Search found 452 matches

by S~V~S
Tue Mar 17, 2015 5:34 pm
Forum: Previous Jobs
Topic: Harry Stephen Keeler [ENDGAME]
Replies: 4158
Views: 84850

Re: Harry Stephen Keeler [DAY 0]

I went with Silver Buddha. I always wished I had the discipline to be a Buddhist.
by S~V~S
Tue Mar 17, 2015 6:10 pm
Forum: Previous Jobs
Topic: Harry Stephen Keeler [ENDGAME]
Replies: 4158
Views: 84850

Re: Harry Stephen Keeler [DAY 0]

Long Con wrote:I was afraid to take the Silver Buddha (my first choice originally), the Green Jade Hand, OR the Two-Headed Elephant Charm, because I thought they all sounded like they were ripe for being Curse items.
I like Buddha, and I just thought it sounded cool, and first one in gets it. I did not even look past the Buddha tbh.
by S~V~S
Tue Mar 17, 2015 7:22 pm
Forum: Previous Jobs
Topic: Harry Stephen Keeler [ENDGAME]
Replies: 4158
Views: 84850

Re: Harry Stephen Keeler [DAY 0]

I actually have a rare book. A first edition of Dune. I keep it in a glass case, in my Dads office safe, becasue I am afraid to touch it lol.
by S~V~S
Tue Mar 17, 2015 8:19 pm
Forum: Previous Jobs
Topic: Harry Stephen Keeler [ENDGAME]
Replies: 4158
Views: 84850

Re: Harry Stephen Keeler [DAY 0]

That's why it is in a glass box miles away from me lol.
by S~V~S
Tue Mar 17, 2015 9:49 pm
Forum: Previous Jobs
Topic: Harry Stephen Keeler [ENDGAME]
Replies: 4158
Views: 84850

Re: Harry Stephen Keeler [DAY 0]

Well I guess I was in the right place at the right time. How zen :D
by S~V~S
Wed Mar 18, 2015 5:51 am
Forum: Previous Jobs
Topic: Harry Stephen Keeler [ENDGAME]
Replies: 4158
Views: 84850

Re: Harry Stephen Keeler [DAY 0]

I don't like acronyms that are too long, although I am an acronym myself lol. I would go with something different were I to rename myself today, but it is what it is.

I Am thinking I'll call him what he wants to be called if he states a preference. Until then, Shep it is since that is the first part of the name.

I am intrigued by BF & Golden. Positioning themselves as a Batman & Robin of sorts right out of the gate, sticking cred right onto each other. Then, as Epi pointed out, BF did the same in another game. That is still in progress, but Golden at least was civ there.

And don't get me started on socks, you guys :( I really was excited for this becasue I was excited about socks, the works of HSK, not so much. I was sad to see that sabotage-eed. I already have an alarming lack of dignity for my age :haha:
by S~V~S
Wed Mar 18, 2015 6:17 am
Forum: Previous Jobs
Topic: Harry Stephen Keeler [ENDGAME]
Replies: 4158
Views: 84850

Re: Harry Stephen Keeler [DAY 0]

I go to work at 7, I am always up this early weekdays. And yeah, I am sure you are not the only one.
by S~V~S
Wed Mar 18, 2015 6:49 am
Forum: Previous Jobs
Topic: Harry Stephen Keeler [ENDGAME]
Replies: 4158
Views: 84850

Re: Harry Stephen Keeler [DAY 0]

rabbit8 wrote:My two favorite ladies are awake, and here I am drunk in China about to go to dinner with some fuckers who I need to invest in my shit. I wish I could punch Diggs in the face....right now!!!!!



:guitar:
Wow he said something nice...kinda :cloud9:
by S~V~S
Wed Mar 18, 2015 9:48 am
Forum: Previous Jobs
Topic: Harry Stephen Keeler [ENDGAME]
Replies: 4158
Views: 84850

Re: Harry Stephen Keeler [DAY 0]

You know what I meant, Epi. Stop correcting me. I am not one of your students :)
by S~V~S
Wed Mar 18, 2015 3:14 pm
Forum: Previous Jobs
Topic: Harry Stephen Keeler [ENDGAME]
Replies: 4158
Views: 84850

Re: Harry Stephen Keeler [DAY 0]

Whose ever will it is their game will be ruined, right or not, through no fault of their own. But if BF does not say, he is toast if he's honest about his item.

Once the cats out of the bagitshard to put him back.

Linki, nice Llama
by S~V~S
Wed Mar 18, 2015 3:32 pm
Forum: Previous Jobs
Topic: Harry Stephen Keeler [ENDGAME]
Replies: 4158
Views: 84850

Re: Harry Stephen Keeler [DAY 0]

Can you tell us why, BF, or are you just talking to Golden?

