ricochet wrote:
thellama73 wrote:
FZ. wrote:
thellama73 wrote:Also, SVS also said she doesn't like to vote for players who can't defend themselves and she was the first vote for BWT. Why not pick on her for a while?
Are you asking him to pick on SVS because you think she's bad? Do you think he's bad for selectively going after you and not her? Because you told him "You seem to think you have caught me in some kind of "gotcha" moment", which would mean you think he's genuine. If you don't think either is looking bad, why do you want him to go after her?
I don't want him to go after her. I was pointing out the hypocrisy in only calling me out on something other people did too. I don't think SVS is bad and I am still unsure about Rico.
Four other people voted for BWT because they saw it fit and did not invoke doing so despite hating to vote for someone who won't be able to defend himself (anymore). No hypocrisy there, I believe.
I don't know if llama is bad, but this seems like a weird reason to go after him. Why would he say that if he meant that in the case of BWT and then go and vote for him? So either, he meant it in regards to other people, like he claims, or he's a really silly baddie doing something like this
I'm willing to bet the former of the two. I think llama's post about lynching undefendable players and his vote for BWT are unrelated.

But I would like llama (and you) to explain why you want to lynch vomps today.
by Marmot
Mon Jan 26, 2015 5:11 pm
Forum: Previous Jobs
Topic: [ENDGAME]: Film Directors.
Replies: 3481
Views: 85581

Re: [Day 1]: Film Directors.

thellama73 wrote:
Metalmarsh89 wrote:
FZ. wrote:
Ricochet wrote:
thellama73 wrote:
FZ. wrote:
thellama73 wrote:Also, SVS also said she doesn't like to vote for players who can't defend themselves and she was the first vote for BWT. Why not pick on her for a while?
Are you asking him to pick on SVS because you think she's bad? Do you think he's bad for selectively going after you and not her? Because you told him "You seem to think you have caught me in some kind of "gotcha" moment", which would mean you think he's genuine. If you don't think either is looking bad, why do you want him to go after her?
I don't want him to go after her. I was pointing out the hypocrisy in only calling me out on something other people did too. I don't think SVS is bad and I am still unsure about Rico.
Four other people voted for BWT because they saw it fit and did not invoke doing so despite hating to vote for someone who won't be able to defend himself (anymore). No hypocrisy there, I believe.
I don't know if llama is bad, but this seems like a weird reason to go after him. Why would he say that if he meant that in the case of BWT and then go and vote for him? So either, he meant it in regards to other people, like he claims, or he's a really silly baddie doing something like this
I'm willing to bet the former of the two. I think llama's post about lynching undefendable players and his vote for BWT are unrelated.

But I would like llama (and you) to explain why you want to lynch vomps today.
You are right, they are unrelated. I did not notice that BWT said he would be gone when I voted for him, until Roxy pointed it out. I was referring to you, not BWT.

I will gladly explain why I want to vote for Vomps. Basically, I just think I am seeing his baddie game. He's more engaged than he usually is, and more on topic. He reacted to my suspicion of him when I was the only one even talking about a vote for him, and in my experience, a civ Vomps would have been unfazed by that and ignored it. Then, he started trying to buddy up to me, calling me the epitome of a helpful civ. I have very often seen baddies try to support the people who suspect them as a way of engendering sympathy, and I have very often seen it work.

It doesn't feel like Vomps' normal game. He seems unduly worried about getting lynched (even though only two people really mentioned him as a lynch possibility) and in my experience, people with teams to support are more worried about getting lynched than lone civilians.
I'll take your word for it. I don't have any interest in lynching vomps (aside from exacting my revenge from Oblique Mafia).
by Marmot
Mon Jan 26, 2015 5:30 pm
Forum: Previous Jobs
Topic: [ENDGAME]: Film Directors.
Replies: 3481
Views: 85581

Re: [Day 1]: Film Directors.