Linki
by S~V~S
Wed Mar 18, 2015 4:24 pm
Forum: Previous Jobs
Topic: Harry Stephen Keeler [ENDGAME]
Replies: 4158
Views: 84850

Re: Harry Stephen Keeler [DAY 1]

That person can also be Oliver Oliver right?
by S~V~S
Wed Mar 18, 2015 4:39 pm
Forum: Previous Jobs
Topic: Harry Stephen Keeler [ENDGAME]
Replies: 4158
Views: 84850

Re: Harry Stephen Keeler [DAY 1]

It kinda is unfair IMO if it something you cantvdefend against. Like info gained from an item.
by S~V~S
Wed Mar 18, 2015 7:59 pm
Forum: Previous Jobs
Topic: Harry Stephen Keeler [ENDGAME]
Replies: 4158
Views: 84850

Re: Harry Stephen Keeler [DAY 0]

OK, I saw something too :)

This is all before BF started discussing who he suspected, the will, and why he suspected who he suspected. He got my eye right out of the gate, tbh.
blindfaeth wrote:So, I already have a suspicion but I am keeping to myself until day 1 to see how everything plays out.

Golden, do you see what I see?
blindfaeth wrote:
juliets wrote:bf, why did you ask Golden and only Golden that question?
He's my best fran in mafia.

Also we usually agree/see eye to eye.
blindfaeth wrote:
Golden wrote:
blindfaeth wrote:So, I already have a suspicion but I am keeping to myself until day 1 to see how everything plays out.

Golden, do you see what I see?

As I'm reading back through... because the way you've phrased it makes me now think we are possibly seeing different things.

Mine is definitely more an idea, a category of people, than a single person. But your phrase makes it sound like a suspicion of a particular individual... and that I'm not getting.
Mine is actually two individuals. Grammar nazi :pout:
This whole section reads like buddying to me. Like BF is buddying up to Golden BIG TIME. Before the point where he started discussing his item and his suspects, all of his posts were either related to Golden, or bantering, like what do we call Sheepywolf and so forth.

Fairly early on, I dropped this into the thread:
S~V~S wrote:Weds, 5:51 AM

I am intrigued by BF & Golden. Positioning themselves as a Batman & Robin of sorts right out of the gate, sticking cred right onto each other. Then, as Epi pointed out, BF did the same in another game. That is still in progress, but Golden at least was civ there.
Golden addressed this in the next post he made at 2:15:
Golden wrote:
S~V~S wrote:I am intrigued by BF & Golden. Positioning themselves as a Batman & Robin of sorts right out of the gate, sticking cred right onto each other. Then, as Epi pointed out, BF did the same in another game. That is still in progress, but Golden at least was civ there.
Hey... I'm not sticking any cred into bf. :suspish:

All I'm doing is saying it is normal for bf to do it, which I think you would know. I don't think it's helpful for the town to go suspecting bf based on something he would do when civ. There is a big difference between saying 'thats normal bf and i don't suspect him for it' and 'thats bf's civvie game'.
A minute later, 2:16, BF replies to Golden who had JUST replied to me, saying he was not sticking any cred on BF, and BF did not mention it AT ALL.

He never addressed it.

Later (and I will make another post later more directly addressing the whole info/Millionaire thing) after listing his suspects:
blindfaeth wrote:
Golden wrote:I disagree strongly with bullz statement.

I can't remember a time when the person lynched on day one didn't feel it was unfair, no matter what the reason. Day one lynches always suck.

Whats the difference between it being unfair because someone has a hunch that their item is a role hint, and it being unfair because someone sees some minutiae in the thread? I don't see one.

I don't like that it is being made some kind of moral issue. It's a host setting - either it's ok or it isn't. (and my eye is squarely on bullz for his comment).
My eye was already on Bulls and turnip head. Was this your hunch? More on this later, I'm at work. But it does in my mind seem to coincide well already.
I asked him:
S~V~S wrote:Can you tell us why, BF, or are you just talking to Golden?

Linki
And then he says "Both" and lauches into his cases against Bullz & TH. He only really addressed his consistent point of addressing all of his posts to Golden when Juliets asked him a direct question.

This was the first thing that struck me; that BF was seriously buddying Golden. Then he brought up that Millionaire thing. The more I have gone over that, the less innocent it seems to me.

I want to hear what Splints thinks of this, as well as Golden. I could be reading more into this than there is. But that was what caught my eye.
by S~V~S
Wed Mar 18, 2015 8:08 pm
Forum: Previous Jobs
Topic: Harry Stephen Keeler [ENDGAME]
Replies: 4158
Views: 84850

Re: Harry Stephen Keeler [DAY 1]

And fwiw, I was told I have a pretty silver colored statue, lol. It did not do anything, and I was not told that it was going to do anything. Which is what they all say, apparently, but tis true for me~

Linki~ I have mixed up Hedge with Ninjajujube when Ninja had the smaller avatar.
by S~V~S
Wed Mar 18, 2015 9:42 pm
Forum: Previous Jobs
Topic: Harry Stephen Keeler [ENDGAME]
Replies: 4158
Views: 84850

Re: Harry Stephen Keeler [DAY 1]

blindfaeth wrote:SVS, I always buddy with golden. He is my bestie, get over it. Why does the fact I ignored your comment bothering you? I didn't feel the need to address it.
Really? We are both playing Mafia, right? Golden felt the need to address it, in his first post after I said it. You only addressed the point being made when Juliets asked you a direct question. That strikes me as suspicious, much more so that calling someone by the similar sounding name of someone not even playing this game.

Think of it like this; you know how you are using Bullz reaction to your suspicions against him as part of the suspicion in and of itself? Well, that's how I feel about your ignoring this post, especially when Golden replied to it, mentioning your name and saying he was not giving you cred A MINUTE BEFORE YOU POSTED, and you still ignored it.

My next point about you is the fact that when you start to discuss your info (and yes, info is the civvies friend. Using it in a way that does not ruin someone elses game is good sportmanship. I am NOT saying you did this; you have not. You have not revealed a name. The way to do it is to not say, "I have info". It is to use the thread to lynch your suspect) you automatically went to the baddie role. Oliver Oliver comes before Reed Bardeen (and you obviously read the role descriptions; you called Reed the Millionaire, not by his name). You picked TH out for making a voting mistake, when imo someone with BTS would be less likely to make a mistake of that nature.

Then when several instances of why you could be wrong about the millionaire are pointed out, you say:
blindfaeth wrote:
S~V~S wrote:That person can also be Oliver Oliver right?
I suppose so. BR also made a good point, it could be someone who picked one of the "valuable" items. It could be completely random. I'm just following my gut, and my gut smells something fishy :srsnod:
And your reply to Bullz defenses?
blindfaeth wrote:So why are you so worried about it then? Day one is almost always a civ lynch. Is this not any worse than random?
Linki, Sheepy, they're married.
by S~V~S
Wed Mar 18, 2015 9:45 pm
Forum: Previous Jobs
Topic: Harry Stephen Keeler [ENDGAME]
Replies: 4158
Views: 84850

Re: Harry Stephen Keeler [DAY 1]

I am not voting for you now, BF, and am not sure that I even will. It's early, and it's Day One. We are talking about what has caught our eye, and this is what has caught mine.
by S~V~S
Thu Mar 19, 2015 5:21 am
Forum: Previous Jobs
Topic: Harry Stephen Keeler [ENDGAME]
Replies: 4158
Views: 84850

Re: Harry Stephen Keeler [DAY 1]

Wow. Staying up late is apparently so much more awesome if you like reading posts than getting up early.

Gonna catch up with coffee.
by S~V~S
Thu Mar 19, 2015 6:27 am
Forum: Previous Jobs
Topic: Harry Stephen Keeler [ENDGAME]
Replies: 4158
Views: 84850

Re: Harry Stephen Keeler [DAY 1]

blindfaeth wrote:
S~V~S wrote:I am not voting for you now, BF, and am not sure that I even will. It's early, and it's Day One. We are talking about what has caught our eye, and this is what has caught mine.
Ok. You are wrong, all I can offer is what I've already said. I didn't feel any sort of compelling reason to respond. There was no specific question directed toward me. I had nothing to add.
Thank you for this, your earlier reply addressing this sounded kind of petulant, like you were sticking your lip out in a cute little pout. This sounds more sincere.

But I think you are misconstruing my suspicion. I suspected you before you did not respond to my point. My original remark was directed to my suspicion of you. Not addressing it, especially after Golden did so literally one minute before you posted, intensified it. But ignoring my point was not the main focus of my suspicion. I know you and Golden are friends. Lots of people are friends, or even partners. When you played in games with Boogs in the past, you did not address every post to Boogs, and pretty much ignore everyone else. When I play with Bea, or Kate, I don't address every post to one of them, and ignore everyone else. You seemed to have this hyperfocus on Golden, like you were trying to draw him in.

You seemed to be cultivating Golden a bit. His opinion of it is something I am considering, but that is a whole other can of worms after last night. It almost feels like he is being pushed into defending you.

Of the initial Batman/Robin feel i had re BF/Golden, if I had to pick one of you to be more likely to be bad, it was you (obvs) not Golden. You reached out to him, after all. Yet there is a hard push to shift it onto Golden. That is making me very, very wary. I have to reread last nights posts again more carefully when I have more time. But my initial feel for that is that Rabbit is just fucking around more than anything.

Rabbit, you have an opinion on BF? If you posted it, I missed it.

Epi, though, feels more serious to me. And Epi was the person who started the whole "game in play" re Roger Rabbit by "confirming" that BF also started that game out with an address to Golden. I don't recall anyone asking about that before he "confirmed" it. If it did happen it is possible that I missed it. I thought it was an odd thing for a host of an ongoing game to say, especially when one of the two people involved, is still alive.

But again, this is quick read, and experience tells me that a quick read of Golden, Epi or Rabbit is a mistake, and this is all three ha ha. But i already spent too much time on Mafia this AM. Suffolk County Transit waits for no man (or woman).

Not seeing the TH or Bullz suspicions. MPs pompous lite "How ridiculous" reaction to suspicion is pretty par for the course for him, good or bad. I think BR made an interesting point, but I would need to see more from him. As Day Zero mistakes go, it is somewhat more suspicious than TH not knowing he had to be the only voter mainly due to the leaving & coming back factor re MP.