Vompatti wrote:
Ricochet wrote:This is the first time that I can record llama fully explaining his read on vomps and his reason to vote him, which took some time, but I wholeheartedly applaud. Some parts (the being more on-topic thing) still sound more like "I'll just feeling it this way" obstinate reasoning, especially given others having pointed out the opposite (or nothing that is entirely concludent) from past experience, but other points are actually interesting. I think this deserves a defence from Vompatti.

I think I'm out for the day (midnight here).
I believe that if Llama were to count my posts he would find that most of them are indeed OFF-topic, and, if I survive the lynch, will be increasingly so due to the thread already being tl;dr at this point. :mafia:

You may embed only 7 quotes within each other.
I'm taking a leaf from llama's mafiabook.

Are you bad k?
by Marmot
Mon Jan 26, 2015 5:40 pm
Forum: Previous Jobs
Topic: [ENDGAME]: Film Directors.
Replies: 3481
Views: 85581

Re: [Day 1]: Film Directors.

A Person wrote:
Vompatti wrote:
Metalmarsh89 wrote:
Vompatti wrote:
Ricochet wrote:This is the first time that I can record llama fully explaining his read on vomps and his reason to vote him, which took some time, but I wholeheartedly applaud. Some parts (the being more on-topic thing) still sound more like "I'll just feeling it this way" obstinate reasoning, especially given others having pointed out the opposite (or nothing that is entirely concludent) from past experience, but other points are actually interesting. I think this deserves a defence from Vompatti.

I think I'm out for the day (midnight here).
I believe that if Llama were to count my posts he would find that most of them are indeed OFF-topic, and, if I survive the lynch, will be increasingly so due to the thread already being tl;dr at this point. :mafia:

You may embed only 7 quotes within each other.
I'm taking a leaf from llama's mafiabook.

Are you bad k?
I am if you want me to be ;)
hot
I get the feeling you only come here for le sex.
by Marmot
Mon Jan 26, 2015 5:56 pm
Forum: Previous Jobs
Topic: [ENDGAME]: Film Directors.
Replies: 3481
Views: 85581

Re: [Day 1]: Film Directors.

Long Con wrote:Can you list the games for us? Maybe someone else can do a read of them and analyze Vompatti's behaviour to see if they agree.
That sounds like a lot of work. No thanks.

llama, if you don't think a list of vompatti's games played here will be useful, why post the list, or use those games as reference for his current playstyle?
by Marmot
Mon Jan 26, 2015 6:04 pm
Forum: Previous Jobs
Topic: [ENDGAME]: Film Directors.
Replies: 3481
Views: 85581

Re: [Day 1]: Film Directors.

MovingPictures07 wrote:I am sort of frustrated right now to be honest because people are acting like this thing between and Dom is happening in a vacuum and I feel I've had to explain things over and over. Does no one else think Dom read things into my post that weren't there? And if so do they think that makes him suspect? I assume no one does or else they would have said it by now but it's odd to me that no one really paid attention to my vote yesterday.
Perhaps he's afraid you'll somehow be set up (yet again) for an unintentional roleclaim to prove you are good and he is bad. :fishslap:

Linki: I kinda agree with TH. Other people are just acknowledging the argument, but the partakers are the ones continuing it.
by Marmot
Mon Jan 26, 2015 6:06 pm
Forum: Previous Jobs
Topic: [ENDGAME]: Film Directors.
Replies: 3481
Views: 85581

Re: [Day 1]: Film Directors.

EBWOP, I misunderstood TH's post, but that's how I feel anyway.
by Marmot
Mon Jan 26, 2015 7:46 pm
Forum: Previous Jobs
Topic: [ENDGAME]: Film Directors.
Replies: 3481
Views: 85581

Re: [Day 1]: Film Directors.

S~V~S wrote:
Dom wrote:Just a warning:

I go to school in Rhode Island. I am on an Island. We are going to experience extremely high winds (Hurricane Force) all night and get 2-3+ feet of snow. If I am absent, you know why. :p
That's right, I forgot you were in RI, I am on the North Shore of Long Island, right across the Sound, so yeah. Good Luck :) Stay warm & electrified~!
WTF, it is 65 out here in Oregon.

What a bizarre winter.
by Marmot
Mon Jan 26, 2015 8:19 pm
Forum: Previous Jobs
Topic: [ENDGAME]: Film Directors.
Replies: 3481
Views: 85581

Re: [Day 1]: Film Directors.

Ricochet wrote: So I will probably vote before taking the train home (roughly five-six hours before poll closes). I'll also do my best to look again through the Vomp/Llama matter - arguments, posts, links et all - and share my view on it in the morning/afternoon, to avoid the already bad precedent of "voting now k thx bye", but I want to state again that my participation tomorrow (today) could be severly limited by the circumstances.
This is rarely a problem. It just happened this time that the player who was lynched happened to say something of a similar vein (as did I).


I've been looking forward to some input from BWT, but he's only posted once since the new day began.

Linki: No reads on your list MP. Bass is the only one I can remember posting anything, but I can't remember what he's said. That idea alone tells me he just might be flying under the radar a bit. I'll take a look at him when I get a chance.

Linki 2: Do you guys REALLY think that vomps would be suspicious of himself for being bad? You've got WIFOM all over your face.

Linki 3: What?
by Marmot
Mon Jan 26, 2015 8:25 pm
Forum: Previous Jobs
Topic: [ENDGAME]: Film Directors.
Replies: 3481
Views: 85581

Re: [Day 1]: Film Directors.

Yes, the what was directed at Rico. Sorry for confuzionz.

I didn't understand the "looking at llama through vomps" bit.

Linki: Stop that. :smile:
by Marmot
Mon Jan 26, 2015 8:39 pm
Forum: Previous Jobs
Topic: [ENDGAME]: Film Directors.
Replies: 3481
Views: 85581

Re: [Day 1]: Film Directors.

Regarding Bass, first there is this post.
Bass_the_Clever wrote:so i really don't get all these votes for bwt. The two people who stuck out to me was MM and Ricochet which puts me in a tough spot because i don't want to vote someone who isn't here to defend himself and i also don't want to vote a new player on day one. So with that said i'm voting MM because his self vote really seemed like something a baddie would do to try and lay low when he wouldn't be around.
Then there is this one.
Bass_the_Clever wrote:I don't understand why people keep bringing up llama's and S~V~S's vote for I think llama has made it pretty clear that BWT had enough time to say what he had to say before he voted. I think people keep bring this up to maybe distract the tread about talking about anything else.

SVS and llama voted for BWT. Why is there a sudden casual defense for SVS and llama even though he previously called them out for voting BWT.

Also Bass, why was my self-vote suspicious but you did not address AP's self-vote?
by Marmot
Mon Jan 26, 2015 9:03 pm
Forum: Previous Jobs
Topic: [ENDGAME]: Film Directors.
Replies: 3481
Views: 85581

Re: [Day 1]: Film Directors.

thellama73 wrote:Why are you being so hard on the new kid, TH? It's only Day 1. Give him a chance. :D
This llama is one kool kat
by Marmot
Mon Jan 26, 2015 9:16 pm
Forum: Previous Jobs
Topic: [ENDGAME]: Film Directors.
Replies: 3481
Views: 85581

Re: [Day 1]: Film Directors.

Thanks MP.

I do think others should take a look at my post about Bass (here), mainly because it's the only ping I have so far.
by Marmot
Tue Jan 27, 2015 1:51 am
Forum: Previous Jobs
Topic: [ENDGAME]: Film Directors.
Replies: 3481
Views: 85581

Re: [Day 1]: Film Directors.

Bass_the_Clever wrote:
Metalmarsh89 wrote:Regarding Bass, first there is this post.
Bass_the_Clever wrote:so i really don't get all these votes for bwt. The two people who stuck out to me was MM and Ricochet which puts me in a tough spot because i don't want to vote someone who isn't here to defend himself and i also don't want to vote a new player on day one. So with that said i'm voting MM because his self vote really seemed like something a baddie would do to try and lay low when he wouldn't be around.
Then there is this one.
Bass_the_Clever wrote:I don't understand why people keep bringing up llama's and S~V~S's vote for I think llama has made it pretty clear that BWT had enough time to say what he had to say before he voted. I think people keep bring this up to maybe distract the tread about talking about anything else.