So no hard & fast opinions from me re last nights festivities yet, I need a deeper read first.

And I hope the three of you give each other a chance; you are all fun in different ways, but also very high intensity, awesome Mafia players. Letting stylistic differences put you at odds would be unfortunate.
by S~V~S
Thu Mar 19, 2015 7:39 am
Forum: Previous Jobs
Topic: Harry Stephen Keeler [ENDGAME]
Replies: 4158
Views: 84850

Re: Harry Stephen Keeler [DAY 1]

Did MP say what he thought of your suspicions of TH & Bullz, BF? Because tbh I thought BRs observation had a bit more meat on it than did yours.

Like I said, I need to see more of MP, I am just curious about that point.

Link I, again you are misconstruing my point. I don't suspect you because you did not reply to me. The circumstances in which you did not reply led me to suspect you MORE. You are over simplifying and being dismissive.
by S~V~S
Thu Mar 19, 2015 7:51 am
Forum: Previous Jobs
Topic: Harry Stephen Keeler [ENDGAME]
Replies: 4158
Views: 84850

Re: Harry Stephen Keeler [DAY 1]

blindfaeth wrote:
bea wrote:SVS raises a good point about BF seeming to buddy up to Golden. She even went to the trouble of pulling quotes so you know she means business. I can see where she's coming from too. I'm not sure it's suspicious yet, but BF - man -there are others playing!! Mafia besties are the best for sure! What do you think of everyone else?
You're kidding right? I'm like one of the highest posters. I've talked about others tons. Summary:

1. No reason to distrust Golden. Clarification for Dom, doesn't mean I trust him :rolleyes:
2. Bullz - on my bad list
3. Epi - on my worse list
4. TH - suspicious of, but recent posts have made me reconsider
5. SVS - misguided
blindfaeth wrote:I have to say, I agree with the points re: civ behavior. I know rabbit and Epi will never agree with me. I understand the arguments on both sides. I think the "trying to look suspicious/bad" routine is just harmful to the civs in the current game, whilst trying to set up themselves for success as a baddie in future games so people will say "Oh that's just always how they act, you'll get used to it"

But, I digress. I will still be suspicious of them and still push for their lynch just about every time. :shrug2:
So Epi is on your very naughty list, but you are basically saying your opinion of Epi is worthless in your next post. Good to know.

And linki again, there you go again oversimplifying and trivializing.
by S~V~S
Thu Mar 19, 2015 10:56 am
Forum: Previous Jobs
Topic: Harry Stephen Keeler [ENDGAME]
Replies: 4158
Views: 84850

Re: Harry Stephen Keeler [DAY 1]

blindfaeth wrote:
rabbit8 wrote:Did I miss this info? I thought you just said you have a name and think you get rich when they die, BF?
You think this leads you to believe you know who the Millionaire is, correct? How come you don't think it could be the The Wealthy Gad-About-Town? Did I miss your explanation on why?
I do think it could be them. Didn't think about it until someone pointed out though. I've mentioned at least twice that it could technically be anyones and not tied to a specific role. I've been very clear it's not info.
[quote[ytubehd][/ytubehd]="blindfaeth"]
S~V~S wrote:That person can also be Oliver Oliver right?
I suppose so. BR also made a good point, it could be someone who picked one of the "valuable" items. It could be completely random. I'm just following my gut, and my gut smells something fishy :srsnod:[/quote]

This was your reaction to the Oliver Oliver (wealthy gadabout) thing. Despite supposing the will could belong to Oliver, and thinking BR could have a valid point, you still seem more inclined to think its fishy.
by S~V~S
Thu Mar 19, 2015 10:58 am
Forum: Previous Jobs
Topic: Harry Stephen Keeler [ENDGAME]
Replies: 4158
Views: 84850

Re: Harry Stephen Keeler [DAY 1]

Big fingers phone post quote fail :(
by S~V~S
Thu Mar 19, 2015 3:12 pm
Forum: Previous Jobs
Topic: Harry Stephen Keeler [ENDGAME]
Replies: 4158
Views: 84850

Re: Harry Stephen Keeler [DAY 1]

Juliets. I was suspicious of BF before the info thing. Personally I doubt he knows the ID of the millionaire unless it is his teammate. I think maybe he's trying to bait the item stealers, one of whom is a civ and one an Indy.

I thought he was suspish before any of that. The excessive buddying plus the refusal to mention just who had pinged him until day started even though there were no night powers in play.

His whole general presentation has felt bad to me pretty much from the get go.