SVS and llama voted for BWT. Why is there a sudden casual defense for SVS and llama even though he previously called them out for voting BWT.

Also Bass, why was my self-vote suspicious but you did not address AP's self-vote?
1. I never called anyone out for voting BWT I said " I really don't get all the votes for BWT"
2. I wasn't trying to defend anyone I was just saying that people keep bringing something up after llama addressed it. To me it was like an easy way for a baddie to keep the tread talking about it.
3. AP's self vote did catch my eye but I really have nothing else that has made me think AP is bad.
1) Fair enough
2) Did SVS address it?
3) At the point that you commented about my self-vote, there was nothing else to warrant any more suspicion in me aside from the act of self-voting. Why does my self-vote and AP's self-vote carry different weights?
by Marmot
Tue Jan 27, 2015 11:34 am
Forum: Previous Jobs
Topic: [ENDGAME]: Film Directors.
Replies: 3481
Views: 85581

Re: [Day 1]: Film Directors.

S~V~S wrote:
Metalmarsh89 wrote:
Bass_the_Clever wrote:
Metalmarsh89 wrote:Regarding Bass, first there is this post.
Bass_the_Clever wrote:so i really don't get all these votes for bwt. The two people who stuck out to me was MM and Ricochet which puts me in a tough spot because i don't want to vote someone who isn't here to defend himself and i also don't want to vote a new player on day one. So with that said i'm voting MM because his self vote really seemed like something a baddie would do to try and lay low when he wouldn't be around.
Then there is this one.
Bass_the_Clever wrote:I don't understand why people keep bringing up llama's and S~V~S's vote for I think llama has made it pretty clear that BWT had enough time to say what he had to say before he voted. I think people keep bring this up to maybe distract the tread about talking about anything else.

SVS and llama voted for BWT. Why is there a sudden casual defense for SVS and llama even though he previously called them out for voting BWT.

Also Bass, why was my self-vote suspicious but you did not address AP's self-vote?
1. I never called anyone out for voting BWT I said " I really don't get all the votes for BWT"
2. I wasn't trying to defend anyone I was just saying that people keep bringing something up after llama addressed it. To me it was like an easy way for a baddie to keep the tread talking about it.
3. AP's self vote did catch my eye but I really have nothing else that has made me think AP is bad.
1) Fair enough
2) Did SVS address it?
3) At the point that you commented about my self-vote, there was nothing else to warrant any more suspicion in me aside from the act of self-voting. Why does my self-vote and AP's self-vote carry different weights?
I meant to address this earlier, but I forgot.

I am fairly sure I did address it, if you mean my vote for BWT. I thought his vote was a baddie thing to do, it was not like it was in the context of being afk for days like you were, and iirc, his name was in the tray when I voted. So :shrug:

Not sure what you are getting at here?
I was trying to make a point to Bass, but thanks, that also helps I guess. I wasn't trying to say anything about your vote.
by Marmot
Tue Jan 27, 2015 11:42 am
Forum: Previous Jobs
Topic: [ENDGAME]: Film Directors.
Replies: 3481
Views: 85581

Re: [Day 1]: Film Directors.

Made wrote:gotta vote now, because last to vote FZ and another reason i swear is legit... i just forgot it <_<

it should be in my post history...
No, I believe the only thing you've said about FZ is that she seems genuine.

Did you mean LC???
by Marmot
Tue Jan 27, 2015 11:46 am
Forum: Previous Jobs
Topic: [ENDGAME]: Film Directors.
Replies: 3481
Views: 85581

Re: [Day 1]: Film Directors.

I was going to say it could be forced, but then I remembered we never had a night phase.

Return to “[ENDGAME]: Film Directors.”