I have to reread what MP said when not on phone. His outrage and indignation at being suspected is becoming kinds passe, he does it every game it seems to me, good or bad.
by S~V~S
Thu Mar 19, 2015 3:41 pm
Forum: Previous Jobs
Topic: Harry Stephen Keeler [ENDGAME]
Replies: 4158
Views: 84850

Re: Harry Stephen Keeler [DAY 1]

I thought it was excessive initially, and BFs reactions to suspicion have led me to believe it was calculated. I am not sure what to make of Golden's opinion. He has been under some pretty intense scrutiny, and I need to retrad last night more carefully. But he has said a few waffly things re BF. So :shrug:

And JC, what does any baddie have to gain by buddying up? I am fairly sure I have seen you suspect people for similar things. Buddying up to someone you know well may make them lower their defenses a bit and make them less likely to be suspicious.
by S~V~S
Thu Mar 19, 2015 5:10 pm
Forum: Previous Jobs
Topic: Harry Stephen Keeler [ENDGAME]
Replies: 4158
Views: 84850

Re: Harry Stephen Keeler [DAY 1]

MP it was just a word. No personal content. I am sorry if I offended you, it was not intentional.
by S~V~S
Thu Mar 19, 2015 6:10 pm
Forum: Previous Jobs
Topic: Harry Stephen Keeler [ENDGAME]
Replies: 4158
Views: 84850

Re: Harry Stephen Keeler [DAY 1]

Metalmarsh89 wrote:I just want to point out that the points on MP are BS (in my opinion), and have decided that I don't care if I die, but I'm gonna defend something I think is unjust. The same thing has been happening every game to him recently, and I feel bad about it, especially since I've been one of those to target him for such things before.

Also, I just finished taking my finals today, and pulled an all-nighter at the library last night. So, right now, I don't feel like scum-hunting, and I'm going to be fairly busy through Sunday anyway.

It doesn't just happen to him. My point was that him getting upset about it does not point to affiliation for me, so I basically ignore it.

And lots of people make bullshit cases on day one. I am looking forward to your ardent defense of others who have bullshit cases on them in the future :)

Link I, :hug:
by S~V~S
Thu Mar 19, 2015 6:32 pm
Forum: Previous Jobs
Topic: Harry Stephen Keeler [ENDGAME]
Replies: 4158
Views: 84850

Re: Harry Stephen Keeler [DAY 1]

blindfaeth wrote:
blindfaeth wrote:OK, I think I understand. I know you play from your gut too SVS, Excel is for squares. To put it simply, I expected opposition, but not to the degree that actually came to fruition. Regardless of others opinions, I still don't think it was a bad idea, I don't regret mentioning it. When multiple people oppose ideas I set forth, I get the hunch I'm onto something. All it takes is a couple mafia throwing in some doubt and letting the rest of the players ride the wave. So that is why I believe I am still likely to be correct if I had to guess. Does that explain better?

Linki with br, will read in a sec
Because I have been on phone at work. I dontbdo multi quotes for
The most part on phone. I do skim and reacts. Dont worry I will get to you

SVS, why have you not responded to/acknowledged this? :noble:
by S~V~S
Thu Mar 19, 2015 6:34 pm
Forum: Previous Jobs
Topic: Harry Stephen Keeler [ENDGAME]
Replies: 4158
Views: 84850

Re: Harry Stephen Keeler [DAY 1]

Sorry phone reply fail, my reply starts with "because"
by S~V~S
Thu Mar 19, 2015 7:18 pm
Forum: Previous Jobs
Topic: Harry Stephen Keeler [ENDGAME]
Replies: 4158
Views: 84850

Re: Harry Stephen Keeler [DAY 1]

Turnip Head wrote:
Zomberella12 wrote:TH - You seem different then you did in Death Note.
I can confirm that I'm not an invincible independent that needs to be lynched to win in this game.
You were pretty awesome in Death Note, I thought you kept things moving, and your running commentary was very helpful. The mechanics of that game made a lot of unique playstyles possible.

blindfaeth wrote:OK, I think I understand. I know you play from your gut too SVS, Excel is for squares. To put it simply, I expected opposition, but not to the degree that actually came to fruition. Regardless of others opinions, I still don't think it was a bad idea, I don't regret mentioning it. When multiple people oppose ideas I set forth, I get the hunch I'm onto something. All it takes is a couple mafia throwing in some doubt and letting the rest of the players ride the wave. So that is why I believe I am still likely to be correct if I had to guess. Does that explain better?

Linki with br, will read in a sec
First I agree, down with Excel boo hiss.

It does explain it better, but it does not say much towards why I specifically suspected you. Since you & Golden are that close and often think alike, who is the person you most need to fool? I know when I am in a position where I am playing against someone (and with the win cons in this game, that would be everyone not on your team if you are bad) and that someone knows me well, I want them on my side. You were so hyperfocused on Golden. Your subsequent behavior, and your attempts to pooh pooh off what I was saying has not made me feel better, it only made me feel worse.

Then that whole "I know someone who has a lot of money! It must be The Millionaire!!" You can backpedal, but when you were approached with other possibilities, you basically said, "Yeah, that could be true, but my gut says something is stinky here". So either you have more info than you are saying (and if so, why did you give a reduced version?) or it's a red herring gone bad by the unexpected bad reaction to the "I have info!!" announcement. Personally, I am leaning towards the latter.

Far fetched? Perhaps. But plausible. I might be wrong, but this is what I saw and what I got from it.

Now I have to spend a bit more quality time with Rabbit v Golden v Epignosis from last night, a veritable intensityathon.
by S~V~S
Thu Mar 19, 2015 8:47 pm
Forum: Previous Jobs
Topic: Harry Stephen Keeler [ENDGAME]
Replies: 4158
Views: 84850

Re: Harry Stephen Keeler [DAY 1]

Golden wrote:How do we know no-one will get the item.

Llama, when dishing out the lynchee's items, will dead people be excluded when you allocate?
Only the first person to vote for a person gets the item they have. And MM self voted.
by S~V~S
Thu Mar 19, 2015 8:49 pm
Forum: Previous Jobs
Topic: Harry Stephen Keeler [ENDGAME]
Replies: 4158
Views: 84850

Re: Harry Stephen Keeler [DAY 1]

Ebwop, not quite. Sorry, I forgot the rest of the item rules:
How Items Work

Some items can be used to confer benefits, some cannot. Some items will be consumed when used, some will not. Most items can be stolen. When someone is lynched, all of the items they possess go to the people who voted for them, in order. So the first vote gets the first item, etc. When someone is NKed, whoever performed the kill gets the item. Items may not be voluntarily traded between players.
by S~V~S
Fri Mar 20, 2015 6:29 am
Forum: Previous Jobs
Topic: Harry Stephen Keeler [ENDGAME]
Replies: 4158
Views: 84850

Re: Harry Stephen Keeler [DAY 1]

Catching up on Epi v Rabbit v Golden was interesting. I see a lot of philosophy "discussion" in our future as the three are very strong individuals with very diverse opinions on the game in general. While Epi in his last post made his disdain for the concept of "civvie behavior" clear, I do and always have disagreed with him. There are certain things a civvie just should not do. Being obstructionist for his own obscure reasons is one of those things, IMO. Epi has gone rather quiet after the three way the other night.

Personally, I also found Epi to be waffly re BF/Golden. I was the person initially pinged by them, and BF was the one doing the pinging, not Golden. Epi pointing out how BFs behavior was consistent with his behavior in an ongoing game, then (imo) seeming to appear (it is hard sometimes even with 3 reads to tell what Epi is *actually* saying or doing, thus the "seeming") to be trying to shift that Buddying thing onto Golden, makes me super wary of him.

I have a busy day tomorrow, and will be in the middle of D & D when the poll ends. Not 100% sure I will be here tonight, so i am going to vote now, I don't see me changing my mind.

*Votes BF*

Now, re this "us" thing of Doms. That is an astonishingly quibbly question, lol. I am not sure why bad Dom would pose it, especially to Juliets on Day One. I understood what she meant right off the bat, and when i first read that question it raised my brow a bit. Again, not sure why bad Dom would ask it. Then not sure why civ Dom would ask it, either.

I don't love self voting either, like LC says (if he did not say it in this game, he said it in another) it's an easy way to set yourself up for no accountability when you ARE a baddie. And I can understand that. When I first started playing, like many people, my civvie game was very distinct from my baddie game. Most people in that situation try to make their baddie game more like their civvie game. I did the opposite. I took a lot of lynches in civvie games, but it set me up for the old "but she acts like this bad or good" chestnut for quite a while until the aggression started creeping back into my civvie game, and more hosts started running one Mafia games. Hosts, y u do that?

This is a Llama game. Want to hear a helluva lot more from Mongoose. Quiet Mongoose is scary Mongoose. Other than the self vote, I want to hear more from MM~ is he posting content, or snappy comebacks & jokes? Who does Bullz suspect? I don't recall anything BWT has said, like at all.
by S~V~S
Fri Mar 20, 2015 2:15 pm
Forum: Previous Jobs
Topic: Harry Stephen Keeler [ENDGAME]
Replies: 4158
Views: 84850

Re: Harry Stephen Keeler [DAY 0]

S~V~S wrote:I don't like acronyms that are too long, although I am an acronym myself lol. I would go with something different were I to rename myself today, but it is what it is.

I Am thinking I'll call him what he wants to be called if he states a preference. Until then, Shep it is since that is the first part of the name.

I am intrigued by BF & Golden. Positioning themselves as a Batman & Robin of sorts right out of the gate, sticking cred right onto each other. Then, as Epi pointed out, BF did the same in another game. That is still in progress, but Golden at least was civ there.

And don't get me started on socks, you guys :( I really was excited for this becasue I was excited about socks, the works of HSK, not so much. I was sad to see that sabotage-eed. I already have an alarming lack of dignity for my age :haha:
BR, this was where I started discussing BF, Weds 3/18 st 5:51 AM. The majority of my posts after this have involved my suspicions of BF.

I am not sure what you need explained about my vote? I think he's bad. I sucked in Film cause I did not follow my gut. I don't want to suck here, too.
by S~V~S
Fri Mar 20, 2015 5:28 pm
Forum: Previous Jobs
Topic: Harry Stephen Keeler [ENDGAME]
Replies: 4158
Views: 84850

Re: Harry Stephen Keeler [DAY 1]

And he was bad in two of them, right?
by S~V~S
Fri Mar 20, 2015 5:30 pm
Forum: Previous Jobs
Topic: Harry Stephen Keeler [ENDGAME]
Replies: 4158
Views: 84850

Re: Harry Stephen Keeler [DAY 1]

EBWOP, which isn't to say he's bad in this one. But just becasue someone always does something, doesn't mean he's a civvie, either.
by S~V~S
Fri Mar 20, 2015 9:37 pm
Forum: Previous Jobs
Topic: Harry Stephen Keeler [ENDGAME]
Replies: 4158
Views: 84850

Re: Harry Stephen Keeler [DAY 1]

blindfaeth wrote:Oh well, if people are interested in lynching me I suppose I'll share what I know. At least if I die, SVS won't be able to lie to you about whose will it is. It is Zomberellas will. The reason I did not come after her in the thread as many of you suggested is because she was literally absent for so long. Which I think is oddly convenient, but whatever. Final thoughts, I think dom is bad, he's only analytical like this when he has a team. I think epi and bills are bad. Think SVS is misguided. Good luck
This is a very weird post. You think I am going to lie about who is in the will should I get it. Yet you also say i am misguided.

So if I am misguided (which I take to mean you don't think I am bad), then why the hell would I lie about it?

I just got home, and I am fried, later for youse :fishslap:

Linki, but he also implied i am civ~ :shrug:
by S~V~S
Sat Mar 21, 2015 7:06 am
Forum: Previous Jobs
Topic: Harry Stephen Keeler [ENDGAME]
Replies: 4158
Views: 84850

Re: Harry Stephen Keeler [DAY 1]

LizKeen wrote:
DFaraday wrote:I don't think a baddie would create such a spectacle around themselves.
This is why I'd have a hard time putting a vote on bf because I'm thinking the same thing. I need to vote as I won't be back around before the day ends and I'm in a quandry as to what to do. I don't know if I'm completely misunderstanding the situation or if Zomberella outed herself but if that's the way to take it I guess I'm going to put my vote on her today. I'm not feeling confident enough about voting a self-voter yet even though I still find it odd. I really wish I had more time to see how this plays out for the next 10 hours. :sigh:
I don't think he expected a spectacle. Where we used to play, there was a higher tolerance for the wink wink nudge nudge usage of info.

And there are two roles that could be ruined by this, one a civ, one bad. Regardless of which she is, her game is ruined through no fault of her own.
by S~V~S
Sat Mar 21, 2015 9:03 am
Forum: Previous Jobs
Topic: Harry Stephen Keeler [ENDGAME]
Replies: 4158
Views: 84850

Re: Harry Stephen Keeler [DAY 1]

blindfaeth wrote:
Metalmarsh89 wrote:
blindfaeth wrote:Oh well, if people are interested in lynching me I suppose I'll share what I know. At least if I die, SVS won't be able to lie to you about whose will it is. It is Zomberellas will. The reason I did not come after her in the thread as many of you suggested is because she was literally absent for so long. Which I think is oddly convenient, but whatever. Final thoughts, I think dom is bad, he's only analytical like this when he has a team. I think epi and bills are bad. Think SVS is misguided. Good luck
So do you think she is the millionaire, or even a baddie at all?
I think she is bad. It is awfully convenient she was completely absent a LONG time when I was talking about a stranger who could be the millionaire. And her posts until that silent period ended were complete fluff.

Yes I meant bullz, must have been a phone autocorrect.
But you did not even consider that she might be Oliver Oliver. That is the thing that bothers me most about this part of your game, the Will. TBH, I would be MUCH more likely to think I could be wrong about you had you done so, had you waffled at all.

Your choosing the will made me think you were one of two players, giving a chance that my gut read about you could have been wrong:


Sato Okimo - The Japanese Lawyer - Can execute wills, stock certificates and promissory notes. (Civ)

Gustav Shrik - The Banker - Can store papers in his vault. (bad)

The way you handled all of this in such a way that I cannot reconcile it with you being Sato Okimo.

I think Zomba is going to be lynched, becasue people can't resist info, even it it only has a 50% chance of accuracy. However she flips will tell us something. None of the baddies are unlynchable, so even with the Millionaire in play, I don't see such an aggressive pushing under the bus happening, so you will have my apologies if she IS the Millionaire. The way the whole rest of the game plays out will be based on today, I think.

Linki~ I am sorry that you feel i have ruined YOUR game, BF. Like I said, i don't think you will be lynched. I don;t think my suspicion of you is any more ridiculous than anyone elses suspicions :shrug:
by S~V~S
Sat Mar 21, 2015 10:40 am
Forum: Previous Jobs
Topic: Harry Stephen Keeler [ENDGAME]
Replies: 4158
Views: 84850

Re: Harry Stephen Keeler [DAY 1]

juliets wrote:I really don't want to bring this up but I want to get some reaction to a thought I had while falling asleep last night (when most of my ideas occur). Regardless of whether BF is civ or bad shouldn't we vote for him to keep the will out of the mafia's hands? I know there is no guarantee SVS is not mafia but it seems like a lower probability that she is bad than what would happen if the baddies NK BF (which I think they would surely do). If they NK BF then they will surely NK Zomba. I really don't think BF is bad, I just think he was misguided when he announced that he had a will as that would surely put a target on his back. So, I'm prepared to vote elsewhere today, I just want to do the right thing for the most people. So let me know what you think about what i'm thinking.
No, you should vote for whoever you think is bad. TBH, if the mafia gets it, so what? Then they will lie about its contents; I have no intentions of voting for anyone based on info, whether I trust the dropper or not. I don't think it really matters who gets it. I don't particularly want it, and would be pleased if one of the item takers were to take it from me. Neither of them are baddies (the circus people seem to have pretty neutral win cons). All it oes is draw a target on my back, tbh.

I do think BF is bad, but don't vote for him unless you think so, too. Not becasue of the will.
by S~V~S
Sat Mar 21, 2015 11:07 am
Forum: Previous Jobs
Topic: Harry Stephen Keeler [ENDGAME]
Replies: 4158
Views: 84850

Re: Harry Stephen Keeler [DAY 1]

What would be interesting is if she really was the Millionaire. Then by mentioning her name, BF would be getting her votes, but her lynch is far from a done deal. He did not mention her name until he had several votes. So if she is that role, BF would actually be helping her get some votes, which her role could use if she is not lynched. And if she was lynched, he would get tons of cred.

When life hands you lemons, make lemonade, right?
by S~V~S
Sat Mar 21, 2015 11:20 am
Forum: Previous Jobs
Topic: Harry Stephen Keeler [ENDGAME]
Replies: 4158
Views: 84850

Re: Harry Stephen Keeler [DAY 1]

Thanks for pointing that out LC, lol.
by S~V~S
Sat Mar 21, 2015 11:21 am
Forum: Previous Jobs
Topic: Harry Stephen Keeler [ENDGAME]
Replies: 4158
Views: 84850

Re: Harry Stephen Keeler [DAY 1]

EBWOP, I am sure they already knew it ha ha.
by S~V~S
Sat Mar 21, 2015 12:10 pm
Forum: Previous Jobs
Topic: Harry Stephen Keeler [ENDGAME]
Replies: 4158
Views: 84850

Re: Harry Stephen Keeler [DAY 1]

Yeah, I also wondered if you could be Oliver Oliver. And I was the one with the cred theory, it would only be valid if it looked like a team member was going to be lynched. Which BF was. The only point of it was that if one of you are lynched, it does not give the other an automatic pass.

I don't like it when peoples games are ruined for info, and I for one would not have voted for you had I not already voted when BF dropped your name.
by S~V~S
Sat Mar 21, 2015 12:10 pm
Forum: Previous Jobs
Topic: Harry Stephen Keeler [ENDGAME]
Replies: 4158
Views: 84850

Re: Harry Stephen Keeler [DAY 1]

Who do you think people should vote for, Zomba?
by S~V~S
Sat Mar 21, 2015 3:18 pm
Forum: Previous Jobs
Topic: Harry Stephen Keeler [ENDGAME]
Replies: 4158
Views: 84850

Re: Harry Stephen Keeler [NIGHT 1]

Sorry BF :(
by S~V~S
Sat Mar 21, 2015 3:35 pm
Forum: Previous Jobs
Topic: Harry Stephen Keeler [ENDGAME]
Replies: 4158
Views: 84850

Re: Harry Stephen Keeler [NIGHT 1]

Also, I did receive the will. All it says is that if Zomba dies, whoever holds the will will get everything she has. It does NOT say she is wealthy. Just becasue she has a will does not mean she is rich. Normally I would not even post this, but since her name was already out there, I just want to confirm that BF was not lying, but that there is nothing that indicates a specific role holds the will. I thought BF might have been witholding something, but he was not.
by S~V~S
Sat Mar 21, 2015 3:39 pm
Forum: Previous Jobs
Topic: Harry Stephen Keeler [ENDGAME]
Replies: 4158
Views: 84850

Re: Harry Stephen Keeler [NIGHT 1]

It would appear so.
by S~V~S
Sat Mar 21, 2015 3:49 pm
Forum: Previous Jobs
Topic: Harry Stephen Keeler [ENDGAME]
Replies: 4158
Views: 84850

Re: Harry Stephen Keeler [NIGHT 1]

She said it ruined her role. It could be the Millionaire or Oliver Oliver. I don;t think her reaction is related to wealth via item, or otherwise. She said role.
by S~V~S
Sat Mar 21, 2015 3:49 pm
Forum: Previous Jobs
Topic: Harry Stephen Keeler [ENDGAME]
Replies: 4158
Views: 84850

Re: Harry Stephen Keeler [NIGHT 1]

I hate this fwiw.

Return to “Harry Stephen Keeler [ENDGAME]”